Content Analysis: An Introduction Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Ph.D. Cleveland State University Fall 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Qualitative Social Work Research
Advertisements

Extended Project Research Skills 1 st Feb Aims of this session  Developing a clear focus of what you are trying to achieve in your Extended Project.
Empirically Assessing End User Software Engineering Techniques Gregg Rothermel Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Nebraska --
47.269: Research I: The Basics Dr. Leonard Spring 2010
Introduction to Research
Qualitative Research. Comparing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Before discussing the differences between qualitative and quantitative methodologies.
Welcome To Sociological Research Methods Chuck Brown, Ph.D. Albright College.
Product Perception By Michelle Olguin & Karen Dambroski Undergraduate Students Fort Lewis College Durango, Colorado.
Formulating the research design
Methodology: How Social Psychologists Do Research
Fig Theory construction. A good theory will generate a host of testable hypotheses. In a typical study, only one or a few of these hypotheses can.
Intro to Computing Research
Complete Hypothesis and Operationalisation Activity Understand the importance of validity and peer review Be able to write all types of hypotheses; directional/experimental,
Chapter 3 Researching the Social World Copyright 2012, SAGE Publications, Inc.
Define and Identify components of an experiment..
Lesson 2 – Studying Marriages and Families Robert Wonser.
Research Methods Key Points What is empirical research? What is the scientific method? How do psychologists conduct research? What are some important.
REH 6306 Edwin D. Bell.  Understand why research questions are so important to your action research.  Demonstrate the ability to formulate and focus.
Authentic Assessment Lynne E. Houtz, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Education Creighton University.
Biostatistics Ibrahim Altubasi, PT, PhD The University of Jordan.
Content Analysis: Sampling & Units Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Ph.D. Cleveland State University Fall 2011.
Research Methods Irving Goffman People play parts/ roles
Understanding MYP Criteria
CHAPTER 2 The Tools of Sociology. Chapter Outline  Applying the Sociological Imagination  The Basic Methods  Analyzing the Data  Theories and Perspectives.
Chapter 16 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 16 Developing the Research Proposal.
Behavioral Research Chapter 6-Observing Behavior.
WELNS 670: Wellness Research Design Chapter 5: Planning Your Research Design.
Quantitative Research. Overview Non-experimental QualitativeCase study Phenomenology Ethnography Historical Literature Review QuantitativeObservational.
Agenda Review of Last week Learn about types of Research designs –How are they different from each other? From other things? Applying what you learned.
Introduction to Research
Research PHE 498. Define Research Research can be considered as systematic inquiry: A process that needs to be followed systematically to derive conclusions.
COM 633: Content Analysis Introduction Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Ph.D. Cleveland State University Fall 2010.
Experimentation in Computer Science (Part 1). Outline  Empirical Strategies  Measurement  Experiment Process.
Quantitative Text Analysis Content and Interaction Analyses.
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 17: Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research 1.
Why is research important Propose theories Test theories Increase understanding Improve teaching and learning.
 What is MASS?  What is a MEDIUM?  What is MASS? › Large, undifferentiated audience? › The large, general group is often defined by a certain demographic.
 Descriptive Methods ◦ Observation ◦ Survey Research  Experimental Methods ◦ Independent Groups Designs ◦ Repeated Measures Designs ◦ Complex Designs.
Unit Two: Methods Psychology. How do Psychologists use the Scientific Method? Do Now: What is the Scientific Method?
Content Analysis: Measurement and Validity Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Ph.D. Cleveland State University Fall 2011.
1 Chapter 1- The Science Of Biology. 2 I. What is Science A. What Science is and is Not. 1. The goal of science is to investigate and understand the natural.
COM 633: Content Analysis Measurement; Validity Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Ph.D. Cleveland State University Fall 2010.
COM 633: Content Analysis Sampling and Units Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Ph.D. Cleveland State University Fall 2010.
Nursing research Is a systematic inquiry into a subject that uses various approach quantitative and qualitative methods) to answer questions and solve.
EDUC 502: Introduction to Research August 29, 2005 Dr. Groth Note: This will be ed to your SU account after class tonight.
Chapter 2 Doing Sociological Research Key Terms. scientific method Involves several steps in research process, including observation, hypothesis testing,
Introduction to Quantitative Research Charles Laugharne.
Introduction to Scientific Research. Science Vs. Belief Belief is knowing something without needing evidence. Eg. The Jewish, Islamic and Christian belief.
Introduction to Research Methods PSY 101. How to read a journal reference Courtney, K.E. & Polich, J. (2009). Binge drinking in young adults: Data, definitions,
Sociological Research Methods. Survey Research - Interview - Questionnaire - Closed- end Questions - Open- ended Questions.
Experiments (cont.) Content Analysis COMM Fall 2007 Nan Yu.
Methodology: How Social Psychologists Do Research
Sociological Methods. Scientific Method  Sociologists use the scientific method to study society  Definition – systematic, organized series of steps.
Introduction to Research
Review: Stages in Research Process Formulate Problem Determine Research Design Determine Data Collection Method Design Data Collection Forms Design Sample.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433 Chapter 5 Research Reports.
Formulating the Research Design Faisal Abbas, PhD Lecture 8 th.
McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Sociological Research SOCIOLOGY Richard T. Schaefer 2.
RESEARCHING THE SOCIAL WORLD George Ritzer Prepared by Rolande D. Dathis.
Part Two.
Researching the Social World
Sociological Research
First review….. Review, Physiological Measures, Implicit Measures, and Qualitative Research.
What qualifies as evidence of student learning?
A 4 Step Process (Kind of…)
Chapter 1 – Investigating scientifically
Features of a Good Research Study
Research Methods Introduction Jarod Locke.
Chapter 4 Summary.
Chapter 10 Content Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Content Analysis: An Introduction Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Ph.D. Cleveland State University Fall 2011

