Attributing direct radiative forcing to specific emissions using adjoint sensitivities Daven K Henze, Drew T. Shindell, Robert J. D. Spurr g-con.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
N emissions and the changing landscape of air quality Rob Pinder US EPA Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Advertisements

Simulation of Absorbing Aerosol Index & Understanding the Relation of NO 2 Column Retrievals with Ground-based Monitors Randall Martin (Dalhousie, Harvard-Smithsonian)
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
Aerosol Lifetimes at High Latitudes Betty Croft 1, Jeff Pierce 1,2 and Randall Martin 1,3 1 Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada 2 Colorado State University,
Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed Aerosol Optical Depth Aaron van Donkelaar 1, Randall Martin 1,2,
GEOS-CHEM adjoint development using TAF
"Future climate impacts of direct radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols, tropospheric ozone, and long-lived greenhouse gases" Chen, W; Liao, H; Seinfeld,
Xuan Wang and Colette L. Heald 7th International GEOS-Chem User’s Meeting, May 5, 2015 This work is funded by U.S. EPA Simulating Brown Carbon and its.
Constraining aerosol sources using MODIS backscattered radiances Easan Drury - G2
Future Inorganic Aerosol Levels 4th GEOS-Chem Users’ Meeting 9 April 2009 Havala Pye* 1, Hong Liao 2, Shiliang Wu 3,5, Loretta Mickley 3, Daniel Jacob.
Retrieval of SO 2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne: Dalhousie.
Re-thinking the IPCC radiative forcing bar chart: The sector based paradigm Nadine Unger NASA GISS Columbia University.
Eric M. Leibensperger, Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University Climate response to changing.
1 A Fractional AOD Approach to Derive PM2.5 Information Using MISR Data Coupled with GEOS-CHEM Aerosol Simulation Results Yang Liu, Ralph Kahn, Solene.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
Sensitivity of sulfate direct climate forcing to the hysteresis of particle phase transitions Jun Wang, Andrew Hoffman, Scot Martin, Daniel Jacob Present.
ARM Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program. 2 Improve the performance of general circulation models (GCMs) used for climate research and prediction.
OMI NO 2 observations of boreal forest fires Nicolas Bousserez, Randall V. Martin, Lok Lamsal, and the ARCTAS team Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Presented At AMS Meeting, Long Beach, CA, 2003 Aerosol Phase Function And Size Distributions From Polar Nephelometer Measurements During The SEAS Experiment.
Aerosols and climate Rob Wood, Atmospheric Sciences.
Black Carbon:Global Budget and Impacts on Climate.
Daven K. Henze with Amir Hakami and John H. Seinfeld Caltech, Chemical Engineering Support from: NSF, EPA, TeraGrid and JPL Supercomp., W. & S. Davidow.
Martin Manning and Greg Bodeker National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Presented at ‘Expert meeting on assessment of contributions to climate.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Organic aerosol and its climate impact Min Zhong and Myoseon Jang Sept. 24, 2013 Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences University of Florida.
Effects of Pollution on Visibility and the Earth’s Radiation Balance John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno,
Assessing the Lightning NO x Parameterization in GEOS-Chem with HNO 3 Columns from IASI Matthew Cooper 1 Randall Martin 1,2, Catherine Wespes 3, Pierre-Francois.
Direct radiative forcing of aerosols and tropospheric ozone from specific emissions sectors and locations CMAS 10/11/2010 Daven K Henze University of Colorado.
M. Van Roozendael, AMFIC Final Meeting, 23 Oct 2009, Beijing, China1 MAXDOAS measurements in Beijing M. Van Roozendael 1, K. Clémer 1, C. Fayt 1, C. Hermans.
Using MODIS fire count data as an interim solution for estimating biomass burning emission of aerosols and trace gases Mian Chin, Tom Kucsera, Louis Giglio,
Retrieval and Interpretation of Tropospheric Observations from GOME Randall Martin Daniel Jacob Paul Palmer Sushil Chandra Jerry Ziemke Mian Chin Kelly.
IPCC WG1 AR5: Key Findings Relevant to Future Air Quality Fiona M. O’Connor, Atmospheric Composition & Climate Team, Met Office Hadley Centre.
In Situ and Remote Sensing Characterization of Spectral Absorption by Black Carbon and other Aerosols J. Vanderlei Martins, Paulo Artaxo, Yoram Kaufman,
Representation of Sea Salt Aerosol in CAM coupled with a Sectional Aerosol Microphysical Model CARMA Tianyi Fan, Owen Brian Toon LASP/ATOC, University.
Optical properties Satellite observation ? T,H 2 O… From dust microphysical properties to dust hyperspectral infrared remote sensing Clémence Pierangelo.
Overview of the tracer code in RegCM Tracers Aerosols ( droplets, smoke particles, dust, pollens, flying cats …) Gazeous phase, chemical species Evolution.
