Slow Neutron Background Simulation " Long-lived neutrons created, diffuse around collision hall " They get captured by nuclei, emitting a photon " Compton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
Advertisements

Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
Monte Carlo Studies of the HERMES RICH in SBS—progress report Andrew Puckett 11/10/2010.
M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gamma backgrounds, shielding and veto performance for dark matter detectors M. Carson,
M. Carson, University of Sheffield IDM 2004, University of Edinburgh Veto performance for a large xenon detector.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Upgrading the CMS simulation and reconstruction David J Lange LLNL April CHEP 2015D. Lange.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, MIT, July Interference in Coherent Vector Meson Production in UPC Au+Au Collisions at √s = 200GeV Brooke Haag UC Davis.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
Reminder of TPG background simulation Abingdon 30/ Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
GAMMA RAY SPECTROSCOPY
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Neutron Background Simulation Long-lived neutrons created, diffuse around collision hall They get captured by nuclei, emitting a photon Compton scattering.
Neutron Background Simulation R. Wilkinson. 2 Neutron Background Simulation Long-lived neutrons created, diffuse around collision hall They get captured.
Neutron Background Simulation: Infrastructure and Validation Vadim Khotilovich, Rick Wilkinson, with help from Piet Verwilligen, Alexei Safonov, Tim Cox.
Event Analysis for the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Robin Morris, RIACS Johann Cohen-Tanugi INFN, Pisa.
SPD spill-over and the subtractor Míriam Calvo 23 June 2010.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.
Occupancy Study George Courcoubetis. Goal Produce the occupancy distribution for FCAL channels for a single train.
I have made the second half of the poster, first half which is made by tarak will have neutrino information. A patch between the two, telling why we do.
0 A Fast Time Incorporating Monte-Carlo Simulation of Wire Chamber Based Small Animal PET Scanners for Detector Scatter Correction M. Dawood 1, Don Vernekohl.
Since Rich wanted some relatively quick info on what detector might be needed to help MuTr pattern recognition, I did a scan on a central HIJING file I.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
1 Lesson 5: Flux, etc. Flux determination Flux determination Cell Cell Surface Surface Flux integral tallies (reaction rates) Flux integral tallies (reaction.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
Walid DRIDI, CEA/Saclay n_TOF Collaboration Meeting, Paris December 4-5, 2006 DAPNIA Neutron capture cross section of 234 U Walid DRIDI CEA/Saclay for.
Design Optimization of Toroidal Fusion Shield  Fusion Theory [BLAHBLAHBLAH] Fusion energy production is based on the collision nuclei in a deuterium and.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Simulation of GOSSIP/GridPix Nominal Detector, and GOSSIP in ATLAS.
PIXEL Slow Simulation Xin Li 3/16/2008. CMOS Active Pixel Sensor (APS) Epitaxy is a kind of interface between a thin film and a substrate. The term epitaxy.
DVCS – Hall A Study of the Background Noise HUGS 2008 Florian ITARD.
2011 JINR, DUBNA Student Practice.  Vaclav Kosar Czech Technical University in Prague  Viktor Burian Czech Technical University in Prague  Andra-Georgia.
CSC High Pileup Sumulations Vadim Khotilovich Alexei Safonov Texas A&M University June 15, 2009.
Status of neutron simulations Piotr Mijakowski (Warsaw) ArDM meeting, 2010/12/03 1.
Event Analysis for the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Robin Morris, RIACS Johann Cohen-Tanugi SLAC.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Chapter 2 Relativity 2.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
RPC Simulation software Raffaello Trentadue. RPC Digi producer RPC Digitizer RPC Synchronizer RPC Simulation model Average model Parametrized model Parametrized.
PoGO_G4_ ppt1 Study of optimized fast scintillator length for the astronomical hard X- ray/soft gamma-ray polarimeter PoGO November 1, 2004 Tsunefumi.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
STAR Simulation. Status and plans V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
1 Study of Data from the GLAST Balloon Prototype Based on a Geant4 Simulator Tsunefumi Mizuno February 22, Geant4 Work Shop The GLAST Satellite.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
Simulation of Heavy Hypernuclear Lifetime Measurement For E Zhihong Ye Hampton University HKS/HES, Hall C Outline: 1,Physics 2,Detectors 3,Events.
Centrality, N part & N collision at BRAHMS H. Ito University of Kansas For the BRAHMS Collaboration.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose
Studies for Phase-II Muon Detector (|η| = ) – Plans
Occupancy tolerances for the TPC
Muon stopping target optimization
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
Status of Full Simulation for Muon Trigger at SLHC
Issues with Simulating High Luminosities in ATLAS
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Simulation Update S. Margetis.
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

Slow Neutron Background Simulation " Long-lived neutrons created, diffuse around collision hall " They get captured by nuclei, emitting a photon " Compton scattering or photoelectric effect makes MeV electrons, which cause hits in muon chambers

Why is Neutron Background Hard to Simulate? Because neutrons can live up to a second before making a signal They can’t be treated like ordinary minimum-bias pileup, because millions of collisions in the past can contribute

The Way It Was Done Before: Parametrization ~6 years ago, UC Davis group (Hessian, Fisyak, Breedon) Based on 2000 simulated min-bias events, simulated down to low energies and long times " Start with “mother” hits with some distribution in energy, position, and direction " Add some number additional hits in same layer " Propagate each hit to next layer and repeat

Disadvantages of Parametrization Hard to maintain " Many parameters " Needs to be done separately for each detector type for CSC, DT, and RPC " Needs to be updated when geometry or shielding changes Can we use the original events rather than a parametrization of them?

What I’ve Done: Database of Neutron Hit Patterns Start with a sample of simulated min-bias events Take the events apart. Treat each chamber with hits as an independent event. Zero out the time.

Database of Chamber SimHit Patterns Store these patterns of neutron hits in a ROOT file, grouped by chamber type: ME1/A ME 1/1 ME1/2 ME1/3 ME2/1 ME2/2 …. …. When I need to add neutron background to the simulation, I just read in some number of these patterns and superimpose them Done before electronics simulation, of course, so things pile up correctly.

How Many Patterns to Superimpose? Say we simulate a window of +-10 bunch crossings around the event That’s ~280 min bias events (at ) that may create signals in future crossings. I think we can assume that the amount of neutron signal in our 21-bx window is the total amount that would come from ~280 minimum bias events in the past. If ME2/1 chambers have a neutron-induced occupancy of 0.25% per min-bias event per chamber, we should superimpose a Poisson mean of 280*0.25% = 0.7 hit patterns per chamber

Further Studies " The Thai group seems interested They have good GEANT3 and GEANT4 skills " Lots to do: Comparing fluxes and spectra from different generators Creating and maintaining neutron datasets