July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration SUSY 2005, July 18-23, 2005 Durham, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Advertisements

Quark Compositeness Search with γ +Jet Final State at the LHC Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh Choudhary, Debajyoti Choudhury Department.
Efficiency of the L1 Trigger for SUSY Study performed by L. Boldizsár, P. Hidas KFKI Budapest J. Erö, M. Fierro, A. Jeitler, N. Neumeister, P. Porth, H.
Alain Romeyer - January Light higgs decay in SUSY cascade - Status report Introduction Trigger efficiency B tagging Jet calibration Invariant mass.
Batool Safarzadeh (science and research campus azad university & ipm ) First IPM meeting on LHC Physics
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
September 27, 2005FAKT 2005, ViennaSlide 1 B-Tagging and ttH, H → bb Analysis on Fully Simulated Events in the ATLAS Experiment A.H. Wildauer Universität.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
6 th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons July 2, 2004 Rare B Decays at LHC Sébastien VIRET Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
Higgs Detection Sensitivity from GGF H  WW Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ATLAS Higgs Meeting October 3, 2008.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
S. Martí i García Liverpool December 02 1 Selection of events in the all-hadronic channel S. Martí i García CDF End Of Year Review Liverpool / December.
Update FTK Meeting 07/13/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.
Data-based background predictions using forward events Victor Pavlunin and David Stuart University of California Santa Barbara July 10, 2008.
1 Top Pair Production Cross Section with the ATLAS Detector A. Bangert, N. Ghodbane, T. Goettfert, R. Haertel, A. Macchiolo, R. Nisius, S. Pataraia Max.
22. April 2004, New Phenomena MeetingChristian Autermann - Resonant Slepton Production1 Overview R-parity violating Supersymmetry Cross section and Run.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
The CMS Level-1 Trigger System Dave Newbold, University of Bristol On behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
A few slides to summarise what Alessandro and I were up to for March 24th video meeting Taking for granted that W+/- are good measurements to make- are.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
M. Poli Lener XI Spring School - "Bruno Touschek" 1 Luminosity measurements with dimuon and single muon reconstruction of Z 0 and W decays OUTLINE:  LHCb.
1 SM Higgs Searches in CMS The LHC Early Phase for the ILC FNAL April Albert De Roeck CERN and University of Antwerp and the IPPP Durham.
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
Itamar Roth, Ehud Duchovni Group meeting 19/01/15 1.
1 Update on tt-bar signal and background simulation Stan Bentvelsen.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Randall- Sundrum Gravitons and Black Holes at the LHC Kevin Black Harvard University For the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations.
1 Diboson production with CMS Vuko Brigljevic Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Physics at LHC Cracow, July
CMS week1 Agenda Sarah Eno: Status of project Volker Drollinger: jet energy scale and top mass Ritua Kinnunen: Higgs mass resolution E. Doroshkevic:
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
October 5, 2006S.Abdullin SUSY Studies at CMS1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration LHC Days in Split, October 2-7, 2006 Split, Croatia ITEP //
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Moriond 2001Jets at the TeVatron1 QCD: Approaching True Precision or, Latest Jet Results from the TeVatron Experimental Details SubJets and Event Quantities.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
1 UPDATE: 1. Selection reorganized : Triggered, 2Zs, 2Leading Jets 2. Issue of W mass reconstructed For signal, show the efficiency of matching btw leading.
Search for Anomalous Production of Multi-lepton Events at CDF Alon Attal Outline  Motivation  R p V SUSY  CDF & lepton detection  Analysis  Results.
SESAPS November 11, B. Scurlock, University of Florida1 Bobby Scurlock Darin Acosta Paolo Bartalini Richard Cavanaugh Alexey Drozdetskiy Guenakh.
Top physics during ATLAS commissioning
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
ttH (Hγγ) search and CP measurement
tt+jets simulation comparisons
Erik Brubaker U of Chicago
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration SUSY 2005, July 18-23, 2005 Durham, UK

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers2 Outline LHC rate challenge mSUGRA test points L1 trigger L2 inclusive jet + E T miss L2 trigger cuts optimization More (cross-) triggers QCD multi-jet rate Summary

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers3 Triggering on SUSY : Rate Challenge Task : reduce 40 MHz bx rate ( ~1 GHz pp) O(100 Hz) To preserve maximal SUSY signal efficiency in jets + E T channel Recon. MET (hi lumi) Recon. MET (low lumi) Gen. MET (hi lumi) Gen MET (low lumi) Expected Missing E T Rate Calo resolution Requiring a rate to tape of a ~few Hz implies an inclusive single-jet threshold of GeV and an inclusive missing ET threshold of GeV Low lumi High lumi Inclusive Jet Rate (cone algorithm, R=0.5) Full GEANT-based CMS simulation + OO reconstruction CMS DAQ TDR CERN/LHCC

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers4 SUSY Points DAQ TDR points mSUGRA low-mass test points (“4-6”) have been chosen fo DAQ TDR: -close to the Tevatron reach -different final state topologies (backup slides contain more details) mSUGRA high-mass points (“7-9”) from DAQ TDR are not considered here as having fairly high trigger efficiency DAQ TDR points “LM” and “HM” points (low and high mass) for Phys. TDR