Fog- and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Thomas F. Eck (Code 618 NASA GSFC) and Brent N. Holben (Code.
Numerical simulations of optical properties of nonspherical dust aerosols using the T-matrix method Hyung-Jin Choi School.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
Hemispheric transport of ozone pollution and the nonlinearities GMI meeting UC Irvine March 17, 2008 Shiliang Wu, Harvard Bryan Duncan, NASA / GSFC Arlene.
ESTIMATION OF SOLAR RADIATIVE IMPACT DUE TO BIOMASS BURNING OVER THE AFRICAN CONTINENT Y. Govaerts (1), G. Myhre (2), J. M. Haywood (3), T. K. Berntsen.
Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.
An Interactive Aerosol-Climate Model based on CAM/CCSM: Progress and challenging issues Chien Wang and Dongchul Kim (MIT) Annica Ekman (U. Stockholm) Mary.
Global budget and radiative forcing of black carbon aerosol: constraints from pole-to-pole (HIPPO) observations across the Pacific Qiaoqiao Wang, Daniel.
Estimating PM 2.5 from MODIS and MISR AOD Aaron van Donkelaar and Randall Martin March 2009.
Radiative forcing due to BC on snow and the direct aerosol effect of BC in the Arctic Gunnar Myhre CICERO – Center for International Climate and Environmental.
Tom Breider, Loretta Mickley, Daniel Jacob, Cui Ge, Jun Wang, Melissa Payer, Betty Croft, David Ridley, Sangeeta Sharma, Kostas Eleftheriadis, Joe McConnell,
Direct aerosol radiative effects based on combined A-Train observations Jens Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, J. Livingston, M. Vaughan, P. Russell, M.Kacenelenbogen,
WORKSHOP ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND AIR QUALITY : part I: Intercontinental transport and climatic effects of pollutants OBJECTIVE: Define a near-term (-2003)
Radiative transfer simulations of the ATR-42 SW and LW irradiance profiles above Lampedusa Island Daniela Meloni with contributions from: ChArMEx/ADRIMED.
RESULTS: CO constraints from an adjoint inversion REFERENCES Streets et al. [2003] JGR doi: /2003GB Heald et al. [2003a] JGR doi: /2002JD
Bottom-up and top-down estimates of ammonia emissions over China Lin Zhang 1 Yuanhong Zhao 1, Youfan Chen 1, Yuepeng Pan 2, Yuesi.
How do regional aerosol emissions affect climate? Matthew Kasoar With: Apostolos Voulgarakis (Imperial), Drew Shindell (NASA GISS/Duke), Greg Faluvegi.
A tale of two near-term climate forcers: black carbon and methane Daniel J. Jacob with Qiaoqiao Wang, Alex Turner, Bram Maasakkers.
Picture: METEOSAT Oct 2000 Tropospheric O 3 budget of the South Atlantic region B. Sauvage, R. V. Martin, A. van Donkelaar, I. Folkins, X.Liu, P. Palmer,
Public health impacts of the severe haze in Equatorial Asia in September-October 2015: A new tool for fire management to reduce downwind smoke exposure.
Aerosol simulation with coupled meteorology-radiation- chemistry model WRF/Chem over Europe.
Retrieval of desert dust aerosols vertical profiles from IASI measurements in the TIR atmospheric window Sophie Vandenbussche, Svetlana Kochenova, Ann-Carine.
Global Air Pollution Inferred from Satellite Remote Sensing Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian with contributions from Aaron van Donkelaar,
Near-term climate forcers and climate policy: methane and black carbon Daniel J. Jacob.
Comparison of adjoint and analytical approaches for solving atmospheric chemistry inverse problems Monika Kopacz 1, Daniel J. Jacob 1, Daven Henze 2, Colette.
What Are the Implications of Optical Closure Using Measurements from the Two Column Aerosol Project? J.D. Fast 1, L.K. Berg 1, E. Kassianov 1, D. Chand.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way Coupled System: Part II Jonathan.
N. Bousserez, R. V. Martin, L. N. Lamsal, J. Mao, R. Cohen, and B. R
Emission metrics inferred from regional aerosol perturbations
Assimilating Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer profiles in GEOS-Chem
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Polarization Effects on Column CO2 Retrievals from Non-Nadir Satellite Measurements in the Short-Wave Infrared Vijay Natraj1, Hartmut Bösch2, Robert J.D.
Chris Sioris Kelly Chance
Presentation transcript:

Attributing direct radiative forcing to specific emissions using adjoint sensitivities Daven K Henze, Drew T. Shindell, Robert J. D. Spurr g-con

Radiative Forcing Transfer Functions How to calculate the radiative forcing change for a given change in emissions? IPCC, 2007 Global contributions to aerosol direct RF

Radiative Forcing Transfer Functions How to calculate the radiative forcing change for a given change in emissions? Using transfer function T :

Radiative Forcing Transfer Functions How to calculate the radiative forcing change for a given change in emissions? Using transfer function T : Approximate T using adjoint: Calculated using GC adjoint (Henze et al., 2007 and LIDORT (Spurr, 2002)

Radiative Forcing Transfer Functions The % change in radiative forcing per change in BC emission: note: per change in any BC emission. This shows variation in efficiency of BC emissions forcing.

