Prediction of B cell epitopes Ole Lund. Outline What is a B-cell epitope? How can you predict B-cell epitopes?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSIS Technical University of Denmark - DTU Department of systems biology B cell epitopes and predictions.
Advertisements

Prediction of B cell epitopes Pernille Haste Andersen Immunological Bioinformatics CBS, DTU
Humoral Immunity.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSISTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK DTU B cell epitopes and predictions Pernille Haste Andersen, Ph.d. student Immunological.
Antibody responses to linear and conformational epitopes Biosys course, Pernille Andersen.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSISTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK DTU B cell epitopes and predictions Pernille Haste Andersen, Ph.d. student Immunological.
The branch that breaks Is called rotten, but Wasn’t there snow on it? Bartolt Brecht Haiti after a hurricane.
Antibodies & Antigens1 Antibodies Also chap 5 pp Self-Test Questions: Chap 4: all Chap 5: D all MolnQuiry.
B-Cell Epitopes Chapter 10 Claus Lundegaard.
Gamma Globulins Dr Gihan Gawish.
B-Cell Epitopes Chapter 10.
The branch that breaks Is called rotten, but Wasn’t there snow on it? Bartolt Brecht Haiti after a hurricane.
General Microbiology (Micr300)
Immunological databases on the web Ole Lund Center for Biological Sequence Analysis BioCentrum-DTU Technical University of Denmark
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSISTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK DTU B cell epitopes and B cell epitope predictions Morten Nielsen, CBS, BioCentrum,
Specific Immunity. Who are the players? Antigens: foreign proteins, usually part of virus or bacteria Antibodies: Proteins made by immune cells that “recognize”
Immunogen, antigen, epitope, hapten
Lecture 2 Antigens, Receptors and Immunoglobulins.
Immunoglobulins structure and function
IMMUNOGLOBULINS STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
How Cells of the Immune System “See” and Respond to Antigen
ANTIBODY STRUCTURE AND THE GENERATION OF B-CELL DIVERSITY
BINF6201/8201 Principle components analysis (PCA) -- Visualization of amino acids using their physico-chemical properties
Methods MHC class-I T cell epitope prediction for Nef Consensus and ancestral sequences of the Nef protein for the different HIV-1 subtypes were obtained.
Specific Resistance = Immunity
Antibodies & Antigens Pin Ling ( 凌 斌 ), Ph.D. ext 5632; References: 1. Abbas, A, K. et.al, Cellular and Molecular Immunology.
Selection of T Cell Epitopes Using an Integrative Approach Mette Voldby Larsen cand. scient. in Biology PhD in Immunological Bioinformatics.
MLRS 242 Immunology Pat Reed Antibodies
 Four levels of protein structure  Linear  Sub-Structure  3D Structure  Complex Structure.
Protein Structure Modelling Many sequences - few structures Homology Modelling - Based on Sequence Similarity with Sequences of Known Structures.
110/30/2015 Antigens Antigens Hugh B. Fackrell 210/30/2015 ä Assigned Reading ä Content Outline ä Performance Objectives ä Key terms ä Key Concepts ä.
Telling self from non-self: Learning the language of the Immune System Rose Hoberman and Roni Rosenfeld BioLM Workshop May 2003.
Antigen Receptors of Lymphocytes. Recognition: molecular patterns Recognition : molecular details (antigenic determinants) Innate immunity Aquired immunity.
1 Web Site: Dr. G P S Raghava, Head Bioinformatics Centre Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India Prediction.
Antibodies & Antigens1 Antibodies Also chap 5 pp Self-Test Questions: Chap 4: all Chap 5: D all MolnQuiry.
Antigen and Antigenicity Antigen and Antigenicity
Recurring conformation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 V3 loop Robyn L. Stanfield, Jayant B. Ghiara, Erica O. Saphire, Albert T. Profy,
MICR 304 Immunology & Serology Lecture 7B Antibodies Part I Chapter 3.1 – 3.9 Lecture 7B Antibodies Part I Chapter 3.1 – 3.9.
Immunoglobulin: Ab-Ag Interactions Lecture 10 20/10/2015.
Antigen Presenting Cells
ANTIGENS  Antigen: Any substance reacting with the products of any specific immune response (Ig or T cells)  Immunogen: Any substance capable to induce.
Antigens & Immunogen.
B cell epitopes and predictions
October 5, IMMUNITY ADAPTIVEINNATE CELL MEDIATEDHUMORAL.
AP Biology Immune Systems Part 2. Important concepts from previous units: 1) Three parts to the Signal Transduction Pathway – Reception, transduction,
Lecture 1: Immunogenetics Dr ; Kwanama
Antibodies & Antigens Pin Ling (凌 斌), Ph.D.
Epitopes: Lymphocytes recog. specific sites on molecules  Ag determinant/epitope With some Ag, B cells recog 1 part; T cells another The recognition process.
Immunology B cells and Antibodies – humoral
Bioinformatics in Vaccine Design
ANTIBODIES. Cells cooperation in immune response.
Janeway’s Immunobiology
Chapter Pgs Objective: I can describe how adaptive immunity (immunological memory) works. Challenging but cool, like a Rube Goldberg.
Chapter 43 The Immune System.
IMMUNOGLOBULIN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
Intracellular Pathogens Extracellular Pathogens
Single chain antibody library Why single domain antibodies are preferred? Single domain antibodies represent the smallest antibody that was proven of diagnostic.
Antibody domain Single domain antibodies represent the smallest antibody that was proven of diagnostic and therapeutic usefulness. They are antibody fragments.
IgSF.
The Differentiation of Vertebrate Immune Cells
Humoral & Cell-mediated immunity
Telling self from non-self: Learning the language of the Immune System
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
The Differentiation of Vertebrate Immune Cells
Thesis Defense.
Loyola Marymount University
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages (October 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Prediction of B cell epitopes Ole Lund

