Dr. Alexei A. Pevtsov Helicity on the Sun. If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Site Visit Madison, May 1-2, 2006 Magnetic Helicity Conservation and Transport R. Kulsrud and H. Ji for participants of the Center for Magnetic Self-organization.
Advertisements

Free Magnetic Energy and Relative Helicity in Quiet Sun Regions and their role in Solar Dynamics Kostas Tziotziou IAASARS, National Observatory of Athens,
1 A New Model of Solar Flare Trigger Mechanism Kanya Kusano (Hiroshima University) Collaboration with T.Maeshiro (Hiroshima Univ.) T.Yokoyama (Univ. of.
What can HMI teach us about flares & CMEs? Some Discussion-Starting Ideas by Brian Welsch, SSL UC-Berkeley WARNING: My ideas tend to be half-baked, hand-wavy,
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Nonlinearity of the force-free parameter over active regions. M.Hagino and T.Sakurai National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Solar Observatory.
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
1. Helicity: basic properties, open geometries 2. Observations of helicity and helicity flux 3. Twist and Writhe Mitchell Berger Review of Magnetic Helicity.
The Solar Corona B. C. Low High Altitude Observatory National Center for Atmospheric Research The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated.
Coronal Mass Ejections without photospheric/chromospheric signatures Session organizers: Alexei Pevtsov (NSO) and Vasyl Yurchyshyn (BBSO) Discussion leaders:
Active Region Evolution and the Removal of Magnetic Helicity by CMEs Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
SOLIS: Status and results Alexei A. Pevtsov (National Solar Observatory, USA)
The Relation between Filament Skew Angle and Magnetic Helicity of Active Regions Masaoki HAGINO, Y.J. MOON (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
Magnetic Tongues, Magnetic Helicity and Twist in Active Regions. É. Pariat & P. Démoulin LESIA, CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, France Flux Emergence Workshop.
Evolution of Magnetic Helicity in the Corona During Flux Emergence Anna Malanushenko, Humed Yusuf, Dana Longcope.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
The Importance of Sub-surface Magnetic Field Structure and Evolution George H. Fisher SSL, UC Berkeley Shine Meeting 2005.
Flux emergence: An overview of thin flux tube models George Fisher, SSL/UC Berkeley.
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
Free Energies via Velocity Estimates B.T. Welsch & G.H. Fisher, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Helicity • Magnetic helicity measures
Magnetic Helicity Generation Inside the Sun
Dec. 2, 2008 Bangalore, India Active region emergence and its effect on the solar corona Dana Longcope Montana State University, Bozeman, MT Isaac Klapper.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Solar Flare and CME Prediction From Characteristics of 1075 Solar Cycle 23 Active Regions Determined Using.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Flows and the Photospheric Magnetic Field Dynamics at Interior – Corona Interface Brian Welsch, George Fisher, Yan Li, & the UCB/SSL MURI & CISM Teams.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Kinetic and Magnetic Helicities of Solar Active Regions Ram Ajor Maurya, Ashok Ambastha And Vema Reddy Udaipur Solar Observatory Physical Research Laboratory,
How Does Free Magnetic Energy Enter the Corona? Brian Welsch, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley Free magnetic energy, equivalent to departures of the coronal.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
B. T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA J. M. McTiernan Space Sciences.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Summary of UCB MURI workshop on vector magnetograms Have picked 2 observed events for targeted study and modeling: AR8210 (May 1, 1998), and AR8038 (May.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Knots and Bolts of Solar Helicity Dr. Alexei A. Pevtsov “If You are after good publicity, You should not speak about current helicity” – Jan Stenflo.
Helicity: where it comes from and what it tells us Dana Longcope, MSU Anna Malanushenko, MSU/LMSAL 8/11/10Canfield-fest Thanks: Graham Barnes, CoRA B.
The Occurrence and Speed of CMEs Related to Magnetic Helicity Injection in Their Source Regions Sung-Hong Park Solar and Space Weather Research Group Korea.
Comparison on Calculated Helicity Parameters at Different Observing Sites Haiqing Xu (NAOC) Collaborators: Hongqi, Zhang, NAOC Kirill Kuzanyan, IZMIRAN,
The Flux Transport Dynamo, Flux Tubes and Helicity The Flux Transport Dynamo, Flux Tubes and Helicity Arnab Rai Choudhuri Department of Physics Indian.
1 Mei Zhang ( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences ) Helicity Transport from the convection zone to interplanetary space Collaborators:
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
Helicity as a Constraint on the Solar Dynamo Alexei A. Pevtsov If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo.
Newark, Wiegelmann et al.: Coronal magnetic fields1 Solar coronal magnetic fields: Source of Space weather Thomas Wiegelmann, Julia Thalmann,
Helicity Observations by Huairou Vector Magnetograph Mei Zhang National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences Plan of the Talk: 1.Huairou.
Practical Calculation of Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budgets in Solar Active Regions Manolis K. Georgoulis Research Center for Astronomy.
The Solar Dynamo and Emerging Flux Presented by Angelo P. Verdoni Physics 681 Fall 05 George H. Fisher, Yuhong Fan, Dana W. Longcope, Mark G. Linton and.
Long-term Helicity Evolution in AR 8100 A. The relative magnetic helicity content of the coronal field B. The magnetic helicity injected by photospheric.
Observation on Current Helicity and Subsurface Kinetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions Gao Yu Helicity Thinkshop Main Collaborators: Zhang, H.
SHINE 2006 David Alexander Rice University Exploring the dynamics of flux-emergence in magnetically-complex solar active regions David Alexander and Lirong.
1 Mei Zhang ( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences ) Solar cycle variation of kinetic helicity Collaborators: Junwei Zhao (Stanford,
Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.
Solar Magnetic Field Reversal V J Pizzo SHINE Workshop August 18, 2002.
Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept Pascal Démoulin but there is no way to estimate it from observations.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
Scientific rationale for vector polarimetry aboard SDO Or “Why do we need to determine photospheric vector fields?” Hector Socas-Navarro.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
2. Method outline2. Method outline Equation of relative helicity (Berger 1985): - : the fourier transform of normal component of magnetic field on the.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept Pascal Démoulin but there is no way to estimate it from observations.
CMEs: Taking magnetic helicity from low corona
Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions
Thought in 2000: Magnetic helicity is an important theoretical concept
Introduction to Space Weather
Magnetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions: Some Observational Results
Big Bear Solar Observatory of NJIT
Magnetic Helicity In Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Alexei A. Pevtsov Helicity on the Sun. If you worry about publicity Do not speak of Current Helicity Jan Stenflo

