Analysis of UCS by OpenSees GSR Tae-Hyung Lee PI Khalid M. Mosalam May 23 rd, 2002 Meeting at RFS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAFER Project - FINAL MEETING Elin Skurtveit & Amir M. Kaynia - NGI
Advertisements

Recent Experience in Turkey for Building Vulnerability and Estimating Damage Losses P. Gülkan and A. Yakut Middle East Technical University.
Hybrid Simulation with On-line Updating of Numerical Model Based on Measured Experimental Behavior M. Javad Hashemi, Armin Masroor, and Gilberto Mosqueda.
An-Najah National University
PREDICTION OF RESPONSE SPECTRAL PARAMETERS FOR BHUJ EARTHQUAKE (26TH JANUARY 2001) USING COMPONENT ATTENUATION MODELLING TECHNIQUE By DR. SAROSH.H. LODI.
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
APRU – 2013Tuesday Oct 29 Multi-Hazard Loss Estimations Using Socioeconomic Data J.R. Holliday*J.B. Rundle University of California, Davis 1 / 115.
Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.
Patricia M. Clayton University of Washington
ATC 58 Performance Assessment Calculation Tool (PACT)
Shake Table Testing of a Large Scale Two Span R-C Bridge Univ. of Washington *PI: Marc Eberhard Co-PI: Pedro Arduino Co-PI: Steven Kramer RA: Tyler Ranf.
DARPA Assessing Parameter and Model Sensitivities of Cycle-Time Predictions Using GTX u Abstract The GTX (GSRC Technology Extrapolation) system serves.
Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
IRENG07 1 Seismic Consideration Discussion for The Interaction Region Fred Asiri-SLAC.
University of Minho School of Engineering ISISE, Department of Civil Engineering Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de Engenharia - 24.
Acceleration – Magnitude The Analysis of Accelerograms for the Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures.
GMSM Mission and Vision Jennie Watson-Lamprey October 29, 2007.
Van Nuys Sensitivity Study Keith Porter PEER Building Testbed Progress Meeting Richmond Field Station 23 May 2002.
Slide# Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations.
PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.
Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Emma Crossman-University of Nevada, Reno PIs: Manos Maragakis, Ahmad Itani, and Gokhan Pekcan Mentor: Siyavash Soroushian Host Institution:
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
Time-history seismic analysis with SAP2000 A step-by-step guide for BEng/MEng/MSc students familiarizing with this piece of software.
Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering
Streamlined Process for Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Nuclear Facilities Utilizing GTSTRUDL and MTR/SASSI Wei Li, Michael Perez, Mansour Tabatabaie,
Preliminary Investigations on Post-earthquake Assessment of Damaged RC Structures Based on Residual Drift Jianze Wang Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Kaoshan.
FE model implementation of seismically driven GG noise in subterranean gravitational wave detectors David Rabeling, Eric Hennes, and Jo van den Brand
Seismic Design of Concrete Structure.
PEER EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE-ENGINEERING INTERFACE: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE Allin Cornell Stanford University SCEC WORKSHOP Oakland, CA.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Unit U nit 3- Mitigation Measures by Type of Disaster.
Static Pushover Analysis
정형조, 세종대학교 토목환경공학과 조교수 최강민, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 박사과정 지한록, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 석사과정 고만기, 공주대학교 토목환경공학과 교수 이인원, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 교수 2005 년 한국강구조학회 학술발표회.
NEES Facilities Used: University of Nevada, Reno University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana INTRODUCTION Bridge columns are subjected to combinations of.
sound, light*,water seismic (earthquakes)
Opportunities for NEES Research Utilization Robert D Hanson Professor Emeritus University of Michigan.
Site Operations Manager’s Workshop – September 26 th -28 th, 2006 Data Curation at NEES Claude Trottier Data Curator Site Operations Managers Workshop.
1 지진하중을 받는 구조물의 MR 댐퍼의 동특성을 고려한 반능동 신경망제어 Heon-Jae Lee 1), Hyung-Jo Jung 2), Ju-Won Oh 3), In-Won Lee 4) 1) Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental.
University of Palestine
1 Efficient Mode Superposition Methods for Non-Classically Damped System Sang-Won Cho, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Ju-Won Oh, Professor, Hannam University,
Application of SASHA for the Icelandic case Vera D’Amico 1, Dario Albarello 2, Ragnar Sigbjörnsson 3, Rajesh Rupakhety 3 1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica.
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
Waves and Oscillation waves transport energy along a medium without transporting matter.
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models Role of SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation Technical Activity Group (GMSV TAG) in SEISM Project.
Probabilistic Ground Motions for Scoggins Dam, Oregon Chris Wood Seismotectonics & Geophysics Group Technical Service Center July 2012.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
C ONSIDERATION OF C OLLAPSE AND R ESIDUAL D EFORMATION IN R ELIABILITY-BASED P ERFORMANCE E VALUATION OF B UILDINGS Chiun-lin WU 1, Chin-Hsiung LOH 2,
GMSV in SEISM Project Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles.
1 Ivan Wong Principal Seismologist/Vice President Seismic Hazards Group, URS Corporation Oakland, CA Uncertainties in Characterizing the Cascadia Subduction.
Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the pseudo-negative stiffness control of a steel base-isolated building: A comparative study with bilinear.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
University of Illinois Contribution Amr S. Elnashai Sung Jig Kim Curtis Holub Narutoshi Nakata Oh Sung Kwon Seismic Simulation and Design of Bridge Columns.
Davide Forcellini, Univ. of San Marino Prof. Ahmed Elgamal, Dr. Jinchi Lu, UC San Diego Prof. Kevin Mackie, Univ. of Central Florida SEISMIC ASSESSMENT.
Waves and Energy sound, light*,water seismic (earthquakes)
Probabilistic hazard analysis of earthquake-induced landslides – an example from Kuohsing, Taiwan Liao, Chi-Wen Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Activity 90: The Frequency of Sound Warm up: A. How many decibels is a sound that has a relative intensity of 100,000? B. Label the parts of the wave below:
ASCE G-I Case History Night, April 28, 2016
Management of Earthquake Risk using Condition Indicators Determination of vulnerability functions Jens Ulfkjaer.
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
HAZARD AND FRAGILITY ANALYSIS
ANDRÉS ALONSO-RODRIGUEZ Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
Effect of Earthquake on Fire Protection Systems
Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.
California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (CSMIP)
CALTRANS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Version 1.7 November 2012
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of UCS by OpenSees GSR Tae-Hyung Lee PI Khalid M. Mosalam May 23 rd, 2002 Meeting at RFS

