Interconnection in a Liberalized Network: California’s ISPs View Reciprocal Compensation Yale M. Braunstein School of Information Management & Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Next Step for Next Generation Technology: Interconnecting Managed Packet Networks to Preserve Voice Service Quality and Competition Joe Gillan
Advertisements

Telecommunications and Natural Gas Industry. Telecommunications Voice (landline, wireless) Video (cable, satellite) Data (cable, wireless) Convergence.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
The Old Rules Just Don’t Fit Anymore: A Panel Discussion on the Proposed Revision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 John Windhausen, Jr., Past President,
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
Internet Business Models and the Competitive Dynamics of the Backbone Market Michael Kende 9 April 2001.
Intercarrier Compensation. Nextel calls to BellSouth BellSouth pays to terminate Nextel calls In aggregate, it may cause BellSouth to increase capacity.
ECO 436 Industry Seminar Dr. David G. Loomis Illinois State University
ECO 436 Industry Studies Seminar David G. Loomis Universal Service.
Pricing Interconnection and Universal Service in a Liberalized Network Yale M. Braunstein School of Information Management & Systems University of California.
Hands off the Internet... No Broadband Regulation! Jae Jung Adam Leader Deidra Ritcherson Steve Ringer.
1 Access: From Interconnection to Convergence Yale M. Braunstein School of Information University of California Berkeley, CA (U.S.A.) March 2008.
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
Pricing Interconnection and Universal Service in a Liberalized Network Yale M. Braunstein School of Information Management & Systems University of California.
Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
Chp. 3 – Industry Overview Traditional Telephone Companies & Cable TV Providers Mobile Providers Smaller Competitors Internet Based Competitors Why Governments.
Unified Intercarrier Compensation – An Old Problem 1980 FCC Tentative Access Plan (pre- divestiture) Found the wide variety of existing access compensation.
Telecommunications The Transition to Competition.
1 * 1998 figures are estimates from the the 1998 Multimedia Telecom Market Review and from IAD. Sources: Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the U.S.
The Public Network Chapter 4 Tamra Dean.
Internet Policy Day 1 - Workshop Session No. 2 Market structure Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
Business Data Communications, Fourth Edition Chapter 1: Introduction to Communications.
Business Data Communications Standards and Laws. What are Standards? Documented agreements Technical specifications or other precise criteria to be used.
Carriers Carriers carry traffic for a fee Must have rights of way to lay wire Given some monopoly protection Regulated but being deregulated.
U.S. Telecommunications Regulation and Market Developments September 2008.
Bruce Kushnick New Networks Institute Reverse AT&T-ALEC.
EU Regulation for Intercommunication And Roaming Lasse Rautopuro Helsinki University of Technology
California Teleconnect Fund Program Technical Meeting CPUC Auditorium September 5, :15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
An SAIC Company Steve Cohen Vice President Solutions Marketing (732) March 15, 2001 Operations Support Systems: Today’s and.
ITS 302 Purposes of the course –Review the history of US telecommunications as a case study –Examine the basics of regulation, especially as they apply.
Communication & Information Technology Telecommunications Policy.
Changes in State and Federal Telecommunications Policies: How Do They Affect US All? SCAN NATOA 16 th Annual Spring Conference and Star Awards Long Beach,
Can Technology Save Competition in Telecommunications? John W. Mayo Georgetown University (202) Phoenix Center December.
PHOENIX CENTER 2002 U.S. TELECOMS SYMPOSIUM Personal Remarks of Lawrence J. Spiwak President © 2002 Phoenix Center and Lawrence J. Spiwak 20 November 2002.
Course overview INSS Telecommunications. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc1 - 2 Three Faces of Networking Fundamental concepts of networking.
Missoula Plan Plan reflects themes that always seem to appear – Different treatment for different ILECs by size and by type of regulation (price cap versus.
Communication & Information Technology Telecommunications Policy.
Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.13-1 Natural Monopolies And Regulation.
1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.
REGULATORYAND COMPETION POLICY ISSUES IN THE PRIVATIZATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES: THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE.
McGraw-Hill©2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter 8 Telephone and Cable TV Networks: Residential Connection to the Internet.
Wireless Services TC 310 June 2,2007. Why Regulate License Legacy Substituting Wireline  Regulatory Parity Network Effects  Interconnection  Standards.
ECON 100 Mar 10, 2008 Mergers, Natural Monopolies and Deregulation.
A Tire Industry Perspective on Tire Rolling Resistance Tracey Norberg Rubber Manufacturers Association Presentation to the California Energy Commission.
Emily Mikesell.  Started in 1875  Founder Alexander Graham Bell's invention of the telephone.  AT&T became the parent company of the Bell System ›
The Three Rs: The Need for Reliable, Redundant and Resilient Telecommunications in the New Age Presentation for the National Association of State Utility.
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
1 1084_06F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. The Current State Of Telecommunications Dan Barker TNT Consulting Group.
Industry Overview AT&T and the Bell System Post Divestiture Factors in the Emergence of Competition to the Bells The Vision of the Telecommunications Act.
Presented by Ruth Gorski Introducing the American Express OnePoint ® Program This document contains unpublished confidential and proprietary information.
+ Universal Service Administrative Company Description: Created in 1997 as a non-profit subsidiary of the National Exchange carrier Association (NECA).
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
Briefing on New Franchise Ordinances for Telecommunications & Video Services Applicant: Verizon.
What’s So Bad About Monopolies? & What Can We Do About It?
International Trade Policies Dr. Petre Badulescu.
Do Now How would you feel if you had to pay more for high-speed access to various websites on the internet? What plan would you join from the choices below?
1 ETNS Pricing & Interconnection Interconnect tariff models Market introduction of European Numbers Serving to Service Network relationship Possible Service.
© Copyright 2005 Frost & Sullivan. All Rights Reserved. Trends in U.S. Small Business Telecom Services Markets Opportunities Arise for Telecom Service.
Competition Policy for the new U.S. Telecoms Market: Background and Outline Howard A. Shelanski, U.C. Berkeley Nanterre, Paris X November 9, 2006.
What’s So Bad About Monopolies? & What Can We Do About It?
Net Neutrality Gavin Baker Association of Information Technology Professionals, North Central Florida Chapter Gainesville, FL 13 November 2007.
ITS 602 Purposes of the course
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act
Marsha Spellman, JD Regulatory Director, WST October 17, 2016
Monopolies and Anti-Trust Regulation
Internet Interconnection
CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005
Telecom History.
Presentation transcript:

Interconnection in a Liberalized Network: California’s ISPs View Reciprocal Compensation Yale M. Braunstein School of Information Management & Systems University of California Berkeley, CA (U.S.A.) September 2001

Introduction  As new entrants enter a telecommunications market the problem of interconnection has two dimensions: technical and economic. This survey’s focus is on the latter.  ISPs can choose which local telephone company provides their service. The calls on these lines are almost all inbound.  Key acronyms:  ILEC: “incumbent local exchange carrier” (generally the 4 “Baby bells” or RBOCs)  CLEC: “competitive …”

The dimensions of interconnection-1  B.C. (before competition) it was common to see some or all of the following: Local tariffs were averaged across customers. In addition, the non-traffic-sensitive portion of the tariff was often kept artificially low. The tariffs for long distance (trunk) calls were sufficiently higher than costs so as to enable the costs of local service to be kept low. International rates were many times the cost of service.

The dimensions of interconnection -2  A.C. (after competition) it is common to see some or all of the following: “Rebalancing” of local tariffs, increasing the the non-traffic-sensitive portion of the tariff. The tariffs for long distance (trunk) calls decreased to near costs as this market became VERY competitive. The subsidy to local rates has disappeared. International rates are changing. (This is another lecture!)

The dimensions of interconnection -3  And, most importantly for today’s topic, new entrants have emerged to provide new services and services to particular market segments.  There is disagreement over the extent to which this entry is “economic” (justified by new technologies and markets) or “uneconomic” (the result of opportunities that are driven by regulation).

Additional concerns  Equal treatment and symmetry requirements  Whose costs?  Possible difference in technologies  Legacy customers  Preferences for corporate relatives

An illustration of the lack of symmetry Although these diagrams show connections to inter- exchange carriers, they could also be to network access points.

Calls to the Internet in the U.S.

Example of Press Coverage FCC Poised to Close Loophole on Internet Traffic Fees November 30, (Reuters) - Federal regulators will next month likely close a loophole that has allowed some companies to set up telephone centers to carry Internet traffic and reap millions of dollars in fees from regional telephone companies, industry sources said Tuesday. Under the present system, known as reciprocal compensation, established local phone companies like BellSouth Corp. and Verizon Communications have been paying fees to competing telephone carriers for connecting calls, but have not seen a dime in return. And with the rise in consumers connecting to the Internet from home, some competing carriers have been signing up Internet service providers (ISPs) to be the routing carrier of choice to cash in on receiving compensation from the incumbent carriers. But since the Internet does not return calls, the established phone companies end up paying about $2 billion in compensation this year to the rivals without seeing reciprocal fees.

The Survey  Purpose: The California ISP Association wanted to have its views heard as the battle was being fought on three fronts (CPUC, FCC, Congress).  They needed a public interest “hook” on which to base their arguments (rural service).  They wanted “unbiased outside experts” to “bless” the survey.  We agreed with the following conditions: –We were involved in design & administration –We would do all the analysis & interpretation –We had final editorial control  Report is at:

Dealing with the Client  They impose deadlines (and change them)  They have prior arrangements with survey companies, etc., for administration, not all of which were trouble-free  Possible battles over final edits  In this case there was a middleman, which was both good (focus, isolation from some issues) and bad (another layer of management)  Big positives: their professional experience, their past experience, they wrote the press release.

SURVEY OF CALIFORNIA ISPs PREDICTS THAT FCC PLAN WOULD LEAD TO HIGHER INTERNET RATES: U.C. Berkeley Professor Examines Reciprocal Compensation WASHINGTON, D.C., December 6, 2000 – A representative survey conducted by a U.C. Berkeley professor and released today shows that California consumers would have to pay significantly more to access the Web if state and federal regulators accept a proposal to change the way Internet calls are handled. The survey results come on the heels of a report yesterday by the Wall Street Journal that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is moving closer to adopting a proposal to eliminate reciprocal compensation – a reimbursement paid by local carriers for completing calls by each other’s customers.