Nikos Nikoloudakis and T.Shanks, R.Sharples 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Athens, Greece September 20-24, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Astronomical Solutions to Galactic Dark Matter Will Sutherland Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge.
Advertisements

“The Dark Side of the SDSS” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Chris Miller, David Wake, Brice Menard, Idit Zehavi, Ryan Scranton, Gordon Richards, Daniel Eisenstein,
University of Durham Astronomical Instrumentation Group ELT Science Case, Oxford, Report on work done for NIO GSMT book Simon Morris With Cedric.
Institute for Computational Cosmology Durham University Shaun Cole for Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Cosmological simulations.
Cosmological Constraints from Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations
Utane Sawangwit National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand Collaborators: T. Shanks (Durham), M. Irwin (Cambridge) M.J. Drinkwater, D. Parkinson.
Hierarchical Clustering Leopoldo Infante Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Reunión Latinoamericana de Astronomía Córdoba, septiembre 2001.
Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution Springel et al., 2005 Presented by Eve LoCastro October 1, 2009.
Optimization of large-scale surveys to probe the DE David Parkinson University of Sussex Prospects and Principles for Probing the Problematic Propulsion.
CMB: Sound Waves in the Early Universe Before recombination: Universe is ionized. Photons provide enormous pressure and restoring force. Photon-baryon.
SDSS-II SN survey: Constraining Dark Energy with intermediate- redshift probes Hubert Lampeitl University Portsmouth, ICG In collaboration with: H.J. Seo,
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Cluster Cosmology at LPPC Illuminating Dark Energy with BCS and PISCO F. William High 2 nd Year Grad Student Harvard Univ Dept of Physics Monday, 21 August.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Nikolaos Nikoloudakis Friday lunch talk 12/6/09 Supported by a Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Weak Lensing of The Faint Source Correlation Function Eric Morganson KIPAC.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Dark Energy J. Frieman: Overview 30 A. Kim: Supernovae 30 B. Jain: Weak Lensing 30 M. White: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 30 P5, SLAC, Feb. 22, 2008.
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure Alexandre Refregier (Cambridge) Collaborators: Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (Cambridge) Richard.
30/6/09 Unity of the Universe 1. Michael Drinkwater for the team Australia: Blake, Brough, Colless, Couch, Croom, Davis, Glazebrook, Jelliffe, Jurek,
Clustering of Luminous Red Galaxies and Applications to Cosmology NicRoss (Penn State) Research Progress Meeting LBNL 8th November 2007 Ross et al., 2007,
Application of Gravitational Lensing Models to the Brightest Strongly Lensed Lyman Break Galaxy – the 8 o’clock arc E. Buckley-Geer 1, S. Allam 1,2, H.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Cosmology & Large Scale Structure Case, Matthew Colless, GSMT SWG, 4-5 Dec 2002 11 GSMT Science - Case Studies Large Scale Structure and Cosmology Matthew.
Robust cosmological constraints from SDSS-III/BOSS galaxy clustering Chia-Hsun Chuang (Albert) IFT- CSIC/UAM, Spain.
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
BigBOSS Survey and Spectral Simulations Nick Mostek.
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
The PAU (BAO) Survey Enrique Fernandez UAB / IFAE Barcelona 43rd Recontres de Moriond (La Thuille, March08)
Dark Energy & LSS SDSS & DES teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth) Marie Curie (EC)
PAU survey collaboration: Barcelona (IFAE, ICE(IEEC/CSIC), PIC), Madrid (UAM & CIEMAT), València (IFIC & UV), Granada (IAA) PAU survey Physics of the Accelerating.
Next generation redshift surveys with the ESO-VLT
Francisco Javier Castander Serentill Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) Institut de Ciències de l’Espai (ICE/CSIC) Barcelona Exploiting the.
Constraining Cosmology with Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Cosmo 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics & Astronomy,
WFMOS KAOS concept identified via the Gemini Aspen Process and completed a Feasibility Study (Barden et al.) Proposed MOS on Subaru via an international.
DARK ENERGY IN SPACE: WFIRST AND EUCLID RACHEL BEAN (CORNELL UNIVERSITY) ON BEHALF OF THE PHYSPAG DARK ENERGY COMMUNITY Image Credit: NASA/GSFC Image Credit:
David Weinberg, Ohio State University Dept. of Astronomy and CCAPP The Cosmological Content of Galaxy Redshift Surveys or Why are FoMs all over the map?
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
VST ATLAS Mike Irwin, Nigel Metcalfe, Tom Shanks, et al Featuring Utane Sawangwit, PhD +2QDES Michael Drinkwater, Scott Croom et al.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
Wiggles and Bangs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:
Dark Energy and Cosmic Sound Daniel Eisenstein Steward Observatory Eisenstein 2003 (astro-ph/ ) Seo & Eisenstein, ApJ, 598, 720 (2003) Blake & Glazebrook.
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
VST ATLAS: Requirements, Operations and Products Tom Shanks, Nigel Metcalfe, Jamie McMillan (Durham Univ.) +CASU.
23 Sep The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun Peking Univ./ CPPM.
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Emission Line Galaxy Targeting for BigBOSS Nick Mostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BigBOSS Science Meeting Novemenber 19, 2009.
Photometric Redshifts: Some Considerations for the CTIO Dark Energy Camera Survey Huan Lin Experimental Astrophysics Group Fermilab.
1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Prospects of Measuring Dark Energy Equation of State with LAMOST Xuelei Chen ( 陳學雷 ) National Astronomical Observatory of.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
Goals for HETDEX Determine equation of state of Universe and evolutionary history for dark energy from 0
Gravitational Lensing
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
BAO,ISW+SZ from AA  +SDSS R.M. Bielby, U. Sawangwit, T. Shanks, Durham University + 2SLAQ + AAOmega teams.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
Constraining Dark Energy with Redshift Surveys Matthias Steinmetz (AIP)
Princeton University & APC
Images: M. Blanton. Images: M. Blanton Figures: M. Blanton & SDSS.
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Cosmology with Galaxy Correlations from Photometric Redshift Surveys
Presentation transcript:

Nikos Nikoloudakis and T.Shanks, R.Sharples 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Athens, Greece September 20-24, 2009

 4 cloned spectrographs at Calar Alto 3.5 m prime focus  4 x 4k x 4k detectors with 15 µm (0.45) pixel  4000 MOS slits simultaneously over a 1°field  Spectral resolution 10 Å (R~600) with 1.5 slit  Wavelength bands: Å, Å, Å OBSERVING CAPABILITIES with Å galaxy redshifts/night for z up to 0.7 → 1.5 hrs exposure → ~ 5-6 million galaxy spectra in 200 nights → deg² sky area 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

 Observational Cosmology via galaxy redshift surveys at z~0.7 → LRGs (i<21) ELGs (i<22)  Evolution of halo masses and galaxies to z~0.5  Gravitational growth rate via z-space distortion to z~0.7  Measuring the scale of BAO at 0.5 < z < 3  Lyman Break Galaxy redshift survey at z~3  Rich galaxy cluster survey  Photo-z calibration for gravitational lensing  Galactic Archaeology Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

XMS - a further step XMS 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

Galaxy sky densities  i<20 all galaxies ~2500deg -2  21<i<22 all galaxies ~9000deg -2  i<21 z~0.5 em+absn galaxies ~5000deg -2  21<i<22 z~0.7 OII em galaxies ~5000deg -2  2dFGRS in 5% of the observing time at 6x bigger z and ~4mag fainter!!! 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

 i 6 in 1.5hr exposure in ~ 1.´´5 seeing  i 4 in 1.5hr exposure in ~ 1.´´5 seeing XMS Imaging Base Pan-STARRS 3π reaches i~22 (SDSS only i~20) SDSS stripe 82, PAU and ultimately LSST. 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis

Tests of survey feasibility Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

MOSCA Instrument  3.5-m Cassegrain focus at Calar Alto  FOV 10 x 8 arcmin 2  resolution ~ 28Å  ~ 70 slits/ mask William Herschel Deep Field on 12/08/2008 LRGs i<21 ELGs i<22  1 mask/ 2hrs 2 masks/ 1 hr  Green -250 grism  Seeing 1-1.5arcsec / transparency oftenly poor  Technical problems on 1hr masks – half spectra 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

z = 0.95 z = th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

z = 0.62 z = th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

WHDF redshift distribution ELG 66% successful z ~ 0.75 LRG 58% ( only 17 LRGs on MOSCA fields) z ~ 0.68 Galaxies were preselected by photo-z to have 0.4 < z < 0.8 Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

Test z success rate at Å Double-blind test using 267 GAMA spectra (JAP) 89% success for 0.4<z<0.8 Worse when OII and CaII H&K break outside range q=4 red q=3 blue q≤2 green 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

Cosmology with XMS Measuring the scale of BAO Measuring the gravitational growth rate Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

 Using CMB data we can determine precisely the physical length scale of BAO.  Combining apparent size + known physical sizes :  → angular diameter distance dA → Hubble parameter H(z) Better constraints in w= p/ρ Identification of systematics created by non-linearity in P(K) → standard ruler 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

→ oscillation in the power spectrum P(k) → spike in the two point spatial galaxy – galaxy correlation function ξ The BAO signature has been detected in the local universe: 1. 2dFGRS of z~0.1 galaxies ( Cole et al. 2005) 2. SDSS galaxy samples of z~0.35 LRGs ( Eisenstein et al. 2005) 9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

Measurement Galaxy clustering z-space distortions Test of Einstein’s gravity theory independently of geometrical tests using standard candles and rods Estimator of halo masses M/L galaxy groups haloes in CDM models Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

9 th Hellenic Astronomical Conference Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/2009

This quantity can measure survey efficiency for detecting BAO, Gravitational Growth Rate and relative quantities for clustering estimations. Feldman et al The shot noise of the power spectrum must be reduced below the irreducible component due to sampling variance. Errors on P(k) go as 1/sqrt(Veff(k)). Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

XMS Survey Effective Volume WiggleZ XMS GES XMS Total  XMS GES wins at small scales  +20x more halo members than BOSS  XMS Survey remains competitive with BOSS at BAO scales WiggleZ

 XMS offers order of magnitude improvement in MOS multiplex over previous spectrographs (400  4000)  Push the limits to fainter surveys with bigger volume  LRG+ELG tracers in same volume Multiple science cases!  XMS is competitive for BAO at scales Mpc  XMS is more competitive for z-space distortions at smaller scales.  BAO scale competitive with BOSS  Gravitational Growth Rate beats BOSS Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

Overview Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

White, Song/&Percival 2008 Nikos Nikoloudakis 21/09/ th Hellenic Astronomical Conference