The JPARC Neutrino Target

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matt Rooney RAL The T2K Beam Window Matt Rooney Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BENE November 2006.
Advertisements

Target chase, decay and absorber cooling for LBNE A. Marchionni, Fermilab 8th International Workshop on Neutrino Beams & Instrumentation CERN, November.
The Current T2K Beam Window Design and Upgrade Potential Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop Princeton, Nov 2008 Matt Rooney.
Shock simulations in solid targets Chris Densham Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Mike Fitton Engineering Analysis Group Design and Computational Fluid Dynamic analysis of the T2K Target Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation 6th September.
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
T2K Target & Secondary Beamline - progress towards a neutrino Superbeam? Chris Densham.
Target & Horns Fluxes were distributed. W/ J-PARC type 2.5 o, 2 o, 3 o. Target cooling evaluation and test Target stress analysis Serious stress analysis.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
Vacuum windows at JPARC Contents Introduction Vacuum windows at hadron beam line Helium gas cooling Vacuum windows at neutrino beam line primitive discussion.
A powder jet target for a Neutrino Factory Ottone Caretta, Chris Densham (RAL), Tom Davies (Exeter University), Richard Woods (Gericke Ltd)
Target system for hadron & neutrino beam lines at J-PARC Contents Introduction of J-PARC Target and Target system for hadron beam line Target system for.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Fermilab Neutrino Beamline to DUSEL Mike Martens Fermilab PAC November 3, 2009.
Future of Antiproton Triggered Fusion Propulsion Brice Cassenti & Terry Kammash University of Connecticut & University of Michigan.
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
Thermal stress & cooling of J-Parc neutrino target S. Ueda JHF target monitor R&D group Introduction neutrino target requirement for target Thermal stress.
Horn design for the CERN to Fréjus neutrino Super Beam Nikolas Vassilopoulos IPHC/CNRS.
T2K Secondary Beamline – Status of RAL Contributions Chris Densham, Mike Fitton, Vishal Francis, Matt Rooney, Mike Woodward, Martin Baldwin, Dave Wark.
NuMI 2 nd High Power Targetry Workshop October 2005 NuMI Target Status and Future Pat Hurh Page 1 NuMI Target Status and Design Study for Proton Driver.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
JPARC- Decay Volume M.Sakuda (KEK) 11 November Decay Volume Requirements Design 2. Construction Status 3. Summary and schedule In collaboration.
NML High Energy Beam Absorbers and Dump 29-August-2011 Beams-doc-3928.
Future upgrade of the neutrino beam-line for multi-MW beam 5 th Hyper-Kamiokande open Vancouver July Yuichi Oyama (KEK) (for T2K neutrino.
Current Status and Possible Items around ‘neutrino beam’ Horn Target Remote maintenance tools Decay volume window and collimator muon monitor Many items.
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
JCOV, 25 OCT 2001Thermal screens in ATLAS Inner Detector J.Godlewski EP/ATI  ATLAS Inner Detector layout  Specifications for thermal screens  ANSYS.
Consideration of Baffle cooling scheme
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
F NuMI Beamline Accelerator Advisory Committee Presentation May 10, 2006 Mike Martens Fermilab Beams Division.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
Investigation of a “Pencil Shaped” Solid Target Peter Loveridge, Mike Fitton, Ottone Caretta High Power Targets Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK.
SPL-SB and NF Beam Window Studies Stress Analysis Matt Rooney, Tristan Davenne, Chris Densham March 2010.
J-PARC neutrino experiment Target Specification Graphite or Carbon-Carbon composite cylindrical bar : length 900mm, diameter 25~30mm The bar may be divided.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES N. Simos, BNL EUROnu-IDS Target Meeting December 15-18, 2008 Superbeam Horn-Target Integration.
T2K Remote Handling T. Sekiguchi (KEK) on behalf of Tada (KEK) 2012/11/10.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Exercises for Q1. Insulated copper tube A thin walled 10 mm copper tube is used to transport a low-temperature refrigerant with a temperature that is.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Engineering studies for CN2PY secondary beam. LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20141 F. Sanchez Galan (CERN) on behalf of the CERN Secondary.
Target Proposal Feb. 15, 2000 S. Childress Target Proposal Considerations: –For low z target, much less power is deposited in the target for the same pion.
MARS15 Studies of Impact of LBNF Target/Horn Optimization on the Hadron Absorber 6 th High Power Targetry Workshop Merton College, Oxford April 12, 2016.
High Power Target Experience with T2K Chris Densham T2K Beamline Collaboration including RAL / KEK / Kyoto.
Target R&D for the J-PARC neutrino experiment (II) Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the J-PARC target R&D group.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
LBNE Target Pile & Decay Pipe Cooling Andy Stefanik and Ang Lee – Fermilab September 25, 2014.
Beamline for the LBNE Project Heidi Schellman for the LBNE collaboration.
1 Target Introduction Chris Densham STFC/RAL Mu2e Target, Remote Handling, and Heat & Radiation Shield Review Nov
T2K Target status PASI Meeting Fermilab 11 th November Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the T2K beam collaboration.
Chris Densham Figures of Merit for target design for neutrons, neutrinos… Chris Densham Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Horn and Solenoid options in Neutrino Factory M. Yoshida, Osaka Univ. NuFact08, Valencia June 30th, A brief review of pion capture scheme in NuFact,
LBNE 2.4MW Absorber NBI 2014 Presented by Brian Hartsell Contributions by: Kris Anderson, Yury Eidelman, Jim Hylen, Nikolai Mokhov, Igor Rakhno, Salman.
KEK Radiation Related Topics neutrino beam construction subgroup Yuichi Oyama (KEK) and target monitor subgroup for.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Future Neutrino Beam in J-PARC Tetsuro Sekiguchi IPNS, KEK 2013/11/12NNN2013, Kavli IPMU1.
Target work plan for LBNO study Chris Densham STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Irradiated T2K Ti alloy materials test plans
Horn and Solenoid Options in Neutrino Factory
P. Sievers/CERN. A. Ushakov/Univ. Hamburg. S. Riemann/DESY-Zeuthen.
WP2 (SuperBeam) Targets Status of Work Programme
Target R&D for JHF neutrino
EUROnu Beam Window Studies Stress and Cooling Analysis
Superbeam Horn-Target Integration
Presentation transcript:

The JPARC Neutrino Target Y.Hayato (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for T.Nakadaira & J-PARC n beam-line construction group (I borrowed most of all the transparencies from Nakadaira-san)

J-PARC neutrino beam line Primary Proton beam line Proton Energy 50GeV (40/30GeV @ T=0) # of Protons / pulse 3.31014 Beam Power 750kW  4MW @ Phase II Extraction point Target Target station Bunch structure Decay volume 8 (15) bunches/spill Spill width ~5ms beam dump muon monitor Cycle: 3~4 sec Near neutrino detector Bunch spacing: ~600(300) ns Bunch length: 58ns (Full width)

Target Station Accommodate Area filled with Helium gas Baffle: Graphite, 32mmf hole x 1.7m long to protect 1st horn Target 3 Horns Area filled with Helium gas reduce Tritium, NOx production Highly radio-activated ~1Sv/h, Need remote-controlled maintenance system Need cooling (Helium vessel, radiation shield,..) 3rd horn 2nd horn Trg& 1st horn Baffle Target Baffle beam 1st Horn 2nd Horn 3rd Horn

Target dimension Cooing path Co-axial 2 layer cooling pipe: Graphite / Ti-6Al-4V, Helium cooling Outer pipe 47.0 46.4 39.6 35.6 26.0 Ti-6Al-4V [mm] Inner pipe IG-43 target IG-43 spacer Sectional area = 4.610-4 [m2] Cooing path f=47mm f=26mm

One design of the target & surrounding cooling pipe (Not the final design). 陽子ビーム He inlet He outlet Ti-6Al-4V Beam window Ti-6Al-4V 陽子ビーム Target Need further design study Graphite IG-43

Design of inlet and outlet of He Gas is not fixed. } To downstream } To downstream Design of inlet and outlet of He Gas is not fixed.

Disadvantage Target cooling : Water or Helium? Water Cooling Helium Gas cooling Very Efficient  High Heat transfer ratio Already tested. Simple circulation system We can control Ttarget to minimize the irradiation effect. (Ttarget = 400 ~ 800 C) Reduce radioactive waste water No target container is needed large Irradiation effect  Ttarget  300C to avoid the water boiling: Ttarget @ surface < 100C Target container is needed. DPwater= ~2MPa due to the temperature rise by a beam hit. Huge radioactive waste water Very High flow rate ~ 2000 l/min [0.5MPa] ~ 12000 l/min [0.1MPa] Circulation system is complicated. Special treatment for the high temperature gas (200C) is necessary. Advantage Disadvantage

Target : Conceptual design Core: Isotropic-Graphite : IG-43 (Toyo Tanso Co. Ltd) Energy deposit… Total: ~40kJ/spill (30GeV)  DT  200K. seq = 7.5 [MPa]  Tensile strength = 37.2 [MPa] Distribution of the energy deposit in the target (w/ 1 spill) J/gK degree MARS proton beam cm f=47mm f=26mm

Energy deposit (30GeV, s x= s y =4.24mm) Target 39.3 [kJ/spill] R target 13 [mm] DR (target ~ horn) 3[mm] Energy deposit (30GeV, s x= s y =4.24mm) Target 39.3 [kJ/spill] 3.5 [kJ/spill] 1.1 [kJ/spill] 1.5 [kJ/spill] 99.09% (0.91%loss) Inner Pipe Outer Pipe Insulator Targeting Efficiency For Gaussian beam Helium flow (T gas < 200C, suction=0.03MPa) Cross section 459.3 [mm2] 491 [Nm3/h] 246 [m/s] 0.0833 [MPa] Flow rate Avg. speed @ target DP @straight part+1st hex

Irradiation Effect of Graphite Expected radiation damage of the target The approximation formula used by NuMI target group : 0.25dpa/year MARS simulation : 0.15~0.20 dpa/year Dimension change : shrinkage by ~5mm in length in 5 years at maximum. ~75mm in radius Degradation of thermal conductivity … decreased by 97% @ 200 C 70~80% @ 400 C Magnitude of the damage strongly depends on the irradiation temperature. It is better to keep the temperature of target around 400 ~ 800 C 400 600 800 1000 Irradiation Temperature(C) 1 2 3 (dpa) 400oC 800oC Thermal conductivity (After/Before) JAERI report (1991) 2dpa -0.5% 1dpa Dimension change Toyo-Tanso Co Ltd. IG-11

FEM simulation of He cooling Assumptions: 0.19MPa He Initial temperature: 25 C He flow rate: 6000 [l/min]  194 [m/sec] Heat convection rate: 820 [W/m2/K] (50GeV,f=15mm) Target Temperature Helium Temperature Max: ~ 500 C Min: ~ 300 C Avg. : ~380 C Max: ~160 C (DT = 135 C) Avg. : ~40 C

FEM simulation of He cooling (50GeV,f=15mm) Assumptions: 0.19MPa (Possible pressure drop at the downstream of target is taken into account.) He Initial temperature: 25 C He flow rate: 6000 [l/min]  194 [m/sec] Heat convection rate: 820 [W/m2/K]

fin.