Outline What is a B-cell epitope? How can you predict B-cell epitopes?

What is a B-cell epitope? B-cell epitopes Accessible structural feature of a pathogen molecule. Antibodies are developed to bind the epitope specifically using the complementary determining regions (CDRs). Antibody Fab fragment

B-cell epitope classification Linear epitopes One segment of the amino acid chain Discontinuous epitope (with linear determinant) Discontinuous epitope Several small segments brought into proximity by the protein fold B-cell epitope – structural feature of a molecule or pathogen, accessible and recognizable by B-cells

The Antibody Two light and heavy chains High variability in the complementary determine regions (CDR) ~2.5 * 10 7 different phenotypes

Binding of a discontinuous epitope Guinea Fowl Lysozyme KVFGRCELAAAMKRHGLDNYRGYSLGNWVCAAKFESNFNSQNRNTDGS DYGVLNSRWWCNDGRTPGSRNLCNIPCSALQSSDITATANCAKKIVSDG GMNAWVAWRKCKGTDVRVWIKGCRL Antibody FAB fragment complexed with Guinea Fowl Lysozyme (1FBI). Black: Light chain, Blue: Heavy chain, Yellow: Residues with atoms distanced < 5Å from FAB antibody fragments.

B-cell epitope annotation Linear epitopes: –Chop sequence into small pieces and measure binding to antibody Discontinuous epitopes: –Measure binding of whole protein to antibody The best annotation method : X-ray crystal structure of the antibody-epitope complex

B-cell epitope data bases Databases: IEDB, AntiJen, BciPep, Los Alamos HIV database, Protein Data Bank Large amount of data available for linear epitopes Few data available for discontinuous epitopes

Sequence-based methods for prediction of linear epitopes  Protein hydrophobicity – hydrophilicity algorithms Parker, Fauchere, Janin, Kyte and Doolittle, Manavalan Sweet and Eisenberg, Goldman, Engelman and Steitz (GES), von Heijne  Protein flexibility prediction algorithm Karplus and Schulz  Protein secondary structure prediction algorithms GOR II method (Garnier and Robson), Chou and Fasman, Pellequer  Protein “antigenicity” prediction : Hopp and Woods, Welling TSQDLSVFPLASCCKDNIASTSVTLGCLVTG YLPMSTTVTWDTGSLNKNVTTFPTTFHETY GLHSIVSQVTASGKWAKQRFTCSVAHAEST AINKTFSACALNFIPPTVKLFHSSCNPVGDT HTTIQLLCLISGYVPGDMEVIWLVDGQKATN IFPYTAPGTKEGNVTSTHSELNITQGEWVSQ KTYTCQVTYQGFTFKDEARKCSESDPRGVT SYLSPPSPL

Propensity scales: The principle The Parker hydrophilicity scale Derived from experimental data D2.46 E1.86 N1.64 S1.50 Q1.37 G1.28 K1.26 T1.15 R0.87 P0.30 H0.30 C0.11 A0.03 Y-0.78 V-1.27 M-1.41 I-2.45 F-2.78 L-2.87 W-3.00 Hydrophilicity

Propensity scales: The principle ….LISTFVDEKRPGSDIVEDLILKDENKTTVI…. ( )/7 = 0.39 Prediction scores: Epitope

Evaluation of performance A Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) is useful for finding a good threshold and rank methods

