Lec 31, Handout: Public passenger transport (objectives) Be familiar with mass transit classifications and characteristics Know how urban transport demands.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Vehicle Types Vehicle TypeFreeway Lane Capacity BusesLimited Capacity Bus Rapid Transit Medium/High Capacity Rail TransitHigh Capacity.
Advertisements

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Urban Transportation Norman W. Garrick Lecture 3 CE 2710.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
This is my “focus” slide, used to make sure that I’m getting the sharpest possible picture on the projection screen. It is the 1954 Freeway Plan for the.
11 Tunde Balvanyos, Ph.D. Bus Rapid Transit Coordinator, Pace APTA BRT May 2009.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Network Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
1 Think Big – Build Small Presented to White Flint Sector Plan Advisory Committee Nov, 2007 Presented by Natalie Goldberg.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Lec 3, Ch. 2 Transp Systems & Organization Understand the nation’s transportation system is the result of independent actions (through reading) Understand.
Lec 17, Supply Analysis Part 1: Role of supply analysis (ch7.1) and Analysis of system performance (ch7.2) The role of performance analysis in transportation.
Lec 24: Ch1.(T&LD): Urban transportation planning vs. Site planning Review the transportation-land use cycle (Read examples in Ch.1 & compare the development.
Norman W. Garrick Travel Flow Data Some Basic Concepts Good travel flow data for all modes of travel is important for transportation planning and design.
Lec 5. Ch.3P1 UT and TP system characteristics Relationship between Transportation trips and facilities/services System hierarchy and transportation facility.
CHAPTER 8 THE THEORY OF URBAN PASSENGER TRANSPORT MODES
SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS IN TRANSPORT SECTOR/ OPTIONS AND BENEFITS
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Transport Modelling– An overview of the four modeling stages
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. TOPICS 1.ROADS AND PUBLIC GOODS 2.RATIONALE TO JUSTIFY ROAD BUILDING 3.URBAN PLANNING AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION (UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES)
Lecture 1: Selecting Between Transit Mode Alternatives This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute of Technology; Dr. Jeff.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Modes of Transportation Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN. Modes of Transportations 1. Highways 2. Urban Transit 3. Air 4. Rail 5. Water 6. Pipelines 7. Other Modes.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Chapter 10 1 Chapter 10. Public Mass Transportation 1. Design rail service in a corridor with respect to station spacing and vehicle capabilities 2. Calculate.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Transportation Planning and Design in Practice
Sketch Model to Forecast Heavy-Rail Ridership Len Usvyat 1, Linda Meckel 1, Mary DiCarlantonio 2, Clayton Lane 1 – PB Americas, Inc. 2 – Jeffrey Parker.
Introduction Nablus is the largest city in the West Bank after Jerusalem. 150,000 inhabitants live in Nablus. Nablus has the largest university in the.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Chapter 1: Highway Functions
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
Some network flow problems in urban road networks Michael Zhang Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
CHAPTER 12 Trolley Buses and Duo-Buses GUIDELINES FOR PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA A MULTI MODAL ANALYSIS.
Highway Functional Classification Chapter 16 Dr. TALEB M. AL-ROUSAN.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Professor: Keren Mertens Horn Office: Wheatley 5-78B Office Hours: TR 2:30-4:00 pm ECONOMICS OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA 212G,
Interpreting Demand and Capacity for Street and Highway Design Lecture 6 CE 5720 Norman Garrick Norman W. Garrick.
Public Transportation
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
1 Presentation to TAC May 20, 2009 Priority Corridor Network (PCN) Evaluation Project Introduction.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
ROBERT LANG, PH.D. | PROFESSOR & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BROOKINGS MOUNTAIN WEST | THE LINCY INSTITUTE GREENSPUN COLLEGE | UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS LEARNING.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
10 Nov Seong Yil BAE Vice President
STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY - US 19 to BRUCE B. DOWNS BOULEVARD STATE ROAD 54/56 PROJECT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT STUDY.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Transportation System Engineering 1 , 61360
MODULE 4, LESSON 2 Fundamentals of Transit Service and Networks.
MODULE 3: PLANNING & DESIGN Lesson 2: Modal Characteristics and Impacts.
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
NORMS AND STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN GAUTENG PROVINCE
Presentation transcript:

Lec 31, Handout: Public passenger transport (objectives) Be familiar with mass transit classifications and characteristics Know how urban transport demands are classified Know typical bus route network types

What we discuss in class today… Mass transit classifications Transit system operations, service and characteristics Urban transport demand classifications Transit service network types Video: The extensive bus transit system in Curitiba, Brazil (An example of using an exclusive bus route system  one reason for its success)

Three ways to classify mass transit systems Right of wayROW = the strip of land on which the transit vehicle operates: Category A: “Grade separated” or “exclusive”  NY Subways, DC’s Metro, Monorail in Las Vegas, Bullet train systems in Japan, Guided buses (BRT) in Germany  TRAX LRT between Sandy & 1300S (except some at-grade crossing) Category B: “Longitudinally fully separated” but “may have grade crossing”  TRAX LRT between Delta Center & 1300S Category C: “surface streets with mixed traffic”  UTA buses  Directly affected by traffic delays TechnologyMechanical features of the vehicles and the riding surface. (1) Support between the vehicle and the riding surface (rubber tires vs. steel wheels), (2) Steering of vehicles (driver vs. guided path), (3) Propulsion method (gasoline, electricity, LPG gas, gasoline/electricity hybrid, hydrogen) and (4) Means of controlling vehicles longitudinally (driver stay in a lane vs. rail follow the guided rails) Type of service (1) Short haul in CBD (Shuttles), (2) City transit (medium haul), and (3) Regional transit (long haul)

TRAX’s ROW Runs on an old rail road ROW

Transit system operations, service, and characteristics Operations (service supply) Bus scheduling, crew rostering (assignment), running and supervision of vehicles, fare collection, and system maintenance ServiceThe transit system as experienced by its actual and potential users Characteris tics Transit system characteristics are classified in four categories 1. System performance 2. Level of service 3. (Operational and service) impacts to the community they serve: short-term (less congestion, pollution, noise, etc.) and long-term impacts (land values, economic activities, social environment, etc.) 4. Costs: investment (capital) costs and operating costs

Performance and LOS measures System performance Service frequency (departures/hr) Operating speed (Average travel speed) Reliability (% of vehicle arrivals with less than a fixed- time deviation from schedule) Safety (No. of fatalities, injuries & property damages per xxx passenger-miles) Line capacity (Max no. of persons that transit vehicles can carry past a point along the line like a flow rate) Productive capacity = Operating speed x line capacity Productivity (veh-km, space-km, operating cost, etc.) Utilization = the ratio of output to input (person- km/space-km) Level of service (term project data) Performance elements affecting users, such as operating speed, reliability, and safety Service quality, such as convenience and simplicity of using the system, comfort, aesthetics, cleanliness, and behavior of passengers

Travel demand classifications FUN DOME FASHION PLACE SLC CBD 2. Trips along circumferential routes 4. Trips within CBD 3. Trips between and within local areas 5. Trips connecting major activity centers 1. Trips along the radial routes to CBD This is a topic of CE565.

Public transport system classified by routing and scheduling types Scheduling (frequency of service) Routing (degree of coverage and access

Transit modes related to residential density ModeServiceMin. necessary residential density (DU/acre) Remarks Local bus Min., 20 buses/day Intermediate, 40 Frequent, Varies as a function of downtown size and distance from residential area to downtown Express bus 5 buses during 2-hr peak period 5-10 buses during 2-hr peak period 15 (avg density over 2- mi 2 ) 3 (avg density over 20-mi 2 ) From 10 to 15 mi away to largest CBD From mi away to CBD larger than 20 million ft 2 non residential space Light rail5-min headways or better during peak hour 9 (avg for a corridor of 25 to 100 mi 2 ) To CBD of 20 to 50 million ft 2 of non residential space

Network types Grid networksRadial networks Circumferential connections Territorial networks No connection between the lines in the suburbs

Let’s check UTA’s system maps (cont) Provo-Orem area (grid & territorial) Major transfer points

Let’s see how some large systems look like… DC Metro (Radial)

New York City Subway (radial) Basically all lines go through mid/downtown Manhattan. Not much interaction between other boroughs.

Tokyo Rail Systems map Yamonote Line (loop line) connects major business centers in Tokyo.