Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning - 2010 Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Theory of Change.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 7 Understanding the change process Towards more effective Capacity Development.
Advertisements

Outputs, outcomes and impacts Using Theory of Change to plan, develop and evaluate your initiative.
Immigrant Integration as a Complex Adaptive Social Systems Agnes Meinhard, PhD.
Cynefin Framework slides (From Organizations in Development Course, mainly drawn and adapted from David Snowden)
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation 4 Quadrants of Change.
Developmental Evaluation Why we do it How we are using it A way to contribute.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
Supporting continuous improvement in the replication process Getting to Grips with Replication Seminar 3: Monitoring, evaluation & continuous improvement.
1 Theory of Change Chesapeake Bay Funders Network Program Evaluation Training Workshop OMG Center for Collaborative Learning January 9-10, 2008.
An Introduction to an Integrated P,M&E System developed by IDRC Kaia Ambrose October, 2005.
Session Four: M&E System for AfT bankable projects UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) Expert Group Meeting on Monitoring.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Complexity, a bit of chaos and robust adaptive strategies Prof Clive Morley Graduate School of Business.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Institutional analysis.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Your case presentations.
Institutional and Policy Mapping for Small-Scale Producer inclusion in Modern Markets.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Drivers, Trends and.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Mindsets and Paradigms.
Landscape functions and people Bangkok, October 2010 Ten principles for a Adaptive Landscape Approach.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Rich Picture Visit://portals.wi.wur.nl/msp//portals.wi.wur.nl/msp.
Centre for Development Innovation Intro to MSP Jim Woodhill, Centre for Development Innovation.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation MSP Generic Process.
Partnerships and Power Dealing with Power, Conflict and Learning in the Facilitation of Multi- stakeholder Processes.
MSP course 2007 Phase 0 – Setting up Kumasi, Ghana 2008 Wageningen International.
SUNITA RAI PRINCIPAL KV AJNI
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Participation Visit://portals.wi.wur.nl/msp//portals.wi.wur.nl/msp.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Multi-Stakeholder.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Programme & Welcome!
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
1 A proposed skills framework for all 11- to 19-year-olds.
Thinking systemically: Seeing from simple to complex in impact evaluation Professor Patricia Rogers Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Australia.
Collaborative Watershed Management Integrating Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management for Sustainable Development Vicente L. Lopes University of.
What is actor analysis? … a way to understand who is affected by and who has the power to influence water policy decisions and implementation, i.e. the.
Logistics and supply chain strategy planning
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
Developing Indicators
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Examining the development & practice of quality management at ONS, using both linear and non- linear thinking Karen Williams.
11th Ordinary Meeting of the General Assembly of CORAF/WECARD 20 June, 2014 Niamey- Niger Addendum to the Strategic Plan ( ) & the 2nd Operational.
Implementation of decentralisation support: Donors as change agents Harmonisation, Decentralisation and Local Governance.
Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer / Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Semi structured.
Providing mentor support for practice educators in training Exploring and evaluating approaches used by Bournemouth University 2010.
Illawarra TAFE Leadership Development Program Workshop One September 2008.
Measuring Sustainable development: Achievements and Challenges Enrico Giovannini OECD Chief Statistician June 2005.
Conflict Resolution and Negotiation Skills for Integrated Water Resources Management Section Five: Implications for Water Resources Management.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
Why is this on the agenda? Our baseline study was highly critiqued Our monitoring method was revised Our mid-term review highlights monitoring and evaluation.
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Constructing indicators of progress/well-being with citizens/communities Dr Jonathan POTTER OECD Local Economic and Employment Development Programme.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
CONVENTION & DESTINATION MARKETING Prepared by Yooshik Yoon, Kyunghee University
Outcome Harvesting Principles in Practice
Workshop to develop theories of change
Project Cycle Management
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Building an Intervention Logic
Intro slide to all of these:
KEY PRINCIPLES OF THINKING SYSTEMICALLY
COMPLIMENTARY TEACHING MATERIALS
An Introduction to an Integrated P,M&E System developed by IDRC
Articulate how the practice of management has evolved
Evaluating support to capacity development
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Outcome Mapping: from alternative to mainstream
What is complexity?.
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Presentation transcript:

Facilitating Multi Stakeholder Processes and Social Learning Herman Brouwer/ Karèn Verhoosel Centre for Development Innovation Theory of Change and Complexity Visit://portals.wi.wur.nl/msp//portals.wi.wur.nl/msp

Still analyzing and planning …. Collaborative Action Adaptive Planning Initiating Reflective Monitoring

