WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Overlapping jurisdiction Cases arising under state law Concurrent state & federal jurisdiction Diversity cases What law.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction/Civil procedure
Advertisements

The Implications of Federal Circuit Jurisdiction for the Development of Antitrust Law FTC/DOJ Hearings on Competition and Intellectual Property Law and.
Mon. Apr. 14. same-sex marriage and full faith and credit.
Wed. Apr. 16. Erie Tompkins (a PA domiciliary) sues Erie (a NY domiciliary) in NY state court concerning an accident in PA Can NY use its own standard.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION.
Objective 29c Distinguish among federal, state, and concurrent jurisdiction, and explain how state and federal courts interrelate Rose Evans 4/23/08 5.
Law For Business And Personal Use
Chapter 18 Review. Cases that are only heard in federal court 1.Original Jurisdiction 2.Appellate Jurisdiction 3.Exclusive Jurisdiction 4.Precedent.
3-2 Federal Court System By Kaitlyn Flanagan and Lindsey Hill.
Fair DP IDEALS/ABSTRACT “Criminal Justice System” “Fairness and justice for all” “Equality under the law” “Checks and balances” “Best legal system in the.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal (Territorial) Jurisdiction.
THE PROBLEM Overlapping Jurisdiction #1 Cases involving federal law Exclusive jurisdiction Federal courts Concurrent jurisdiction 1331 “arising under”
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal (Territorial) Jurisdiction.
Legal Environment of Business (Management 518) Professor Charles H. Smith The Court System (Chapter 2) Spring 2005.
American Civil Litigation and Dispute Resolution University of Insubria, Como, Italy Jeffrey W. Stempel William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada,
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 42 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Dec 2, 2005.
Chapter 3 The Court System. The Right to a Jury Trial Jury Jury Why would someone want this? Why would someone want this? Bench Trial Bench Trial Held.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. BROWN v. SOUTHLAND 620 F.Supp (E.D.Mo. 1985) Case Brief.
Ethics & Law Business Law.
The Judiciary. Jurisdiction Original jurisdiction: where the case is heard first, usually in a trial. Appellate jurisdiction: cases brought on appeal.
Chapter 3-2 The Federal Court System
Tues. Dec. 4 2:00. issue preclusion If in an earlier case an issue was - actually litigated and decided - litigated fairly and fully - and essential.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
Letter to your official. Start by 1. Choosing your issue.  What do you care about? 2. Decide what level of government handles that issue. 1. Federal.
Judicial Branch Citizenship: American Government.
Dual Court System Federal & State Courts.
1 Agenda for 24th Class Name plates out Fee Shifting Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction to Erie.
Federalism The Division of Power. Federalism System of government in which a written constitution divides the powers of government Division of powers.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
Declining Supplemental Jurisd. Standard of Appellate Review “Standard of review” What mean?
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal (Territorial) Jurisdiction.
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Overlapping jurisdiction Cases arising under state law Concurrent state & federal jurisdiction Diversity cases What law.
Wed., Nov. 19. In the light of Erie, how to interpret state law?
11/17/09 BR- Fill in the blanks.. “Trial courts are concerned with issues of ____.” “Appellate courts are concerned with ____.” Today: Understanding Types.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Venue Venue.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court Choosing a Trial Court (Federal or State Court) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Personal (Territorial) Jurisdiction.
Addressing the Oklahoma DEQ v. EPA D.C. Circuit Decision: Implementation Plans in Indian Country National Tribal Forum – May 2015 EPA Outreach and Information.
The Federal Courts. I. Jurisdiction A. Trivia Question: How many court systems exist in the US today?
Introduction: From Swift to Erie. Why Was Diversity Jurisdiction Created?
CHAPTER 2: COURT SYSTEMS. Chapter 22 Learning Objectives: Court Operation State and Federal Court Systems Law and Equity CHAPTER 2: COURT SYSTEMS.
Con Law I Constitutional Law Methods Prof. Steven Jamar January 2008 Constitutional Law Methods Prof. Steven Jamar January 2008.
The Courts and Canadian Federalism: From Watertight Compartment to Shared Responsibility.
The Supreme Court. Jurisdiction Original—first to hear a case 1.State vs. US. (New York vs. Clinton) 2.Ambassador/public minister 3.Issues between states.
Spring 2000Supreme Court Review1 Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee Title history of the Fairfax Estate (300,000 acres) commonly known as NORTHERN NECK (VIRGINIA)
Rethinking Patent Law’s Uniformity Principle Craig A. Nard and John F. Duffy Patents and Diversity in Innovation University of Michigan Law School
Tues., Nov. 18.
Today: Understanding Types of Courts, and Their Functions
The Judicial Branch.
4.            P sues D under federal antitrust law in the Federal District Court for the District of Connecticut. D defaults and P gets a judgment of $80,000.
3-2 The Federal Court System
Lecture 25 Apr. 11, 2018.
Lecture 24 Apr. 9, 2018.
Lecture 26 Apr. 16, 2018.
CHAPTER 12 CASE LAW ANALYSIS
Forensics Week 4.
The Judicial Branch “The Balancing Branch” AP Government: Mr. Tumino
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court
Itumeleng Lesofe Competition Commission South Africa
Conflict of laws Today we will talk about Conflict of Laws, which occurs when the laws of two or more different jurisdictions could apply to a particular.
AP U.S. Government Chapter 14
The American court system
Wed., Dec. 5.
FEDERAL COURT The Constitution (Article III) allows Congress to grant the federal courts jurisdiction over eight types of cases: cases arising under the.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Choosing a Trial Court
Principles of the Constitution
Erie statutes 28 U.S.C. § State laws as rules of decision
Presentation transcript:

WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING Overlapping jurisdiction Cases arising under state law Concurrent state & federal jurisdiction Diversity cases What law applies?

SKILLS: READING CASES Guaranty Trust v. York, p. 276 Basics Why not easy case after Erie? Why reach S.Ct.? Black letter law “significantly affect result of litigation” apply state law

POLICY ARGUMENTS “Outcome determinative” Hypothetical, p. 278, Note 2 Why care? Stopping points?

SKILLS: READING CASES Byrd v. Blue Ridge REC, p. 281 Basics “Outcome determinative” under York? Black letter law

TAKEAWAYS Black letter law York “significantly affect result of litigation” if disregard controlling state law Byrd If state law doesn’t determine outcome isn’t bound up with substantive rts/obligations Federal court applies balancing test Value of uniformity v. state’s interest

TAKEAWAYS Federalism policy concerns Forum shopping Outcome-determination Federal interest in uniformity State “substantive” interests