Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 Research Data and Infrastructures A Funder’s Perspective.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint Information Systems Committee Digital Library Services BL/JISC Workshop Rachel Bruce JISC Programme Director The Digital Library and its Services,
Advertisements

Knowledge Exchange TF-EMC 2, Lyon - 14 February 2011 Christopher Brownhttp://
Welcome to SURF Workshop on Institutional Repositories Utrecht, 16 and 17 January 2007 Wim Liebrand, director SURF.
Implementing Open Acces in Denmark UNESCO Regional Consultations on Open Access, Berlin, November 2013 forfatter.
1 Roundtable Meeting of Quality Assurance Agencies of the Organisation of Islamic Conference Member Countries Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia November 2009.
Research in archives and records management: a UK perspective Dr Elizabeth Shepherd
Berlin, Knowledge by Networking 2007 Scientific Library Services and Information Systems: “Digitisation.
1 Canada’s National Data Archive Consultations Chuck Humphrey University of Alberta IASSIST 2005.
New DFG Information Infrastructure Projects Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Birmingham, 28. March 2011 New DFG Information Infrastructure Projects.
JRC's Open Access (OA) Policy G. P. Tartaglia, A. Annoni, G. Merlo, F
Corporation For National Research Initiatives NSF SMETE Library Building the SMETE Library: Getting Started William Y. Arms.
THE JOINED UP WORLD OF E-RESEARCH Professor Neil McLean National Technical Standards Adviser to the Department of Education Science and Training (DEST)
2 nd Data without Boundaries Training Course Bucharest, February 2013.
OMICS Group Contact us at: OMICS Group International through its Open Access Initiative is committed to make genuine and.
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES The work of UNICA in the context of new modes of publication and dissemination Dr Paul Ayris Chair, UNICA Scholarly Communications.
Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Mark Thorley, Natural Environment Research Council Research Outputs: Their Access & Preservation A perspective.
VOEF and Open Textbooks. Currently, Virginia schools must rely on publishers and commercial integrators to provide authoritative learning content resources.
Good practice in Research Data Management Module 6: Tools, training and support.
Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation, Beijing July 14 – Network of Expertise in Digital Preservation 1 Trusted Digital Repositories,
Common Ground A Policy Framework for Open Access to Research Data Susan Reilly, LIBER Projects
Integrating Digital Curation in a Digital Library curriculum: the International Master DILL case study Anna Maria Tammaro University of Parma Florence,
Research in archives and records management Dr Elizabeth Shepherd
Data Archiving and Networked Services DANS is an institute of KNAW en NWO Trusted Digital Archives and the Data Seal of Approval Peter Doorn Data Archiving.
Managing Research Data – The Organisational Challenge at Oxford James A J Wilson Friday 6 th December,
SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.
Considering Open Access – Digital Preservation of arts research data: AKA Managing your “stuff” Open Repositories Conference 2015 Main Strand Dr Robin.
Ensuring access to the record of science: driving changes in the role of research libraries APE2014 Berlin, 29 th January Susan Reilly Projects Manager.
1 INFRA : INFRA : Scientific Information Repository supporting FP7 “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Sept. 5, 2012 Kevin T. Gallagher and Linda C. Gundersen September 5, 2012 CDI Science.
CAUL Strategic Plan Review 2003 Objectives & Actions.
THE ROAD TO OPEN ACCESS A guide to the implementation of the Berlin Declaration Frederick J. Friend OSI Open Access Advocate JISC Consultant Honorary Director.
FP7-Infrastructures Open access in Slovenia and OpenAIRE project.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
1 Why should “WE” CARE about data?. International initiatives OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding 2007 “Access.
From community website to (social) knowledge base? The Influence and Impact of Web 2.0 on e-Research Infrastructure, Applications and Users (25/03/2009)
Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice in Germany Prof. Ulrike Beisiegel Chair of the DFG Ombudsman DFG Ombudsman Germany Director of the Institute of Molecular.
The Knowledge Exchange Presentation to CNI April 2005 Bas Cordewener, SURF Sigrun Eckelmann, DFG Norman Wiseman, JISC.
ICSTI Annual Members’ Meeting & Workshop Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Paris, 5. March 2012 The Alliance of German Science Organisations - Recommendations on.
Dr. Maria-Carme Torras i Calvo Chair, IFLA Information Literacy Section Dr. Sharon Mader Secretary, IFLA Information Literacy Section Global Partnerships.
W HAT IS I NTEROPERABILITY ? ( AND HOW DO WE MEASURE IT ?) INSPIRE Conference 2011 Edinburgh, UK.
Energy security of APEC economies: policy options for energy resource diversification in the Asia-Pacific region 47th Energy Working Group Meeting Kunming,
11-Oct-07 Marcel Brannemann AWI-Library, Bremerhaven, Germany Open Access Chance for Paradigm Change in Scientific Publishing ? German Experiences in Global.
Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.
Ministerial NEtwoRk for Valorising Activising in digitisation Quality for Cultural Websites : The MINERVA Approach on Quality Isabelle Dujacquier MED-CULT.
Responsible Data Use: Copyright and Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Version 1.0 Review Date.
ARL Workshop on New Collaborative Relationships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe September 26-27, 2006 ARL Prue.
Copyright and Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Section: Responsible Data Use Version 1.0 October 2012 Copyright 2012 Matthew.
EDLproject WP3 “Developing the European Digital Library” LIBER – EBLIDA workshop Digitisation of Library Material in Europe Copenhagen, October.
SEDAC Long-Term Archive Development Robert R. Downs Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center Center for International Earth Science Information Network.
Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,
University of St Andrews Towards e-Research June 16 th 2005 Research-related computing developments in St Andrews Birgit Plietzsch, Anna Clements, Jeremy.
19-20 October 2010 IT Directors’ Group meeting 1 Item 6 of the agenda ISA programme Pascal JACQUES Unit B2 - Methodology/Research Local Informatics Security.
| 1 Anita de Waard, VP Research Data Collaborations Elsevier RDM Services May 20, 2016 Publishing The Full Research Cycle To Support.
Why ANDS? 16 May, 2011 Mathew Wyatt. Trends towards open data  Data science  Gov 2.0  Research 2.0  Open Science  Freedom of Information.
UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN Access to information and knowledge for open government: The contribution of libraries and IFLA Dr. Maria-Carme Torras i Calvo Library.
Community of Practice K Lead Project Team: الالتزامالتحفيز التفكير المؤسسي المرونةالتميزالشراكةالاستقامة.
NRF Open Access Statement
CESSDA SaW Training on Trust, Identifying Demand & Networking
‘openLandscapes’ The Knowledge Collection of Landscapes Science
SowiDataNet - A User-Driven Repository for Data Sharing and Centralizing Research Data from the Social and Economic Sciences in Germany Monika Linne, 30.
Sustainable EU Research Infrastructures
DRIVER Digital Repository Infrastructure Vision for European Research
Research Data Management
National Data Management Policies: The case of Germany
Joint NHDS & CRKN Workshop on Documentary Heritage
Research data in library catalogues and the joint initiative of European technical libraries for data registration Jan Brase Workshop Primary data for.
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
Bird of Feather Session
Introduction to the CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide
Exchanging Data Management Plans with DDI
Presentation transcript:

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 Research Data and Infrastructures A Funder’s Perspective

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 The German Research Foundation Mission Statement: The German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) is the central, self-governing research funding organisation that promotes research at universities and other publicly financed research institutions in Germany. The DFG serves all branches of science and the humanities by funding research projects and facilitating cooperation among researchers.

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 What is the issue? Research Data... ... are the basis of scientific findings. ... are inadequately used today. ... are accessible in a very limited manner. ... are not available on a long-term basis. The Vision of the Research Councils  Research data should be freely accessible, they should be easy to get and they should be professionally curated on a long-term basis.

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 Let’s assume, secure storage and archiving, sharing and re-use of research data would be possible and it would be standard in science!  We would have many more data in a specific discipline and would optimise the research process.  We could compare very diverse data from other fields and would avoid duplicate work.  Data sharing would ensure quality control and other data sets could support own results and interpretations, new interpretations would be possible.  Own results could be acknowledged by other researchers.  Unique, non-reproducible results would be documented.  A free access to research data would ensure the standards of „good scientific practice“.

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May and there is an incentive!

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 But,... my data - my precious ! For scientists in many disciplines exist “very good reasons” not to share data, which may mean “giving them away”. A selection of quotes:  I have spent xxx Euro of my budget and yyy years of my work time to produce these data.  The data may be easily misunderstood.  The data could be erroneous and anybody else may discover this.  Somebody could find something interesting in my data.  Anybody could publish my data before I do.  It takes way too much time to understand and to format my data in the right context.  Where to and how could I deliver my data?  I fully loose control over my data.

