1 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), March 3-12, 2005 Clark Haynes and Sarjoun Skaff March 22, 2005 Center for the Foundation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIGbot: Complex Climbing Maneuvers in a Hexapod Robot Eric D. Diller, Luther R. Palmer, Roger D. Quinn Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Case.
Advertisements

Mobile Robot Locomotion
Aircraft Motion and Control
LOCOMOTION IN INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS Navjot Garg.
Ambulation and Ambulation Aids
Design of Compliant Climbing Feet Alan Asbeck 9/14/04.
Communication Piazza – Code Angel Computers in Lab Joined late – Be sure to me to remind me!
Why Humanoid Robots?* Çetin Meriçli Department of Computer Engineering Boğaziçi University * Largely adapted from Carlos Balaguer’s talk in.
Benjamin Stephens Carnegie Mellon University 9 th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots December 8, 2009 Modeling and Control of Periodic.
Trajectory Planning.  Goal: to generate the reference inputs to the motion control system which ensures that the manipulator executes the planned trajectory.
READY, GO! Hare and Snail Challenges. 1. What are some design considerations to make a fast robot? 2. What are some design considerations to make a slow.
Leg ideas Sprawlita Rhex Rolling Contact 4 bar Flex Chain Pantograph 2R serial chain.
Fast and Robust Legged Locomotion Sean Bailey Mechanical Engineering Design Division Advisor: Dr. Mark Cutkosky May 12, 2000.
1 Preliminary Test Track Experiments April 16, 2004 Motohide Hatanaka, Emily Ma Stanford University.
INTRODUCTIONF FOR BIOMECHANICS By Abdulgalil Allam.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
Comparing the Locomotion Dynamics of a Cockroach and a Shape Deposition Manufactured Biomimetic Robot Sean A. Bailey, Jorge G. Cham, Mark R. Cutkosky Biomimetic.
“Teaching the Science, Inspiring the Art, Producing Aviation Candidates!” Aerodynamics II Getting to the Point.
Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: 1) What part of the aircraft that is located on the outer portion of the trailing.
1 Research on Animals and Vehicles Chapter 8 of Raibert By Rick Cory.
Motion Control Locomotion Mobile Robot Kinematics Legged Locomotion
Ch. 6 Single Variable Control
Building a Better Runner.  Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO 2 MAX )  Lactate threshold (LT)  Running speed  Running economy Performance Velocity Resistance.
Advanced Programming for 3D Applications CE Bob Hobbs Staffordshire university Human Motion Lecture 3.
Lecture 2: Introduction to Concepts in Robotics
Control and Mobility A1.1 Platform Experimental Study of a MAST Platform in collaboration with Prof. Fearing (Micromechanics Center)
Climbing Feet for RiSE June 14, 2004 Miguel Piedrahita BDML.
BIPEDAL LOCOMOTION Prima Parte Antonio D'Angelo.
Parametric Contact Model (PCM) Development Plan MilestoneDateSoftware GoalExperimental Goal – Purchase DE (Dynamics Engine by Arachi) 10/1/03 (11/1/03)
Theory of walking Locomotion on ground can be realized with three different basic mechanisms: slide lever wheel or track First two are walking mechanisms.
Fig.6 Next Generation Airplane ( ■ Design of Next Generation Airplanes - Lightweight airframe - High aspect ratio.
Biomimetic Robots for Robust Operation in Unstructured Environments M. Cutkosky and T. Kenny Stanford University R. Full and H. Kazerooni U.C. Berkeley.
High-Level Control MURI Low-Level Control Fabrication How do we build robust biomimetic structures and systems? Shape deposition manufacturing of integrated.
12 November 2009, UT Austin, CS Department Control of Humanoid Robots Luis Sentis, Ph.D. Personal robotics Guidance of gait.
3D Simulation of Human-like Walking and Stability Analysis for Bipedal Robot with Distributed Sole Force Sensors Authors : Chao SHI and Eric H. K. Fung.
ZMP-BASED LOCOMOTION Robotics Course Lesson 22.
Sticky system modeling -Principle of sticky mechanism- Sangbae Kim.
3-1 Kinesiology for Manual Therapies Chapter 3 Basic Biomechanical Factors and Concepts McGraw-Hill © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Motion Planning of Extreme Locomotion Maneuvers Using Multi-Contact Dynamics and Numerical Integration Luis Sentis and Mike Slovich The Human Center Robotics.
The MIT Leg Lab: From Robots to Rehab.
Rachel Downs, Makayla Ianuzzi, James O’Donnell, and Sara Sohmer.
Newton’s 1 st Law of Motion. Newton’s 1 st Law Newton’s 1 st Law: An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion, unless acted.
1 Motivation We wish to test different trajectories on the Stanford Test Track in order to gain insight into the effects of different trajectory parameters.
Newton’s 1 st Law of Motion. Newton’s 1 st Law Newton’s 1 st Law: An object at _______stays at _______and an object in motion stays in motion, unless.
*Why Humanoid Robots?* PREPARED BY THI.PRASANNA S.PRITHIVIRAJ
Optimal Path Planning Using the Minimum-Time Criterion by James Bobrow Guha Jayachandran April 29, 2002.
Newton’s Laws.
Parametric Contact Model (PCM) Development Plan MilestoneDateSoftware GoalExperimental Goal – Purchase DE (Dynamics Engine by Arachi) 10/1/03 (11/1/03)
Flight Investigations TEXT BOOK CHAPTER 16 PAGE
Demonstration Platform. Engaging-disengaging scheme engagedisengage High torque required?
Pressure Sensor Findings and Thoughts on Future Work Miguel Piedrahita BDML 5/13/04.
Robot Intelligence Technology Lab. 10. Complex Hardware Morphologies: Walking Machines Presented by In-Won Park
Hardware and Locomotion
Physics 218 Lecture 8: Dynamics Alexei Safonov.
Date of download: 10/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
INTRODUCTIONF FOR BIOMECHANICS
A) it depends on how fast the cart is moving
Bare weight Provide a means for locomotion Maintain equilibrium
UNITS 12 AND 13.
By: Zeeshan Ansari, BEng (Hons) Electronic Engineering
NEWTON’S LAWS.
RABBIT: A Testbed for Advanced Control Theory Chevallereau, et. al.
Forces and Motion PS9.21 PS9.22 PS9.23 PS9.24 ps9.25
Contact Modeling for Climbing Environments
West Point Aviation Club Private Pilot Ground Instruction
Robot Fabrication MURI Fabrication
Robust Dynamic Locomotion Through Feedforward-Preflex Interaction
Sprawl Robots Biomimetic Design Analysis: Simplified Models
Tianyu Gu April. 18, 2013 Hex Guard ad 2018/11/30 Final Presentation.
RiSE State-Based Voltage Control
Presentation transcript:

1 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), March 3-12, 2005 Clark Haynes and Sarjoun Skaff March 22, 2005 Center for the Foundation of Robotics

2 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall

3 Wall Climbing Challenges Minimally Invasive Discreet Low Power Multiple Surfaces Dynamic Climbing

4 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Biologically Inspired Answer Six leg - Actuated motion - Passive compliance Collection of feet - Sticky for smooth surfaces - Clawed for rough surfaces

5 RiSE: First Steps up the WallRiSE Robot in Scansorial Environments - First prototype to climb hard and soft surfaces - Develop intuition to improve performance Dactyl on carpet Sticky foot on Plexiglass

6 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Field Trip Behavior Generation Climbing SurfacesOutline System Description

7 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Mechanical Platform

8 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Mechanical Platform

9 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Climbing Carpet at 90° Feet Type Dactyl Gait Type Tripod Challenge Difficult Detachment

10 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Climbing Cork at 90° Challenges - Fragile material  Careful attachment - Failed attachment  Immediate fall - Attachment sensitive to spine sharpness Feet Type Spiny Gait Type Tripod

11 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Climbing PlexiGlass at 55° Feet Type Lamellarized Polyurethane Gait Type Tetrapod Challenges - Large Feet  High C.O.G. - Foot contact area depends on weight distribution - Vibrations limits foot contact area

12 RiSE: First Steps up the WallWalking Feet Type Rubber Gait Type Tripod Challenges - Inadequate passive compliance - Small gear ratio  Low speed

13 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Gait Design - 1 st DOF: 4-bar kinematics, “Beta Curve” - 2 nd DOF: Wing joint - Beta x Wing  2D Manifold β = FKin( Θ) π2π

14 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Geometric Considerations - Beta Curve chosen to perform both running and climbing - Gaits are piecewise linear trajectories upon 2D Manifold - 4 components to a generic climbing gait: “Attachment”, “Stance”, “Detachment”, “Flight” PlexiglassWalking

15 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Trajectory Variations - Surface properties dictate climbing trajectories - Pull-in forces, attachment, detachment vary PlexiglassCarpetCork

16 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Fore-Aft Differentiation Carpet Leg 1Carpet Leg 3 Push-Pull relationship between back and front legs helps to prevent pitchback of robot

17 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Forward vs. Backward Gaits Carpet ForwardCarpet Backward - Running gait in reverse doesn’t work! - Attachment requires pull-in, detachment needs straight exit from surface

18 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Leg Phasing and Duty Factors Tripod Rippled Tripod Tetrapod Pentapod

19 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Carpet Mobility Challenge: - Maneuver robot through obstacle course on carpeted surface - Turning with claws attached to wall - Forward vs. Backward gaits - Tripod vs. Pentapod for speed, stability

20 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Tripod Turning Tripod 1Tripod 2 50%

21 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Tripod Turning Tripod 1aTripod 2Tripod 1b 50%25%

22 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Ripple/Tetrapod Turning Set 1Set 2Set 3 33%

23 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Transitions - Related Gaits Forward TripodBackward Tripod

24 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Transitions – Unrelated Gaits TripodPentapod

25 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall SwRI Test Facility

26 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Carpet Mobility

27 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Hybrid Foot Configuration

28 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Tree Climbing

29 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Clinging to Surfaces

30 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall On-site Foot Development

31 RiSE: First Steps up the WallBrick

32 RiSE: First Steps up the WallWalking

33 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Lessons Learned PlexiGlass - Adhesion deteriorates with dirt  Climbing 0.5m is different from climbing 3m - Foot morphology - Large feet  More adhesion - Small Feet  C.O.G closer to surface  Steeper climbs Cork - Fragile surfaces  Smooth attachment - Re-Attach to avoid fall  Detect attachment failure Carpet - Difficult detachment  Detect detachment failure, Microspines

34 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall Looking Ahead - Drop the gears - Actuate the tail - Climb faster - Climb outdoor surfaces - Multi-purpose feet - Horizontal ↔ Vertical - Add Feedback

35 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall K. Autumn M. Buehler M. Cutkosky R. Fearing R. J. Full D. E. Koditschek A. A. Rizzi Clark Haynes Sarjoun Skaff Uluç Saranli Lewis & Clark Boston Dynamics Stanford UC Berkeley U Penn Carnegie MellonCredits

36 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall

37 RiSE: First Steps up the Wall FTFT Mg MTMT ATAT TNTN FNFN MNMN ANAN D L Assume Normal Force Tangential Force Surface Loads Tangential Loading Normal Loading Assume equal weight distribution Normal Force Max - Fully Attached - Partially Attached Tangential Force Max - Fully Attached - Partially Attached