50 Minutes
50 Minutes Brought to you by: The All Certification Network
CTAG The Certification and Training Assessment Group Now playing at a theatre near you !! Dolby SoundFull ScreenRated PG
With Special Guest... Gina Davis
The CTAG Mission To facilitate improvement in the national Pesticide Applicator Certification and Training Program.
Five Goals Reduce risks to the public from pesticide use. Provide high quality pesticide education and safety training programs. Improve the certification and recertification programs and processes. Ensure adequacy and equity of funding. Improve the efficiency of program organization and operations.
C&T Plan and Reporting Web-based Template –Facilitate updating plans –Mechanism for annual reporting Plan components meet the requirements of FIFRA and 40CFR171 –Administration, authority, conformity, categories, examinations, supervision, reciprocity Reports exceeds FIFRA and 40CFR171 –Applicator totals, category totals, cycles, recertification, regulatory activities, participation, monitoring, enforcement related to certification
85/15 Match Requirements EPA funding to state regulatory agencies for certification Replace 50/50 match requirement with a 85/15 match requirement FIFRA change
CTAG Board of Directors Kevin KeaneyEPA-OPPCo-Chair Carol RamsayWashingtonCo-Chair Carl MartinArizonaVice-Chair Gina DavisMichiganPast-Chair Al MuenchEPA AssistantSecretary Win Hock*AAPSEMember VacantCESMember VacantTPPCMember Andrew ThostensonNorth Dakota Member Dr. Bill TozierAFPMBMember Kathy Dictor North CarolinaMember Jack PetersonArizonaMember Monte JohnsonUSDAMember Richard PontEPA-OPPMember Jeanneanne GettleEPA RegionMember
Communication Efforts –Pesticide in the 21st Century –Progress Reports –Annual Reports –PREP Course –Presentations at national and regional meetings –AAPCO, AAPSE, POM Updates
The CTAG Process for Issue Development Issues may be brought before the Board by a Board member, a CTAG partner or stakeholder. –Issue must be sufficiently developed to address the significance of the issue and describe the problem to be avoided or solved. The Board will prioritize all issues –May result in fast-tracking some issues or putting an issue on hold.
The CTAG Process for Issue Development Generally, an issue will result in a project, or a guidance document, concept document, or regulatory issue paper. –The issue will be assigned to a workgroup. –The workgroup will develop a document through meetings, conference calls, and/or discussions.
The CTAG Process for Issue Development Following development of a draft document Board Review - resulting in approval of the draft or returning to the workgroup for further work. Once approved by the Board, CTAG will circulate the draft to partners via the AAPCO, ASPCRO, AAPSE, PSEP, and TPPC listservs and will solicit comments within a prescribed period of time. The draft document and request for comments will also be posted on the CTAG web site.
The CTAG Process for Issue Development The workgroup will collect and evaluate partner comments and make necessary revisions. Board for approval. For approved guidance documents, the process will end here, since they are dynamic and can be easily edited and updated. The process of partner and stakeholder review and comment will be repeated as necessary.
The CTAG Process for Issue Development Following final approval by the Board, CTAG will work with EPA and other appropriate agencies, as necessary, to facilitate formal consideration of the document and begin the process to move toward regulatory change. CTAG will track activities from the point of initial Board approval to consider a project/issue through its development stages until it is finalized or implemented.
Minimum Age Requirements United States Department of Labor Rules –29 CFR Part Prohibits the employment in agriculture of children below the age of 16 if the job encompasses handling or applying agri- chemicals with signal words “Poison”, “Skull and Crossbones” and “Warning” Fair Labor Standards Act Sets forth minimum age requirements for children under the age of 17 working in agriculture.
Minimum Age Minimum age recommendation for a certified applicator commercial [legal adult] 17 private ( 16 if you can breakout Tox. Cat. 1) –Ability to supervise others –Ability of law enforcement to approach and deal directly with certified applicator –Ability to deal with hardships –Consistent with DOL current regulations
Closed Book Exams Written, closed-book examination for private and commercial applicators. Closed-book = only calculator from outside. Necessary exam reference material will be provided as part of the examination process. Supplying reference materials for information that should be committed to memory, such as the core knowledge requirements, would be inappropriate.
Positive Identification for Exams, Training, and RUP Purchases Advantages –Cause little inconvenience for the proctor –Minimal costs incurred –Minimal effort for retail dealers to confirm buyer’s identity
Positive Identification for Exams, Training, and RUP Purchases Limitations –Some religious groups prohibit pictures (two forms of non-photo id would then be required). –Large group meetings may require additional staff. –Internet and telephone sales
Tiered Classification of Pesticides
Tiered Classification Product Classification –Toxicity, security, site sensitivity, type of user, education & safety training required User Type –Occupational, domestic Training/Examination Required –Training only –Examination: core, category, product-specific
Exam Security Manual Exam oversight and controls –Pre-registration, scheduling exams, fees, –Retakes, –Disqualification, prohibitions –Exam environment –Proctoring and cheating –Grading –Notification and/or certification –Personnel
Additional CTAG Activities PSEP Long-Term Funding Integrate WPS Training Requirements Remote Testing Continued discussion on Exam Blueprints National database of applicators with revoked credentials 2003 Progress Report
Questions ??
50 Minutes Brought to you by: The All Certification Network