LIGO-G030236-01-M Advanced LIGO1 Mass Limits & Balancing Dennis Coyne Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication Bidder’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2E4: SOLIDS & STRUCTURES Lecture 8
Advertisements

Today’s Objectives: Students will be able to:
LIGO - G R 1 HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI David Ottaway November 2005 LIGO-G Z.
Work Done by a Constant Force
Intended Audience: This StAIR is intended for advanced second year students (10-12 grade) with a mechanical focus.Objective: Given the Applying GD&T StAIR.
EQUILIBRIUM OF RIGID BODIES IN TWO DIMENSIONS
LIGO-G D 1 Coupled Dynamics of Payload Structures on the Seismically Isolated Optics Table Dennis Coyne, LIGO Caltech SWG Meeting, 2 Sep 2005.
Chapter Four Fits and Tolerances: Linear and Geometry.
Forces on Submerged Surfaces in Static Fluids
1 Atlas Truss Adapter & Launch Vehicle Details (all I can find in the Atlas Mission Planner’s Guide and Standard Interface Spec) David Robinson/543 7/18/08.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
Forces on Submerged surfaces—plane surfaces Problem consider a plane surface of area A Draw an y and x axis passing through the centroid x y Place surface.
Water Pressure and Pressure Forces
Dennis Coyne Excomm Jan 26, 2004
Review of HAM Suspension Designs for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson HAM Isolation Requirements Review Caltech, July 11th 2005.
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
ES 202 Fluid and Thermal Systems Lecture 4: Pressure Distributions on Submerged Surface (12/09/2002)
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO1 Finite Element Modeling Requirements Dennis Coyne Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Schedule »through R&D, including near-term plans »project.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.
20 Nov 2008G v21 Optical & Vacuum Equipment Layouts Dennis Coyne Mike Smith Luke Williams 20 Nov 2008 Adv. LIGO Team Meeting, Caltech, Pasadena,
LIGO-G M 1 Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Dennis Coyne LIGO Seminar March 29, 2002.
LIGO-G D 1 MEPI electroMagnetic External Pre-Isolator Backup alternative to the Hydraulic actuator approach Goal: maximum commonality with HEPI.
1 MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Chapter 2: FLUID STATICS Instructor: Professor C. T. HSU.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Design for Advanced LIGO Phil Willems NSF Review, Oct , 2002 MIT.
Oct 17, 2001SALT PFIS PDR - Structure1 Structure Interface/ constraints Loads Structure design rationale Truss Weight and CG Finite Element Analysis/ Image.
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
Chapter 4: Equilibrium Equilibrium means balance of forces to prevent body from translating, and balance of moments to prevent body from rotating. Vector.
SAM PDR1 SAM LGS Mechanical Design A. Montane, A. Tokovinin, H. Ochoa SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
Lecture 5 January 31,  Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 5/ Slide 2 In this Lecture Impulsive.
22nd March 2005 LIGO-G R Passive attenuation for the LIGO Output mode cleaner; HAM SAS R. DeSalvo, S. Marka, V. Sannibale, A. Takamori, C. Torrie,
Development of a Wearable 6-D Force Sensor for Human Dynamics Analysis Tao LIU Department of Intelligent Mechanical Systems Engineering Kochi University.
MERLIN BEAMLINE RIXS refocusing mirror system D. Yegian
Redesign of the STOL CH 701 Landing Gear Strut
Projectiles Horizontal Projection Horizontally: Vertically: Vertical acceleration g  9.8 To investigate the motion of a projectile, its horizontal and.
The purpose of the change of basis matrices is to combine local instruments to sense (or drive ) the platforms rigid body motions along the axis of the.
A NON-TRADITIONAL HIGH PERFORMANCE BROAD-BAND SEISMOMETER PMD/eentec, USA
Center of Mass AP Physics C Mrs. Coyle. Center of Mass The point of an object at which all the mass of the object is thought to be concentrated. Average.
LIGO-G M Contract Plans and Strategy Irena Petrac Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication Bidder’s Conference.
TVAC Trolley Design Review1 GLAST LAT Project8 September 2005 TVAC Trolley Design Status Review 8 September 2005 TVAC Trolley Design Status Review 8 September.
LIGO- G050xxx -00-D Advanced LIGO SUS Installation into BSC Chambers: Mechanical Fixtures Dennis Coyne (with input from many) G May 4 th 2005.
Seismic Isolation System Prototypes Seismometer Pod IDR Ref: A.
LSC Meeting March ‘07 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) LASTI Progress and Plans LSC Meeting, LLO Dave Ottaway/Richard Mittleman March.
LIGO-G R Inverted pendulum studies for seismic attenuation Ilaria Taurasi University of Sannio at Benevento, Italy September 20, 2005 Supervisor.
Copyright © 2004 Alliance Spacesystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Confidential and Proprietary Material of ASI. Reproduction without prior written permission.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
LIGO-G R 1 HAM Passive Seismic Attenuation System (SAS) System Performance, Fabrication, Assembly, Installation Riccardo DeSalvo, Valerio Boschi,
Objectives  Introduce the concept of pressure;  Prove it has a unique value at any particular elevation;  Show how it varies with depth according.
Advanced LIGO Lateral/Tilt Mechanical Coupling Study Ken Smith January 8, 2004 Ref: A.
LSC Meeting Baton Rouge, LA, V.Boschi for the HAM-SAS team Ben Abbott, Valerio Boschi, Dennis Coyne, Michael Forte, Jay Heefner, Yu-mei Huang,
LIGO-G D Design Requirements Larry Jones Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication Bidder’s Conference April.
ARCHITECTURE 2351 INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURE CONCEPTS.
Understand the principles of statics Graphical vectors Triangle of forces theorem Parallelogram of forces theorem Concept of equilibrium
Fits and Tolerances: Linear and Geometry.
LCGT Seismic Attenuation System LCGT-SAS
Sphere Option for Helical spring CF16 Bellows Adjustment bolts (horizontal plane) CF38.
Work Done by a Constant Force
TPC Support and Constraint TPC Support
1/10 prototype support tube
PRINCIPLES OF STIFFNESS METHOD FOR BEAMS AND PLANE FRAMES
Example 7-12 A group of extended bodies, each with a known CM. Find the CM of the group.
A mass m = 2.0 kg is attached to a spring having a force constant k = 990 N/m as in the figure. The mass is displaced from its equilibrium position.
HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI
HAM-SAS Mechanics Status of modeling V.Boschi, V. Sannibale.
Course Title: Analytic Mechanics
Moments and Centers of Mass
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO1 Mass Limits & Balancing Dennis Coyne Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication Bidder’s Conference April 29, 2003

