1 COE Rubrics Assessment Process Dr. Marwan Abu-Amara April 5 th, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Poster & Project Presentations The Robert Gordon University
Advertisements

Title: The title should accurately describe the issue to be addressed and can never contain a proposed countermeasure. Overview Note: Remember that the.
JKA_F081 Presentation Tips for Engineering Freshmen John K. Athanasiou Oct. 15, 2008 Charles W. Davidson College of Engineering San Jose State University.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATIONS Center for Professional Communication.
Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.
Electronic Visualization Laboratory University of Illinois at Chicago Giving Good Presentations Electronic Visualization Laboratory University of Illinois.
Comments from your last final presentation (fall 2011)
Using Rubrics for Evaluating Student Learning. Purpose To review the development of rubrics for the purpose of assessment To share an example of how a.
Using RUBRICS to Assess Program Learning Outcomes By Dr. Ibrahim Al-Jabri Director, Program Assessment Center April 16, 2007.
Supporting Literacy in the Content Areas: Science, Math, & Social Studies.
Lamar State College-Port Arthur February 16 & 17, 2011.
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Some Guidelines on How to Deliver a Good Presentation Dr. Aiman El-Maleh King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Computer Engineering Department COE.
Using Rubrics for Evaluating Student Learning Office of Assessment and Accreditation Indiana State University.
Computer Engineering Program Outcomes Assessment Prepared by Prof. Mayez Al-Muhammad and Dr. Aiman El-Maleh Dept. of Computer Engineering King Fahd University.
August, 2014 Susan M. Schultz Berkeley ELL Writing Power Writing and Four Square Strategies.
 Professional Military Instructor (PME)  Goals  Objectives  Criteria  Scoring Key  Assessment Requirements  Conclusion  References.
Slide 1. Slide 2 Senior Project Measuring attitudes, knowledge, and skills that cannot be measured on a standardized assessment— a performance assessment.
Assessment and Rubrics From K. Purgason and J. Adelson-Goldstein.
Developing an Effective Assessment Plan
Engineering H193 - Team Project Spring Quarter2005 Gateway Engineering Education Coalition P. 1 Lecture on Oral Presentations Week 7 Day 1.
The SLO Process Session 2 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.
1 Assessment and Evaluation for Online Courses Associate Professor Dr. Annabel Bhamani Kajornboon CULI’s 6 th Intl Conference: Facing.
Assessing Students Ability to Communicate Effectively— Findings from the College of Technology & Computer Science College of Technology and Computer Science.
Engineering Presentations Development and Delivery Made by Matukhin D.L. Associate Prof. EEI TPU TOMSK POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY.
Portfolio Assessment A collection of a student’s work specifically selected to tell a story about the student.
1 Managing Learning Environments. 2 Goal: To learn how to design effective lessons.
1 Managing Learning Environments. 2 Goal: To learn how to design effective lessons.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Essential Presentation Skills
Assessed: 2004, 2008, Student Learning Outcome: Make effective oral presentations that are informative as well as persuasive, as appropriate.
Navigating Murky Waters The Challenge of Assessing Preservice Teacher Dispositions Dr. Anne B. Bucalos and Dr. Christine G. Price Bellarmine University.
Science Fair Projects.
Human Impact Project Science & Social Studies. Driving Question How can the issues created by humans in the Great Lakes region be addressed and corrected?
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR ACCREDITING THE COMPUTER ENGINEERING PROGRAM King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Computer Engineering Department.
David W. Dillard AVCTC. Objectives Overview of the need for student assessments Define Student Assessments & parts of a rubric Samples of rubrics Develop.
First-Year Engineering Program P. 1 Lab Safety Policies Don’t stand on lab chairs Don’t sit or stand on lab tables No dangling jewelry or loose clothes.
Najd 124 Speaking Task Presentations. Presentation weeks Presentation 1WEEK 5 General Topic min Use visual aids Presentation 2WEEK 10 General Topic.
Unit 5.  Know your topic and become an expert  Have an idea what the background is of your audience is so you will know how much detail to go into and.
Title of Training Module Design Plan
PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATIONS Center for Professional Communication.
The Guidance For Successful Graduation Project Mousa Al-Omari Alaa Bani Amer Abdullah Al-Doghim Mhmoud Shannag Ali Sameeh.
Concept Map 2 – Title: Sampling Designs Terms: Voluntary Response Sample Simple Random Sample Stratified Random Sample Cluster Sampling Systematic Sampling.
Understanding Rubrics What is a rubric? A scoring tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” (e.g., purpose, organization, detail,
Update on ABET Assessment Work
Writing a Lab Report.
Guidelines for Presentations Hasan Çam Computer Science and Engineering Department Arizona State University.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
Week 13 Day 1 Presentations 101 Today in Class: -- Presentation schedule -- Presentations -- Self Critique Paper.
Presenting a Paper (in English) Sean Kung July
INFO 414 Human Information Behavior Presentation tips.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Literacy in Science Developing skills across KS3-KS5 “The more you read, the more things you will know. The more that you learn, the more places you'll.
Oral Presentation Tips (Ch. 7 of Making Sense) Oral component is worth 25% of second assignment It’s a collective team grade.
College of Education, Eastern Visayas State University September 16, 2011.
Forrest Gump For the next few days, we will watch the movie, Forrest Gump. This movie follows a fictional character who seems to end up interacting with,
Giving a Presentation “There are always three speeches, for every one you actually gave. The one you practiced, the one you gave, and the one you wish.
Study Support Session Oral Presentations. Identifying the Purpose  What are you hoping to achieve: to inform, train, persuade or demonstrate?  Are you.
RUBRICS AND SCALES 1. Rate yourself on what you already know about scales. Use the scale below to guide your reflection. 2.
Investigate Plan Design Create Evaluate (Test it to objective evaluation at each stage of the design cycle) state – describe - explain the problem some.
Oral Communication Week Two.
Human Impact Project: Science & Social Studies 6th grade
Just what is a rubric?.
Effective Use of Rubrics to Assess Student Learning
Student Assessment Methods David W. Dillard AVCTC.
Some Guidelines on How to Deliver a Good Presentation
Developing Instructional rubrics
Presentation transcript:

