What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Universidad del Sagrado Corazón
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
Self Study: Some Things to Consider The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey September 20, 2010.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The Middle States Accreditation and Review Process & the ESC Self-Study Center for Distance Learning Craig Lamb – Director of Academic Support Val Chukhlomin.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
District Accreditation as a Quality System Presented by Mary Beth Huber On behalf of the Calcasieu Parish SACS CASI Steering Committee.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
Professional Standards 2009 Suzanne Scott, Ph.D., IDEC, ASID, Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation,
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Preparing and Planning for Self Study Washington & Jefferson College November 2010.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
CCC: Where Teaching and Learning Transform Lives, Putting Together the Self- Study Puzzle Corning Community College August 24, 2012.
New England Association of Schools and Colleges The Accreditation Process A Report Guide.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
Long-Range Planning Presentation to the Del Mar College Board Committee May 13, 2008.
Accreditation Who? Regional Accrediting Agency: NWCCU (Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities). What? Self-study followed by on-campus.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
The NJIT Accreditation Process: Launching the Middle States Commission on Higher Education Self Study Presentation to Committee on Academic Affairs September.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Self-Study 2010: Review, Reflect, and Renew. The Accrediting Process  A means of self-regulation  Intended to strengthen and sustain the quality higher.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Evergreen Valley College Accreditation Update October 20, 2014
Overview of accjc stanard IV
Reaccreditation and Illinois
UPRM Self-Study for MSCHE
Task Force Orientation
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene Swilkey and Claudine Keenan October 6 – November 19, 2010

What is Accreditation? A means of demonstrating compliance with Federal Title IV regulations in a variety of areas. A self- and peer-reviewed means of providing quality assurance in the areas of – Student learning and achievement – Curriculum development and support – Faculty – Facilities and equipment – Finance, administration, and governance – Integrity and compliance

The Cycle Initial Candidacy (Stockton founding, ) Full accreditation: 1975 Re-accreditation alternates these two processes: – Periodic Review Reports – Self Study and Visiting Team Events from the most recent cycle: – Self Study ; Visiting Team 2002 – Periodic Review Report 2007 – Self Study ; Visiting Team 2012

What is REaccreditation? A Focused Process A defined time for an entire institution to come together to examine the “big questions” such as: – Are we making decisions aligned with our mission? – Do we have and allocate resources in a fashion that enables us to meet our mission? – Do our governance and administrative structures facilitate the learning process? – Are student and faculty support structures adequate? A PARTICIPATORY process involving – The Richard Stockton College community Faculty, Staff, Students, Alumni, Board – the larger educational community Engaged with/by the College and the Middle States Region

How Does it Work Here? Planning Committee – Communicates with Middle States Liaison, plans timelines, offers assistance to entire community Steering Committee – Guides the efforts of each Work Team, shapes the details of the overall process Work Teams – Gather evidence from entire community, draft reports for the Self Study ID=203&pageID=19

What is a Self Study? dynamic A dynamic document Bridges of communication and cooperation A greater awareness A renewed commitment A clarification of why we are a part of The Richard Stockton College A glimpse of where we and the College would like to be

The Standards “Characteristics of Excellence” – “Middle States’ accreditation is an expression of confidence in an institution’s mission and goals, its performance, and its resources.” --- Characteristics – The articulation of the qualities, behaviors, support structures, and outcomes that the member institutions of the of the Middle States Commission on Higher Education believe must be demonstrated by an accredited post-secondary institution. are intended be viewed as an interrelated whole emphasize functions rather than structures may not necessarily apply fully to all institutions may be grouped when engaging in self-study.

Our Research Questions Provide Structure and Focus – 1,4,6: Mission and Goals; Leadership and Governance; Integrity – 2,3,5: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal; Institutional Resources; Administration – 7: Institutional Assessment – 8,9: Student Admissions and Retention; Student Support Services; – 11, 12, 13: Educational Offerings; General Education; related Educational Activities – 10: Faculty – 14: Assessment of Student Learning &pageID=16

The Research Questions and You Work Teams want to gather evidence that demonstrates – Compliance with the Commission’s standards – Commitment to institutional self-understanding and improvement. – “What evidence is there …” – “How effective is …” – “To what extent …” – “How consistent …” – “How comprehensively …” – “How successful …” – “How well …” – “How sufficient …” Take their calls. Answer their messages. Be heard!

Plan Goals Strategies Resource Allocation Assessment

Otherwise … Wants Pressures Terrific Ideas

The Balanced Scorecard Cycle Top Down Bottom Up

The view from... SAS MSCHE Commission MSCHE Committee on Evaluation Reports Visiting Team Institution Work Team Individual Participant “The Evidence” To reaffirm accreditation. The periodic review report is due June 1, 2017.

Don’t Forget … This is YOUR process Participation makes it a rich process There are already some extraordinary things going on Some excellent evidence is already available The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey has a history of working with exceptional MSCHE liaisons …. Thank you, Andrea Lex!