Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Algebra: Validating an Assessment of Teacher Knowledge Robert E. Floden Raven McCrory Michigan State University January,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Algebra/Pre-calculus Advanced Functions and Modeling Math Analysis AP Statistics Statistics and Probability/Discrete Math.
Advertisements

KTMT Research Action Cluster Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics Tasks Update for the CSU-MTEP Convening October 10-11, 2014.
Marilyn Carlson Patrick Thompson Arizona State University NSF-ED Math and Science Partnership Meeting October 20th, 2005 Assessing Mathematics Conceptual.
A Ph.D. Program in Mathematics Education in a Dept. of Mathematics: Arizona State University as an Example Marilyn Carlson Arizona State University
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness TM An Overview of the Program Victoria Young Director of Reading, Writing, and Social Studies Assessments.
Western Oregon University's Pre-Service Middle School Mathematics Focus Laurie Burton & Rachel Harrington TOTOM 2010.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
Meeting the Challenge for the Preparation of Pre-service Teachers of Middle School Mathematics —The Fayetteville State University (FSU) Answer Presenters:
Glenn Ledder Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska-Lincoln Designing Math Courses:
Knowledge of Algebra for Teaching: Framework, Item Development, and Pilot Results Joan Ferrini-Mundy Sharon Senk Division of Science and Mathematics Education.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
© 2006 Knowing Mathematics for Teaching Algebra NSF REC # Released Items Released Items NSF REC # Knowledge of Mathematics for Teaching Algebra.
Assessing Pre-Service Secondary School Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Algebra Sharon Senk Joan Ferrini-Mundy Michigan State University January.
THE TRANSITION FROM ARITHMETIC TO ALGEBRA: WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE DO NOT KNOW (Some ways of asking questions about this transition)‏
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Mathematics for Elementary School Teaching:What Is It and How Do Teachers Learn It? Raven McCrory, Michigan State University Deborah Ball, University of.
New York State Teacher Certification Examinations: Academic Literacy Skills Test July 29, 2013.
2.1 The Addition Property of Equality
Kenmore West Math Department Courses School Year.
Fifth Annual NSF Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Conference July 7-9, 2010 Enrique Ortiz University of Central Florida Using a Teaching Goals.
{ Mathematics Anna Demarinis.  The student understands and applies the concepts and procedures of mathematics  GLE  Students learn to solve many new.
1 Unexpected answers offered by computer algebra systems to school equations Eno Tõnisson University of Tartu Estonia CADGME 2010 Hluboká nad Vltavou,
1 UTeach Professional Development Courses. 2 UTS Step 1 Early exposure to classroom environment (can be as early as a student’s first semester)
Innovations in MTH 100E Kristen Bieda and Raven McCrory, Teacher Education Steven Wolf, Post-Doc in CREATE for STEM.
Affecting and Documenting Shifts in Secondary Precalculus Teachers’ Instructional Effectiveness and Students’ Learning Marilyn P. Carlson Arizona State.
JOHN CHAMPE CLUSTER CURRICULUM NIGHT MATHEMATICS Math Presentation: Susan Hollinger and Megan Neterer.
Do Now Based on what you currently know about TNReady, please jot down two or three instructional practices that you will change or incorporate in preparation.
Unpacking the EOC Algebra I Release Items Eligible Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division Fall 2010.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Common Core and the Community College May 20, 2014.
Welcome Parents! November 20, 2014.
Do Now Based on what you currently know about TNReady, please jot down two or three instructional practices that you will change or incorporate in preparation.
Mathematics Teachers High School October 11, 2013.
Computational Physics Introduction 3/30/11. Goals  Calculate solutions to physics problems  All physics problems can be formulated mathematically. 
Accelerated Math Mrs. Melissa Galazin
Table of Contents Professional Development School Pilot Study.
Developing Measures of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Geoffrey Phelps, Heather Hill, Deborah.
Comments on the Common Core State Standards Martha K. Smith JMM, January 2011.
Hong Qian, PhD Student Peter Youngs, Associate Professor Michigan State University Presentation to Global Education Group February 16, 2011 The Influence.
ALM15/July2008/Schmitt1 Initial Findings from Research on the TIAN Project A New Professional Learning Model for Adult Education Math Teachers Mary Jane.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Math I Cluster Quiz Data. Math I Unit 2 Represent & Solve Equations & Inequalities Graphically.
Chapter 13 Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Chapter 7: Rational Algebraic Functions Section 7-11: Variation Functions.
Math Department Data. Algebra II 1 st Period LEVEL I LEVEL II LEVEL III LEVEL IV # of students 1850 % PROFICIENT: 33% % NONPROFICIENT: 67%
4.8 “The Quadratic Formula” Steps: 1.Get the equation in the correct form. 2.Identify a, b, & c. 3.Plug numbers into the formula. 4.Solve, then simplify.
AIM: K–8 Science Iris Weiss Eric Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
Pathway Chart Algebra II Geometry HS Algebra I Math III Math II Math I Courses in higher level mathematics: Precalculus, Calculus, Advanced Statistics,
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
Algebra Review. Systems of Equations Review: Substitution Linear Combination 2 Methods to Solve:
MATH II – QUADRATICS to solve quadratic equations. MATH III – MATH II –
Mater Gardens Middle School MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT WHERE LEARNING HAS NO FINISH LINE ! 1.
Future Middle School Teachers Janet Beissinger and Bonnie Saunders University of Illinois at Chicago
Mathematics: The Big Picture TMP Summer Institute, August 41 Standards WASL Curriculum Review High School Mathematics Courses College Readiness Test (Algebra.
Planning to Implement CCSS-M Function Cluster:
as presented on that date, with special formatting removed
Math Curriculum “The philosophy of the Core Plus Mathematics Program is that students are working in groups to identify, investigate, and explore the.
Melanie Taylor Horizon Research, Inc.
Mathematics Specialist Specialization Proposal
Unit 6 Part 2 Test Review Algebra 1.
Analyzing PARCC Results to Inform Instruction
Systems of equations.
Chapter 2 Section 1.
Solving Equations 3x+7 –7 13 –7 =.
Section Solving Linear Systems Algebraically
7th grade math Unit 3: Ratios and Proportional Reason
Canonical Correlation Analysis
JACKSON SCHOOL DISTRICT Middle School Math Informational Night
Pedagogical Content Knowledge – Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Algebra: Validating an Assessment of Teacher Knowledge Robert E. Floden Raven McCrory Michigan State University January, 2007