Helicity on the Sun: What is it good for anyway? Dr. Alexei A. Pevtsov

Outline Definition of helicity (incl. graphic repr.) Hemispheric helicity rule (observations, origin, cycle variation) Helicity transport Fitting pieces of puzzle together???

Knots and Bolts H = 0

Knots and Bolts H = 0H= -1

Writhe and Twist H = W+T W = -1; T=0 T = -1; W=0

Helicities A – vector potential, B – magnetic induction. For liner force-free field (  constant) where  is arbitrary scalar function, where E is magnetic energy -topological invariant -conserves better than energy (Woltjer, 1958; Taylor 1974; Ji et al, 1995) -dynamo, reconnection, stability energy decay – % helicity dissipation – % Magnetic Helicity  Current Helicity  Kinetic Helicity 

What We Observe Observations: Force-free field (1) : Current helicity density (2) : WL, H-alpha, X-ray Morphology: Abramenko et al, 1996 Bao and Zhang, 1998 Pevtsov et al, 1995, Longcope et al, 1998

What We Observe Relative helicity: (e.g. Chae, 2001) (Berger, 1985)

466 active regions observed by Haleakala Stokes Polarimeter  = -0.23, Likelihood of no correlation is 2.5x10 -7 N/(-) S/(+) 69% 75% (cycle 22, Pevtsov et al, 1995) 63% 70% (cycle 23, Pevtsov et al, 2001) Seehafer, 1990 Pevtsov et al, 1995, Abramenko et al, 1996 Longcope et al, 1998, Bao and Zhang, 1998, Pevtsov et al. 2001, Hagino and Sakurai, %, hemispheric helicity rule

