Snapshot of Photon + MET Trigger Studies Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC SUSY-EtMiss Subgroup Meeting 24 November 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CDF D0 Supersymmetry at the Tevatron R. Demina University of Rochester.
Advertisements

Physics with Photons and Missing Energy at ATLAS DOE Site Visit Wednesday July 27, 2011 Bangert *, Damiani, Kim, Kuhl, Litke, Mitrevski, Nielsen, Schumm.
From GMSB to Photons plus Missing E t : Some Thoughts on Model Independence SUSY/E t Miss “Kickoff” Meeting February 5, 2010 Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
Lots of Plots Andrea Bangert Scipp meeting, March 2 nd, 2010.
Summary of Results and Projected Precision Rediscovering the Top Quark Marc-André Pleier, Universität Bonn Top Quark Pair Production and Decay According.
Discussion of Various Issues w.r.t. Photons + MET analysis and its GM Interpretation Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC Editorial Review Meeting 01 April 2011 *)
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
GMSB Trigger Efficiency and Data Stream Issues Non-pointing Photon Meeting September Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
Basic Philosophy of SUSY Photons+MET Selection Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC SUSY 2011 Data Workshop 17 March 2011 n.b.: We are becoming a general photon +
Susy05, Durham 21 st July1 Split SUSY at Colliders Peter Richardson Durham University Work done in collaboration with W. Kilian, T. Plehn and E. Schmidt,
GMSB2 Trigger Efficiency vs. Decay Radius for Some 3- Jet Triggers Non-pointing Photon Meeting August Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
June 8, 2007DSU 2007, Minnesota Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Phys.
Search for Long-Lived Particles at DØ Todd Adams Florida State University July 19, 2005 SUSY05 IPPP Durham.
Snapshot of Photon + MET Trigger Studies On behalf of SUSY Photon+MET Group Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC SUSY Trigger Meeting 14 December 2010.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
Hasty Overview of Photon + MET Studies in the Context of GMSB Bruce Schumm Joint SUSY/UED Meeting 23 November 2010.
Rambling Thoughts on Further Photon(s) + MET Analysis SUSY EtMiss Subgroup Meeting 17 February 2011 Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC, For the SUSY Photon + MET.
Basic Philosophy of SUSY Photons+MET Selection Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC SUSY 2011 Data Workshop 17 March 2011 n.b.: We are becoming a general photon +
First Look at Conversions for Non-Pointing Photons US ATLAS Egamma Meeting March Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP.
1 Search for Excited Leptons with the CMS Detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Andy Yen, Yong Yang, Marat Gataullin, Vladimir Litvine California Institute.
Update from the Photons + MET Group Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 11 March 2010.
Motivations for a  +MET Trigger EGamma and (separately) MET Trigger Meetings 08 Feb 2011 Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC, For the SUSY Photon + MET Group.
Trigger efficiencies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics April 19 th,
1 Calice Analysis Meeting 13/02/07David Ward Just a collection of thoughts to guide us in planning electron analysis In order to end up with a coherent.
Snapshot of Photon + MET Trigger Studies Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC SUSY Trigger Meeting 14 December 2010.
Update from the Photons + MET Group Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 26 August 2010 SUSY/MET Meeting.
University of Science & Technology of China (USTC) University of Science & Technology of China (USTC) W/Z+  ATLAS On behalf of ATLAS Collaboration.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
Trigger studies for GMSB with photons (Internal note for approval) Shilei Zang Bernadette Heyburn, Uriel Nauenberg University of Colorado, Boulder TSG.
Issues and Run-II Musings About the  +MET Analysis Osamu Jinnouchi (Tokyo Tech), Ryan Reece (SCIPP), Sheena Schier (SCIPP), Bruce Schumm (SCIPP) Prepared.
Searching for Supersymmetry with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC SUSY-After-Higgs Workshhop UC Davis April 22-26, 2013 Bruce A. Schumm Santa Cruz Institute.
1 Top Quark Pair Production at Tevatron and LHC Andrea Bangert, Herbstschule fuer Hochenergiephysik, Maria Laach, September 2007.
SUSY with Photons and MET: Introduction and thoughts about Diphoton and Single Photon Analyses Annecy DESY/University of Hamburg Liverpool University Tokyo.
Update on the Diphoton + MET Analysis Basckground Bruce Schumm, Osamu Jinnouchi (Tokyo Tech), Ryan Reese (SCIPP), Sheena Schier (SCIPP) 26 August 2014.
Diphoton+MET 2015: Tasks and Timelines A living document… Bruce Schumm SCIPP.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
SUSY08 Seoul 17 June 081 Daniel Teyssier RWTH Aachen University Searches for non-standard SUSY signatures in CMS on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Feasibility of Detecting Leptoquarks With the CDF Detector Althea Moorhead Mentor: Darin Acosta.
Latest New Phenomena Results from Alexey Popov (IHEP, Protvino) For the DO Collaboration ITEP, Moscow
Diphoton + MET Analysis Update Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 24 January 2014 Editorial Board Meeting.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University CIPANP, June 2012.
Diphoton + MET Analysis Update Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 03 July 2013 Editorial Board Meeting.
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 16 Supersymmetry A purely phenomenological perspective. Disclaimer: I am not an expert on SUSY !!! All you get should.
Searching for Supersymmetry with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC for the ATLAS Collaboration CIPANP 2012 St. Petersburg, FL May 29 – June 2, 2012 Bruce A.
Dave Toback Texas A&M University HCP 2004 June 17 th Run II Searches for Supersymmetry Dave Toback Texas A&M University June 17 th 2004 HCP2004.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
Signatures of lepton-jet production at the LHC Eva Halkiadakis (Rutgers University) with Adam Falkowski, Yuri Gershtein (Rutgers University) Josh Ruderman.
ATLAS physics – an introduction Alan Barr, University of Oxford.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
(Di-)Photon + MET Status and Plans for 5 fb -1 Analysis Who plans to contribute? DESY (Ehrenfeld, Wildt, Vankov) Annecy (Przysiezniak-Frey) Penn (Williams,
Photon + MET Analysis Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 05 August 2013 SUSY Review Talk.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
Physics with Photons and Missing Energy at ATLAS DOE Site Visit Thursday June 14, 2012 Damiani *, Kim, Kuhl, Litke, Mitrevski, Nielsen, Schumm (convener)
Diphoton+MET 2015: Overview of Path towards First Results A living document… Bruce Schumm SCIPP 18 May 2015.
Measuring the t-tbar Cross-Section in the Dilepton Channel at CDF* J. Incandela for C. Mills Jan. 17, 2008 DOE Site Visit UC Santa Barbara * PhD Thesis.
Higgs to  at CDF Amit Lath Rutgers University Tev4LHC Workshop, Sep
Xenon100 collaboration gives a stringent constraint on spin-independent elastic WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section. Ton-scale detectors for direct detection.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
Search for SUSY in Photonic and Tau Channels with the ATLAS Detector
DiPhoton + MET: Towards Unblinding of the 5 fb-1 Analysis
Diphoton+X 2015: Overview of Plans and Goals
Photon(s)+X: Paper Draft Status
Open Reading of the SUSY Photon+X+MET Paper
Weak Production SUSY Search In LHC
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
SUSY RESULTS FROM ATLAS (Plus some musings)
Presentation transcript:

Snapshot of Photon + MET Trigger Studies Bruce Schumm, SCIPP/UCSC SUSY-EtMiss Subgroup Meeting 24 November 2010

Significant Transition: MGM to GGM Tevatron analysis based on “Snowmass Points and Slopes” trajectory that is essentially Minimal Gauge Mediation (MGM) MGM ties strong (gluino) and EW (neutralino) partner scales together, and leads to very massive gluino  Tevatron analyses exploited weak production (lot of data at low energy); sets limits on neutralino mass MGM not particularly well motivated  look at Generalized Gauge Mediation (GGM) which decouples strong, EW scales Re-cast in terms of limits in M g -M  plane for each of three possible neutralino species: Bino-, Wino-, Higgsino-like

Bino-Like Neutralino Grid For Bino-like neutralino, two photons + MET is most promising but lose coverage if hadronic activity is required (jets, HT, etc.) No visible jet activity when M g ~ M  Desecrated plot thanks to Shih/Ruderman, ArXiv D0 Limit

p T of photons M bino = 150 – 580 GeV M gluino = 600GeV (  = 0.26pb ) M bino = 200 GeV M gluino=400–700GeV (  =6–0.07 pb) BR doesn’t change ~ 80% p T of photons ~ similar BR changes vs. M bino: 90% (M bino = 150GeV) 65% (M bino = 580GeV) p T of photons! Photon p T can be soft for M  small

Production cross-section (7TeV) Wino - like Neutralino: |M2|<<  and |M2| < |M1| Natural for photon+lepton channel Not shown: Higgsino, which has no photonic decay TRIGGERS?

Back to Bino-like case… Summary for grid points we have generated so far. Results are out of 1000 events Some inefficiency for M  = M g – 30 (haven’t yet explored) What about E T dependence?

Close to 2g20_loose would be close to knee (remember that current limit is below this, at 150 GeV)

Tentative Conclusions for Bino-Like Case We are probably OK for 2g20_loose, and perhaps even 2g25_loose (need to run through M  = 150 case) Tight electron trigger 90% efficient  For e  control sample (background estimation), gXX_loose  eXX_tight where XX is value of 2g trigger above, should be fine. What about a quick peek at non-pointing photons?

GMSB2 sample:  c   ~ 10s of cm What about non-photon triggers? Looking into it…

Summary and Conclusions Pending a look at M  = 150 GeV, proposed 2011 triggers seem workable for Bino case Other cases (Wino, Higgsino) being looked into Non-pointing photons don’t seem to be captured with photon triggers; what about others? Looking into that also.

Sorry – that’s all folks…