Changing Collegial Culture to Break through the Academic Glass Ceiling Cheryl Geisler Dean, Communication, Art & Technology Simon Fraser University Cheryl Geisler Dean, Communication, Art & Technology Simon Fraser University
I. The Academic Glass Ceiling
National Academies 2010 Report Success rate in promotion to full… no difference BUT Time in rank before promotion … 2.9 yr gap Knowledge of institution’s policy on promotion … significant difference Engaging in conversation on professional topics with colleagues … significant difference Success rate in promotion to full… no difference BUT Time in rank before promotion … 2.9 yr gap Knowledge of institution’s policy on promotion … significant difference Engaging in conversation on professional topics with colleagues … significant difference
Agenda I. The Academic Glass Ceiling II. The MEN Model for Change in the Academy III. MEN in the University V. MEN in the Professions VI. What You Can Do I. The Academic Glass Ceiling II. The MEN Model for Change in the Academy III. MEN in the University V. MEN in the Professions VI. What You Can Do
II. The MEN Model for Change in the Academy
Matrix Organization Collegial system Bureaucratic system Collegial system Bureaucratic system
Matrix Organization Bureaucratic system = policy reform Collegial system = cultural change Bureaucratic system = policy reform Collegial system = cultural change
Collegial System “social contract” of the academic professions Intense collegiality Self-regulation Apprenticeship “social contract” of the academic professions Intense collegiality Self-regulation Apprenticeship
Changing Collegial Culture M onitoring: make a case E ngagement: engage senior faculty N etworking: create networking patterns M onitoring: make a case E ngagement: engage senior faculty N etworking: create networking patterns
III. MEN in the University
M onitoring at Rensselaer 13+ Club Index 13 or more years since highest degree Index = % of women in Club not yet promoted % of men in Club not yet promoted Index = 1 = parity 13+ Club Index 13 or more years since highest degree Index = % of women in Club not yet promoted % of men in Club not yet promoted Index = 1 = parity
13+ Club DIY List of the members with rank Year of terminal degree Gender Publicly available List of the members with rank Year of terminal degree Gender Publicly available
E ngagement & N etworking “Quiet” Phase Faculty Coaches Networking “Quiet” Phase Faculty Coaches Networking
Changes in the 13+ Index
MEN in a Professional Society
Role of the Professional Society Control of Rewards Peer Review Journal Publication Awards Control of Networks Editorial boards Journal reviewers External letters Control of Rewards Peer Review Journal Publication Awards Control of Networks Editorial boards Journal reviewers External letters
M onitoring 13+ Club in the Society Membership list Rank Gender Year of degree Overall Index = 1.7 13+ Club in the Society Membership list Rank Gender Year of degree Overall Index = 1.7
E ngagement Special Session Task Force “Quiet” Phase Special Session Task Force “Quiet” Phase
N etworking Career Retreat 2-3 day get together 18-month networking groups Career Mentors Career Retreat 2-3 day get together 18-month networking groups Career Mentors
Areas that Participants Change Changing patterns of work Restarting research programs Developing networks Changing patterns of work Restarting research programs Developing networks
V. What You Can Do 1. M onitor promotion patterns 2.E ngage the senior faculty 3.N etwork 1. M onitor promotion patterns 2.E ngage the senior faculty 3.N etwork
Resources The 13+ Club: A Metric for Understanding, Documenting, and Resisting Patterns of Non-Promotion to Full Professor. Geisler, Cheryl, Debbie Kaminski, and Robyn A. Berkley. The National Women’s Studies Association Journal 19(3), 2007, pp The 13+ Club: A Metric for Understanding, Documenting, and Resisting Patterns of Non-Promotion to Full Professor. Geisler, Cheryl, Debbie Kaminski, and Robyn A. Berkley. The National Women’s Studies Association Journal 19(3), 2007, pp