KNOWING MATHEMATICS FOR TEACHING ALGBRA (KAT) PROJECT (NSF REC No ) Joan Ferrini-Mundy, Initial PI Robert Floden, Current PI Raven McCrory Mark Reckase Sharon Senk Karen Allen & Xuhui Li

GOALS OF KAT PROJECT Instrument Design ( ) Develop theoretical constructs, items, test forms Assessment Validation ( ) Do the forms measure distinct constructs? What differences in knowledge affect teacher responses? Sensitivity to Instruction ( ) How do teacher preparation experiences affect responses?

Item Development August October 2005 Constructs defined Item writing workshops with mathematicians, math educators, secondary teachers Additional Items written by KAT faculty & GAs Items reviewed by mathematicians Items edited by KAT staff

Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Algebra (simplified for assessment design) Knowledge of school algebra algebra in middle and high school Advanced mathematical knowledge related college math, e.g. calculus, abstract algebra Teaching knowledge knowledge of typical errors, canonical uses of school math, curriculum trajectories, etc.

Sample Item: Identify an Exponential Function (School Knowledge) Which of the following situations can be modeled using an exponential function? i. The height h of a ball t seconds after it is thrown into the air. ii. The population P of a community after t years with an increase of n people annually. iii. The value V of a car after t years if it depreciates d% per year. A. i only B. ii only C. iii only D. i and ii only E. ii and iii only

Pilot Test Results: Identify Exponential Function Number of casesDifficulty Pre-service teachers In-service teachers Total

Sample Item: Number Systems (Advanced Knowledge) For which of the following sets S is the following statement true? For all a and b in S, if ab = 0, then either a = 0 or b = 0. i. the set of real numbers i. the set of complex numbers iii. the set of integers mod 6 iv. the set of integers mod 5 v. the set of 2x2 matrices with real number entries A. i onlyD. i, ii, iii and iv only B. i and ii onlyE. i, ii, iii, iv, and v C. i, ii and iv only

Pilot Test Results: Properties of Number Systems (Advanced Knowledge) Number of casesDifficulty Pre-service teachers In-service teachers Total

Sample Item: Identifying Student’s Error in Solving a Linear Equation (Teaching Knowledge) A student solved the equation 3(n - 7) = 4 - n and obtained the solution n = What might the student have done wrong?

Pilot Test Results: Identify Student’s Error Number of casesDifficulty Pre-service teachers In-service teachers Total

Validation Study Design Recruit sample with varying combinations of constructs Combination of factor analysis and cluster analysis to identify empirical sub-scales Analysis of clustered items to interpret clusters Interviews with test-takers to understand reasoning behind correct and incorrect responses

Number of Participants in Validation Studies Pre-service teachers In-service teachers Math majors Non-math major Total822 Career stage 818 Major

Next Steps Complete interpretation of clusters Examine results for special samples (e.g., very high math knowledge) Interview study of new sample of teachers Measure change in assessment results in selected teacher preparation programs

Questions for the Future Will our assessment reveal differences in the effects among approaches to mathematics teacher education (pre-service or inservice)? Will programs vary in their relative impact on the three components?: Knowledge of school algebra Advanced mathematical knowledge Teaching knowledge Will differences in assessment results predict differences in teaching effectiveness?

Discussion What information from our project would be useful to you in designing courses for teachers? How can we best make our results useful to teacher educators? What do you hope our project can tell you?

Contacts for KAT Project Information Xuhui Li, Project Robert E. Floden, PI, Raven McCrory,