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 Many open issues  Constitutional Freedom of Science: German Constitution § 5: Does this include the freedom, NOT to share data?  Who owns the data? Funding organisation, host institution, funding applicant, scientist, publisher?  How will data be provided? What are the regulations for data re-use? Which licence model will be used? What are the incentives for scientists to share data? (The availability of data not only is a technical issue …)  Quality control Any data? What is possible, desirable and how? Who is responsible, which data where and how long should be archived?

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011  The DFG together with: Max-Planck-Society Helmholtz Association Leibniz Association Frauenhofer Association and others  22 June 2008: Priority Initiative "Digital Information"  The main topics are: National Licensing Open Access National Hosting Strategy Research Data Virtual Research Environments Legal Frameworks The Alliance of German Science Organisations

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011  1998: DFG „Proposals for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice”  2003: Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities  since 2007: workshops and expert round table discussions  2008: National priority initiative „Digital Information "of the Alliance of German Science Organisations  2010: GWK/Joint Science Conference by the Federal and Länder Governments Commission on the Future of Information Infrastructure („KII“) The German Research Foundation

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 Recommendations for Secure Storage and Availability of Digital Primary Research Data Committee on Scientific Library Services and Information Systems Subcommittee on Information Management January 2009  Definitions of research data, organisational concepts, meta data and standards  Keeping the rights of scientists and their interests in access to data  Free availability on a trans-regional level  Quality control at „Publications“

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011  Shaping and moderation of an awareness building process aiming at using digital resources more efficient, develop and implement appropriate infrastructures and tools and to finally make research data available (back up and archiving and re-use).  Close cooperation of scientists as data producers and providers to data repositories and also as users of those repositories with experts of the information management jointly shaping the process.  Define discipline specific demands and specifications and include these into the process.  Development of means for publication of research data (incl. peer-review).  Identify best practise examples and use experience.  Initiate pilot and exploration projects. Research data management: approaches and strategies

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 Supplement to the Guidelines for Proposal Preparation (implemented at April 2010) „... If during the proposed project scientific data will be gathered systematically, which may be feasible for later re-use, please describe the means how these data will be securely stored and made available for other scientists. Please regard the standards and the services of existing data repositories, if available in your specific scientific discipline … “ Call for proposals: Information infrastructures for research data (call closed at the 28. April 2010) In order to improve the long-term preservation of research data, the German Research Foundation (DFG) had issued a call for proposals for projects aimed at developing and optimising information infrastructures that seek to achieve an efficient and sustained use of research data. This initiative is administered by the DFG’s Scientific Library Services and Information Systems (LIS) division. Current Activities The German Research Foundation supports the systematic collaboration between scientists and information management experts.

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 Information management experts? E.g. libraries, archives... Old Reading Room of the British Library, London cc: by-sa "Archive of the Members of the German Bundestag", a work of art by Christian Boltanski, in the basement of the Reichstag building cc: by-nc-sa

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May Earth System Science Data (ESSD) is an international, interdisciplinary journal for the publication of articles on original research data(sets), furthering the reuse of high (reference) quality data of benefit to Earth System Sciences. The editors encourage submissions on original data or data collections which are of sufficient quality and potential impact to contribute to these aims. Papers that pass a rapid access peer-review are immediately published on the Earth System Science Data Discussions (ESSDD) website. They are then subject to Interactive Public Discussion, during which the referees' comments (anonymous or attributed), additional short comments by other members of the scientific community (attributed) and the authors' replies are also published in ESSD. Data publications; e.g. ESSD

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011  Think disciplines Define types of data, amount and characteristics, their specific life cycles and usage characteristics.  Encouraging the publication of data sets The willingness to provide access to data for scientific re-use should become standard in science and research  Legal regulations  Teaching and qualification Scientists and data curators  Working across sectors  Digital collections of scientific objects  Development and implementation of infrastructure Collaboration between scientists and information management experts Securing the interoperability of international and interdisciplinary networks What is on the agenda? A Summary

Research Data and Infrastructures – A Funder’s Perspective Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Bonn, 10. May 2011 Thank you for your attention!