Content Analysis Defined  Content analysis is a summarizing, quantitative analysis of messages that relies on the scientific method (including attention to objectivity/intersubjectivity, a priori design, reliability, validity, generalizability, replicability, and hypothesis testing)  It is not limited as to the types of variables that may be measured, nor to the context in which the messages are created or presented [Source: Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.]

Content Analysis within the Family of Empirical Methods  Experiment: At least one IV (independent variable) is manipulated; unit of data collection is often (but not always) in a controlled (e.g., laboratory) setting (if not, it may be called a field experiment)  Survey: Variables are measured as they “naturally” occur; unit of data collection is typically situated in its (his/her) natural environment; no variables are manipulated  Qualitative Methods: Includes such variants as ethnography, narratology, focus groups, and participant observation; the researcher, and their knowledge and skills, are an integral part of the measurement process

Content Analysis within the Family of Empirical Methods - 2 Experiments Surveys Qualitative Studies Content Analyses??

Content Analysis within the Family of Empirical Methods - 2 Experiments Surveys Qualitative Studies Content Analyses??

The Growth of Content Analaysis: Timeline—Content/Text Analysis Publications by Year

A “Simple” Content Analysis: Gottschall et al. (2008) ( Gottschall, Jonathan, et al. (2008). The “beauty myth” is no myth: Emphasis on male- female attractiveness in world folktales. Human Nature, 19, )  An example of results from a fairly “easy” content analysis is shown in Figure 1.2. The figure summarizes the findings of Gottschall et al. (2008), a team of 31 co-authors/coders who inspected folktales from around the world for one particular aspect—the use of attractiveness descriptors for females (vs. males). The study included measures of— (a) attractiveness and unattractiveness references (measured via the presence of 58 pre-chosen adjectives and their variants (e.g., pretty, prettiest; ugly, uglier, ugliest)), and (b) the gender of the character to whom each reference applied (measured via personal pronoun). Additionally, (c) a rough measure of how many characters in each tale were female and male was executed via electronic word searches for pronouns, so that attractiveness references could be expressed as proportional to the number of characters of that gender.  So, just three measures were developed for this study. The coder training task was relatively simple, and acceptable intercoder reliability was achieved, even with 30 coders.

 Although using an elegantly simple coding scheme, the researchers chose an ambitiously large sample for its application: 90 volumes of traditional folktales from 13 regions around the world. In total, 8.17 million words in 16,541 single-spaced pages were analyzed.  Figure 1.2 shows the main findings, the female-to- male ratio of “risk” that a character will be referred to with “attractiveness” terminology. These figures take into account the rough numbers of females and males in the tales. A “Simple” Content Analysis: Gottschall et al. (2008)

Figure 1.2. A “Simple” Content Analysis: Gottschall et al. (2008) Female-Male Attractiveness Emphasis in World Folktales  Figure 1.2 shows the main findings, the female-to-male ratio of “risk” that a character will be referred to with “attractiveness” terminology. These figures take into account the rough numbers of females and males in the tales. Thus, we see that stories from European folktales show the greatest “gender bias”—a female character in these tales is 8.81 times more likely to be referred to as attractive/unattractive than is a male.0.5 Overall, female characters are 6.0 times more likely to be referred to with regard to attractiveness than are males. And there is no region of the world that seems to generate folktales with gender parity, or male predominance, when it comes to attractiveness references.

 pause