Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Federal Technology Transfer Process: Licenses and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements ADVANCED LICENSING INSTITUTE AT.
Advertisements

Protecting IP Rights Under Federal Grants Richard W. OehlerEric A. Aaserud Tel: (206) Tel: (208)
March 4, 2003Gary G. Borda NASA Headquarters1 Government Data Rights Under the FAR.
Selling Technology to the U.S. Government While Preserving IP Rights
0 Overview of Bayh-Dole Act and Data Rights under the Federal Acquisition Regulation Milton Hsieh Office of Chief Counsel August 10, 2006.
Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
A Primer for Departmental Administrators and Other Compliance Professionals.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Bayh-Dole Act and Tech Transfer Issues FLC Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting October 23, 2007 John Raubitschek US Army Patent Attorney.
FAR Part 27 PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS 1. Intellectual Property IP means patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. In dealing with IP rights,
Protecting and Maximizing Value of Contractor Intellectual Property Under Government Contracts Presented By: William A. Shook and G. Matthew Koehl October.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Mark Langguth Sr. Attorney, Intellectual Property Argonne National Laboratory February 21, 2012 Bayh-Dole: Basics & Beyond 1.
Intellectual Property in the Digital Age Series “Don’t I Own My Own Work?” Negotiating to Keep Your Copyright Intellectual Property in the Digital Age:
© National Council of University Research Administrators SECTION I INTRODUCTION TO PRIMER ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOR THE RESEARCH ADMINISTRATOR.
Version 6.0 Approved by HIPAA Implementation Team April 14, HIPAA Learning Module The following is an educational Powerpoint presentation on the.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
STEPHANI L. ABRAMSON COUNSEL FOR PROCUREMENT AND EMPLOYMENT LAW NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (301)
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators National Council of University.
An invention is a unique or novel device, method, composition or process. It may be an improvement upon a machine or product, or a new process for creating.
© 2001, 2002, 2003 Cahn & Samuels, LLP INTRODUCTION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & THE ARMY PATENT PROCESS George A. Metzenthin Cahn & Samuels, LLP Washington,
Technology Transfer at Rice
Intellectual Property in Government SBIR Contracts
Tim Wittig Principal Technology Management Group SAIC 202/ Value Not to be Lost SBIR Data Rights Another Level of Sophistication.
Aerospace Industries Association Intellectual Property Committee Fall 2009 meeting SMC Enabling Clause Holly Emrick Svetz (703)
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Intellectual Property and Government Contracts. What is intellectual property? Creations of the human mind Physical manifestations of original thought.
Practicum in Marketing Dynamics Unit 2 Lesson 2 Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
UARC Intellectual Property Management Burney Le Boeuf Director, Aligned Research Program of UARC Professor Emeritus UC Santa Cruz November 12, 2009.
FAR Part 1 The Federal Acquisition Regulation System.
Copyright - DOD Contracts Flayo O. Kirk Associate General Counsel, DISA March 2003 (703)
March 17, Open Source Release of NASA Software GSA/GWU Open Source in Government Conference NASA Open Source Legal Team.
YOUR RELIABLE PARTNER. “Taxation of intellectual property, research & development in Russian Federation”
Overview of the Indian Eqvt. to Bayh-Dole Act (USA) [Protection and Utilization of Public Funded Intellectual property (Bill 2008)]. By Dr. Gopakumar G.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Dr. Marie Talnack, Director, TechnologyTransfer Office and Industry Clinic.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
Technical Data Rights- Who Cares………. Introduction n Why Do I Need To Know This? – Acquiring Tech Data is expensive – Dynamic environment, each situation.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIEHS SRP Annual Meeting November 18 – 20, 2015 George Tucker Chief, Grants.
The United States Department of Transportation. The United States Department of Transportation Public Access Plan is still under development and is subject.
1 Some Risks Associated With Research and Development Under Federal Government Contracts Charles R. “Rod” Marvin, Jr., Esq. Venable, LLP Washington, DC.
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Top 10 Legal Minefields A University Perspective October 8, 2009 Catherine Shea Associate University Counsel University of Colorado.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
Government Contract Law – Post Award Shraddha Upadhyaya Contract Law Division U.S. Department of Commerce Office of General Counsel GSA Training Conference.
1 2 CFR Part 200: – Property Standards Jason Guilbeault, Senior Consultant.
Purdue University’s Approach to Industry-Sponsored Student Class Projects Sponsored Program Services Effective March 1, 2016.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Regulation Highlights Kimberly Heifetz May 15, 2012.
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Technology Transfer Office
The Basics of Intellectual Property Reporting
Intellectual Property Rights and the Federal Government
OMB Super Circular Big Changes for Nonprofits
Export Controls – Export Provisions in Research Agreements
U.S. Army Technology Transfer Mechanisms
Understanding The 2019 Changes To The SBIR & STTR Programs
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we need to understand that – Bayh-Dole Act was enacted into law (codified at 37 CFR 401) –1982 OMB A-124 issued policy guidance to federal agencies so that a standard patent rights clause was established (found at FAR ) –1984 FAR was amended to insure that all R&D agencies would implement the Bayh-Dole Act

