Christian Zempel Eric Stackpole Gavin Hagiwara Xander Wroblewski Department of Mechanical Engineering IRIS-VIEWS SHOT II 6/11/10 Verification of In-flight.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ocean Science Data Based Lesson A Guide to Construction of Materials for Ships, Oceans and Satellites (S.O.S.) This guide is intended to be used in conjunction.
Advertisements

Team K^3 + C Final Team Presentation Khin Oo, Kim Gleffe, Carlie Bolin, Katelyn Harder AEM /16/11.
Procedure for the Can Challenge: CMPLEB By: Katie Pavelec and Lindsey Baur.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
Page 1 Aalborg University Communication system for the AAUSAT-II Communication System for the AAUSAT-II Kresten K. Sørensen Department.
Clean Air Project: Team Big Green SpaceGasm Launch Readiness Review Hillary Beltran, Edward Crawford, Nicole Harris, Edward Lowe, Emily Proano, and Kevin.
Cornell University Space Systems Design Studio AIAA GNC Conference - 8/11/2009 Violet: A High-Agility Nanosatellite for Demonstrating Small Control-Moment.
Gary MKIII University of Central Florida Chris Valle, Braden Urban, John Rowe, and Tyler Yoemans.
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Team BIOHAZARD Presents: Project CRUENTO. CRUENTO: Latin – to make bloody; stain with blood.
Flight Club Critical Design Review Evan Akselrad, Chris Anaya, Natalie Bixler, Melanie Dubin, Logan Finch, Ted Maritz, and Scott Williams October 14, 2008.
Team D.S.R.O Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Gracie Harsha Emily Howard Bobby Stillwell September 23, 2008.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
Team Helios. Mission and Experiment Mission: Launch a balloonsat to determine the light filtering effect of the atmosphere and test the effectiveness.
Team Space Jam Critical Design Review Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Jamie Usherwood, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Taylor King, and Paul Guerrie October 5,
Tres Volcanus Conceptual Design Review Community College of Aurora Adam Kim Ian Jones Dani Strohmier 06/10/10.
1 SHOT II Communication System Experiment University of Minnesota Max Schadegg, Cole Christensen, Ian Macmillen, Steve Haviland June 10 th, 2010 University.
1 Student Hands On Training I (2009) Construction, Integration, and Test Construction, Integration, and Test.
Team BIOHAZARD Presents: Project CRUENTO. CRUENTO: Latin – to make bloody; stain with blood.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Foam Core Class #05 Foam Core Class #05.
Carnivorous Ninja Warriors Launch Readiness Review Katie Brissenden, Hannah Williams, Aram Podolski, Kat Bryant, Arley Hendrick, Cam Comeau November 5,
Cube Root Georgia Institute of Technology Matt Bigelow, Gregory Hansen, Sarah McNeese, Luke Walker.
Project YES! Critical Design Review Team Search: Matt Paley, Emily Fuentes, Nick Stohl, Ian Andrzejczak, Jackie Myrose, Erik Horn 10/6/09.
M-SAT Missouri S&T Satellite Team SHOT II Pre-Launch Ryan Pahl Matt Campbell Stephanie Evans Austin Ferguson.
Minnesat SHOTII Presentation, June 16 th, Minnesat University of Minnesota Jason Mintz Jim Pogemiller Abdul Azeem Khan Vincent Jusuf SHOT II Presentation.
Critical Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani October 17, 2006.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Conceptual Design Review Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani September 21, 2006.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Bronco 1 Casey Kute Phelps Williams Kuan Ju Ho Kyle Ogle.
CDR Presentation. - Team T.E.N.’s objectives are to fly Ralph with all the systems functioning properly. This includes the boom arm, radiation badge,
Thomas Jeffries, Anthony Anglin, Dylan Cooper, Dustin Fishelman, Colin Harkins, Joao Mansur, Starteya Pais, Andrew Trujillo 10/2/2012.
Deniz Bertuna, Tyler Drake, Jason Hohl, Gavin Kutil, Ryan Quakenbush, Gauravdev Singh Soin October 18, 2007.
PHAT-TACO Experiment Pressure Humidity And Temperature Tests And Camera Observations Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring.
University at Buffalo GLADOS SHOT II Balloon Payload Presentation June 29, 2012 Andrew Dianetti, Alex Wende, Bryant Carlson, Joe Flannery 1.
Argus: SLU Core Bus Operational Test Steve Massey, Tyler Olson, Joe Kirwen, Wesley Gardner SHOT II Pre-Launch Presentation June 29, 2012.
VUCIRO 3 A Balloon Project by: Team Tartive. Group Members Christopher Zanca:  Project Management  Software  Electrical Design Rachael Drella:  Science.
Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, Sydni Smith, and Shweta Maurya 5 November, 2009.
1 Structure (STR) Subsystem Overview Jonah White – STR Co-Lead.
1 University of Maryland DYMAFLEX SHOT II Pre-Flight Presentation June 29, 2012.
Boston University Daniel TaylorNima Badizadegan R. Terry BlackPantelis Thomadis.
Zachary Cuseo, Sydni Smith, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, and Shweta Maurya 8 October 2009.
Bully Blue Lock Midterm Presentation 2014 Senior Design II.
Team Magnaritaville Conceptual Design Review Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge, Shweta Maurya, Sydni Smith, Christopher Nie, Tyler Knappe 9/22/09 Fall 2009 Rev.
Napoleon Connor Strait | Chris Gray | Chad Alvarez Akeem Huggins | Ashley Zimmerer Tucker Emmett | Ginny Christiansen |Caleb Lipscomb Conceptual Design.
1 SOARS Matt Edwards Arseny Dolgov John Shelton Johnny Jannetto Galina Dvorkina Nick Driver Eric Kohut Kevin Eberhart Self Organizing Aerial Reconnaissance.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
Prox-0.3 Georgia Institute of Technology Kiichiro DeLuca Richard Zappulla Matt Uhlman Ian Chen 1.
Team Magnaritaville Final Presentation Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge’, Tyler Knappe, Christopher Nie, Sydni Smith, and Shweta Maurya December 1, 2009.
Prox-0.3 Georgia Institute of Technology Kiichiro DeLuca Richard Zappulla Ian Chen Matt Uhlman 1.
TERSat Massachusetts Institute of Technology Eric Peters, Danilo Roascio, Leonard Tampkins, Kezi Cheng June 29,
109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski 1 30 Sep – 01 Oct 2009DRAFT RBSP EFW ICDR 109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski IDPU Chassis Mechanical Design and Development Bill Donakowski.
S.H.I.E.L.D. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Addison, Travis, Jared, Evan, Aaron, Matt 10/14/08.
GLAST LAT ProjectFace to Face, 14 April 2004 LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EGSE and Interface Verification Pat Hascall SLAC System.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
SWETrak: High-Altitude Balloon Payload
Mission Statement... The Space Wolverines will;
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Final Presentation
Preliminary Design Review
PROJECT METEOR: RITSAT1 P08102
Space Debris Critical Design Review
Launch Readiness Review
CUSat High Altitude Test (CHAT) Mission Briefing
StratoBuoy II Matt Voll Brian Mayernik Pat O’Hara.
HA1L High Altitude 1U Laboratory
Proposal Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend.
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Presentation transcript:

