MDI meeting, Nov14 2003 1 First look at Transient Recorder data Livio Piemontese Stan Ecklund and Mark Petree have installed – in the IR2 alcove – a 32.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.C. Aschenauer 2013/03/132 polarisation for Blue and Yellow t o -calibration underway minimal impact on polarization, makes A N more stable  should.
Advertisements

Bent Crystal Results to Date Feb 26, 2007 D. Still.
Glencoe: Chapter 3 Section 1 Pages 70-75
Describing Motion 2.1 Motion
2E34 Meeting and MCC News IR2 Vacuum Studies (Mike Sullivan) Plans for Lattice and Optics Work (Yunhai Cai)
PEP Magnets Simulation Status Report Gary Bower March 19, 2004 MDI meeting.
Initial rough Background comparisons between Run5 and Run 4 Guy Wormser LAL Orsay.
1 IR Vacuum M. Sullivan MAC Review Jan , 2006 M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee Review January 18-20, 2006 IR Vacuum.
IR2 Vacuum Status M. Sullivan for S. Ecklund, A Fisher, S. Novokhatski, F-J Decker, A. Kulikov, S. DeBarger, U. Wienands, S. Gierman, M. Petree, many BaBarians.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
HER vacuum study June 2006 J. Kaminski weekly MDI meeting 7/13/2006.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
M. WeaverPEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07  Operational issues  radiation aborts  background monitoring  Background extrapolations  model comparisons.
Topics from this weeks 2E34 meeting M. Weaver Jan 6, 2006.
Status of EMC background data Tim West University of Manchester.
W. KozaneckiMDI meeting, 16 Jan 2004 BaBar-wide Background monitoring  Motivation  institutionalize...  through a weekly report to PEP-II/BBR meeting.
IR 2 Vacuum Update M. Sullivan for PEP-II team For the 2e34 meeting of Feb. 15, 2006.
Deadtime Sensitivity Trigger rate varies over a wide range DCH quadrant 0 (upper east) drives high deadtime periods Do backgrounds target upper east DCH?
Functions.
1 IR NEG heating M. Sullivan MAC Review Dec , 2004 M. Sullivan Machine Advisory Committee Review December 13-15, 2004 IR NEG Heating and Upgrade.
Trickle Injection Overview Background Injection is necessary to refill beam “buckets” which have lost charge. A particular bucket is targeted for each.
IR vacuum M. Sullivan PEP-II meeting Feb. 22, 2007.
Let's zoom in on one corner of the coordinate plane
Radiation-protection experience at Belle / summary of beam abort system 22 September, 2003 T.Tsuboyama (KEK)
Information Theory and Security Prakash Panangaden McGill University First Canada-France Workshop on Foundations and Practice of Security Montréal 2008.
Ircon ® ScanIR ® 3 Linescanner How to work with Snapshots? Confidential Rev. A 07/2013.
1 System Description (2-4) Gains from single photo-electrons in vacuum at room temperature (5-8) Linearity Test at V in vacuum at room temperature.
Data Acquisition Data acquisition (DAQ) basics Connecting Signals Simple DAQ application Computer DAQ Device Terminal Block Cable Sensors.
Gauge Operation and Software by Scott A. Ager. Computer Recommendations 750 MHz Pentium III 64 Meg SRAM 40 Gig Hard Drive 1024 x 768 graphics CD Writer.
Graphing Basics & Velocity 8/22/11. graph = a visual display of data, usually resulting in an observable pattern line graph = a graph in which the data.
1.8 Represent Functions as Graphs
7 Nov 2007Paul Dauncey1 Test results from Imperial Basic tests Source tests Firmware status Jamie Ballin, Paul Dauncey, Anne-Marie Magnan, Matt Noy Imperial.
MDI meeting, March 19, 2004 Categorizing radiation aborts Livio Piemontese When something really bad happens to the beams, they are aborted. An optimized.
Graphing Why? Help us communicate information : Visual What is it telling your? Basic Types Line Bar Pie.
Xiao-Yan Zhao Beam Instrumentation Group Accelerator Center, IHEP BEPCII Background Issues: Beam Loss Measurement.
TE-MPE-CP, RD, 23-Nov Summary of Radiation Induced QPS Events in LHC 2010 R. Denz TE-MPE-CP.
Graphing Exercise. In this exercise you are going to make as many dots as you can on your whiteboard in a chosen amount of time. You will then graph your.
I LIKE FANCY SLIDES BECAUSE I CAN, THAT’S WHY. LET’S PLAY: IS IT INFECTED? THREE EXAMPLES OF MALWARE WACKINESS.
Monitoring of background events in 2010 run Giuseppe Zito 06/11/2015 PFG/MIG Topical meeting on beam background.
CPO Science Workshop: The CPO Timer Integrated Physics and Chemistry.
July 19, 2006VLCW-06 Vancouver1 Scint/MAPMT Muon Prototype Operation Robert Abrams Indiana University.
January 19, 2006PEP TFB R.Akre PEP II Transverse Feedback System Ron Akre William Colocho Anatoly Krasnykh Vojtech Pacak Dmitry Teytelman Uli Wienands.
L2 Upgrade review 19th June 2007Alison Lister, UC Davis1 XFT Monitoring + Error Rates Alison Lister Robin Erbacher, Rob Forrest, Andrew Ivanov, Aron Soha.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
Graphing and the Coordinate Plane. This is a chameleon: His name is Sam. Sam likes to eat bugs and flies. He always has a lot to eat, because he is very.
Target tests 1 st – 2 nd Nov. Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th December 2006.
The labjack. WHAT IS A LABJACK? An interface box that allows a computer to interact with the real world by collecting data and passing out instructions.
August 4-5, 2004 PEP-II Post Run 4 Review 1 M. Sullivan PEP-II Post Run 4 Review August 4-5, 2004 IR Summary and Issues.
FUNCTIONS FUNCTIONS DOMAIN: THE INPUT VALUES FOR A RELATION. USUALLY X INDEPENDENT VARIABLE RANGE: THE OUTPUT VALUES FOR A RELATION. USUALLY.
1 Run7 startup M. Sullivan MAC Review Nov , 2007 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team Machine Advisory Committee Review November 15-17, 2007 Run 7 Startup.
M. WeaverB-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006 BaBar Backgrounds Matt Weaver B-Factory Operations Review April 24, 2006.
Ground motion studies at ATF2 June 11, 2014 Orbit jitter source identification via ground motion studies at ATF2 (Results of the June run) Marcin Patecki,
12 FURTHER MATHEMATICS Investigating and modelling time series.
William Lockman UC Santa Cruz May 6, 2005MDI meeting G4 simulation: status and validation strategy Goals Contributors Status Needed plots Future tasks.
F Monitor of Beam in the Abort Gap Randy Thurman-Keup DOE Review of Tevatron Operations at FNAL March 29-31, 2005 a.k.a. Abort Gap Integrator (AGI)
Some thoughs about trigger/DAQ … Dominique Breton (C.Beigbeder, G.Dubois-Felsmann, S.Luitz) SuperB meeting – La Biodola – June 2008.
Belle-II VXD radiation monitoring and beam abort with sCVD diamond sensors Lorenzo Vitale, Belle-II SVD collaboration INFN and Univ. Trieste, ITALY Requirements.
A transformer is a complex protective object
Distinguish between independent and dependent variables.
LHC Status Su Morning 17-April R. Assmann, B. Holzer et al
Trickle Background Investigation
Radiation Abort Policy
DIRC Background Status
Long term projections summary
To Do list, open items as of 10-Feb \ Study threshold dependence on bunch length (Just changed Vrf to 4.5.
07/08/2010 Fill #1264 dump at 02:14:38.
1. Make a table for y = 2x + 3 with domain 0, 3, 6, and 9.
Distinguish between independent and dependent variables.
Near Field Probe Configuration
Presentation transcript:

MDI meeting, Nov First look at Transient Recorder data Livio Piemontese Stan Ecklund and Mark Petree have installed – in the IR2 alcove – a 32 channel Transient Recorder, which digitizes and records 32 signals from PEP2 and Babar when triggered. The trigger is the “beam abort” signal, independent from where it comes from. The signals are read and stored in the TR’s memory. They are digitized every ms. Data are stored for various time intervals – typically 10s. A typical event is 4 Mbytes; in an average month (May2003) there are 566 events. The amount of information is enormous. Given the sheer size of the data, a systematic analysis has NOT been attempted so far. There MAY be there useful information to understand some of our background problems (sudden radiation spikes?). The files are in a PC in IR2. So far, data have been transported by car. In 2003, it is a shame. File names contain the date and time of the abort.

MDI meeting, Nov Which signals are recorded? The 32 channels can be grouped into:  17 CsI beam loss counters (Va’vra’s)  7 PEP2 “Beam Loss Monitors”  4 vacuum pumps  2 SVTRAD diamonds  2 microphones  2 “first_level trigger lines” (?): DCH and EMC The philosophy is (probably) to look where in the beam we can start seeing the background? The counters are located in IR2 or very near. They have not been identified precisely yet… Even though there is a huge number of files, not all aborts have been recorded. Sometimes the system is down or stopped. Sometimes (as a rule so far?) the system was only recording aborts during stable beam conditions (ie, not aborts during injection). A powerful possibility offered by the TR is to adapt its readings (the signals connected to its inputs) to the requests. Ie, it may not tell us where the background is coming from; but it can help test our models.

MDI meeting, Nov The data which have been looked for and at first are those of the aborts selected by Brian Petersen as “ aborts during injection”. Only 4 corresponding files have been found.

MDI meeting, Nov Data in the Transient Recorder for the same file (June26, 09:53:11) seen from the point of view of SVTRAD in the previous slide.

MDI meeting, Nov

6

7

8

9

10

MDI meeting, Nov These plots are the same as in the previous page, BUT for the horizontal scale, with a much more limited range. One can distinguish the pattern of the injection. By properly identifying the hit counters, it is possible to distinguish HER from LER backgrounds.

MDI meeting, Nov

MDI meeting, Nov

MDI meeting, Nov Conclusions Abort files have been found, read, turned into ntuples and looked at. Abort events are clearly identified. Many variables which are recorded (p.ex. Beam Loss Monitors) do not appear to give any information so far: they could (with permission by SE, MP) be replaced by more interesting signals for special tests. I still need to identify precisely which counters are recorded. The units are not clear yet (they are not nice, digitized in ASCII form quantities, always the same through the exp.): they are in most cases Volts, we have to make sense of them.