50 Minutes. 50 Minutes Brought to you by: The All Certification Network.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

HISPC-Illinois II The Public-Private Partnership Moves Forward on Privacy and Security.
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Nov Private Pesticide Applicator Certification.
___State Program Improvement Planning (PIP) Process and Expectations Date (7/30/07)
Using Pesticides in Indian Country Using Pesticides in Indian Country and the EPA’s Federal Certification Plan.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Certification & Training Assessment Group C T A G Canadian PETC Working Group 2002.
Structural Pesticide Ordinance Development In A Tribal Community Presented At The 17th Annual Region 9 Tribal EPA Conference October 21-23, 2009 Barry.
1 Pesticide Worker Safety Program: Enhancements in Protections Amy Brown, U. MD Pesticide Safety Ed. Program representing American Association of Pesticide.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO HELP ENSURE FINANCIAL INTEGRITY.
Financial Affairs Communication Plan. Meeting Attendance & FAR Member Guidelines   FAR members are responsible for disseminating information to the.
PESTICIDE SAFETY EDUCATION: STILL NEEDED? Barry M. Brennan, PhD Pesticide Coordinator College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources University of.
Security Controls – What Works
1 Pesticide Worker Safety Program: Enhancements in Protections Briefing for the Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee Workgroup February 27, 2006.
Work Group on Worker Safety Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee June 15, 2006.
CTAG Certification and Training Assessment Group Update Carol Ramsay Kevin Keaney Washington State UniversityUS EPA OPP WSB CTAG Co-Chairs.
Certification & Training Assessment Group Work Groups 1 & 2 Jack Peterson – Arizona Department of Agriculture Carl John Martin – Arizona Structural Pest.
1 Pesticide Worker Safety Program: Enhancements in Protections -Western Region Pesticide Meeting- Panel Presentation Kevin Keaney, US EPAJack Peterson,
CTAG Issues  Written Exam and Age Requirement SLA Funding Worker Protection Integration  Certified Pesticide Dealers and Vendors Certified Consultants.
CTAG Certification and Training Assessment Group Update Carol Ramsay Washington State University CTAG Vice-Chair.
CTAG August 2003 Pesticide Applicator Certification and Safety Education Workshop Tim Drake and Bill Tozer Pesticide Classification & Applicator, Dealer,
Wisconsin Knowledge & Concepts Examination (WKCE) Test Security Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational Accountability 06/26/2013.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
1 Pesticide Worker Safety Program: Enhancements in Protections Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee Worker Safety Subcommittee Working Session June 14,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
EPA Update on Pesticide Worker Safety Issues February 7, 2013 Richard Pont Certification and Worker Protection Branch Office of Pesticide Programs.
Pesticide Worker Safety Program: Enhancements in Protections Briefing for the Pesticide Program Dialogue Subcommittee.
Certification & Training Assessment Group History & Current Activity North Central Region Pesticide Education & Certification Workshop June 2002.
Conservation Districts Supervisor Accreditation Module 9: Employer/Employee Relations.
Strategic Reviews of Pesticide Worker Safety Programs Kevin Keaney, Chief Pesticide Worker Safety Programs U. S. EPA 2005 Kevin Keaney, Chief Pesticide.
Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee III-4.
Certification & Training Assessment Group C T A G Western Region Pesticide Meeting 2002.
“Pesticide Safety for the 21st Century” A Progress Report National Certification & Training Workshop Honolulu, Hawaii August 2003.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Grant Management and Monitoring – Discretionary Grantees Southern California Training and.
1 Environmental Information Exchange Network - Principles and Components Molly O’Neill, State Director, Network Steering Board Pat Garvey, EPA Director,
Lisa Babcock & Tim Post Expedited Claim Account Program (ECAP) State Water Resources Control Board April 20, 2015 (modified June 2015)
BSA PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.  Written, approved by the board of directors, and noted in the board minutes.  Based on the risk assessment  Fully implemented.
1 Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee Meeting State Lead Agency Presentation Chuck Andrews, Chair AAPCO Worker Protection Committee California Department.
Your Name A + G or J Your Company’s Name MN PIE – City Your Legal Signature Today’s date All.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
RCRAInfo May 6, RCRAInfo: What is it? The national (mission critical) information system that supports the RCRA Subtitle C program. A national.
Pesticide Safety for the 21st Century: Proposed Changes to Pesticide Education & Safety Training and Applicator Certification Programs Certification and.
APTA Annual Meeting Safety Rulemaking Update October 6, 2015.
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference, November 19, 2015 TURNING TO THE STATES: WOULD MORE STATE AUTHORITY AND OVERSIGHT IMPROVE SAFETY? A Look at the.
CHAPTER 12 Professional Conduct National Pesticide Applicator Certification Core Manual Chapter 12 and Category E Chapter 10.
SUSD Technology Integration and Digital Citizenship in SUSD Informational Presentation Selma Unified School Administrative Retreat July 29-30, 2009.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Inspector General Oversight of EPA FIFRA Implementation June 2, 2015 SFIREG Meeting.
IT Summit November 4th, 2009 Presented by: IT Internal Audit Team Leroy Amos Sue Ann Lipinski Suzanne Lopez Janice Shelton.
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
Testing Liaison Basic Training. Who can be a Testing Liaison? ONE RULE: INSTRUCTORS AND INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES CANNOT BE TESTING LIAISONS OR PROCTORS Typically,
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
A REVIEW OF THE NPSD’S ACCEPTABLE USE POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS JUNE 17 TH & 20 TH TEACHER IN-SERVICE The Acceptable Use of Technology 1.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
A REVIEW OF THE NPSD’S ACCEPTABLE USE POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS JUNE 17 TH & 20 TH TEACHER IN-SERVICE The Acceptable Use of Technology 1.
Continuous Quality Improvement Basics Created by Michigan’s Campaign to End Homelessness Statewide Training Workgroup 2010.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
AHIMA’s Commission on Certification for Health Informatics and Information Management (CCHIIM) Test Development Process Jo Santos, RHIA Senior Manager,
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
The Acceptable Use of Technology
Facility Manager IPM PLAN and Policy
Session 30 Transition to the Certification Phase of Training
Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards
Maintenance of Certification
Facility Manager IPM PLAN and Policy
The Agricultural Worker Protection Regulation & the Applicator Certification Regulation are Part of EPA’s Pesticide Worker Safety Program Strategic Mission.
Presentation transcript:

50 Minutes

50 Minutes Brought to you by: The All Certification Network

CTAG The Certification and Training Assessment Group Now playing at a theatre near you !! Dolby SoundFull ScreenRated PG

With Special Guest... Gina Davis

The CTAG Mission To facilitate improvement in the national Pesticide Applicator Certification and Training Program.

Five Goals Reduce risks to the public from pesticide use. Provide high quality pesticide education and safety training programs. Improve the certification and recertification programs and processes. Ensure adequacy and equity of funding. Improve the efficiency of program organization and operations.

C&T Plan and Reporting Web-based Template –Facilitate updating plans –Mechanism for annual reporting Plan components meet the requirements of FIFRA and 40CFR171 –Administration, authority, conformity, categories, examinations, supervision, reciprocity Reports exceeds FIFRA and 40CFR171 –Applicator totals, category totals, cycles, recertification, regulatory activities, participation, monitoring, enforcement related to certification

85/15 Match Requirements EPA funding to state regulatory agencies for certification Replace 50/50 match requirement with a 85/15 match requirement FIFRA change

CTAG Board of Directors Kevin KeaneyEPA-OPPCo-Chair Carol RamsayWashingtonCo-Chair Carl MartinArizonaVice-Chair Gina DavisMichiganPast-Chair Al MuenchEPA AssistantSecretary Win Hock*AAPSEMember VacantCESMember VacantTPPCMember Andrew ThostensonNorth Dakota Member Dr. Bill TozierAFPMBMember Kathy Dictor North CarolinaMember Jack PetersonArizonaMember Monte JohnsonUSDAMember Richard PontEPA-OPPMember Jeanneanne GettleEPA RegionMember

