Investigation of the influence of suspended optic’s motion on LIGO detector sensitivity Sanichiro Yoshida Southeastern Louisiana University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

Vibration Isolation Group R. Takahashi (ICRR)Chief T. Uchiyama (ICRR)Payload design H. Ishizaki (NAOJ)Prototype test R. DeSalvo (Caltech)SAS design A.
LIGO - G R 1 HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI David Ottaway November 2005 LIGO-G Z.
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
1 S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O John Worden, Richard McCarthy, Doug Cook, Hugh Radkins, LHO Josh Dalrymple, SU I.Pre-S4 “fixes”
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
LIGO Magnetic External Pre-Isolator Richard Mittleman, David Ottaway & Gregg Harry April 18, 2003.
S4 Environmental Disturbances Robert Schofield, U of O I.Pre-S4 “fixes” II.Some S4 veto issues III. Early coupling results from S4 PEM injections.
1 Environmental Disturbances: S4 and Pre-S5 Robert Schofield, U of O Doug Cook, Fred Raab, Richard McCarthy, LHO I.Seismic up-conversion II.Some peak identification.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
LIGO-G Z1 E2e modeling of violin mode S. Yoshida Southeastern Louisiana University V. Sannibale M. Barton, and H. Yamamoto Caltech LIGO NSF: PHYS
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
G D Initial LIGO improvements & Advanced LIGO P Fritschel PAC Meeting LLO, 18 May 2005.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
Southeastern Louisiana University / LIGO Livingston 1 Modeling the Input Optics using E2E R. Dodda, T. Findley, N. Jamal, K.Rogillio, and S. Yoshida, Southeastern.
Environmental noise studies at VIRGO Environmental contributions to Virgo readout noise (C-runs) many sources identified through coherency analyses with.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
SUSPENSIONS Pisa S.Braccini C.Bradaschia R.Cavalieri G.Cella V.Dattilo A.Di Virgilio F.Fidecaro F.Frasconi A.Gennai G.Gennaro A.Giazotto L.Holloway F.Paoletti.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
LIGO-G D LIGO II1 AUX OPTICS SUPPORT Michael Smith, 6/11/03 STRAY LIGHT CONTROL ACTIVE OPTICS COMPENSATION OUTPUT MODE CLEANER PO MIRROR AND PO.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
LIGO-G Z The Status of VIRGO E. Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration GWADW 2004, Aspen From the CITF to VIRGO Commissioning of the Fabry-Perot.
Modeling the Input Optics with e2e T. Findley, S. Yoshida, D. Dubois, N. Jamal, and R. Dodda Southeastern Louisiana University LIGO-G D.
Modeling of the Effects of Beam Fluctuations from LIGO’s Input Optics Nafis Jamal Shivanand Sanichiro Yoshida Biplab Bhawal LSC Conference Aug ’05 LIGO-G Z.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
Low frequency anti-vibration system of LCGT Vibration Isolation Group R. Takahashi (ICRR), K. Yamamoto (ICRR), T. Uchiyama (ICRR), T. Sekiguchi (ICRR),
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Modeling the Input Optics using E2E S. Yoshida, R. Dodda, T. Findley, K.Rogillio, and N. Jamal, Southeastern Louisiana.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
Elba Gravitational Wave Adv. Detector Workshop1May 22, 2002 Simulation of LIGO Interferometers 1. End to End simulation 2. Lock acquisition 3. Noise.
LIGO-G D Commissioning P Fritschel LIGO NSF review, 23 October 2002 M.I.T.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
40m Optical Systems & Sensing DRD, G R 1 40m Optical Systems and Sensing Design Requirements Document & Conceptual Design Michael Smith 10/18/01.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
LIGO-G Z1 e2e modeling of seismic isolation S. Yoshida 1 and H. Yamamoto 2 1. Southeastern Louisiana University 2. Caltech LIGO.
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300 Results from the Stanford 10m all-reflective polarization Sagnac interferometer Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300.
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
BSC HEPI Pier Amplification
Signal recycling R&D at LAL: Influence in Virgo
Control of the KAGRA Cryogenic Vibration Isolation System
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype: design and preliminary tests
Status of the LIGO Detectors
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
LIGO Detector Commissioning
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI
Simulating the Advanced LIGO Interferometer Using the Real Control Code Juan F. Castillo.
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
HAM-SAS Mechanics Status of modeling V.Boschi, V. Sannibale.
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype
Presentation transcript:

Investigation of the influence of suspended optic’s motion on LIGO detector sensitivity Sanichiro Yoshida Southeastern Louisiana University

The beginning.. LIGO E2E (H. Yamamoto) (1) Interested in comparing mechanical simulation of e2e and measurement (stack motion, mirror motion). (2) Need good seismic motion data, including correlation. SLU (Students) (1) Interested in studying dynamics of LIGO suspended optics. (2) Measurement and modeling at site - Good for undergraduates. SLU (S. Yoshida) (1) Background- Input optics implementation. (2) Interested in effect of input optics to LIGO performance.