Purpose of Bayh-Dole Establishes uniform federal patent policy Promotes collaboration between commercial entities and non-profits, including universities Universities may retain title to inventions Universities must file patents they elect to own Government retains a non-exclusive license and march in rights Uniform guidelines for granting licenses

Standard Patent Rights Clause FAR Patent Rights (Part 27) What are the elements of FAR – what does this document contain? –Definitions - to understand text –Allocation of Principal Rights – who gets what –Guidelines for invention disclosure, election of title and filing procedures –Conditions under which the Government may obtain title and what rights the university would retain in this case –University obligations to protect the Government’s interests

FAR Patent Rights (cont.) - Subcontracts - Reporting requirements for use of inventions - March – in rights - Special Provisions for contracts with non-profits - Communications specifications (agency specific)

FAR Patent Rights (cont.) Provisions apply to all inventions conceived or first reduced to practice in the performance of a project, whether fully or partially funded by federal dollars University has an obligation to disclose invention to agency within 2 months of internal disclosure University must make decision to retain title within 2 years from disclosure to agency (or sooner if publication of research results takes place) If title is retained, must file patent application within one year (or prior to end of statutory period) If university does not intend to file, agency may file on its own behalf

FAR Patent Rights (cont.) If university retains title, government gets a non-exclusive, irrevocable, paid-up license to practice the invention or have it practiced on behalf of the government (government contractors) through out the world May not assign rights to third parties (except to patent management organization) Must share royalties/income with inventor Any remaining income, after expenses, must be used to support scientific research or education Agencies may request reports on use of invention

FAR Patent Rights (conclusion) Many agencies maintain their own version of this clause Dept of Defense at Dept of Energy at (A) (2) Standard patent rights clause to work from, specifically geared for non-profits and universities. Expectation is that in a FAR based contract, we would see one of these clauses NOTE: these clauses can be and frequently are revised

Rights in Data in Federal Contracts Unlike patent rights, there is no standard approach to data rights With a few exceptions, most agencies offer only vague guidelines and/or definitions. Since 1987, agencies have tried but have been unable to devise a uniform approach to rights in data OMB A-110 (1999 Revision) now defines data

Rights in Data in Federal Contracts How is “data” defined to date? “Data means” recorded information, including technical data and computer software. When do federal rights apply? When data/software is first developed or specifically used or required for performance of the contract.

Rights in Data in Federal Contracts Rights in technical data and computer software outlined in FAR and its supplements Ownership of data is determined by terms of the agreement Obligations under Federal contracts May vary depending on agency, statement of work or source of funds Most require institutional dissemination Normally government receives a royalty free, non-exclusive, irrevocable, world wide license to use, disclose,reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to public and perform and display publicly the copyrighted data “first produced”

FAR Rights in Data Most agencies (other than DOD, DOE and NASA) use FAR What does this document contain? –Definitions - to understand text –Allocation of Principal Rights – who gets what –Copyright –Release, publication and use of data –Unauthorized, omitted or incorrect marking of data –Protection of limited rights data and restricted computer software –Subcontracts –Relationship to patents –ALTERNATE IV

FAR Rights in Data (cont.) What are the important elements of the clause? Title to data and software belongs to the university Government receives unlimited rights University may establish without prior approval, copyright in scientific and technical articles if they contain data first produced in the performance of the contract and published in professional journals Inclusion of Alternate IV is important because it provides university with the right to claim copyright without limitation in any data, including software

Rights in Data in Federal Contracts There are three different levels of access for government rights to technical data and computer software Unlimited rights – government has rights to data for any purpose, and to have or permit others to do so (solely government funded) Government purpose rights – government has rights and may permit others but must be on behalf of government (government and third party funded) Limited rights – data may be reproduced and used by government but may not without written permission be used or disclosed outside of government – must be MARKED (privately funded)

FAR Rights in Data (conclusion) Why request Alternate IV? Differentiates between data and software –Gives government rights to data –Government cannot distribute software Provides universities with right to claim copyright without limitation in any data (including technical data and software) Required to be used in contracts for basic or applied research to be performed solely by universities Some restrictions apply