Analysis of Design Process Lewis/Gould 1981 Study TC518 W ’06 Students Early Focus on Users 62%58% Empirical Measurement 40%69% Iterative Design 20%62%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Testing Relational Database
Advertisements

A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Classroom Assessment Techniques for Early Alert of Students At Risk Carleen Vande Zande, Ph.D. Academic Leaders Workshop.
Experiential Learning Cycle
Welcome to Day 3 Please be seated in groups of 4.  Like grade bands  Mixed schools  New faces Introduce yourself to your table members.
IS214 Recap. IS214 Understanding Users and Their Work –User and task analysis –Ethnographic methods –Site visits: observation, interviews –Contextual.
Administrivia  Review Deliverable 2 –Overview (audience) –Excellent additions  User Goals  Usability Goals  User Group (who are you designing for?)
Message Design and Content Creation 23 January 2007 Kathy E. Gill.
Midterm Exam Review IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
Heuristics  Basis  Evaluators –Qualifications –Training  Preparation –Scenario  Results –List of problems –Severity –Group synthesis.
Scientific workflow systems are problem-solving environments designed to allow researchers to perform complex tasks simply by piecing together individual.
Project Sharing  Team discussions –Share results of heuristic evaluations –Discuss your choice of methods and results  Class-level discussion –Each spokesperson.
Administrivia  Feedback on first Deliverable –Audience: Management –Requirements  Description of the system (what it is, how it works)  Define user.
Administrivia EPost and Portfolio EPost and Portfolio Analysis of Design process Analysis of Design process.
Recap of IS214. Placing this course in context Creating information technology that helps people accomplish their goals, make the experience effective,
Design Process …and the project.
Warm-up, Free-write Task: –On a blank sheet of paper, begin to write down what you know about the users of your product, the tasks they use the product.
Syllabus – Weekly schedule. Project Sharing – Exercise 3 Team level discussion Teams share results of contextual inquiry Note: Jennifer & Anita circulate,
Elicitation Methods Information types Information types Information Information Internal Perspectives Internal Perspectives Behavior Behavior Facts Facts.
QUESTIONS TO PROMOTE SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING SAMANTHA RONSICK AET/531 DECEMBER 8, 2014 DANENE MIMS, INSTRUCTOR.
User Centered Design Lecture # 5 Gabriel Spitz.
Lesson Planning Objectives:
Communication & Conflict Management Jan. 23, 2014.
Macquarie University Library1 LAMS, e-learning & Information Literacy: possibilities & practicalities Margaret Wright, Macquarie University Heather Cooper,
July 28, 2011 Nancy Nation & Mirna Whidden.  What do you associate with the word assessment??
Chapman students present physical geology research projects to AP Environmental Science class, Orange High School Bringing Research into Your Classroom.
Emily Stone, Katie Dardis, Rachael Rzepka, Courtney Ariola Robot Or Not?
1 UTeach Professional Development Courses. 2 UTS Step 1 Early exposure to classroom environment (can be as early as a student’s first semester)
Alexandra Savelieva, Sergey Avdoshin, PhD National Research University “Higher School of Economics” Alexandra Savelieva, Sergey Avdoshin, PhD National.
What should teachers do in order to maximize learning outcomes for their students?
Engineering Education Conference - Spring 2009 Increasing Assessment Effectiveness in a Time of Decreasing Budgets Increasing Assessment Effectiveness.
Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.
Facilitating the B.R.C. Classroom Dan Petterson, Ed.D Please work with others on the crossword puzzle on the tables -
Prof. James A. Landay Luke Vink Cornell Tech Spring 2014 May 14, 2014 HCI+DESIGN: USER INTERFACE DESIGN + PROTOTYPING + EVALUATION Cornell Tech HCI+Design.
CLC reading program Nguyen Thi Thu Trang. In-class activities Assignment Assessment Add your text in here Reading program Objectives Contents.
Overview of the rest of the semester Building on Assignment 1 Using iterative prototyping.
Jonghwi PARK ICT in Education, APEID UNESCO Bangkok How to Design Project Based Learning : Lesson Plan.
Interaction Design CMU. Today’s objectives Continue Design approaches (UCD, ACD)  User-Centered Design  Activity-Centered Design.
User Interfaces 4 BTECH: IT WIKI PAGE:
Music and Dance Back to School In-Service: Towards Performance Readiness District Learning Day Colonial Middle School 8:00 – 3:00 August 5, 2015.
Design Process … and some design inspiration. Course ReCap To make you notice interfaces, good and bad – You’ll never look at doors the same way again.
Curriculum & Instruction / Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching Innovation 2008 Breckenridge, CO April 14-15, 2008 Correia, Moving from.
Project Sharing  Team discussions (15 minutes) –Share results of your work on the Project Scope Proposal –Discuss your choice of methods and results –Prepare.
Administrivia  Final Exam –Due Date – Thursday, March 17 –Q & A  Deliverable 2 –Q & A.
Mid-Term Evaluation  Course and Instructor evaluation  Jennie Dorman.
Differentiation What is meant by differences between learners?
Motivating adult learners can sometimes be a challenge. This module will provide you with information on how to design instructional content that will.
Administrivia  Feedback from the mid-term evaluation  Insights from project proposal.
EVALUATION AND SELFASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR THE VIRTUAL TEACHING: MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONNAIRES Claudio Cameselle, Susana Gouveia Departamento de Enxeñería.
Technologies Derek Middleton, Qualification Development Manager Scottish Qualifications Authority.
AP Capstone: Seminar A Brave New YWCPA. Class Overview The AP Capstone is an inquiry-based course that aims to engage students in cross-curricular.
Supporting the design of interactive systems a perspective on supporting people’s work Hans de Graaff 27 april 2000.
National PE Cycle of Analysis. Fitness Assessment + Gathering Data Why do we need to asses our fitness levels?? * Strengths + Weeknesses -> Develop Performance.
CHAPTER 4 – EVALUATION GRADING AND BACKWASH Presenter: Diane Whaley.
1 Sobah Abbas Petersen Adjunct Associate Professor, NTNU Researcher, Sintef TDT4252 Modelling of Information Systems Advanced Course TDT4252,
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Course Work 2: Critical Reflection GERALDINE DORAN B
Learning Assessment Techniques
“It was years after we had taken usability to guide us that it was said by some other companies that they could not afford to employ a usability specialist.
Administrivia Final Exam Deliverable 3 Feedback on Heuristic Eval
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
Administrivia Issues – EPost and Portfolio
Introducing ISTQB Agile Foundation Extending the ISTQB Program’s Support Further Presented by Rex Black, CTAL Copyright © 2014 ASTQB 1.
Assessment Design For Learning
McNeese State University Professional Development Opportunity
A Fundamental Challenge
Pima Medical Institute Online Education
Skills for Learning, Life and Work
A new educative role and expectations
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Design Process Lewis/Gould 1981 Study TC518 W ’06 Students Early Focus on Users 62%58% Empirical Measurement 40%69% Iterative Design 20%62%