Objectives Conduct and verify a 2-D nonlinear time history analysis of UCS using OpenSees Develop floor responses to be utilized for the UCB and UCI shake table tests of the building contents Assess the importance of the different sources of uncertanties on the structural response Extend investigation to 3-D modeling including multi-directional ground motion

Current Status 2-D structural model completed for the UCS building Time history results (as absolute and relative floor displacements and accelerations and mid-points of all floors) are available for two levels of seismic hazard (50% and 10% in 50 years) Similar results will be available for the third level of seismic hazard (2% in 50 years) by the end of July.

Future Tasks 1) Verification: A similar shear wall building where response data are available will be analyzed using the same modeling approach in OpenSees An example is the 9 story Robert A. Millikan Library Building at Caltech [McVerry 1979]

Future Tasks (Cont.) 2) Assess Importance of Uncertainties: The following five sources will be considered a)Spectral acceleration b)Mass c)Damping d)Force-deformation characteristics of the different elements, e.g. in terms of moment-curvature relations e)Soil/foundation properties

Future Tasks (Cont.) 2) Assess Importance of Uncertainties (Cont.) : The objective is to conduct similar study to that of (Porter et al. 2002, Earthquake Spectra) with focus on structural response parameters (rather than costs) and their sensitivity to modeling issues and input intensities. The importance of uncertainties will be assessed by developing a “tornado diagram” using the idea of “swing” estimation.

Future Tasks (Cont.) A methodology has been developed using SFEM to generate probabilistic moment-curvature or interaction diagrams of RC elements [Lee and Mosalam, 2002, Computers and Structures]

Future Tasks (Cont.) Several verification studies were conducted

Future Tasks (Cont.) Some results of interaction diagrams

Future Tasks (Cont.) 3) Extension to 3-D: Modeling structural elements in longitudinal as well as transverse direction. Subject the building to simultaneous components of the ground motions. Investigate variations of floor response parameters within the floor space.