Communication Efforts –Pesticide in the 21st Century –Progress Reports –Annual Reports –PREP Course –Presentations at national and regional meetings –AAPCO, AAPSE, POM Updates

The CTAG Process for Issue Development Issues may be brought before the Board by a Board member, a CTAG partner or stakeholder. –Issue must be sufficiently developed to address the significance of the issue and describe the problem to be avoided or solved. The Board will prioritize all issues –May result in fast-tracking some issues or putting an issue on hold.

The CTAG Process for Issue Development Generally, an issue will result in a project, or a guidance document, concept document, or regulatory issue paper. –The issue will be assigned to a workgroup. –The workgroup will develop a document through meetings, conference calls, and/or discussions.

The CTAG Process for Issue Development Following development of a draft document  Board Review - resulting in approval of the draft or returning to the workgroup for further work. Once approved by the Board, CTAG will circulate the draft to partners via the AAPCO, ASPCRO, AAPSE, PSEP, and TPPC listservs and will solicit comments within a prescribed period of time. The draft document and request for comments will also be posted on the CTAG web site.

The CTAG Process for Issue Development The workgroup will collect and evaluate partner comments and make necessary revisions.  Board for approval. For approved guidance documents, the process will end here, since they are dynamic and can be easily edited and updated. The process of partner and stakeholder review and comment will be repeated as necessary.

The CTAG Process for Issue Development Following final approval by the Board, CTAG will work with EPA and other appropriate agencies, as necessary, to facilitate formal consideration of the document and begin the process to move toward regulatory change. CTAG will track activities from the point of initial Board approval to consider a project/issue through its development stages until it is finalized or implemented.

Minimum Age Requirements United States Department of Labor Rules –29 CFR Part Prohibits the employment in agriculture of children below the age of 16 if the job encompasses handling or applying agri- chemicals with signal words “Poison”, “Skull and Crossbones” and “Warning” Fair Labor Standards Act Sets forth minimum age requirements for children under the age of 17 working in agriculture.

Minimum Age Minimum age recommendation for a certified applicator commercial [legal adult] 17 private ( 16 if you can breakout Tox. Cat. 1) –Ability to supervise others –Ability of law enforcement to approach and deal directly with certified applicator –Ability to deal with hardships –Consistent with DOL current regulations

Closed Book Exams Written, closed-book examination for private and commercial applicators. Closed-book = only calculator from outside. Necessary exam reference material will be provided as part of the examination process. Supplying reference materials for information that should be committed to memory, such as the core knowledge requirements, would be inappropriate.

Positive Identification for Exams, Training, and RUP Purchases Advantages –Cause little inconvenience for the proctor –Minimal costs incurred –Minimal effort for retail dealers to confirm buyer’s identity

Positive Identification for Exams, Training, and RUP Purchases Limitations –Some religious groups prohibit pictures (two forms of non-photo id would then be required). –Large group meetings may require additional staff. –Internet and telephone sales

Tiered Classification of Pesticides

Tiered Classification Product Classification –Toxicity, security, site sensitivity, type of user, education & safety training required User Type –Occupational, domestic Training/Examination Required –Training only –Examination: core, category, product-specific

Exam Security Manual Exam oversight and controls –Pre-registration, scheduling exams, fees, –Retakes, –Disqualification, prohibitions –Exam environment –Proctoring and cheating –Grading –Notification and/or certification –Personnel

Additional CTAG Activities PSEP Long-Term Funding Integrate WPS Training Requirements Remote Testing Continued discussion on Exam Blueprints National database of applicators with revoked credentials 2003 Progress Report

Questions ??

50 Minutes Brought to you by: The All Certification Network