Cycle variation? Pevtsov et al 2001 Bao et al, 1999, reverse sign for hc at the beginning Cycle 23 Hagino & Sakurai, 2002, some periods disobey the rule Nandi & Choudhuri 2004 – cycle variation of helicity rule  Lat  best 

Zhang, 2006

ObservationsRad/MmRef. AR~0.01Pevtsov et al 1995 substructures~0.2Pevtsov etal 1994, Leka et al, 1996 Sources of Twist Joy’s Law0.001Longcope & Klapper 1997 Diff’l rotation0.002Longcope et al 1999  - effect ~0.02Longcope et al 1998 Created in dynamo4 x Charbonneau & Gilman 1998 Holder et al, 2003; Tian et al., 2001 Chae 2001, Green et al 2003 Demoulin et al 2003 – direct action of Coriolis force and differential rotation produce insufficient amount of helicity and cannot explain significant scatter in latitudinal dependency – dynamo does not produce enough helicity.  -effect can do it all? Seehafer et al, 2003 Longcope et al, 1999

Nandy, 2006  ~  Scatter is latitude-independent Trend, scatter agree with  -effect

Helicity Transport For liner force-free field (  constant)where  is arbitrary scalar function Lepping et al (1990) fitted 18 MCs,  = m -1, B 0 = G,  =10 21 Mx. H MC =(L  /2  )  2 = 5 x Mx 2 Larson et al (1995), H MC = 4 x Mx 2 Demoulin et al, 2002, AR x Mx 2 (26 CMEs, 1 rotation) 5 rotations - ? Total helicity ejected by MCs often exceeds coronal helicity (diff. rotation cannot replenish).

Helicity Transport via Reconnection Independent flux systems: H m = H 1 + H 2 + H 3 ; e.g. H 1 =0.5H crit ; H 2 =0.4H crit ; H 3 =0.2H crit H m >H crit Canfield & Reardon, 1998 Pevtsov et al 1996

Twist in Emerging Flux Tube Longcope and Welsch, 2000: - vortical motions responsible for helicity injection cannot be driven by pressure gradient and cannot be produced by coupling motions of non-mag. plasma -magnetic torque at photosphere-corona transition cannot be countered by pressure gradients.

Evolution of ARs and their Helicity - MDI full disk magnetograms -SoHO EIT 195A images - 6 emerging active regions Maleev et al, 2002

Modeling Flux Emergence - no twist at emergence - emergence – linear increase in d - d increases in constant rate until t 1

Fitted Model Parameters NOAAalpha ramp-up (days) d days Flux (10 20 Mx) Helicity Mx 2 d 0 Mm V A m sec …1.79…………

Sunspot Rotation -Kempf, P., Astron. Nachrichten, 1910, Nr. 4429, Bd. 195, 197 -Brown, et al, Solar Phys., 2003, 216, 79 -Pevtsov, A. A. and Sattarov, I.S., Soln. Dannye, 1985, No. 3, 65. Courtesy R. Nightingale

Sunspot Rotation (R. Nightingale data) CCWCWBi-direct N31% (70%) 13% (30%) 16% S15% (46%) 17% (54%) 14% * Correct sign of twist; “hemispheric preference” is in agreement with the hemispheric helicity rule * No good correlation between sign of current helicity and direction of rotation

Courtesy R. Nightingale

Kinetic Helicity and flares See poster by F. Hill et al

How These All Might Fit Together? Solar magnetic fields exhibit hemispheric sign asymmetry. Helicity (ARs) is created in upper CZN (  -effect explains large scatter and helicity amplitude; solar cycle variations???). Helicity is removed from AR as a result of eruption. Subphotospheric portion of flux tube may serve as “reservoir” of helicity, supplying helicity between flares/CMEs. Sunspot rotation and subphotospheric pattern of kinetic helicity may be indications of helicity transport via torsional waves.

Open Questions Evolution of kinetic helicity (before/after flare/flux emergence). Timing of sunspot rotation vs. flare Is helicity of active region determined at their emergence, or maybe, significant amount of helicity can be injected later during AR lifetime?