My Field has High Soil Test P. Now what? John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MITERRA-EUROPE Assessment of nitrogen flows in agriculture of EU-27
Advertisements

Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Nutrient Retention Model Water Supply Model Precipitation Evapotranspiration Soil Depth and Plant available water Land cover Topography (slope/runoff)
Tim Reinbott University of Missouri Bradford Research and Extension Center.
Reducing Soil Phosphorus Buildup From Animal Manure Applications Gerald W. Evers Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center Overton.
Phosphorus and Potassium CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
A. What is it? B. Why is it important? C. How is it done?
Project collaborators: Laura Ward Good, Katie Songer, Matt Diebel, John Panuska, Jeff Maxted, Pete Nowak, John Norman, K.G. Karthikeyan, Tom Cox, Water.
Phosphorus and Potassium. How is P managed? Key to managing soil and fertilizer P: Knowledge of whether or not the level of soil solution P is adequate.
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
Short Term Effectiveness of Poultry Litter as a Fertilizer for Newly Established Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Allan Pringle and Kenneth Farrish Division.
Water Quality  Nutrient runoff – the primary concern is with Phosphorous.
Waste Handling for Poultry Production Lori Marsh, Associate Professor, Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech.
S TATE T ECHNICAL M EETING February 14, AGENDA Ag Water Quality Plans Nutrient Management Plans – Options for producers.
Water Quality Concerns in Ohio Waters What has been Happening in Lake Erie? Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist, Agronomic Systems.
Missouri CAFO Regulations & Nutrient Management Requirements Randy Kixmiller, P.E. October 20, 2005 Jefferson City, MO.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
Accessing Reduction of Nonpoint Source Phosphorous Runoff From Land Application of Biosolids Treated With Water Treatment Residuals Project # FY
P Index Development and Implementation The Iowa Experience Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University.
Ethanol: Impacts on Soil and Water Quality Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension Water Quality Program (573)
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
Wisconsin’s Integrated Approach to Phosphorus Indexing Laura Ward Good, Larry Bundy, and Paul Kaarakka University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Section 6 Manure Application Building Environmental.
Introduction Agriculture is a large contributor of non-point source pollution to surface water. Field surface application of manure as a soil amendment.
Hay Fertility Management Sarah Kenyon Agronomy Specialist Houston, MO Slides Prepared by: Brie Menjoulet.
Soil Fertility Considerations Part of the Ruminant Livestock: Facing New Economic Realities Meetings.
Soil Phosphorus Issues Miguel Cabrera and David Radcliffe Crop and Soil Sciences University of Georgia.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Soil Respiration Unit: Soil Science. Objectives O Define: soil respiration and soil microbes O Explain the role of soil respiration in determining soil.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Soil and the Characteristics Important for Plant Growth Sustainable Small Acreage Farming and Ranching Slides adapted from the Living on the Land curriculum,
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Evaluating Field Soils In-field evaluation Routine soil tests Biological tests Comprehensive soil health evaluation (Cornell)
Agenda Item 2. A review of basic concepts and terminology related to phosphorus movement from cropland to streams and rivers. Great Lakes Protections Fund.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Sections 2 and 3 Nutrient Management Regulations.
Summary of the Nitrogen and Carbon Cycle on Georgia’s Pasture-Based Dairies N.S. Hill, Professor Dept. Crop and Soil Sci., UGA, Athens.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
TARGETING PERENNIAL/BIOMASS CROPS TO SENSITIVE AREAS Claire Baffaut USDA-ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, MO Translating.
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
Managing Your Pasture Joyce E. Meader Dairy/ Livestock Educator Cooperative Extension, U. Conn.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan The How, Where, When, and Why.
Whole Farm Simulation and Nutrient Management USDA, Agricultural Research Service University Park, Pennsylvania C. Alan Rotz USDA / ARS.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
Potassium Cycle, Fertilizer, and Organic K Sources. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training. August Morgantown, WV. Ed Rayburn West Virginia.
Forage Yield, Distribution, and Quality: (Matching forage production with animal needs) Nick Hill, Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences, Athens.
What The Agricultural Industry Is Doing Now A Focus On “Nutrient Service Providers” Douglas Busdeker The Andersons, Inc. & Ohio AgriBusiness Association.
COVER CROPS  Provide food for beneficial soil microbes and earthworms  Increase soil organic matter, which helps improve soil quality and fertility Blanco-Canqui.
NRCS Conservation Planning Slide 1 Astor BoozerWayne Honeycutt Regional ConservationistDeputy Chief for Science & Technology USDA NRCSUSDA-NRCSWashington,
High Rock Lake Watershed: Agricultural Study Deanna L. Osmond Department of Soil Science, NC State University and Kathy Neas NCDA&CS, Statistics Division/
Bob Woods Area Extension Agronomy Specialist
High Rock Lake Watershed:
Soil Bulk Density/Moisture/Aeration
Crop Susceptibility to Climate Change
Lecture 3 CATTLE NUTRITION Cattle are natural grazers
leaching, runoff, and volatilization
Precision Nutrient Management: Grid-Sampling Basis
2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference
Overcoming climate challenges
Manure’s Fertility Value
In-Field Soil Sampling
BASIC ISSUES OF MANURE MANAGEMENT: ASSIGNING MANURE SPREADING PRIORITIES RICHARD WOLKOWSKI AND KEITH KELLING DEPARTMENT OF SOIL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF.
Poultry Litter as Fertilizer?
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Presentation transcript:

My Field has High Soil Test P. Now what? John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri

Nutrient Management Scale Farm P Assessment Scale Field

Water Quality Scale Watershed

Water Quality Scale Watershed Nutrient Management Scale Farm P Assessment Scale Field

Lake 3 – MU Dairy Farm Lake: 6 acres Watershed: 77 acres Mean soil test P: 94 lbs/a 197 ppb P

Missouri Reservoirs Jones and Knowlton 1993 Water Clarity as measured by Secchi depth (m) Missouri reservoirs Lake 3

Lake 1 – MU Dairy Farm Lake: 15 acres Watershed: 135 acres Mean soil test P: 69 lbs/a 223 ppb P

Lake 2 – MU Dairy Farm Lake: 2.4 acres Watershed: 22 acres Mean soil test P: 91 lbs/a Lake 2 68 ppb P

Understanding Edge of field P losses

Bray-1 Soil Test P (lbs/acre) Dissolved Reactive P in runoff (ppb) Effect of soil test P on runoff P in forage systems (small plot runoff) Creldon Soil

What are my options? 223 ppb P

What are my options? Improve timing of application 223 ppb P

Water Soluble P in Runoff (ppm) Days After Treatment 200 lbs./acre phosphate applied 3/22/00 to forages Mt. Vernon, MO Improve timing of surface application

Days after application Dissolved Reactive P (mg kg -1 ) DAPPoultry Litter Effect of recently applied P on runoff P in forage systems

Aug.Oct. Nov. Dec.Jan. Volumetric Water Content (%) Soil moisture at Mt. Vernon, MO 2003 Saturated soil Feb.Mar.Apr.MayJun.Jul.Sep. 2 inches 4 inches Precipitation (in)

Aug.Oct. Nov. Dec.Jan. Volumetric Water Content (%) Soil moisture at Mt. Vernon, MO 2004 Saturated soil Feb.Mar.Apr.MayJun.Jul.Sep. 2 inches 4 inches Precipitation (in)

Nitrogen for Tall Fescue Hay AprilAugustOctoberJune Forage yield Herd feed requirement

Litter is an excellent fertilizer for fall fescue growth

What are my options? Lower P index on fields 223 ppb P

The importance of erosion TreatmentSTP Soluble P in runoff Erosion Runoff volume ppm kg/hamm Pasture Tillage w/residue Tillage w/o residue

What are my options? Lower P balance watershed 223 ppb P Export more manure Import less manure and fertilizer

What are my options? Lower P balance watershed 223 ppb P Should I raise STP on this field?

Raise soil test P 10 units with manure Low testing field: 5 ppm to 15 ppm Very high testing field: 50 to 60 ppm Very high testing field: 500 to 510 ppm Is there a water quality benefit from choosing one field over another?

Raise soil test P 10 units with manure Low testing field: 5 ppm to 15 ppm –Improved yield and forage quality –Reduced erosion –Lower runoff volume Very high testing field: 50 to 60 ppm Very high testing field: 500 to 510 ppm

What are my options? Follow the rules. 223 ppb P No application on frozen or saturated soils No application on >10% slope Adhere to setback requirements

What are my options Improve timing of applications Lower field P index Import less and export more P Follow the rules

Some philosophy It is a lot easier to avoid a problem then to fix a problem. The P index is best used as a educational tool, not a justification for more manure applications