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers5 L1 SUSY Triggers L1 Jet&MET triggers alone are > 80 % efficient, All L1 triggers ~ 89-96% CMS Note 2003/028 SUSY signal efficiency (%) and background rate (kHz) Differ from DAQ TDR numbers as not 95% cuts 96.2% 96.3% 88.9%

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers6 Inclusive SUSY Jet+MET 1 2 QCD L2 rate (Hz) mSUGRA 5 L2 Efficiency Running a bit ahead – chosen L2 cuts yield ~ % efficiency at a few Hz of QCD rate Jet1 threshold (150 GeV) - calibrated MET threshold (92 GeV) - raw

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers7 Chosen L2 Triggers (I) L2 triggers : a combination of J1+MET and J4 J1+MET works for “standard” SUSY, while J4 - for most challenging (fot trigger) R-parity violation scenario 3j, points 4R, 5R, 6R J4 MET, J1 150 GeV    

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers8 Chosen L2 Triggers (II) Cuts were optimized simultaneously for all 6 probing SUSY points using Genetic Algorithm for given rate allocation of ~ 12 Hz (more details can be found on the backup slides) SUSY signal efficiency (%) and background rate (Hz) mostly QCD 113 GeV at 95% eff In DAQ TDR 180 & 123 GeV at 95% eff in DAQ TDR

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers9 More Triggers For SUSY Lepton + MET - SM bkgd. : normalize predictions for W and tt - might add smth. to SUSY signal, especially if  decay leptonically - MET+lepton+jet might be too complicated, so - lepton + MET (above) - jet + MET (exists) - lepton + jet (1/2 exists, for electrons) 2 leptons + MET might help to keep low thresholds and low rates The efficiencies of these triggers (above) for SUSY have to be studied for CMS Physics TDR

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers10 L1-L2 Streams For SUSY Among various possible combinations of L1 and L2 triggers there are typically just a few “leading” streams which provide the essential part of the signal efficiency For instance, among 18 L1-L2 streams considered, only 6 are essential both for R-parity conservation and violation scenarios.

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers11 QCD Multijet Rate Issue QCD multi-jet is a main rate component, about 90% of the total rate even at L2, so since years there was a question about possible significant underestimate of the QCD rate All previous rate calculations have been made with PYTHIA (shower model) Now a preliminary comparison of the inclusive jet E T distributions is made at the level of the MC jets between ALPGEN 2.01 and PYTHIA 6.2 (“old” shower model) Details of calculation can be found on the backup slides

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers12 Inclusive Jet ET Distributions For low-Et and “medium”-Et 3d and 4th jets the difference does not look significant Harder jet E T cuts to be investigated !

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers13 Summary No problem with L1 trigger even for low-mass SUSY L2 has to be optimized due to the limited bandwidth allocated to jets and MET More cross-triggers might possibly increase L2 SUSY signal efficiency (to be studied) Preliminary comparison of 3d and 4 th jets inclusive distributions show a good Agreement between ALPGEN and PYTHIA

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers14 Backup Slides

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers15 DAQ TDR mSUGRA Test Points Tevatron mass reach

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers16 R-Parity Violation Scenario

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers17 Probing Points with R-Parity

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers18 L2 MET Distributions Similar to t t _

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers19 Number of L2 Jets

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers20 Leading L2 Jets

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers21 Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (I)

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers22 Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (II)

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers23 Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (III)

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers24 QCD Simulation with PYTHIA P T > 20 and 120 GeV Official CMS Production data cards ^ To put ALPGEN and PYTHIA data on the common ground a cut of 120 GeV is applied on the 1st jet E T in both samples

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers25 ALPGEN samples ALPGEN v201 Q 2 =  P T 2 (parton) PDFs CTEQ5L Matching scheme CKKW (M Mangano impementation in Alpgen, see Jet parameters for matching: E T (jet) > 15 GeV R(jet) = 0.525,  R(parton-jet) <

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers26 ALPGEN samples 2-to-2 : N partons =2; P T (parton)>20 (100) GeV; |eta|<5  R(parton-parton) >0.7 2-to-3 : N partons =3; P T (parton)>20 (100) GeV; |eta|<5  R(parton-parton) >0.7 2-to-4 : N partons =4; P T (parton)>20 (100) GeV; |eta|<5  R(parton-parton) >0.7 (parton= outgoing parton)

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers27 samples cross sections sample  (matched-alp)  (unw-alp) matching   (pythia) mb 0.8 mb mb 0.06 mb mb mb total 0.45 mb mb mb sample  (matched-alp)  (unw-alp) matching   (pythia) × mb mb × mb 4 × mb × mb 3.6 × mb total 6.16 × mb × mb × mb 20 GeV 100 GeV

July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers28 Pseudorapidity distributions 3d jet E T > 100 GeV, 4 th jet E T > 100 GeV