Modeling TKR Readout Effects Leon R. Analysis Group 14 March 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ttbar events with Atlantis   A lot of jets in this event !   Bjets (1 and 2) close in phi   Muon from semilep decay of b-jet1   Tau jet   Pb.
Advertisements

1 ttbar events with Atlantis   Tops back to back in the transverse plane, but objects in the barrel apart from c-jet (Extended tile)   Big activity.
Pi0 Mass recon in the NCC R. Seto Oct 17, What I did Ran pisa – took hits file which gives dedx in each Si layer Partitioned the dedx into cells.
Giovanni Petri University of Pisa/INFN Pisa/SLAC 29 August 2005 Study of TEM errors.
S. Ritz 1 Hardware Trigger Throttle Issues Context: the triggers Purpose of throttle on TKR trigger Earlier design using TKR geographic information The.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
High-Multiplicity Events Analysis Group March 28, 2005 Leon R.
S. Ritz1 Checking Out What is Checked In  Need to optimize balance of checking between users and developers. –infuse more of a culture of detailed checking.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
Modeling TKR Readout Effects Part 2 Leon R. Analysis Group 12 September 2005.
Hardware Failure Impacts Exercises S. Ritz. Issues Recent results from design reliability analysis (system engineering, Thurston et al.) Probabilities.
Residual Background events after Rejection Cuts M total background events (GlastReleasev3r3p7) 344 residual events after Bill's rejection cuts. 342.
Surplus Hits Ratio, etc. Leon R. C&A Meeting &
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
Digital Photography Teresa Lankford 08/18/11. STEP #1 Call up the image file called “Sarah002.jpg” and position in your Photoshop window as shown. Notice.
- Are you from India ? -Yes, I am -Do you live in Barcelona ? - No, I don’t. I live in Tarragona. -But do you work in Tarragona ? -No, I don’t. I work.
SPiDeR  SPIDER DECAL SPIDER Digital calorimetry TPAC –Deep Pwell DECAL Future beam tests Wishlist J.J. Velthuis for the.
GLAST CHEP 03 March R.Dubois1/17 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Overview of GLAST Offline Software Richard Dubois Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
SQUARE ROOTS. This isn’t exactly true, but for the next 3 weeks: “Radical” means the same thing as “square root” *Side Note:
 A -  B -  C -  D - Yes No Not sure.  A -  B -  C -  D - Yes No Not sure.
T. Burnett1 GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Baseline-Preliminary Design Review, January 9, 2002 SAS Software: Sources Detector geometry model Simulation Event.
M. Weber, AEM 4/5/041 Weekly report 3/29-4/4 Delivered:7.7pb -1 Recorded:6.3pb -1 (82%) 12.6M events.
Update on Material Studies - Progress on Linearity using calib-hits (very brief) - Revisiting the material problem: - a number of alternative scenarios.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Photoshop Tutorial Greyson M. The Patch Tool Say you want to get rid of something or someone from a picture. Maybe… This guy?
Presentation by student.  Bombing Mission in Vietnam  Takes ground fire  Plane catches fire  Wingman says he shouldn’t eject  Turns off all electric.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
Geant4 for GLAST BFEM -Comparison with Distributions in BFEM Data – T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, S. Ogata, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima/SLAC) M. Roterman, P. Valtersson.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
2012/7/231 Cosmic Ray at STAR Shuai Yang Center of Particle Physics and Technology University of Science and Technology of China STAR Regional Meeting.
EMR detector lying beam-face up in Geneva workshop.
BESIII EMC Simulation & Reconstruction He Miao
Comparison between BFEM data and G4 simulation October 18, 2001 Balloon Analysis VRVS meeting T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, Y. Fukazawa, and T. Kamae
Enhancing Classroom Learning Using Video Session 1: Importing & Editing Video.
28/4/2006Chris Collins-Tooth tth, (h → bb) with EventViews Chris Collins-Tooth, Christian Shaw 03-May-2006.
Square Plant Stand. TOOL: Radial Arm Saw NEXT STEP: Surface Planer RESULTS: Rough size pieces for 4 Legs. 33” long PROJECT Square Plant Stand PART Legs.
MINOS Coll Meet. Oxford, Jan CC/NC Data Cross Checks Thomas Osiecki University of Texas at Austin.
1 Study of Data from the GLAST Balloon Prototype Based on a Geant4 Simulator Tsunefumi Mizuno February 22, Geant4 Work Shop The GLAST Satellite.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Mark Dorman Separation Of Charged Current And Neutral Current Events In The MINOS Far Detector Using The Hough Transform Mark Dorman 16/12/04.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
L1Calo EM Efficiency Maps Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Weekly Meeting 07/03/2011.
Julie Zhu, International Officer UCAS Adjustment and Clearing.
A proposal for the KM3NeT Computing Model Pasquale Migliozzi INFN - Napoli 1.
REVIEW A relation is a set of ordered pairs. {(2,3), (-1,5), (4,-2), (9,9), (0,-6)} This is a relation The domain is the set of all x values.
Can we detect a marble tomb with cosmic muons ? Corinne Goy, Max Chefdeville, Jean Jacquemier, Yannis Karyotakis 21 December 2015.
Mark Dorman – UCL/RAL – Calibration Workshop Talk Update on ND Strip-to-Strip Calibration Work Mark Dorman Calibration Workshop Fermilab, September 7-9.
How to Sync Twitter with Facebook. Amanda Hardin Research/Instruction Specialist and Haiwang Yuan Special Assistant to the Dean for Web & Emerging Technologies.
Report of GLAST Balloon Flight October Annual meeting of Astronomical Society of Japan T. Mizuno and other GLAST Balloon Team
Acd Veto Latching The Acd front end electronics generate a veto primitive when a discriminator goes above threshold. But. The signal is split: One path.
Arisai Mauricio April 8, 2013 Period. 6
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
One Point Perspective You Name It! HENRYDOG.
Overview of Instrument Analysis Effort
Systems of Linear Equations
Computer Simulation with Concert Tour Entrepreneur
TKR to CAL for 16 Towers The usual TKR extrapolation to CAL study, for the 16 tower data. Check calibrations, look for problems, etc. Today -- “work in.
Imaging crystals with TKR
Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test
Tower A: A First Look Finding the Data: Login: THIS ONE! user: glast
Low mass dimuon acceptance
CR Photon Working Group
Systems of Linear Equations
Studies of the Time over Threshold
To find the refractive index of a liquid
Update of G4 simulation -- Development of Cosmic-Ray generator --
Analysis of GLAST Balloon Experiment Data
Presentation transcript:

Modeling TKR Readout Effects Leon R. Analysis Group 14 March 2005

In Each Plane <= n hits <= m hits Only the first m or n hits are kept, where m, n <= 64 This is adjustable by plane (maybe even end?) (Currently handled in MC, with n = 64)

On Each Cable Buffer There are 8 cables on each tower. Each cable reads out one-half of one face of every other tray. No more than 128 hits can be stored in each cable buffer. The hits are read into the buffer from the bottom up. (Not in MC) Buffer

An Air Shower (real data!) In x view, hits at top and bottom of shower are mostly on different cables. In y view, they are on the same cables, and the top hits are lost.. Pink squares mark truncated planes.

This is a real event! Diagnostic info says every plane is truncated to 64 at both ends… Not much to go on!

A 500-GeV Gamma (Simulated, of course!)

Oops! Now without the Neutrals! red x’s are MC postion hits, ACD and TKR Not as bad as I feared it would be!

Another One ACD hits

So What Now? The Problem –The showers from real data develop from the top down. –Albedo from the calorimeter is concentrated at the bottom. –We can’t do much at present (maybe ever!) with lots of hits in a plane. At the head of the track, the combinatorics are overwhelming. Reconstruction in the dense part of the shower is random. The questions –Should we limit the number of hits read out from the bottom planes, to make sure that we see all the hits from the top planes? We don’t have to decide until we’re in orbit! –But we don’t want to be too surprised! –Should we add this effect in the simulation (Yes, I think!)