M1-H2: Magnetic Activity Science Goals and Approaches DRAFT! Chair(s): Abbett/Hoeksema/Komm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Science of Solar B Transient phenomena – this aim covers the wide ranges of explosive phenomena observed on the Sun – from small scale flaring in the.
Advertisements

What can HMI teach us about flares & CMEs? Some Discussion-Starting Ideas by Brian Welsch, SSL UC-Berkeley WARNING: My ideas tend to be half-baked, hand-wavy,
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Can We Determine Electric Fields and Poynting Fluxes from Vector Magnetograms and Doppler Shifts? by George Fisher, Brian Welsch, and Bill Abbett Space.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
SSPVE Discussion Group B Question 5 To what extent is it possible to predict the emergence of active regions before they reach the photosphere, or to predict.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
“Assimilating” Solar Data into MHD Models of the Solar Atmosphere W.P. Abbett SSL UC Berkeley HMI Team Meeting, Jan 2005.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
Simulations of Emerging Magnetic Flux in Active Regions W. P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Solar Turbulence Friedrich Busse Dali Georgobiani Nagi Mansour Mark Miesch Aake Nordlund Mike Rogers Robert Stein Alan Wray.
M3 Session AIA/HMI Science Meeting D-1 : M3-Magnetic Field Data Products Data Product Development Session Chairs: R. Larsen/Y. Liu Status: [draft]
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
HMI/AIA Science Team Meeting, HMI Science Goals Alexander Kosovichev & HMI Team.
1 SDO/HMI Products From Vector Magnetograms Yang Liu – Stanford University
Coupled Models for the Emergence of Magnetic Flux into the Solar Corona W. P. Abbett UC Berkeley SSL G. H. Fisher, Y. Fan, S. A. Ledvina, Y. Li, and D.
Incorporating Vector Magnetic Field Measurements into MHD models of the Solar Atmosphere W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley and B.T. Welsch,
Inductive Local Correlation Tracking or, Getting from One Magnetogram to the Next Goal (MURI grant): Realistically simulate coronal magnetic field in eruptive.
Solar-B XRT XRT-1 The Science and Capability of the Solar-B / X-Ray Telescope Solar-B XRT Presenter: Ed DeLuca Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
R. Komm & Friends NSO, Tucson R. Komm & Friends NSO, Tucson Solar Subsurface Flows from Ring-Diagram Analysis.
Summary of workshop on AR May One of the MURI candidate active regions selected for detailed study and modeling.
SSL (UC Berkeley): Prospective Codes to Transfer to the CCMC Developers: W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, G.H. Fisher, B.T. Welsch, and Y. Fan (HAO/NCAR)
Measuring, Understanding, and Using Flows and Electric Fields in the Solar Atmosphere to Improve Space Weather Prediction George H. Fisher Space Sciences.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
1.B – Solar Dynamo 1.C – Global Circulation 1.D – Irradiance Sources 1.H – Far-side Imaging 1.F – Solar Subsurface Weather 1.E – Coronal Magnetic Field.
Data-Driven Simulations of AR8210 W.P. Abbett Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley SHINE Workshop 2004.
Modeling the Dynamic Evolution of the Solar Atmosphere: C4: HMI-AIA Team Meeting: Bill Abbett SSL, UC Berkeley.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.