Blythe and Flower 2005 Extensive evaluation of propensity scales for epitope prediction Conclusion: –Basically all the classical scales perform close to random! –Other methods must be used for epitope prediction

BepiPred: CBS Web server Parker hydrophilicity scale Hidden Markow model Markow model based on linear epitopes extracted from the AntiJen database Combination of the Parker prediction scores and Markow model leads to prediction score Tested on the Pellequer dataset and epitopes in the HIV Los Alamos database

Data from: J. L. Pellequer, E. Westhof, and Van M. H. Regenmortel. Correlation between the loca- tion of antigenic sites and the prediction of turns in proteins. Immunol. Lett., 36: 83–99, Ole Lund, Morten Nielsen, Claus Lundegaard, Can Kesmir and Søren Brunak. Immunological Bioinformatics. MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts pp.

ROC evaluation Evaluation on HIV Los Alamos data set

Linear epitope prediction performance Pellequer data set: –LevittAROC = 0.66 –ParkerAROC = 0.65 –BepiPredAROC = 0.68 HIV Los Alamos data set –LevittAROC = 0.57 –ParkerAROC = 0.59 –BepiPredAROC = 0.60

BepiPred BepiPred conclusion: –On both of the evaluation data sets, Bepipred was shown to perform better –Still the AROC value is low compared to T-cell epitope prediction tools! –Bepipred is available as a webserver:

Prediction of linear epitopes Con  only ~10% of epitopes can be classified as “linear”  weakly immunogenic in most cases  most epitope peptides do not provide antigen-neutralizing immunity  in many cases represent hypervariable regions Pro  easily predicted computationally  easily identified experimentally  immunodominant epitopes in many cases  do not need 3D structural information  easy to produce and check binding activity experimentally

DiscoTope server CBS server for prediction of discontinuous epitopes Uses protein structure as input Combines propensity scale values of amino acids in discontinuous epitopes with surface exposure Will be available soon (not published yet) Contact me for more information

DiscoTope Andersen PH, Nielsen M, Lund O. Prediction of residues in discontinuous B-cell epitopes using protein 3D structures. Protein Sci : Larsen JE, Lund O, Nielsen M. Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes. Immunome Res : 2.

Web server output

The Biological unit

Prediction of conformational epitopes with DiscoTope: Refining the benchmark

Characterization of the B-cell epitope area Data processing 224 resolved 3-dimensional antigen-protein complexes –Kindly provided by Søren Padkjær Complexes with antigens below 20 amino acids were removed = 162 Similar interactions were removed = complexes were identified as outliers and removed = epitope annotated amino acids were found outside the general binding area and removed

Characterization of the B-cell epitope area Spatial distribution of amino acid in epitopes Hydrofobic center Charged edge RSA = 0.511

Characterization of the B-cell epitope area Modeling the most likely epitope Shape: Flat, oblong, oval shaped area Direction: -30 to 60 degrees relative to the light to heavy chain direction Amino acid distribution: Hydrofobic residues in the center and charged residues on the edge RSA = 0.511

Human proteome (10 6 peptides) on a chip Schafer-Nielsen, Søren Buus, Massimo Andretta, FP6 PepChipOmics project

IRBC The parasite exports VAR2CSA to the RBC membrane which enable adhesion of parasites to CSA in the placenta Causing: Placental malaria

Red blood cell membrane Structural envelope of VAR2CSA with 7 domains

1.We expressed full length 350 kD VAR2CSA and immunized rats 2.We affinity purified rat antibodies on the recombinant protein (thereby purifying IgG reacting with exposed epitopes) 3.Tested the affinity purified IgG on the PePtide array covering the entire VAR2CSA protein. Conclusion: Very few linear epitopes exposed in the VAR2CSA protein, however a number of peptides were identified. These were synthezised, coupled to KLH and used in immunization. Note 1 : The IgG before affinity purification did not reveal many more epitopes Note 2 : The same sera were tested on Pepscan array and were completely blank, ie Schafern peptide array mimicks more epitopes.

Rat sera were then tested by flow cytometry to test if IgG reacts with native VAR2CSA on VAR2CSA expressing malaria parasites: Conclusion. Both peptides induce IgG that reacts with native VAR2CSA. To do: Denature VAR2CSA and induce antibodies against linear epitopes and test on array

Prediction of epitopes Cytotoxic T cell epitope: (A ROC ~ 0.9) Will a given peptide bind to a given MHC class I molecule Helper T cell Epitope (A ROC ~ 0.8) Will a part of a peptide bind to a given MHC II molecule B cell epitope (A ROC ~ 0.7) Will a given part of a protein bind to one of the billions of different B Cell receptors