Piezo Studies and Temperature Measurements Ruben Carcagno May 11, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Advertisements

of LFD Compensation Study S1 Global Cryomodule
WP-M3 Superconducting Materials PArametric COnverter Detector INFN_Genoa Renzo Parodi.
Overview of SMTF RF Systems Brian Chase. Overview Scope of RF Systems RF & LLRF Collaboration LLRF Specifications for SMTF Progress So Far Status of progress.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Lutz Lilje DESY -MPY- XFEL Tuner Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup New Saclay design.
Capture Cavity 1at A0 SIMCON2.1 with MATLAB  closed loop with max gain ( 250 )  RMS amplitude noise ≈ 0.07%  RMS phase Noise ≈ 0.2°  closed.
Capture Cavity 2 Update Tim Koeth April 3 rd Testing at 4.5K.
Cost comparison of tuners H. Hayano, KEK AWLC14
ILC PM Meeting S0 Webex Global Design Effort 1 S0/S1 Next Steps Lutz Lilje GDE.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Sept. 30 Albuquerque Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Test Items in S1-G Cryomodule Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
E. KAKO (KEK) 2010' Sept. 10 KEK Global Design Effort 1 Lorentz Force Detuning Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
, DESY, Hamburg ECFA Workshop, SCRF Session, Lutz Lilje, DESY Lutz Lilje DESY European Linear Collider Workshop ECFA LC2013 Fabrication and Quality.
Salman Tariq Accelerator Division Mechanical Support Department
Shuichi Noguchi,SRF2007,10.71 New Tuners for ILC Cavity Application Shuichi Noguchi KEK.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Lutz Lilje, DESY, TILC08 Tests with the Fast Frequency Tuners in the Saclay-I design Lutz.
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
W. 5th SPL collaboration Meeting CERN, November 25, 20101/18 reported by Wolfgang Hofle CERN BE/RF Update on RF Layout and LLRF activities for.
Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 High-Gradient Module Test Lutz Lilje.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
ILC FAST TUNER R&D PROGRAM at FNAL Status Report CC2 Piezo Test Preliminary Results Ruben Carcagno (on behalf of the FNAL FAST TUNER Working Group) 4/5/06.
Horizontal Test Stands and CC2 Results Andy Hocker Testing an alternative ILC cavity design at USPAS (Q 0 =2.23E+02)
John Carwardine 21 st October 2010 TTF/FLASH 9mA studies: Main studies objectives for January 2011.
Performance of magnetostrictive element at LHe environment 12th International Conference MIXDES 2005 Performance of magnetostrictive element at LHe environment.
FNAL efforts on LHC Crab Cavity R&D (Proposals for R&D sub-tasks, resources and schedule) Nikolay Solyak.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Oct. 26 ILC KEK Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Preparation for S1-Global Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
Preliminary Results from First Blade Tuner Tests in HTS Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Serena Barbannoti Matteo Scorrano.
General remarks: I am impressed with the quantity and quality of the work presented here and the functioning of the organization. I thank ILC and FNAL.
GDE 4/Mar/20081 Lorentz Detuning Calculation for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two modes” model Method of the.
SPL waveguide distribution system Components, configurations, potential problems D. Valuch, E. Ciapala, O. Brunner CERN AB/RF SPL collaboration meeting.
Challenges of PIP-II Warren Schappert Microphonics Workshop 8 Octobe 2015.
Warren Schappert Yuriy Pischalnikov FNAL SRF2011, Chicago.
Superconducting RF: Resonance Control Warren Schappert PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 10 March 2015.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
A Proposal for FJPPL (TYL) Development of Frequency Tuners Optimization and Cryomodule Integration for 1.3 GHz SRF Cavities G. Devanz, F. Nunio, O. Napoly.
1 Tuner performance with LLRF control at KEK Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) Dec.07 TTC Beijing (Michizono) S1G (RDR configuration) - Detuning monitor - Tuner control.
LFD and Microphonics Suppression for PIP-II Warren Schappert April 15, 2014.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control FNAL experience Presented by Yuriy Pischalnikov for Resonance Control Group Fermilab- Los Alamos MaRIE Project Meeting March.
Tuners for 1.3 GHz Elliptical Cavities Warren Schappert Fermilab TD/I&C Thursday May 29, 2013.
Superconducting RF: Resonance Control Presented by Yuriy Pischalnikov for W. Schappert, Y.Pischalnikov, J.Holzbauer PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 15.
Microphonics Suppression in SRF cavities for Project X Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Project X Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, April 11, 2012.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 FNAL September 11, 2009 Design Considerations for CW SRF Linacs Claus H. Rode 12 GeV Project Manager.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control. CW mode of operation (FNAL’s experience). Yu. Pischalnikov W. Schappert FNAL TTC CW SRF Meeting, Cornell University, 12June,
ESS SC cavities development G. Devanz TTC meeting, march 1st 2011, Milano.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Jefferson.
Current Status of PIP-II Resonance Control W. Schappert.
LLRF regulation of CC2 operated at 4˚K Gustavo Cancelo for the AD, TD & CD LLRF team.
Experience with high loaded Q cavity operation at HZB
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
T5.2: Harmonization - Material and Component Reference
Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert (FNAL)
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
R. Paparella, INFN-Milan, LASA Laboratory, Segrate, Italy
SCRF 21-25/Apr/2008 Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Detuning for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two.
ILC LLRF Status Ruben Carcagno, Brian Chase
LCLS II SRF Cavity Tuner (developed by FNAL)
Tuner system Zhenghui MI 2017/01/17
Mechanical setups Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup
Cavity resonance control
Jefferson Lab Low Level RF Controls
Matthias Liepe Zachary Conway CLASSE, Cornell University June 1, 2009
High gradients in TESLA nine-cell cavities
Nick Walker (DESY) EU GDE Meeting Oxford
Resonance Control for Narrow-Bandwidth, SRF Applications
Presentation transcript:

Piezo Studies and Temperature Measurements Ruben Carcagno May 11, 2005

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review2 Background Fast tuners (e.g., piezo tuners) are needed to maintain high RF power efficiency in high gradient (e.g., 35 MV/m) SCRF cavities –Key component for cost reduction of ILC and Proton Driver FNAL piezo tuner studies were done for the 3.9 GHz CKM deflecting cavity at A0. Experience and results are transferable to 1.3 GHz cavities for the ILC and Proton Driver. R&D in these areas will continue at HPTF.

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review3 Detuning and RF Power Δf = cavity detuning (Hz) f 1/2 = cavity bandwidth ~ 200 Hz for 1.3 GHz TESLA cavities ~ 65 Hz for 3.9 GHz CKM cavities RF power increase for field control due to detuning: Detuning highly sensitive to small changes in cavity shape Example: 13-cell, 3.9 GHz CKM cavity (from FEA)

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review4 Detuning Sources Fast, small changes in cavity shape are caused by two primary sources: Lorentz Forces (electromagnetic):  Important for pulsed operation, high gradients (e.g., 35 MV/m)  Highly repetitive  Main detuning concern for ILC and Proton Driver  Piezo compensation demonstrated at the Tesla Test Facility  Microphonics (vibration sources)  Important for cw operation, narrow bandwidth  Random  Microphonics compensation less advanced than Lorentz  FNAL work at A0 contributed to advances in the state of the art of microphonics detuning compensation

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review5 Detuning Compensation: Fast Tuners PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS Commercially available from multiple sources Typically used at room temperature Work at cryogenic temperatures with reduced stroke. Characterization important Actuator of choice in other labs for detuning compensation studies MAGNETOSTRICTIVE ACTUATORS Being introduced as an alternative to piezoelectric actuators for SCRF fast tuning Newer technology for this application, single source Some labs are investigating this option Fast tuners have been proposed for active detuning control by applying a counteracting force to the cavity

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review6 Studies at 1.8 K 3-cell 3.9 GHz CKM cavity Piezo Actuator P from Piezosystem Jena Temperature Rings Microphonics Spectrum with pumps ON and OFF Vibration measurements with piezo as a sensor Piezo-RF detuning transfer function Manual microphonics detuning piezo compensation Quench and hot spot location using thermometry

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review7 Manual Detuning Compensation Cavity system support was not optimized to minimize microphonics Microphonics spectrum shows a strong detuning frequency at ~ 30 Hz Detuning compensation at 1.8 K was attempted by manually adjusting the piezo frequency, amplitude, and phase Detuning was reduced by more than a factor of three and maintained for several seconds The result was reproducible, showing the feasibility of using a piezo actuator to compensate microphonics detuning

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review8 Studies at Room Temperature Automatic Microphonics Detuning Compensation Piezo Automatic compensation with an adaptive feedforward control method demonstrated in a 13-cell CKM cavity at room temperature. For details, see: R. Carcagno, L. Bellantoni, T. Berenc, H. Edwards, D. Orris, A. Rowe, “Microphonics Detuning Compensation in 3.9 GHz Superconducting RF Cavities,” 11 th Workshop on RF- Superconductivity SRF 2003.

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review9 Detuning Compensation Results Automatic compensation demonstrated for three induced frequencies (15 Hz, 27 Hz, and 45 Hz) More than 20 dB attenuation Mechanical Resonances quickly identified by driving piezo with white noise

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review10 Piezo R&D – Next Steps ILC and Proton Driver Support Two Piezos Piezo R&D will continue with the HPTF Capture Cavity 2 test Integrate piezo with cavity tuner Start with DESY design Studies at 2 K for ILC and Proton Driver: Lorentz detuning compensation Microphonic detuning compensation Piezo characterization and reliability under operating conditions Integrate piezo control with LLRF controls Evaluate Alternatives (e.g., magnetostrictive actuators) Increase collaboration efforts with other Labs and institutions (e.g., DESY, ANL, JLab, Saclay, etc) Challenges Piezo mechanical integration with tuner (preload, reliability) Mechanical resonances (complicate control algorithms) Cost/space reduction for mass production and industrialization (power amplifiers, piezo size) Capture Cavity 2 Tuner

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review11 Fast Cavity Thermometry New system based on smaller CERNOX sensors was developed at FNAL Fast (10 kHz) temperature acquisition rate to study quench evolution Traditional Carbon Glass RTDs used in SCRF thermometry (e.g., Cornell system) too large for small 3.9 GHz CKM cavity geometry

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review12 Thermometry Results Quench location clearly identified Hot spot shifts 90 degrees with cw polarization mode Increasing RF power resulted in quench at hot spot location Lambda point

5/11/2005Ruben Carcagno - AAC Review13 Conclusions FNAL has already begun developing expertise in areas of piezo tuning and cavity thermometry R&D in these areas has resulted in advances in microphonics detuning compensation and the ability to pinpoint quench location in small cavities The focus of this work is now shifting towards ILC and Proton Driver support Piezo tuning development work will continue with the HPTF Capture Cavity 2 test Fast tuning (e.g., piezo) capability is critical for cost reduction efforts in high gradient SCRF machines (high RF power efficiency)