Analysis of Design Process Number of Principles Mentioned 0123 Lewis/Gould 1981 Study 26%35%24%16% TC518 W ’06 Students 12%19%38%31%

Discussion  What challenges and complexities are associated with UCD in the “real” world? –What similarities? –What differences? –What surprises? –What implications? –What makes it hard? –What constitutes success of UCD? –Where can you be flexible? –Where do you have to stand firm? –What options do you have for applying and adapting UCD methods?

Usability Maturity Discussion  Are some companies not quite ready for usability? –Usability higher up in the hierarchy of “needs” than functionality? –Capability? Attitude? Readiness? –Usability Maturity Model? Like CMM? Immaturity? Different Models? –Are products from companies that have invested in usability worlds ahead of those from companies that didn't make that investment? –Design vs. Usability –Credit for design success? –Is good design obvious? Simple?

Project Sharing  Team discussions –Share results of Final Design Solution –Discuss your choice of methods and results  Team Presentations –Team (or Spokesperson) briefly present problem and solutions –Especially challenging aspects or surprising insights –Lessons learned

Activity  Draw the process of UCD –Think on your own for a few minutes –Pair up with someone not on your team –Discuss and share with the class

Discussion of Readings  Facilitate class discussion of topics / ideas / themes garnered from the online discussion, related to assigned readings. –Discussion Leaders 1. Gülay Birand 2. Thea Lehming 3. Ben Turner

Topic J: Revisiting User-centered Design Driving Questions:  What activities are involved in doing user-centered design? What skills and knowledge are required to do these activities? How do you select the activities/methods that you will actually use for any specific project?  What challenges arise in doing user-centered design? How can they be resolved?  What type of information is needed to support user-centered design? What sources exist for gaining this information (i.e., the sources of “literature”)? How does a designer evaluate this literature? What are the benefits and costs of turning to these sources in order to support design?  How does a designer accumulate sources of information so that they know where to go in order to become informed on a specific topic?  Overall, how can UCD designers ensure that user-centered perspectives are incorporated into the overall design process?

Parting Thoughts 1. UCD involves REAL users 2. The purpose of UCD is two-fold 1.Improve the product/system 2.Improve the development process 3. Evaluation 4. Iteration (and re-evaluation) 5. The class project was a simplification but… 6. Opportunities for UCD everywhere

User-centered Design of TC518  Some things we learned about our users –You give great feedback! –The following aspects of class helped learning: project work (hands-on), classmate experiences, weekly exercises, sharing independent work, readings, real-world examples, discussion –Concerned about: redundant class discussions, clarification of expectations for assignments –Diverse group in terms of prior experience with design and UCD techniques: professional experience, class experience, little/no experience  We will use this user information to revise the design of the course.

Looking back / Looking ahead Where we’ve been  Topics – Readings and discussion –What is UCD? –Collecting and summarizing info about users, tasks and context –Problem definition –Design –Evaluations  Project –Insights about users, tasks, and contextual issues –Actual data from observing real users –Problem definition –Proposal –Design –Evaluation (heuristic & usability) Where we’re going  On to Design in a brave new world!  Readings: –None  Upcoming Work: –Final Exam  Thanks for learning with us