HMI Science Objectives Convection-zone dynamics and the solar dynamo  Structure and dynamics of the tachocline  Variations in differential rotation 
11/10/05 H1:Local Helioseismology I: Current Issues Science Goal and Approach Sessions Chair(s): Kosovichev/Toomre Status: [draft]
Instrumental & Technical Requirements. Science objectives for helioseismology Understanding the interaction of the p-mode oscillations and the solar magnetic.
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
Solar Probe: Mission to the Sun Donald M. Hassler/David J. McComas Southwest Research Institute.
A topological view of 3D global magnetic field reversal in the solar corona Rhona Maclean Armagh Observatory 5 th December 2006.
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
SLIDE SHOW 3 B changes due to transport + diffusion III -- * * magnetic Reynold number INDUCTION EQUATION B moves with plasma / diffuses through it.
Decay of a simulated bipolar field in the solar surface layers Alexander Vögler Robert H. Cameron Christoph U. Keller Manfred Schüssler Max-Planck-Institute.
The Rise of Solar Cycle 24: Magnetic Fields from the Dynamo through the Photosphere and Corona and Connecting to the Heliosphere Part 1: Interior and Photosphere.
Invited speakers (afternoon): David Alexander (Rice University) Chip Manchester (University of Michigan) Brad Hindman (JILA/University of Colorado)
Joint Planning of SOT/XRT/EIS Observations Outline of 90 Day Initial Observing Plans T. Shimizu, L Culhane.
台灣清華大學, 物理系 Helioseismology (II) Global and Local Helioseismology ( , 北京 ) 周定一 Dean-Yi Chou.
Synoptic Network Workshop (HAO/NCAR, April 2013) Space Weather and Synoptic Observations V J Pizzo – NOAA/SWPC.
WG2 Sessions SHINE Workshop, July 30–August 3, K.D. Leka: “Promises and Reality of Analysis Using Magnetic Field Data” Gave update on present and.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Solar Magnetic Field Reversal V J Pizzo SHINE Workshop August 18, 2002.
11/10/05 H1:Local Helioseismology I: Current Issues Science Goal and Approach Sessions Chair(s): Kosovichev/Toomre Status: [draft]
8:30-9:10 AM: Philip Scherrer, What Can We Hope to Learn from SDO Overview of SDO HMI Investigation HMI Instrument.
WG1-1: Sub-surface Structure and Evolution Motivation: A research program on space weather that ignores the sub-photospheric evolution of magnetic fields.
Scientific rationale for vector polarimetry aboard SDO Or “Why do we need to determine photospheric vector fields?” Hector Socas-Navarro.
Solar Magnetism: Solar Cycle Solar Dynamo Coronal Magnetic Field CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 03, February 6 Spring 2007 References: NASA/MSFC Solar Physics.
Simulations of Solar Convection Zone Nagi N. Mansour.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Helioseismology for HMI Science objectives and tasks* Data analysis plan* Helioseismology working groups and meetings *HMI Concept Study Report, Appendix.
HMI Status P. Scherrer.
WG1 – Sub-surface magnetic connections
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
HMI Science Investigation Overview
HMI Investigation Overview
HMI Data Analysis Pipeline
Vector polarimetry with HMI
HMI Data Analysis Pipeline
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Slit and Slot Interchange
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
Presentation transcript:

M1-H2: Magnetic Activity Science Goals and Approaches DRAFT! Chair(s): Abbett/Hoeksema/Komm

Overall goal of today’s session: To bring together theorists and modelers, observers, magnetometrists, and helioseismologists to foster collaboration, identify scientific challenges, and determine how HMI data products can be best used to address these challenges. To do this in an informal, workshop style atmosphere (participate!!)

HMI science objectives directly relevant to M1: Understand the formation and structure of long-lived complexes of solar activity (active longitudes) –What is the relationship between active longitudes and large-scale circulation patterns deep in the CZ? –Are there systematic large-scale variations in c s deep in the interior below these complexes? –How are the formation of these regions related to flux emergence, meridional circulation, and flux transport to high latitudes? –Can we understand irradiance variations around these complexes? Theoretical / computational tools –Global models of the interior extending down to the overshoot layer; flux transport models, coupled radiative MHD models of the upper CZ and atmosphere.

HMI science objectives directly relevant to M1: Understand the evolution of active region magnetic fields –Can we accurately track the sub-surface evolution of ARs, and if so, how do standard theoretical and computational models compare to the observed behavior? –Do ARs show signs of disconnection of magnetic flux? What is the physics of AR decay? When do ARs lose their sub-surface connection? Is there a systematic change in flow patterns below ARs during this dynamic disconnection? –How do changes in the magnetic topology of the upper atmosphere and corona affect the evolution of ARs? What is the dynamic, energetic and magnetic connection between AR fields below the surface, those observed at the surface, and those inferred from observations of the corona? –What is the physics of flux cancellation? Can we reliably detect the signatures of flux emergence, submergence, and cancellation? Theoretical / computational tools –Local AR-scale MHD models of the interior, surface layers, and corona; static extrapolations of the magnetic field in the corona; flux transport models; realistic radiation MHD models of the upper CZ and low atmosphere

HMI science objectives directly relevant to M1: Understand the formation and dynamic evolution of sunspots –What is the relationship between flows and flux concentrations in sunspots; between vortex flows, magnetic twist and coronal activity; between the Evershed effect and deeper flow patterns? –What is the magnetic connectivity between photospheric magnetic fields in and around sunspots and the overlying atmosphere and low corona? –Can we predict the onset and subsequent lifetime of a sunspot? –What is the effect of magnetic field and temperature perturbations on sound speed images? * Theoretical / computational tools –Local AR-scale MHD models of the interior, surface layers, and corona; static extrapolations of the magnetic field in the corona; large-scale (simplified) radiative MHD models of the upper CZ and low atmosphere * Can we determine well-defined hare-and-hound exercises between compressible MHD models and specific inversion techniques?

HMI science objectives directly relevant to M1: Understand the physics of highly-sheared structures and δ–type sunspots –Is there a signature in the flow pattern of an emerging δ-spot that would allow us to understand the physics and morphology of the underlying structure? –What is the origin of the magnetic twist? –Can we understand in a quantitative way the relationship between the evolving, twisted sub-surface structure and the observed photospheric shear, the energization of the atmosphere, and the resulting topological changes in the corona? Theoretical / computational tools –AR-scale MHD models of the interior (anelastic?), surface layers, and corona; static extrapolations of the magnetic field in the corona; large-scale (simplified) radiative MHD models of the upper CZ and low atmosphere.

HMI science objectives directly relevant to M1: Understand the physics of flux emergence at both large (AR) and small scales –Do we understand signatures in the sub-surface flow pattern well enough to allow for the reliable prediction of an emerging AR? –How does emerging magnetic flux interact with the pre-existing magnetic field of the corona? Can we make predictions of eruptive or transient events based on a physical understanding of this interaction? –Can we characterize the emergence and cancellation of magnetic flux at small scales in terms of idealized emergence, submergence, or diffusive processes? How is the energy balance of the atmosphere affected by the Joule heating of small, concentrated magnetic elements? How many observed emergence/cancellation events are simply due to instrumental effects? Theoretical / computational tools –MHD models (both idealized and realistic, over small and large, AR-scale spatial scales) that incorporate sub-surface layers, low-atmosphere and corona into a single domain; static extrapolations of the magnetic field in the corona.

The plan for this session: Common threads among the M1 HMI scientific goals: –Understanding the dynamic, energetic, and magnetic connectivity between sub-surface fields and flows and the solar atmosphere (over both large and small spatial scales). –Using observations of sub-surface and surface magnetic fields and flows (along with atmospheric emission) to constrain theoretical models of active region formation and evolution Progress so far (theoretical and observational): –two invited speakers: Mats Carlsson: will discuss progress/challenges in realistically modeling the sub-surface CZ and low atmosphere (20 min) Doug Braun: will discuss progress/challenges using helioseismology to probe magnetic structures (20 min) –three additional presentations: Neal Hurlburt: Linking models and observations (5 min) Tom Berger: High resolution photospheric observations (5 min) Brian Welsch: Inferring surface flows from vector magnetograms (a slide or two for discussion!)

The Near Future: Where do we go from here to make real progress on the (many!) stated M1 HMI scientific goals and objectives? Where should we concentrate our effort? What technical challenges do we need to address in order to make real progress on the science questions? –Should we form working groups? –Share data/resources? –Pursue additional funding for collaborative projects? –Schedule follow-up meetings/splinter groups?