ARIES IFE Final Focusing Magnets L. Bromberg Magnet Technology group at MIT MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES Meeting UCSD April 23, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plasma Window Options and Opportunities for Inertial Fusion Applications Leslie Bromberg Ady Herskovitch* MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting.
Advertisements

Lecture 5: Time-varying EM Fields
Simona Bettoni and Remo Maccaferri, CERN Wiggler modeling Double-helix like option.
Physics 2113 Lecture: 09 WED 04 FEB
Quadrupole Magnetic Design for an Electron Ion Collider Paul Brindza May 19, 2008.
Physics 1502: Lecture 4 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Lectures posted on: –HW assignments, solutions.
Update on Self Pinch Transport of Heavy Ion Beams for Chamber Transport D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, Mission Research Corp. S. S. Yu, Lawrence Berkeley National.
Magnet quench during a training run Magnet electrical circuit schematic PROGRESS ON THE MODELING AND MODIFICATION OF THE MICE SUPERCONDUCTING SPECTROMETER.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
Plasma Window Performance Leslie Bromberg Katie Maurer Ady Herskovitch* MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting Madison, WI April 23, 2002 *Brookhaven.
1 Configuration Development for HIF Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole Array HIF Final Focus Meeting July 2, 2002 Tom Brown Chang Jun Phil Heitzenroeder.
Chamber clearing L. Bromberg ARIES Meeting Madison, WI September 20, 2001.
Magnet System Definition L. Bromberg P. Titus MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting November 4-5, 2004.
Aerosol protection of laser optics by Electrostatic Fields (not manetic) L. Bromberg ARIES Meeting Madison WI April 23, 2002.
HTS Magnets for ARIES-AT L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES Meeting March 20, 2000.
Stellarator magnets L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting March 8-9, 2004.
Electric Potential with Integration Potential Difference in a Variable E-field If E varies, we integrate the potential difference for a small displacement.
Chamber Clearing by Electrostatic Fields L. Bromberg ARIES Meeting UCSD January 10, 2002.
ARIES CS Magnet definition L. Bromberg MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center USCD November 18, 2005.
Stellarator magnet conductors L. Bromberg J. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Cambridge MA Aries Meeting, Georgia Tech September 3, 2003.
Magnet considerations for ARIES IFE L. Bromberg With contributions from J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES Meeting Madison, WI September.
Review of the mechanical design of the final focusing region of the HIF Point Design T. Brown ARIES Project Meeting January 8, 2003.
Magnet considerations for ARIES IFE HTS/LTS algorithms and design options L. Bromberg With contributions from J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion.
Final Focus Magnet Shielding Update Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier ARIES Meeting October 2-4, 2002 Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department.
AP Physics: Electricity & Magnetism
ARIES-IFE Study L. M. Waganer, June 7, 2000 Page 1 Considerations of HI Beam and Vacuum System Arrangement L. Waganer The Boeing Company 7 June 2001 ARIES.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
F. Cheung, A. Samarian, W. Tsang, B. James School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Magnet costs L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz ARIES Meeting & Review PPPL, October
MAGNETOSTATIC FIELD (STEADY MAGNETIC)
Lecture 4: Boundary Value Problems
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS
Chapter 1 - Vector Analysis. Scalars and Vectors Scalar Fields (temperature) Vector Fields (gravitational, magnetic) Vector Algebra.
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
Gauss’s Law The electric flux through a closed surface is proportional to the charge enclosed The electric flux through a closed surface is proportional.
1 Electric Field – Continuous Charge Distribution As the average separation between source charges is smaller than the distance between the charges and.
Electricity and Magnetism Review 1: Units 1-6
SuperB Meeting, May 2008 Status of the magnetic design of the first quadrupole (QD0) for the SuperB interaction region S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Ampère’s Law.
115 December 2011 Holger Witte Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Elliptical Dipole.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
Physics 2112 Unit 4: Gauss’ Law
L P X dL r Biot-Savard Law L P X dL r Biot-Savard Law.
2). Gauss’ Law and Applications Coulomb’s Law: force on charge i due to charge j is F ij is force on i due to presence of j and acts along line of centres.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In terms of total charge and current  In terms of free charge an current USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2013 Lecture 2 - Basic.
Abstract: The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) is an international effort sited at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, which will demonstrate ionization.
UCRL-PRES Magnet Design Considerations & Efficiency Advantages of Magnetic Diversion Concept W. Meier & N. Martovetsky LLNL HAPL Program Meeting.
Physics 2102 Lecture: 05 FRI 23 JAN Gauss’ Law I Version: 1/22/07 Flux Capacitor (Schematic) Physics 2102 Jonathan Dowling Carl Friedrich Gauss 1777 –
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 Lecture 5  Magnetic Multipoles Magnetic Multipoles,
Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.
Flux Capacitor (Schematic)
Status of Modeling of Damage Effects on Final Optics Mirror Performance T.K. Mau, M.S. Tillack Center for Energy Research Fusion Energy Division University.
Electric Potential Chapter 25 The Electric Potential
Electricity and Magnetism
Muons, Inc. 14 Jan 2010 S. Kahn--IR Quads 1 IR Quadrupoles with Exotic Materials Steve Kahn, Muons Inc. Bob Palmer, BNL Don Summers, Ole Miss.
3/21/20161 ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM Phy 220 Chapter2: Gauss’s Law.
XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting - La Biodola (Isola d'Elba) Italy May 28 th June 2 nd 2011 P.Fabbricatore Sezione di Genova The air core magnets.
Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field Ampère’s Law Example 28-6: Field inside and outside a wire. A long straight cylindrical wire conductor of radius.
Chapter 25 Electric Potential.
Physics 212 Lecture 15 Ampere’s Law.
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
PHYS117B: Lecture 6 Electric field in planar geometry
Physics 2102 Lecture: 04 THU 28 JAN
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
PHYS117B: Lecture 6 Electric field in planar geometry
Preliminary Studies of Plasma-Channel-Based Reactor Beam Transport Section P. LaMarche T. Brown P. Heitzenroeder Aries Project Meeting, UCSD, June.
Multipole Magnets from Maxwell’s Equations
Magnetic Multipoles, Magnet Design
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