1 COE Rubrics Assessment Process Dr. Marwan Abu-Amara April 5 th, 2008

2 Outline What is a “Rubric”? Why use “Rubrics”? How “Rubrics” are used in COE?  Process  Samples Currently available “Rubrics” results Summary

3 What is a “Rubric”? * A scoring tool that  lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” For example, purpose, organization, details, voice, and mechanics are often what count in a piece of writing  describes levels of quality for each criterion For example, qualitative scores (e.g. Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Needs Improvement), or as numerical scores (e.g., 4, 3, 2, 1) * Heidi Goodrich Andrade, a rubrics expert (

4 Why use “Rubrics”? * Rubrics help students and teachers define “quality” When students use rubrics regularly to judge their own work, they begin to accept more responsibility for the end product Rubrics reduce the time teachers spend grading student work and makes it easier for teachers to explain to students why they got the grade they did and what they can do to improve * Heidi Goodrich Andrade, a rubrics expert (

5 How “Rubrics” are used in COE? As presented earlier, for each COE program outcome, an assessment and evaluation plan is developed that contains the following elements:  Assessment and Evaluation Methods  Performance Criteria  Logistics “Rubrics” are one of the direct assessment methods used to evaluate the COE program outcomes A “Rubric” exists for each of the following COE program outcomes:  a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, and n

6 How “Rubrics” are used in COE? … The following COE courses are used to assess the COE program outcomes, and accordingly have an associated set of “Rubrics”:  Microcomputer System Design (COE 305) lab assesses program outcome (b)  Computer Networks lab (COE 344) lab assesses program outcome (b)  Cooperative Work (COE 350/351) assesses program outcomes (a, c, d, e, g, h, i, j, k, and n)  Seminar (COE 390) assesses program outcome (f)  Summer Training (COE 399) assesses program outcome (g)  System Design Laboratory (COE 400) assesses program outcomes (a, b, c, d, e, g, h, i, j, k, and n)  Senior Design Project (COE 485) assesses program outcomes (a, c, d, e, g, h, i, j, k, and n) An equivalent summary is provided in the following slide

7 How “Rubrics” are used in COE? … Note the following:  COE 399 is used for COE program assessment through “Rubrics” only once a year (i.e. in the 1st term)  All other courses are used for COE program assessment through “Rubrics” twice a year (i.e. in the 1 st and the 2 nd terms)

8 How “Rubrics” are used in COE? – Process 1) The instructor of each of the COE 305 lab, COE 344 lab, COE 399, COE 400, and COE 485 as well as each member of the examining committee of COE 399 and COE 350/351 is responsible for performing the following: i. Select a sample of students from their respective course ii. Conduct the respective “Rubrics” using the selected sample of the students from the previous step iii. Forward the results of the conducted “Rubrics” to the COE Assessment Committee (AC) 2) The AC collects the various results of “Rubrics” associated with each COE program outcome, and accordingly calculates a weighted average, out of 4.0, for each COE program outcome 3) Forward “Rubrics” summary results to the Undergraduate Committee (UC) to consider curriculum correction actions, if any From “Rubrics” point of view, a COE program outcome is declared to be achieved if the corresponding weighted average is  2.5 out of 4.0

