Tests for Relevance. Direct Evidence Test Proffered Evidence D shot V D Guilty of Murder Fact Legal Outcome Makes Fact SML Affects Legal Outcome I saw.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit 4 Law and order Word power. Words related to law 1. a dishonest, violent, or immoral action that can be punished by law. Last night a woman was.
Advertisements

Rule 801: The Basic Definition of Hearsay. Start with a fact of consequence Add an observer.
9 x9 81 4/12/2015 Know Your Facts!. 9 x2 18 4/12/2015 Know Your Facts!
1 x0 0 4/15/2015 Know Your Facts!. 9 x1 9 4/15/2015 Know Your Facts!
1 x0 0 4/16/2015 Know Your Facts!. 1 x8 8 4/16/2015 Know Your Facts!
Identification and Individualization
Legal Argumentation 2 Henry Prakken March 28, 2013.
Problem 1. Problem 1 - Is it relevant? Charles: “I would not have voted ‘Yes.’” Charles: “Alice told me that she would not have voted ‘Yes.’” Document:
Inchoate offences In this lecture, we will consider the inchoate offences of: attempt conspiracy incitement.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PEOPLE v. DLUGASH 41 N.Y.2d 725, 363 N.E.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1977) Case Brief.
Introduction. Holmes Suite (BETA) David Achtenberg.
EVIDENCE Trial Procedures. What is the point of Evidence? Evidence is the way in which the Crown and the defence try to reconstruct the chain of events.
Rule 104: Preliminary Questions & Conditional Relevance.
Trial by Jury- Crime by insanity?. -Judge - Keeps order - Offers an objective (un-biased) opinion -Defendant - The person who allegedly committed a crime.
Amanda Karim Writing Lab TA.  A thesis statement is one sentence that briefly states your main point.  A thesis statement must answer two questions.
Topic 12 Attempts Topic 12 Attempts. Topic 12 Attempts Introduction If a defendant fully intends to commit a crime but for some reason fails to complete.
Proving the Crime September 25, 2007 Objectives: Students should understand Key Characteristics of the Criminal Trial Presumption of Innocence most fundamental.
Prior Bad Acts An Introduction to 404(b). How can you use PBAs: If the PBA is being offered to prove character itself? If the PBA is being used to prove.
Expert Testimony. What’s the expert’s role FOC Proffered Evidence Evidentiary Hypothesis P thumb numb Thumb numbness makes it SML that spine was injured.
Problems 2 - 2B. From 100 feet away, I saw Jane shoot Hunter in the head with a hunting rifle. Is it relevant Is it direct or indirect If direct, what’s.
Rule Admit Exclude 403 Balancing Rule 403 reflects a strong preference for admission.
Argumentative Essay Is Queenie guilty or innocent?
Mystery Unit. Elements of a Mystery Story or Novel Characters Suspect: character(s) who may have committed the crime or caused the problem Detective:
The Dissertation Advanced Higher Modern Studies. Marks Allocation The dissertation is worth 45 Marks (the exam is worth 90) How the 45 marks are allocated:
Trial Procedures II CLN4U. The Judge, The Crown, The Defence Judge: Judge: Impartial and unbiased Impartial and unbiased Applies law to case, instructs.
Unit 6 Reading I What did you hear? the scene of the crime murder The sound of a police car.
Breaking The Law How the Legal System Operates. Criminal Law Two types of Crimes Misdemeanors Felonies.
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
Types of Evidence From Arraignment to Verdict. Self-Incrimination The Canada Evidence Act - regulates rules of evidence (1893). Applies to federal jurisdictions.
Body Paragraphs.
New York Criminal Defense Lawyer Phone: / Disclaimer: The tips in this.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
+ Involvement in a Crime. + Division of Blame In a crime, the act is normally not carried out by just one person. How does the law divide blame amount.
Involvement in a Crime Identifying all the possible participants in a crime and the possible charges they could face.
a) The power of arrest for a citizen or police b) The rights of the accused c) How the trial will proceed (in which court) and d) What penalty will.
FBI Method of Profiling Violent Serial Offenders
Evidence and Expert Testimony. Expert Testimony  Two Types of Witnesses: Fact and Expert  Fact -- have personal knowledge of facts of case  Cannot.
Comparative Essay (aka Compare & Contrast) AP World History.
 Defendant may present evidence to show that › No criminal act was committed  Example: a person was carrying a gun but had a valid license › No criminal.
Crime scene investigation, or CSI, is the use of forensic science to examine physical evidence at crime scenes Crime Scene Investigation can be traced.
Argumentative Writing. Characteristics of Argumentative Writing Position is clearly and accurately stated Convinces reader claim is true Uses evidence—facts.
Evidence Intro Aim: Aim: How does testimonial evidence differ from physical evidence? HW: any labs/ worksheet for movie “You can learn a lot by just watching.”
Elements of a Crime ACTUS REUS
Investigation of Traumatic Deaths Homicidal and Suicidal Deaths.
Chapter 2: Types of Evidence. 1. Testimonial Evidence – statement made under oath by a competent witness Juries are heavily influenced by eyewitness accounts.
BURDEN OF PROOF STANDARD OF PROOF In a criminal case, it is the prosecution/state/Crown/Regina/R that has to prove that the person committed the crime.
Unit 4 Word power.
General elements of liability Elements of a crime ACTUS REUS
Case #2 Regina V Girard Nicole Girard caused the death of Kevin Steel at Williams Lake on October 29, 1989 at approximately 02:07 hours. Girard caused.
THE LAW & ORDER APPROACH
Involvement of a crime P
Comparative Essay(aka Compare & Contrast)
Comparative Essay (aka Compare & Contrast)
J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017
Catalyst What pieces of evidence allowed Dupin to solve The Murders in the Rue Morgue? Objective - I will compare class and individual evidence.
Today’s Lesson Question: What types of evidence have probative value?
Case #1 Regina V Girard Nicole Girard caused the death of Kevin Steel at Williams Lake on October 29, 1989 at approximately 02:07 hours. Girard caused.
Unit 5: What’s Your Point?
THE STEPS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM!
Thesis Statements and Topic Sentences
It is NOT the defendant’s job to prove that he/she is not guilty!
Arizona vs. Karen Meentz-Thompson Sanchez
Introduction to Criminal Law
When do we make decisions?
Types of Evidence.
General Considerations
And Then There Were None
School Searches and You
Presentation transcript:

Tests for Relevance

Direct Evidence Test Proffered Evidence D shot V D Guilty of Murder Fact Legal Outcome Makes Fact SML Affects Legal Outcome I saw D shoot V = Is this a FOC

Direct evidence is relevant if it is fact of consequence offered to prove a

Indirect Evidence Test EH: People at the scene are SML to have committed the crime. Makes Fact SML Proffered Evidence Fact D killed V I saw D leave scene before body found. EH is Valid

Indirect evidence is relevant if 2. The EH is valid. 1. EH links it to FOC & (SML is enough.)

Conditional Relevance Test EH: If X’s property is found at scene, it is SML that X did it. + Makes Fact SML Proffered Evidence Fact D owned a gold watch D killed V Gold watch found at scene EH is Valid Enough Evidence of Connecting Fact

Conditionally relevant evidence is relevant if: EH links the combination of the Proffered Evidence & the Connecting Fact to an FOC, & The EH is valid, & There is enough evidence of the connecting fact.

Types of Irrelevance (Phrases Judges Use) Remote (in time) Speculative Unrelated.