Christian Zempel Eric Stackpole Gavin Hagiwara Xander Wroblewski Department of Mechanical Engineering IRIS-VIEWS SHOT II 6/11/10 Verification of In-flight Environmental Wear on Subsystems

Mission Overview Purpose – The purpose of this experiment is to test and verify the performance of several key subsystems that will be used on Santa Clara University’s IRIS nanosatellite. – Monitoring satellite in near space conditions: altitude, temperature, and pressure AVR sats – Custom built multi-purpose microcontrollers that will be used on IRIS – Send in-flight temperature and current data – Packets received versus Packets sent Beacon – Similar antenna and ground plane characteristics and link budget to that of IRIS – Measuring signal strength

Structural Design Main Components – ¼ inch Foam Core Poster Board – ¼ inch Packing Foam – Acrylic Baseplate – Screen Material – Hot Glue – Aluminum Tape – Tape Measure – Velcro/Adhesive fasteners Assembly and Design Process – Measured, cut, and assembled outer structure – Coated each wall with two layers of packing foam – Finalized hole layout on acrylic baseplate and installed components – Installed battery pack with velcro – Slid acrylic baseplate into foam notches – Created holes for balloon rope attachement in top and bottom through center of mass – Connected electrical components and installed antenna – Cut access hatch and sealed the lid

Test Program The whip test The drop test The stair pitch test The cooler test The tests performed yielded positive results, suggesting that the survivability of the main structure and components within is likely. User Guide Compliance -Mass -1680g < 1700g -String Attachment

Expected Results Functionality Will everything continue to work? Packets received/ packets sent Are enough good packets being received? Telemetry Are the packets we’re receiving correct?

Packets Received/ Packets sent Empirical data based on GeneSat/ PharmaSat passes. Theoretical data based on link budget. BOE = 1/10000 Link 45° = 26dB Expected number of “good” packets/ min ≈ 5

Telemetry Information sent: Call Sign Time Temperature Current consumption “Dummy data” Of good packets, how many had erroneous data? GeneSat1.org00454B B F0B00147A2A D06

Expected Results Receive signals from the satellite – Ensures the range and quality of the hardware – Ensures proper environment for hardware Receive health data packets from the satellite – Ensures an optimal range of the hardware – Further tests the environment on the hardware Receive useful health data from the satellite – Tests the correctness of the software in a longer term field test. – Tests the capabilities of the satellite to truly monitor itself in a space environment.