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO2 Mass Limits & Balancing Scope & Definitions Section H, Design Requirements for the In-Vacuum Mechanical Elements of the Advanced LIGO Seismic Isolation System: »BSC Chamber »HAM Chamber Mass Definitions »Structure –all Structure elements defined elsewhere in these requirements, except for the Payload described in H.2 below, including structural members, pods, seismometers, actuators, displacement sensors. –trim masses, which shall be bolted to Stages 1 and 2 in locations and in increments of mass to make each loaded spring flat (correcting the levelness of each stage for variations in spring stiffness) which will level the optical table (to within 0.2 mrad). –balance masses, which shall be bolted to Stages 1 and 2 in locations and in increments of mass to properly locate the center of gravity (CG) of Stages 1 and 2 in accordance with H.4, when a Payload (see H.2) is installed. »Payload –the aggregate of masses of individual non-suspended optical components mounted on the optical table in a chamber –the aggregate of masses of individual suspended optical components mounted on the optical table in a chamber

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO3 Mass Limits & Balancing Mass Definitions +Z +X (parallel to support tubes) Origin = Center of optics table at the interface plane Note: Stages are nested and BSC optics table is inverted

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO4 Mass Limits & Balancing Payload Mass Property Limits Mx = total Payload mass times the composite center-of-mass x-position (direction parallel to the support tubes, referenced to optical table center) My = total Payload mass times the composite center-of-mass y-position (direction perpendicular to the support tubes, referenced to table center) Mz = non-suspended mass times the composite center-of-mass z-position (vertical, referenced to optical table surface)

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO5 Mass Limits & Balancing Interpretation for the HAM Given »envelope restrictions »anticipated mass of Stage 2 [approx lbm (750 Kg)] »anticipated position of the Stage 2 (structure-only) Center of Gravity (CG) [15.6 in. (396 mm) below optics table] »anticipated position of the Lower Zero Moment Plane (LZMP) of the Stage 2 Flexures [17 in. (432 mm) below the optics table] the above mass requirements imply »a total addition of non-structural mass (payload plus balance and trim mass) on Stage 2 of approximately 2646 lbm (1200 kg) total »a requirement to provide balance masses which total approximately 1522 lbm (690 kg) (i.e., 2646 lbm (1200 kg) less the optics table mounted elements totaling 1124 lbm (510 kg)) »A capability to place these masses in the keel of the Stage 2 envelope for the purpose of setting the composite C.G. vertical position within the prescribed tolerance of H.4

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO6 Mass Limits & Balancing Interpretation for the HAM

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO7 Mass Limits & Balancing Interpretation for the BSC Given »envelope restrictions »anticipated mass of Stage 2 [approx lbm (750 Kg)] »anticipated position of the Stage 2 (structure-only) Center of Gravity (CG) [18 in (457 mm) above the optics table] »anticipated position of the Lower Zero Moment Plane (LZMP) of the Stage 2 Flexures [9 in. (229 mm) above the optics table] the above mass requirements imply »a total addition of non-structural mass (payload plus balance and trim mass) on Stage 2 of approximately 2646 lbm (1200 kg) total »a requirement to provide balance masses which total approximately 882 lbm (400 kg) (i.e., 2646 lbm (1200 kg) less the optics table mounted elements totaling 1764 lbm (800 kg)) »A capability to place these masses at the top of the Stage 2 envelope for the purpose of: –leveling the table, i.e. countering the payload horizontal first moments by positioning this balance mass up to 18.2 in (462 mm) –setting the composite C.G. vertical position within the prescribed tolerance of H.4

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO8 Mass Limits & Balancing Interpretation for the BSC