Ingrid – Revisiting the Meteorology Michael Foley Severe Weather Section Bureau of Meteorology
Satellite Overview: 2 – 17 Mar 2005 first known severe impact in all tropical states/territories
Gove Radar: Anatomy of Ingrid eye wall 30 km across gales 180 km across rain band
Cat.Mean Strongest gustTypical Effect No.Winds (km/h) Cyclone Severity Categories < 125 Negligible house damage Crop/trees/caravan damage Small craft drag moorings Minor house damage Significant crop/tree/caravan damage Small craft break moorings Some roof/structural damage Some caravans destroyed Power failure likely Significant roof/structural damage Dangerous airborne debris Widespread power failure 5> 200 > 280 Extremely dangerous Widespread destruction
Intensity Assessments in Cyclone Advices for Ingrid LocationCatMax Gust (km/h) Elizabeth Bay4260 Drysdale Island5290 Croker Island5290 Cape Don4235 Melville Island3215 Faraway Bay (WA)5285 max gusts 320 km/h
What are intensity estimates based on? 1.Direct Measurement – rare in Australia 2.Inference (satellite, radar, impacts) - usual Tracy 1974
Surface Data Received During Ingrid x x x x x x x x x x no data Cape Don anemometer cups blown away
Dvorak: Cloud Patterns Intensity wind speed day
Other Types of Wind Speed Data
Post-Analysis Process done for every cyclone before input into national database uses data not received in time for Cyclone Warning allows benefit of hindsight Black Point Barograph Drysdale Island Survey
Main Outcomes of Postanalysis Ingrid reached Cat 5 just north of Gove, 12 hours earlier than previously thought Ingrid’s winds began to weaken prior to crossing Croker Island at Cat 4 Ingrid only reached Cat 4 in Timor Sea
Almost Gove’s Tracy? redeveloped faster than “allowed” in Gulf
Loss of Structure along North Coast Ingrid’s structure weakened as it moved north of the north coast operational analysis rule: hold winds steady for 12 hours after weakening first observed (wind drop lags drop in structure) recent studies suggest 6 hour lag better on average – this was used in postanalysis why did Ingrid weaken prior to landfall, in favourable environment?
Concentric Eyewalls: Weakening due to Internal Dynamics inner eyewall 14 km across outer eyewall 52 km across
Wind Data in Outer Eyewall McCluer Island AWS max 10-min mean wind 154 km/h was at this time max gust: 207 km/h no obs were obtained in inner eye wall Croker Island
Timor Sea: Not As Well Structured
Reassessments in Intensity OldNew LocationCatMax Gust (km/h) CatMax Gust (km/h) Elizabeth Bay Drysdale Island Croker Island Cape Don Melville Island Faraway Bay (WA)
Ingrid vs Katrina very similar intensities (max gusts around 320 km/h) both exhibited concentric eyewalls Katrina was far bigger
Australian vs US Classification Maximum Gust (km/h) CategoryAustralian (TC)US (Hurricane) 1< > 280> 318
Katrina Concentric Eye Walls
Size – the Big Difference IngridKatrinaextent of gales
Ingrid – Revisiting the Meteorology cyclone intensity analysis largely based on inference rather than direct measurement evidence from satellite analysis supports Cat 5 maximum intensity for Ingrid however, postanalysis has concluded: –Cat 5: 12 hours earlier than previously thought –Cat 4 prior to crossing Croker Island –Cat 4 in Timor Sea we can’t be complacent about Cat 5 systems e.g. Katrina