(An open-ended discussion with random slides attached…) OUTLINE: Layouts Common Issues / Distinguishing Issues U-Shape L-Shape (Si and Si+Diamond) How.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Technical Specifications Review General Properties Geometrical Specifications Technology Specifications –Mask –Test Structures –Mechanical –Electrical.
Advertisements

Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
CO2 cooling for FPCCD Vertex Detector Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK 1.
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
November Vertex 2002 Kazu Hanagaki1 Layer 0 in D0 Silicon Tracker for run2b Kazu Hanagaki / Fermilab for D0 run2b Silicon Tracker group Motivation.
ATLAS detector upgrades ATLAS off to a good start – the detector is performing very well. This talk is about the changes needed in ATLAS during the next.
1 MUON UPGRADE: ME0 GMM All engineering drawings from Sasha Surkhov PRELIMINARY !!
VELO upgrade electronics – HYBRIDS Tony Smith University of Liverpool.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
8/22/01Marina Artuso - Pixel Sensor Meeting - Aug Sensor R&D at Syracuse University Marina Artuso Chaouki Boulahouache Brian Gantz Paul Gelling.
Edgeless Medipix sensors for medical X-ray imaging applications Marten Bosma BND School in Rathen, 2009-Sep-14.
VELO Upgrade Critical Issues Two step upgrade with installation around 2013/2017 Implies a detector which can sustain 5/20/120 fb -1 Very tight schedule.
Semi-conductor Detectors HEP and Accelerators Geoffrey Taylor ARC Centre for Particle Physics at the Terascale (CoEPP) The University of Melbourne.
Medipix sensors included in MP wafers 2 To achieve good spatial resolution through efficient charge collection: Produced by Micron Semiconductor on n-in-p.
VELO Module Kickoff Summary Richard Plackett – VELO Pixel Chip Meeting CERN, 13th November 09.
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL New Pad Plane Design Proposal & Specifications Jim Thomas, John Hammond, Bob Scheetz, Jon Wirth, etc., etc., and a cast of thousands.
R&D status of FPCCD VTX and its cooling system Yasuhiro Sugimoto for FPCCD VTX group 1.
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 3/27/2014 Module R&D Allocation: Requested ~ $320k, received ~160k – Eliminate VICTR testing (continue with FNAL funds.
Mechanical Status of EUDET Module Marc Anduze – 05/04/07.
Sensor Choice The story here is surely damage – See that silicon worked well in the PLT test until we shifted the timing to optimize diamond Reducing BX.
F February 5, 2001 Pixel Detector Size and Shape David Christian Fermilab.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL HFT Issues that may Bear on the Fate of the SSD & SVT presented by Jim Thomas 07/07/2006.
Project Update: A Possible New RF FOIL for the VELO UPGRADE Ray Mountain, Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications D. Bortoletto Purdue University Status report Hybrid Pixel Detectors for LC.
FPCCD option Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/5/24 ILD 1.
Trends and synergies in solid state tracking R&D Executive Summary of the session Frank Hartmann.
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
M. Deveaux, CBM-Collaboration-Meeting, 25 – 28. Feb 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Considerations on the material budget of the CBM Micro Vertex Detector. Outline:
1 FPCCD VTX Work Plan Y. Sugimoto 2010/1/22. 2 FPCCD: Features and R&D issues (1/2) Small pixel size (~5  m) –Sensor development Small size chip; ~6mm.
LHCb Vertex Detector and Beetle Chip
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
ILD Vertex Detector Y. Sugimoto 2012/5/24 ILD
VELO Decisions Thomas Ruf LHCb week February 2001 Interference with LHC machine   LEMIC, January 2001: Presentation of the VELO Vacuum Chamber design.
R. Bradford 10 December, 2014 Sensor Details. Explanation Submitted some designs that will be included on the Novati/Tezzaron submission. Designs based.
VELO upgrade news 19 January VELO Upgrade Survey  Not yet filled in, but last answers arriving in the next 24 hours....!  Hope to soon appoint.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Leonardo Rossi INFN Genova - UTOPIA #12 0 What we have learned from UTOPIA so far? Defined a set of gauge histos to compare layouts Exercised on barrel-part.
FPCCD VTX Work Plan Y. Sugimoto 2010/1/22. FPCCD: Features and R&D issues (1/2) Small pixel size (~5  m) –Sensor development Small size; ~6mm x 6mm Full.
RD program on hybrids & Interconnects Background & motivation At sLHC the luminosity will increase by a factor 10 The physics requirement on the tracker.
Practical aspects of small aperture quadrupoles Dr Ben Leigh Tesla Engineering Ltd.
SLHC SCT Hybrid (CERN 2nd July 2007)1 SLHC SCT Hybrid Concept Ashley Greenall The University of Liverpool.
Ideas on MAPS design for ATLAS ITk. HV-MAPS challenges Fast signal Good signal over noise ratio (S/N). Radiation tolerance (various fluences) Resolution.
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module Peter Kluit, Jan Timmermans Prepared 16 May 2016.
Gloria Corti, LHCb LHCb background on detector. Gloria Corti Page 2 Evaluating impact on experiment Increasing the inner coverage of the TT detector will.
24 September 2012 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Annekathrin Frankenberger (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Status of Mechanics PXD-SVD Meeting Göttingen.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
Feasibility of the detection of D 0 mesons in the NA61/SHINE experiment: Vertex detector for NA61/SHINE P. Staszel and Yasir Ali Jagiellonian University.
Towards Snowmass Jul. 13, 2005 Y.Sugimoto. Charge for Detector WGs Charge for Concept Groups: work towards a baseline design define performance criteria.
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
New Mask and vendor for 3D detectors
 Silicon Vertex Detector Upgrade for the Belle II Experiment
SVT subchapters & editors
Updates on vertex detector
Experience with CST Eigenmode Solver for the LHCb Velo Upgrade Project
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector
Grid Pix Field Simulations and precision needed for a module
Hybrid Pixel R&D and Interconnect Technologies
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
Sensor Layout Options Aim is to understand the implication and constrains of possible sensor design/layout on the general ID Layout. Keep both ATLAS “drum”
Simulated vertex precision
Strawman module design
TK Upgrade report.
Work packages status in Torino and perspectives
Beam Dump outline work plan (UK perspective)
The LHC collider in Geneva
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
Presentation transcript:

(An open-ended discussion with random slides attached…) OUTLINE: Layouts Common Issues / Distinguishing Issues U-Shape L-Shape (Si and Si+Diamond) How to Proceed

SU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan 2010R. Mountain, Syracuse University2 Work Package I – Finalize ‘Strawman’ layout Contribute ideas (by 25 th January) Study selected layouts with parametric simulation Study selected layouts with full simulation Contribute engineering cartoons Thermal simulations Foil R&D assessment Impact on electronics design Plus CAD drawings, cooling options, RF shield studies, physics impact of design variations (SU) Addition of hybrid geometry option (SU) Work Package II – CO2 vs LN2 cooling choice Specify baseline CO2 solution Specify baseline LN2 solution Risk Assessment (…From Paula’s survey)

SU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan 20103R. Mountain, Syracuse University VELO L-Shape Layouts and Others – Marco Gersabeck -velo.upg cartoon

SU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan 20104R. Mountain, Syracuse University VELO L-Shape Layouts and Others – Marco Gersabeck -velo.upg

5R. Mountain, Syracuse UniversitySU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan 2010 U-Shape Sensor Periphery: Active area close to R7.0 only in H direction – limited by ASIC size RF Foil: Design close to current – so AlMg3 possible Can pursue composite, but we have a fallback Cooling: Has 10 chips Sensor Periphery: Can get active area closer to R7.0 in both H,V – principal physics reason for L-shape RF Foil: Must be a new design Must be new material – can’t be AlMg3 This is a strategic gamble Cooling: Has 12 chips L-Shape Many of these differences erased by using Diamond

Physics: Simulation of efficiency, resolution, coverage, etc. A given, not detailed here but the questions are well known Also, material effects, number and spacing of stations vis-à-vis U vs L, etc. ASIC: What is the ultimate size of the ASIC? How much modification is needed How many submissions can be made, given time constraints Sensor Periphery: Silicon limited by rad damage to R7.0 at closest, but guard ring of ~0.5 mm moves active region back to R7.5 Guard ring of 0.5 mm – feasible? Some questions were raised Edgeless silicon – R&D stage, what is max size sensor made edgeless? Note that Diamond will allow recovery to R7.0 Sensor Size: Split silicon into two – if sensor/ASIC registration gives low yield How many ASICs can be accurately bonded to a single sensor? If split, will introduce either overlaps or gaps in coverage (maybe both) SU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan 20106R. Mountain, Syracuse University In order of importance (?)

Overlap: Is an overlap (~0.1 mm, 1-2 pixels) necessary? Can gaps be tolerated? Does a staggered layout help? How bad is the effect of the additional material? Inner Aperture: Square geometry at inner radius gives no coverage in corners – significant? RF Foil: Reduced RL reduces MCS for both cases Cooling: Placement of cooling pipes – effect in fiducial volume? Diamond eases the cooling requirements ASIC Readout: Issue of column direction readout rate and multiplicity? – How serious? Motion Control: Have to adjust the position in V direction? – raised previously Other … SU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan 20107R. Mountain, Syracuse University

SU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan 20108R. Mountain, Syracuse University

SU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan 20109R. Mountain, Syracuse University

SU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan R. Mountain, Syracuse University

What can we determine in the next “two” months? RF Foil: Determine if there are any first-order show stoppers, by Evaluating a realistic L-shape design with CMA Determining basic material parameters, vacuum-tightness, shielding Diamond: Work out U-shaped diamond layout (problem?) Critical, but can’t prove it in short term… Simulations: Continue current work, aim at some killer issue, like… Thermal: Continue simulations (kill CO2?), plus … Plus: Pin down issues related to sensor periphery, size of ASIC, etc. Seriously evaluate potential of higher-risk technologies, like edgeless silicon, TSVs, etc. And … SU VELO Meeting, 27 Jan R. Mountain, Syracuse University I think we can only kill an idea in a two-month period, but we cannot prove it.