Syllogistic Logic 1. C Categorical Propositions 2. V Venn Diagram 3. The Square of Opposition: Tradition / Modern 4. C Conversion, Obversion, Contraposition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argument Requires premises and conclusion Non-arguments : I dont like chocolates; Chocolates are makes you sick; I believe in God Arguments: Chocolates.
Advertisements

Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
Operations (Transformations) On Categorical Sentences
1 Philosophy 1100 Title:Critical Reasoning Instructor:Paul Dickey Website:
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
Critical Thinking Lecture 9 The Square of Opposition By David Kelsey.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more, etc., ad infinitum, Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
EDUCTION.
Categorical Propositions
Categorical Syllogisms Always have two premises Consist entirely of categorical claims May be presented with unstated premise or conclusion May be stated.
Immediate Inference Three Categorical Operations
Chapter 9 Categorical Logic w07
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Categorical Syllogisms
Categorical Propositions To help us make sense of our experience, we humans constantly group things into classes or categories. These classifications are.

CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8 DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF.
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more, ad infinitum, Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Inference Logic.
Chapter 18: Conversion, Obversion, and Squares of Opposition
Strict Logical Entailments of Categorical Propositions
4 Categorical Propositions
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
Logic – Basic Terms Logic: the study of how to reason well. Validity: Valid thinking is thinking in conformity with the rules. If the premises are true.
LOGICAL REASONING FOR CAT 2009.
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
Critical Thinking Lecture 9 The Square of Opposition
Midterm Practice Famous Fallacies, TFTD, Hurley
Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms.
Practice Quiz 3 Hurley 4.3 – 4.6.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
SYLLOGISTIC REASONING PART 2 Properties and Rules PART 2 Properties and Rules.
Chapter 6 Evaluating Deductive Arguments 1: Categorical Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Chapter 14: Categorical Syllogisms. Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) Categorical syllogisms are deductive arguments. Categorical syllogisms.
The Traditional Square of Opposition
Midterm Practice Famous Fallacies, TFTD, Hurley
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Analyze Conditional Statements
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
5.1 Standard Form, Mood, and Figure
Warm Up Challenge 1. The complement of an angle is 10 less than half the measure of the supplement of the angle. What is the measure of the supplement.
Famous Fallacies, TFTD, Hurley
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
Practice Quiz 3 Hurley
Rules and fallacies Formal fallacies.
Famous Fallacies, TFTD, Hurley
4.1 The Components of Categorical Propositions
Categorical Propositions
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
Critical Thinking Lecture 9 The Square of Opposition
4 Categorical Propositions
Categorical propositions
4 Categorical Propositions
“Only,” Categorical Relationships, logical operators
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Conditional Statements
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
X X X X Logical relations among categorical propositions S P S P S P
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
4 Categorical Propositions
Practice Quiz 3 Hurley 4.3 – 4.6.
Presentation transcript:

Syllogistic Logic 1. C Categorical Propositions 2. V Venn Diagram 3. The Square of Opposition: Tradition / Modern 4. C Conversion, Obversion, Contraposition 5. Syllogisms: Mood / figure / Validity Syllogism

Categorical Proposition A (universal affirmative) : All S are P E (universal negative): No S are P I (particular affirmative): Some S are P O (particular negative): Some S are not P

A: All men E: No cats are mortal. are dogs. I: Some books O: Some birds are good. are not red. Quantity Universal Particular Quality Affirmative Negative Categorical Propositions

123 S P 4 SP Venn Diagram SPSP SP

The Square of Proposition: Tradition All S are P A No S are P E I Some S are P O Some S are not P T T F F Contrary C o n t r a d i c t o r y Contradictory C o n t d i c t o r y S u b a t e r n a t e s S u b a t e r n a t e s

Contrary ( 反對關係 ) A E When two propositions are contrary to each other, they could not both be true, but could both be false. When the one is true, the other must be false. When the one is false, the other is indeterminate.

Suncontrary ( 次反對關係 ) I O When two propositions are subcontrary to each other, they could not both be false, but could both be true. When the one is false, the other must be true. When the one is true, the other is indeterminate.

Contradictory ( 矛盾關係 ) A O E I When the one is true, the other must be false. When the one is false, the other must be true. When two propositions are contradictory, they always have the opposite true value.

Subalternation ( 從屬關係 ) A I E O True False True False When A is true, I must be true. When E is true, O must be true. When I is false, A must be false. When O is false, E must be false.

123 S P 4 A: All S are P (Tradition)

123 S P 4 E: No S are P (Tradition)

123 S P 4 I: Some S are P

123 S P 4 O: Some S are not P

123 S P 4 A: All S are P

123 S P 4 E: No S are P

The Square of Proposition: Modern All S are P A No S are P E I Some S are P O Some S are not P C o n t r a d i c t o r y C o n t d i c t o r y

Conversion s p A: s s s p p p E: I: O: s s s s p p p p conversion conversion conversion conversion 123 4

Obversion s p A: s s s p p p E: I: O: s s s s p p p p obversion obversion obversion obversion 123 4

Contraposition s p A: s s s p p p E: I: O: s s s s p p p p contraposition contraposition contraposition contraposition 123 4

Mood C.P. (A,E,I,O) Q M C P Major premise ( 大前提 ) C.P. (A,E,I,O) Q S C M Minor premise ( 小前提 ) C.P. (A,E,I,O) Q S C P 叫我 Middle term ( 中詞 ) 叫我 minor term ( 小詞 )

Figure M PP MM PP M S MS MM SM S S PS PS PS P F1 F2 F3 F4 Collar figure