Suspended optics on HAM table Suspension point Shadow sensor Suspension wire Shadow sensor Wire standoff Shadow sensor Safety stop Stiffener plate Suspension tower HAM (Horizontally Accessible Module) table

(1) field and optics (2) mechanical motions (3) electronics (4) input data (seismic motion, frequency noise, etc) Table top motion (displacement 3, rotation 3) = ground motion (6) x stack transfer function (6x6)  =(x 1 - x 2 )/L? E2e simulation: HAM table  x1x1 x2x2 Vibration isolation stacks

Model of transfer of the floor motion to optic Optic motion (Output) Floor motion (Input) T G->Ht HAM table motion T Ht->Sp  1 Suspension point motion T Sp->Op Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Measurement 3 E2e simulation

LIGO research group at SLU Undergraduate students Raghuveer Dodda (Physics/Computer Science major) Tiffany Findley (Physics major) Physics Faculty David P. Norwood (Optics) Sanichiro Yoshida (LLO, UF LIGO)

Contents MMT3 motion - dark port signal coherence HAM1 table YAW motion measurement Floor motion measurement E2e boxes for MMT3 Model suspension analysis at SLU * MMT3 (Mode Matching Telescope on HAM1)

MMT3 motion - dark port signal coherence

MMT3 on HAM1 Input optics. Different color represents different subsystems. Optical lever is outside vacuum on a pier. Mode Cleaner Mode Matching Telescope To IFO MC2 MC1 MC3 MMT2 MMT1 MMT3 From PSL HAM1HAM2 Optical lever

MMT3 motion and correlation to dark port signal Power Spectrum of MMT3 – peaks seen ~ 1.5Hz, where MMT 3 has no resonance Coherence between MMT3 motion and ASC_Q beam – peaks seen ~ 1.5Hz

MMT3/BS coherence to dark port ~1.5 Hz Both data taken at the same time when arms are fully locked. BS MMT3 1.5 Hz

MMT3/BS to AS_I/AS_Q coherence base line data Arms not locked due to train

Resonant frequencies MMT3 resonance pendular: Hz pitch:0.627 yaw:0.506 side:0.732 vertical:12.32 HAM resonance U - U: 1.5, 2.3 Hz V - V: 1.6, 2.8 Vert - Yaw: 7.2, 8.0 U: beam line V: transverse

HAM1 table YAW motion measurement

HAM table motion measurement by shadow sensors

Measured HAM1 YAW

Floor motion measurement

Corner station seismometer spectra (LLO) X (U) Y (V)

HAM1 accelerometer spectra X (U) Y (V)

Floor motion correlation measurement P1 P2P3 P4 P5 X arm Y arm Portable seismometer location Beam splitter LLO

Phase delay in y component along x arm x Standing wave due to reflection at HAM resonance? ~1.5 Hz HAM

Phase delay in seismometer signal y x x y

E2e boxes for MMT3

Free hanging mirror model (SUS3D.box) iput = motion of HAM1 at the location of MMT3 as calculated by the OSEM-method oput = x,y,z,xtheta,ytheta,ztheta of MMT3 (as a function of time) The PS of the output reveals peaks at: MMT3 Yaw: 0.5 Hz (MMT3 yaw peaks), (HAM1 peaks) [ m(mmt3,sun) = m(mmt3,ham1) + m(ham1,grd) + m(grd,sun). Since, there is no m(grd,sun) in the iput, we should not see any m(grd,sun) peaks in oput. ]

Results of SUS3D.box – the free hanging mirror MMT3 YAW (output) HAM 1 YAW (input)

Floor to optic model (MMT3.box ) This box takes floor motion as input and outputs table motion (=suspension point motion) and optics motion x Op (t) x G (t) T Ht->Op T G->Htp x Ht (t)

Model suspension at SLU

SLU model suspension (1) Mechanical Oscillator L m

SLU model suspension (1) mass Mechanical Oscillator

Ring-down measurement (1) Damping coefficient estimated for three conditions.

Frequency response (1) Damping coefficient from ring-down measurement used for theory.

SLU model suspension (2) Mechanical Oscillator Suspension Block Mirror Block Front ViewSide View

SLU model suspension (2) Mechanical Oscillator Suspension block Optical lever beam CCD camera

Setup for yaw/pitch motion measurement Optical lever Mechanical oscillator Suspended mass wire

Yaw/pitch motion measurement x y Optical lever beam spot

Sample optical lever signal

Ring-down measurement (2)

Frequency dependence (2)

Summary E2e simulation of suspended optics –Influence on IFO Floor to table top modeling –Supporting data taking Table top to optic modeling –Model suspension Measurement of seismic motions with correlation is very important.