Radiative Forcing Transfer Functions The % change in radiative forcing per change in SO 2 emission:

Applying to MFR 2030 – 2000 inventories BC, Total SO 2, Total

Applying to MFR 2030 – 2000 inventories BC, Total SO 2, Total

Applying to CLE 2030 – 2000 inventories BC, Total SO 2, Total

Applying to CLE 2030 – 2000 inventories BC, RESALL SO 2, RESALL

Applying to CLE 2030 – 2000 inventories BC, POWER SO 2, POWER

Validation: BC CLE 2030 – 2000 perturbation Looks good

Validation: SO 2 CLE 2030 – 2000 perturbation Looks OK, but adjoint-approach biased?

Validation: SO 2 10% perturbationsCLE 2030 – 2000 perturbation Check: does reducing perturbation reduce nonlinearity? Yes. The adjoint code is accurate.

Validation: SO 2 RF E SO2 E 2000 E’ 2030 |ADJ| > |FD| E’’ 2030 |ADJ| < |FD| Can we anticipate bias?

Validation: SO 2 CLE 2030 – 2000 perturbation E 2030 > E 2000 (China, India) E 2030 < E 2000 (Europe ) Yes, bias can be anticipated. Also, overall ordering remains the same. Conclusion: adjoint sensitivities provide a rapid means of exploring the effect of specific emissions changes on aerosol DRF.

The end Thanks to: Columbia Univ. Earth Institute Fellowship Drew Shindell, Rob Spurr, Nadine Unger, John Seinfeld NASA GSFC: NCCS NASA JPL: SCC

Radiative Transfer Code Mie Code derivate mode GC Adj Weighting functions Henze et al., 2007 Following Martin et al., 2004, Drury et al., 2008 Radiative Forcing with GEOS-Chem GEOS-Chem Mie Code Grainger et al., 2004 [SIA], [BC], RH, D dry Radiative Transfer Code LIDORT (Spurr, 2002) TOA upward SW flux Forward model Sensitivity calculation:

Radiative Forcing with GEOS-Chem GEOS-Chem [SIA], RH 8.4Koch et al. (1999) 11Chin et al. (2002) Martin et al. (2004) 10.5current work Literature D dry N, D wet Mie Code Grainger et al., 2004 (tabulate as )

Validating Radiative Forcing Sensitivity ignore Phase function coefficients for SIA(D wet ) D max D min

Validating Radiative Forcing Sensitivity Mie results for extinction at discrete mode diameters:

Radiative Forcing (forward calculation) Chemical Transport Model Mie Code Aerosol concentrations optical properties

Radiative Forcing Sensitivity LIDORT Spurr, 2002 Jacobian calculation GEOS-Chem Adj Henze et al., 2007 Mie Derivative [SIA]*, [BC]* Grainger et al., 2004

Radiative Forcing (forward calculation) Chemical Transport Model Mie Code Aerosol concentrations optical properties Radiative Transfer Code TOA upward SW fluxes

Next Steps -Validate the transfer functions -Apply to various emissions perturbations of interest

Radiative Forcing Sensitivity Radiative Transfer Code LIDORT (Spurr 2002) Jacobian calculation GEOS-Chem Adj Mie Derivative [SIA]*, [BC]* 24 hr 1 week

Radiative Forcing with GEOS-Chem GEOS-Chem N, D wet Mie Code Grainger et al., 2004 [SIA], RH [BC] D dry (external mixture) Radiative Transfer Code LIDORT (Spurr, 2002) TOA upward SW flux Following Martin et al., 2004; Drury et al,. 2008

Following Martin et al., 2004, Drury et al., 2008 Radiative Forcing with GEOS-Chem GEOS-Chem Mie Code Grainger et al., 2004 [SIA], [BC], RH, D dry Radiative Transfer Code LIDORT (Spurr, 2002) TOA upward SW flux Forward model Radiative Transfer Code Mie Code derivate mode GEOS-Chem Adj Sensitivity calculation [SIA]*, [BC]* Weighting functions Henze et al., hr 1 wk

Applying to CLE 2030 inventories note: this takes about 10 seconds

Applying to MFR 2030 inventories