Evaluating and Revising the Physical Education Instructional Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Work Sample
Advertisements

M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
Parents as Partners in Education
Continuing QIAT Conversations Joan Breslin Larson Follow up webinar post Feb for AT Conference for AT Teams Hosted by Oklahoma.
An Introduction to Instructional Design Online Learning Institute Mary Ellen Bornak Instructional Designer Bucks County Community College.
Effective Implementation Formative and Summative Project Evaluation.
Program Evaluation.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
By Michael Morris Samika Thompson Integrating and Implementing Technology Fall 2009.
Instructional System Design.  The purpose of instructional design is to maximize the value of instruction for the learner especially the learner's time.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Chapter 15 Evaluation.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Develop Systematic processes Mission Performance Criteria Feedback for Quality Assurance Assessment: Collection, Analysis of Evidence Evaluation: Interpretation.
Data Collection and Student Portfolios Shared by: Anne Arundel County Public Schools.
6. Penilaian Kurikulum The Meaning of Evaluation 1.Evaluation is a process or group of processes by which evaluators gather data in order to make decisions.
Designing and Implementing Career Development Programs and Services Chapter 9.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
The Comprehensive School Health Education Curriculum:
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Problem Based Learning (PBL) David W. Dillard Arcadia Valley CTC.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
Instructional System Design
Instructional Design Eyad Hakami. Instructional Design Instructional design is a systematic process by which educational materials are created, developed,
Monimalika Day CECED. Ambedkar University.  Request from states and organizations to develop or review curriculum  Parents’ expectations  Teacher’s.
Local Control Accountability Plan. LCAP  The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) is a document that provides details regarding the District’s services,
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Campaign Readiness Project Overview Enabling a structured, scalable approach to customer-centric campaigns.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
What is design? Blueprints of the instructional experience Outlining how to reach the instructional goals determined during the Analysis phase The outputs.
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.
Teacher competencies. Professional competence with ICT Draw on appropriate ICT applications to enhance personal and professional effectiveness  Using.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
 The teacher is the decision maker and it is her job to decide on what units to include during the year or what tomorrow’s lesson plan will be.  Thought-out.
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.” Albert Einstein.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
Designing the Concepts Curriculum. Exit Outcomes Program Outcomes Course Outcomes Unit Outcomes Lesson Outcomes.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Re-Cap NGSS. Assessment, Evaluation, and Alignment.
EdHD 5016 Teaching a Class of Mixed Abilities: Differentiated Instruction Instructional Intervention Ideas Fall, 2012.
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS: PRINCIPLES, DESIGN, UTILIZATION AND EVALUTION ASSOCIATE PROF. DR. ABU BAKAR IBRAHIM EDU 555 CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION.
Differentiation Compacting Curriculum Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
K-6 Benchmark Assessment Inservices
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
SEC & State/District Initiatives
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating and Revising the Physical Education Instructional Program

Purpose of Program Evaluation Document the validity and/or importance of the program outcomes Document the way in which the program is being implemented Determine the effect of the program on participants Provide recommendations for revisions based on identified weaknesses

Decisions involved in program evaluation Planning Decisions What should we do? Recycling Decisions Did we do it? Organizing Decisions How should we do it? Implementing Decisions Are we doing it? Curriculum Outcomes Educational Experiences

Developing the evaluation plan Curriculum Outcomes: Planning Decisions –What is the purpose of this evaluation? Adopting a new curriculum? Discontinuing a program? Implementation of new instructional strategies? Program review for accreditation? –Who is a part of this phase? Typically, you the teacher, other peer teachers, at least one administrator, perhaps one community member

Developing the evaluation process Educational Experiences: Organizing Decisions –What is needed for this program to be successful? Facilities? Equipment? Scheduling? Class size? Teacher prep for the experiences –Is this the current status within this program?

Developing the evaluation process Educational Experiences: Implementing decisions –Are we following the curriculum? –Do the learners know what they are supposed to learn? –Do learners have pre-requisite skills based on the scope and sequence Have we implemented the curriculum model appropriately?

Developing the evaluation process Curriculum Outcomes: Recycling decisions –Based on the planned outcomes, the decisions made through organization and implementation, did we meet our outcomes? Did learning occur? Did we accomplish our goals? –If yes? Do we continue this curriculum? –If partly yes? What do we need to change to meet our goals and promote student learning? –If no? Do we discontinuing this curriculum? Was the program effective in meeting goals? Do we need program improvement to meet goals?

Recycling Decisions Program Improvement –Based on documentation of individual student achievement Consider possible changes in program objectives or modifications of the existing program standards Consider changes in instructional strategies Consider whether the program is meeting student need for relevant learning

Recycling Decisions Program Effectiveness –Program evaluation seeks to describe the number of students who are making gains on the program objectives –Evaluation of the program is merely an extension of the evaluation of individual students

Recycling Decisions: Program Effectiveness ☺Did change occur? ☺ Was the change statistically significant? ☺ Was the effect educationally significant? ☺ Can effects be replicated? ☺ Did the observed effects result from the program?

Recycling Decisions: Program Effectiveness If students don’t meet the program outcomes, one must consider: –Characteristics of the teacher –Characteristics of the students –Characteristics of the instructional setting or context –Characteristics of program implementation Strength of relationships often provide insight regarding potential program revisions

Determining needed changes Knowledge of ‘what’ to improve must be supplemented with information suggesting ‘why’ the weakness exists Weakness observed in program implementation usually results from a lack of knowledge about the process that is involved in planning, implementing, or evaluating; therefore, INSERVICE

Recommendations Recommended improvements tend to focus on changing the activity content –If changing content, will the new content be more relevant to the goals and desired outcomes? How will new content align with purpose of the curriculum model? –Would changes in instruction increase the quality of the program? –Are new activities sequence patterns adapted to student readiness? are resources available? Be ready to communicate the evaluation results to school community, regardless of the analysis outcome

Practical Application Based on the scope chart developed for your curriculum model, how would you go about evaluating this program once implemented? –Describe the process of the program evaluation –Describe the data to be collected –Describe how you would analyze the data –Describe how you would utilize the data to implement change