This session Intro to a model of complexity Intro theories of change – what is it and how do you develop them? Practice the use of complexity model and theory of change on our own cases

Taking a Complexity Perspective Friends and Enemies

Control or Emergence

What change really means for a sugar cane farmer Source: Ashish Shah, Kenya green – local pink - national blue – international the farmer

The Cynefin Framework Complicated Complex Chaotic Simple Disorder Undordered Ordered Source: Cognitive Edge (

The Framework Model Source: Cognitive Edge ( ComplicatedComplex Chaotic Simple Disorder Cause and Effect: repeatable, perceivable, and predictable Cause and Effect: not detectable Cause and Effect: understandable in retrospect but not predictable Cause and Effect: detectable but separated over time and space Sense – Categorise - Respond Probe – sense - Respond Act – Sense - Respond Sense – Analyse - Respond Unordered Contexts Ordered Contexts

The Framework Model ComplicatedComplex ChaoticSimple Source: Cognitive Edge ( Disorder Constructing village water supply Vaccination programme Training about legal rights Birth registration Managing a tourist resort Delivering quality forestry services Designing effective M&E system Linking small-scale producers to markets Introducing air traffic control system Agricultural development in face of uncertainty Land tenure reform Institutional change for sustainable tourism Changing tax-incentives to favor small-scale producers Peace building in a failed state Initial response to disasters

The Framework Model ComplicatedComplex ChaoticSimple Source: Cognitive Edge ( Disorder Logical framework Outcome mapping Logical framework Safe Fail Experiments Principle based Just act with instinct Adaptive management

Adaptive and linear approaches need to be integrated and different intervention strategies are needed

Adaptive Change Processes Linear Change Processes Context of Change Continuum Based on clear and perceivable cause and effect relationships Logical step by step result focused Clearly and fully specified at start Simple predetermined measureable indicators Recognises complexity and uncertainty of interactions Iterative, principle based, relationship oriented, experimental Indicative and iterative, based on feedback and learning relationships Learning and process oriented, explains expected and unexpected results Theory of Change Examining assumptions and theories about how change occurs Intervention Logic Deciding on strategies that will be followed to influence/create change Action Planning Organising and executing intervention strategies Monitoring and evaluation Assessing, judging and explaining the results of interventions Paradigms of Development Recognising overall worldview, values and perspectives on development The world is largely knowable, predictable and change can be controlled The world evolves in unpredictable ways that can be only partly influenced Unordered Aspects (Complex and Chaotic) Ordered Aspects (Simple and Complicated)

Theory of Change What is a Theory of Change? Theory of Change or Theories of Change?

Where do things go wrong? Limited or incorrect causal understanding Misjudging the motivations, incentives or capacities for people to act or change in particular ways Insufficient time or resources to achieve objectives Too limited influence over causal factors Breakdowns in human/organisational relations External factors that change causal relations and motivations Lack of adaptive capacity to respond to change

Bring greater rigour to programme design Lead to more appropriate choice in approach based on context and objectives Open up broader range of options for change strategies Help resolve conflicts about choice in strategies based on unarticulated assumptions Better informed, coherent and more transparent decision making Articulating a Theory of Change can:

A Theory of Change can be helpful for: An improved understanding of the complexity of the situation Recognition of unknowns and uncertainties Surfacing different assumptions and beliefs that may cause conflict or upset relationships An improved understanding of differences in paradigms, interests, assumptions about change between the different actors that need to cooperate An improved execution (planning, management and learning) of the interventions

Pathway of Change Goal Long- term Outcome Preconditions Intervention Progress markers Assumption Progress markers

Implications Different underlying assumptions lead to very different strategies for bringing about change Assumptions are often taken for granted and not made explicit The rational and linear model of western scientific inspired reasoning is at odds with the ‘realities’ of complex adaptive systems AND thinking and not OR thinking Surfacing and questioning assumptions is key to adaptive learning Logframes and complex adaptive systems don’t mix

Methods and Tools Cause and effect mapping (where possible) Scenario analysis Outcome mapping ‘Theory of Change’ ‘So-that’ chains Facilitated dialogue and questioning Ritual dissent

Case Work  Complexity: explore what type of problem we deal with in the MSP (simple, complicated, complex, chaos). What does this imply?  Develop a brief Theory of Change for the case: Goal (long term development) Preconditions (outcomes/objectives, results) Underlying Assumptions Indicate where stakeholders are already involved Explore where/how your organisation can intervene Build on your Rich Picture, Institutional analysis and Drivers, Trends and Scenarios analysis. They are part of your Theory of Change!

Thank you! © Wageningen UR