9 How “Rubrics” are used in COE? – Samples The following slides provide a sample of the “Oral Presentation Rubrics” used to assess COE program outcome (g)

10 Oral Presentation Rubrics (Sample) KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM & MINERALS COLLEGE OF COMPUTER SCIENCES & ENGINEERING COMPUTER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ORAL PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT Presenter’s Name: ________________________ Presenter ID#: ___________ Presentation Title: ________________________________________________ Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________ Date: ________________ OutcomeNovice (1)Apprentice (2)Proficient (3)Exemplary (4)ScoreComments  Audience awareness (interacts with audience: e.g. stepping toward audience and speaking to them, not at them), looking at them, making eye contact Does not interact with audience at all … Does not look at the audience … Look at PC, screen, or elsewhere Little interaction with audience … Most of the time looks elsewhere Some interaction with audience Interacts with audience throughout presentation  Focus: goal, evidence, conclusion (gives audience a roadmap and follows it) Does not give audience an adequate road map of goal, evidence and conclusion Gives audience some road map of goal, evidence and conclusion Gives audience an adequate road map of goal, evidence and conclusion Gives audience very clear road map of goal, evidence and conclusion  Transitions (phrases smoothly link one part to next) Abruptly transitions from one phase to the next … No linking Some transition is provided though not smooth Transitions are generally smooth Very smooth Transitions  Use of visual aids (any non-plain text methods such as graphs, charts, flow diagrams …etc.) to tell the story and enhance the quality of the presentation Either does not use visual aids at all; or too much dependency on visual aids There is some use visual aids effectively to tell the story Overall, uses visual aids effectively to tell the story; visual aids add to presentation Uses visual aids very effectively to tell the story; visual aids enhance presentation

11 Oral Presentation Rubrics (Sample)… MechanicsNovice (1)Apprentice (2)Proficient (3)Exemplary (4)ScoreComments  Body position (e.g., facing audience or screen) Body position (faces screen or board all the time) Body position (faces audience some of the time) Body position (faces audience most of the time) Body position (always facing audience)  Eye contact: (e.g., scanning entire audience) No eye contactSome eye contact (not enough, looking down a lot) Eye contact (some scanning of audience, looking at people) Eye contact (excellent scanning of audience, looking at people)  Visual aids (e.g., clear, not too busy, readable size font) Visual Aids (too busy, blurry) Visual Aids (a little bit busy, sometimes not clear) Visual Aids (can read clearly, usually not too much material) Visual Aids (clear, right amount on each slide)  Delivery (e.g., fluency, pace, voice projection, um’s, uh’s) Delivery (too fast, too many um’s, not projecting voice, lack of enthusiasm) Delivery (a little bit fast, sometimes um’s, little projecting voice, little enthusiasm) Delivery (good pace, usually projects voice, some enthusiasm) Delivery (excellent pace, projects voice, great enthusiasm) QuestionsNovice (1)Apprentice (2)Proficient (3)Exemplary (4)ScoreComments  Asks audience for questions Does not ask for questions rarely ask for questions Asks for questionsEffectively opens (“I’d be happy to answer questions”)  Answers questions effectively and smoothly Does not answer questions adequately rarely answer questions adequately Answers questions adequately Answers questions effectively and smoothly

12 Currently available “Rubrics” results The COE program outcomes “Rubrics” have been conducted for both T062 and T071 The summary results for both T062 and T071 are provided next

13 T062 “Rubrics” Results

14 T071 “Rubrics” Results

15 Currently available “Rubrics” results… To explain the weighted average “Rubrics” score for an outcome, consider outcome (c) in the T071 results “Rubrics” for outcome (c) were conducted using COE 350/351, COE 400, and COE 485 with students’ sample of 3, 5, and 3, respectively, and with an average result of 2.13, 2.36, and 2.57, respectively Weighted average score for outcome (c) = (3    2.57)/(3+5+3) = 2.35

16 Currently available “Rubrics” results… By comparing the rubrics results for both T062 and T071, the following can be concluded from a “Rubrics” point of view:  COE program outcomes (b), (d), (e), (f), (g), (i), (k), and (n) were achieved  COE program outcomes (a), (c), (h), and (j) were not achieved

17 Summary “Rubrics” are used as one method to directly assess the COE program outcomes A process is defined to explain how to conduct the “Rubrics” every term The “Rubrics” were conducted for T062 and T071 “Rubrics” results for T062 and T071 reflect that the COE program outcomes (b), (d), (e), (f), (g), (i), (k), and (n) were achieved while the COE program outcomes (a), (c), (h), and (j) were not achieved