ARIES IFE Final Focusing Magnets L. Bromberg Magnet Technology group at MIT MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES Meeting UCSD April 23, 2002

Talk Novel superconducting materials Magnesium diboride End effects Design Window

Magnesium Diboride Maybe If field > 7-8 T Avoid Nb 3 Sn

Quadrupole arrays Large amounts of work to optimize single quadrupoles We have developed optimal designs for quadrupole arrays Minimization of field errors Simpler construction (planar) Applicable away from magnet ends What about the ends? How close can you put these magnets together? sin (2  )cos (2  )

IRE design of array

End effects We have developed requirements for matching currents to multipole required For quadrupoles, two solutions with sin (uniform current density) or cosine (linear variation in current density) However, most of the field errors are introduced at the ends Because of symmetry, only 2*n harmonics, n > 1 (n = 1 is quadrupole) Scalar potential of the magnetic field outside the quadrupoles decays as  sin (k x x) sin (k y y) exp (- (k x +k y ) z) Ansatz: Have the current density vary as j (z ) ~ exp(- (k x +k y ) z)

Treatment of the magnets ends Using j (z) ~ exp (- (k x + k y ) z ), together with. j = 0 For the sin(2  ) case: j z = j 0 c j x = j 0 x (k x + k y ) exp (- (k x + k y ) z ) For the cos (2  ) case: j z = j 0 x/a exp (- (k x + k y ) z ) j x = j 0 (x 2 - a 2 )/2a (k x + k y ) exp (- (k x + k y ) z )

End effects… work in progress We have preliminary evaluated the octopole component of a 3-D system using such magnet end current density Problems with normalization How to measure, where? integral along the path  ~  a n r n ( n = 2 is quadrupole)  n ~ a n dl Fastest e-folding of field with quadrupole array ~ a/ 

Final focused plasma Multiple beam paths… Final focus magnets Well protected, high field, compact magnets Good vacuum (10 -6 Torr) Clean metal surfaces (no insulating surfaces) Plasma source for neutralization Differential pumping Shielding Debris removal Compact axially and radially

Final optics Toughest magnet: 8 T 0.18 m beam tube radius This is a LARGE MAGNET Through out NbTi. HTS OK Maybe Nb 3 Sn

HTS based Tough magnet

LTS based Tough Magnet

Conclusions Design window Good Bad We want to be in the blue region