Remote Earthquake Triggering: (Fault) Failure is Not Always an Option Heather Savage and Emily Brodsky UC Santa Cruz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The rate of aftershock density decay with distance Karen Felzer 1 and Emily Brodsky 2 1. U.S. Geological Survey 2. University of California, Los Angeles.
Advertisements

GE177b- Objectives Introduce a variety of techniques to describe ‘quantitatively’ deformation of the lithosphere and fault slip history. Introduce.
1992 M=7.3 Landers shock increases stress at Big Bear Los Angeles Big Bear Landers First 3 hr of Landers aftershocks plotted from Stein (2003)
Page created by W. G. Huang Mw= Mw= Mw= Mw= Mw= Mw= Mw=
‘Triggering’ = a perturbation in the loading deformation that leads to a change in the probability of failure. Overview of Evidence for Dynamic Triggering.
3-D Finite Element Modeling of the Rise and Fall of the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau Mian Liu and Youqing Yang Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of.
Lessons we have learned from seismological observations in the Taiwan region Jer-Ming Chiu CERI/Dept. of Earth Sciences University of Memphis March 19,
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.
Evidence from the A.D Izu islands earthquake swarm that stressing rate governs seismicity By Toda, S., Stein, R.S. and Sagiya, T. In Nature(2002),
Subduction Zone Geodynamics:
Tidal triggering of earthquakes: Response to fault compliance? Elizabeth S. Cochran IGPP, Scripps.
Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Deformation Through the Seismic Cycle Jeff Freymueller University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Joan Gomberg, Bill Schulz, Paul Bodin, Aaron Wech, Roland Burgmann, Jason Kean, Patricia MacQueen, Katie Foster, Bob Nadeau, Chuck Wicks, Wes Thelen (from.
Summary of triggering of non- volcanic tremor in Cascadia Justin Rubinstein.
Friction: Leonardo Da Vinci Amonton Bowden and Tabor Dieterich.
Remote Seismicity following Landers Earthquake Steve Kidder.
Omori law Students present their assignments The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.
Observing an Earthquake Cycle Within a Decade
Geodetic monitoring of subduction zones Some idea of the kinematics of the subduction interface can be inferred from surface deformation measured from.
Ge277-Experimental Rock Friction implication for seismic faulting Some other references: Byerlee, 1978; Dieterich, 1979; Ruina, 1983; Tse and Rice, 1986;
Earthquakes Faults Stress Quakes at plate boundaries Quakes within plates.
Aftershocks tend to fall preferentially in area of static Coulomb stress increase but there are also earthquakes in area of decrease Coulomb stress Aftershocks.
(Scholz, 1990). Friction behavior for a wide range of materials is shown for step changes in load point velocity (Dieterich & Kilgore 1994). Experimental.
Omori law The modified Omori law Omori law for foreshocks Aftershocks of aftershocks Physical aspects of temporal clustering.
The Spectrum of Fault Slip Behaviors 18 Sep. 2013, C. Marone, Geosc500 Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting Stick-slip dynamics and Instability. Introduction.
 ss=  * +(a-b) ln(V/V * ) a-b > 0 stable sliding a-b < 0 slip is potentially unstable Correspond to T~300 °C For Quartzo- Feldspathic rocks Stationary.
A. Ghosh, EAS, Georgia Tech Distribution of b-value in the Middle America Trench, near Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica Abhijit Ghosh A. V. Newman, A. M. Thomas,
Earthquake nucleation How do they begin? Are large and small ones begin similarly? Are the initial phases geodetically or seismically detectable? Related.
CAPTURING PHYSICAL PHENOMENA IN PARTICLE DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF GRANULAR GOUGE Effects of Contact Laws, Particle Size Distribution, and the 3 rd Dimension.
New earthquake category Nature 447, (3 May 2007) | doi: /nature05780; Received 8 December 2006; Accepted 26 March A scaling law for slow.
Earthquake – A sudden release of stored energy. This energy has built up over long periods of time as a result of tectonic forces within the earth.
Part 8: Fold Types. Tensional Stress Compressive Stress Shear Stress Orientation of stress leads to different folds.
03/000 Phil R. Cummins March 2005 The Indian Ocean Tsunamis – Science and Seismics Australian Government Geoscience Australia.
DYNAMIC DISPLACEMENTS OF THE SEA BOTTOM DUE TO SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKES A.I. IVASHCHENKO Institute of Oceanology, RAS, Moscow L.I. LOBKOVSKY Institute.
Earthquakes and Landscapes
Constraints on Seismogenesis of Small Earthquakes from the Natural Earthquake Laboratory in South African Mines (NELSAM) Margaret S. Boettcher (USGS Mendenhall.
SBST – Core elective: Earthquake Resistant Construction Semester VI Chandra Bhakuni
A Large Block Test to Study the Energetic Failure of Rock – Application to Rock-Bursting and Earthquake Mechanics Maochen Ge, Eliza Richardson, Chris Marone,
How Faulting Keeps Crust Strong? J. Townend & M.D. Zoback, 2000 Geology.
Borehole Strainmeters: Instruments for Measuring Aseismic Deformation in Subduction Zones Evelyn Roeloffs U.S. Geological Survey, Vancouver, WA.
Massimo Cocco INGV Rome INGV The First EarthScope Institute on the Spectrum of Fault Slip Behaviors October 11-14, 2010, Portland, Oregon.
Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults Norman H. Sleep & Michael L. Blanpied Ge 277 – February 19, 2010.
Karen Felzer & Emily Brodsky Testing Stress Shadows.
Using GPS and InSAR to study tectonics, deformation, and earthquakes GPS displacements, velocities (and transients) InSAR displacements.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 15 Oct 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Wed 22 Oct: T&S Last Time: RHEOLOGY Dislocation creep is sensitive to: Temperature.
Andrew V. Newman, Grant. T. Farmer, Abhijit Ghosh, Amanda Thomas, Jaime Convers Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA Seismic and Geodetic.
What can we learn about dynamic triggering in the the lab? Lockner and Beeler, 1999.
Geodetic Deformation, Seismicity and Fault Friction Ge Sensitivity of seismicity to stress perturbations, implications for earthquakes nucleation.
Glenn Spinelli Effects of fluid circulation in ocean crust on subduction zone temperatures and metamorphism.
Aseismic deformation transients in subduction zone and the role of fault dilatancy -- Numerical simulation in the framework of rate and state friction.
Can we forecast an Earthquake??? In the next minute there will be an earthquake somewhere in the world! This sentence is correct (we have seen that there.
A Post-Loma Prieta Progress Report on Earthquake Triggering by a Continuum of Deformations Presented By Joan Gomberg.
-Liu and Rice (2005), Aseismic slip transients emerge spontaneously in three-dimensional rate and state modeling of subduction earthquake sequences, JGR.
Earthquakes and crustal Deformation - Objectives of class- Introduce a variety of techniques to describe ‘quantitatively’ deformation of the lithosphere.
Slow Slip: An Ubiquitous yet Poorly Understood Mode of Strain Release Susan Y. Schwartz Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences UC Santa Cruz.
EART 118 Seismotectonics MWF D250 9:30-10:40 am; Th D250 2:00-4:00 pm Prof.: Thorne Lay, C382 E&MS, Office Hours 11:00-12:00 MWF TA: Lingling Ye, Office.
ACCELERATION AND LOCALIZATION OF SUBCRITICAL CRACK GROWTH IN A NATURAL COMPOSITE MATERIAL S. Lennartz-Sassinek et al. Presented by Yingdi Luo for Ge277,
Mechanical behavior and the degree of localization in large displacement faulting experiments N. M. Beeler and T. E. Tullis, Brown University, Providence,
Triggered tremor may simply be clock- advanced failure, which could make it useful as a widely available ambient tremor and perhaps slow slip ‘meter’.
Research and Hazard Challenges Raised by
Largest Earthquakes in the World Since 1900
A possible mechanism of dynamic earthquake triggering
Alaska 1964 Earthquake Tectonic Deformation
Coupling at subduction zones Background reading: Pacheco, Sykes, Scholz (1993) Hyndman, Yamano, Oleskevich (1997) Carl Tape November 9, 2007 Thanks.
Earthquakes and crustal Deformation - Objectives of class-
On the relation between Geodetic strain, Seismicity and fault frictional properties Nepal Sumatra Taiwan.
amplification of seismic waves: tsunami (seismic sea waves), T&L, Fig
SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008
Susan Bilek University of Michigan
Strain Release Along the Northern Costa Rica Seismogenic Zone
Presentation transcript:

Remote Earthquake Triggering: (Fault) Failure is Not Always an Option Heather Savage and Emily Brodsky UC Santa Cruz

Remote Triggering From Denali Earthquake Gomberg et al., 2004

Triggered Seismicity from the Denali Earthquake 2002 Denali, Alaska Mw 7.9 Earthquake Husker and Brodsky, 2004

Courtesy of Anthony MPa normal stress Tectonics stress: background shear loading rate of 5 µm/s Oscillating stress: V lp = V 0 + Asin(  t) Fault zone materials: granite blocks, glass beads Laboratory Setup 0.5 MPa Time Shear Stress Stick-slip Failure

Transient Trigger t2t2 t1t1 Savage and Marone, 2008 Shear Stress (MPa) Load Point Velocity (µm/s)

Amplitude Dependence Increasing gouge thickness No gouge Inter-event Time (s) Amplitude (µm/s) Shear Stress (MPa) Time (s) Savage and Marone, 2008

Triggering Intensity = Normalized Seismicity Rate Change t2t2 t1t1 Seismicity Rate: =1/t Normalized Seismicity Rate Change: n  ( )/ 1 Felzer and Brodsky, 2005

Changes in Lab Seismicity Rate Triggering Threshold

Changes in Lab Seismicity Rate

Remote Triggering on the Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica Seismic data courtesy of S. Schwartz Solomon Islands - 04/01/07 Peru - 08/15/07 So. Sumatra - 09/12/07 Indonesia - 09/12/07 Fiji - 12/09/07 Sichuan - 05/12/08 New Zealand - 07/15/09 Remote Earthquakes

New Zealand 2009, recorded in Costa Rica Seismic data courtesy of S. Schwartz

Costa Rica Indonesia 09/12/2007 Peru 08/15/2007 Solomon Islands 04/01/07 So. Sumatra 09/12/07 Fiji 12/09/07 New Zealand 0715/09 Sichuan 04/12/08

Remote Triggering in the Western US, Transportable Array Remote Earthquakes New Zealand - 07/15/09 Samoa - 09/29/09 Sumatra - 09/30/09

Samoa 2009, recorded in Eastern Wyoming

Costa Rica and E. Wyoming Sumatra 09/30/09 New Zealand 07/15/09

Conclusions Triggered seismicity is a function of strain amplitude (bigger earthquakes trigger more earthquakes) but is also dependent on interseismic history Large earthquakes that closely follow previous large events are very inefficient at triggering additional seismicity Experiments suggest that fault zone properties determine the relationship between triggering intensity and strain amplitude –Preliminary seismic observations suggest subduction zones spend more time close to critical failure than old crustal faults