RPC timing in simulation Current Situation MC Geant4 RPCSensitiveDetector.cxx Or RPCSensitiveDetectorCosmics.cxx RPC_Digitization RPC_digit_To_RDO RPC_RDO_To_Prep:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.
Advertisements

Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.
Defined plateau region Knee 95% WP=knee+150V RPC operation and Hardware Performance  Annual HV module recalibration – all CAEN A3512N HV module offsets.
TOF offline and calibration A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno)
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
1Daya Bay RPC HV FDR 6/17/2008 RPC HV cable pick-up noise issue C. Lu, Princeton University (6/17/2008)
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
28 Feb 2006Digi - Paul Dauncey1 In principle change from simulation output to “raw” information equivalent to that seen in real data Not “reconstruction”,
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
SITRA Test beams Simulations Zdeněk Doležal Charles University Prague Annual EUDET meeting Munich October 2006.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
BESIII MC Release notes & planned development Dengzy, Hem, Liuhm, Youzy, Yuany Nov. 23, 2005.
1 MTD Calibration for Cosmic Ray Triggered Data in RUN 10 at STAR Lijuan Ruan (BNL), Liang Li (UT Austin) 04/01/ Workshop on STAR MTD Production.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,
Darmstadt, 15. November 2015 Tobias Stockmanns, FZ Jülich1 A STEP to ROOT converter for the FairRoot framework ALICE-FAIR Computing Meeting, GSI,
TOF, Status of the Code F. Pierella, Bologna University and INFN TOF Offline Group ALICE Offline Week, June 2002.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Hit rate at high luminosity logical channels - ghosts – efficiency Toy Monte Carlo : # I have assumed a uniform particle distribution inside the TS # I.
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
Tracker Timing and ISIS RF Edward Overton 1. At CM32… 2 Had done some preliminary checks on the ISIS RF. Was beginning to think about how to handle the.
4 Dec 2008G. Rakness (UCLA)1 Online Software Updates and RPC data in the RAT …including Pad Bit Mapping and Efficiency… Greg Rakness University of California,
1 MuonGeoModel status report focus on issues relevant to , 20 Access to Condition DB with M. Verducci, R. Harrington MDT deformations with I. Logashenco.
Muon Event Filter Status Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the muon EF working group INFN Lecce & Salento University.
CERN, 18 december 2003Coincidence Matrix ASIC PRR Coincidence ASIC modifications E.Petrolo, R.Vari, S.Veneziano INFN-Rome.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
GAUDI Muon Software  Algorithms : Muon Digitization MuonL0Trigger MuonIdentification  Detector Description Database  Transient Detector Store  Detector.
EAS Time Structures with ARGO-YBJ experiment 1 - INFN-CNAF, Bologna, Italy 2 - Università del Salento and INFN Lecce, Italy A.K Calabrese Melcarne 1, G.Marsella.
4/9/2007RPC converter1/18 RPC bytestream converter: Brainstorming a summary of discussions involving M.Bianco, G.Cataldi, G.Chiodini, E.Gorini, A.Guida,
USCMS Physics, May 2001Darin Acosta1 Status Report of PRS/  D.Acosta University of Florida Current U.S. activities PRS/  Activities New PRS organization.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
CGEM-IT project and beam test program G. Felici for the FE-LNF-TO team Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the Program.
RpcPrepRawData 1 The conversion from the online RPC data structure (trigger-driven) to offline RpcPrepRawData is not trivial: generally, one online hit.
Prospects for Integrating Veloroot into GAUDI D. Steele - 24/11/1999.
A. De Caro for the ALICE TOF Offline Group (University of Salerno and INFN)
The Prototype Simulation of SDHCAL Ran.Han Gerald.Grenier Muriel.Donckt IPNL.
Michele Bianco ICATPP 091 Performance of the Resistive Plate Chambers as LVL1 ATLAS muon trigger Michele Bianco INFN Lecce & Physics Department,
RPC Simulation software Raffaello Trentadue. RPC Digi producer RPC Digitizer RPC Synchronizer RPC Simulation model Average model Parametrized model Parametrized.
Giuseppe Ruggiero CERN Straw Chamber WG meeting 07/02/2011 Spectrometer Reconstruction: Pattern recognition and Efficiency 07/02/ G.Ruggiero - Spectrometer.
Calorimeter global commissioning: progress and plans Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 25 jun 2008.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana Dec 7, 2007 Mini WS, SLAC Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Simulations for SuperBelle SuperB computing.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Beam detectors in Au+Au run and future developments - Results of Aug 2012 Au+Au test – radiation damage - scCVD diamond detector with strip metalization.
January 2009 offline detector review - 2 nd go 1 ● Offline – Geometry – Material budget – Simulation – Raw data – OCDB parameters – Reconstruction ● Calibration.
Time-zero evaluation using TOF, T0 and vertex detectors
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
P. Paolucci G. Pugliese M.Tytgat
RPC – status / results Blanco On behalf of HADES RPC Group
v4-18-Release: really the last revision!
Checks of TOF Fiducial Cuts
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
Status of Full Simulation for Muon Trigger at SLHC
Issues with Simulating High Luminosities in ATLAS
Design of Digital Filter Bank and General Purpose Digital Shaper
TPC status - Offline Q&A
Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Clk_ch2 Clk_ch1 L1A global L1A _ch T0+T0r
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
L1 simulation review Aug 2005 Jamie Boyd
Update primary numbers active part
Search for coincidences and study of cosmic rays spectrum
Preliminary design of the behavior level model of the chip
Presentation transcript:

RPC timing in simulation Current Situation MC Geant4 RPCSensitiveDetector.cxx Or RPCSensitiveDetectorCosmics.cxx RPC_Digitization RPC_digit_To_RDO RPC_RDO_To_Prep: RDO to Prep Ambiguity and overlap removal RPC Clusters RPCLV1Trig In cosmic replace Geant4 time and put TOF w.r.t. IP (almost) Not much difference between beam and cosmics (maybe see next slide) Beam: TOF w.r.t. IP Cosmic: TOF from surface + strip propagation time + BCtime ns jitter = t Subtract 50 ns for MC. in sim. added due to the convention that LVL1accept has BCID=2 Where? Pick-up earliest time RPC LV1 sim: input prepared as if all time offsets were compensated: all input times are 0 RPC_BS_To_RDO RDO Data if |t| digit

RPC timing in simulation Current Situation Consequences of current situation: - digit times are the physical times = tof (from IP) + propagation on strips + jitter --- shortcoming: if propagation on strips = 0 (hit very close to FE side) due to the gaussian smearing (sigma = 1.5 ns) the time can be < GEANT4 tof (unphysical); - all digits (i.e. all hits with | t |<70 ns) are seen “as in time” at the input of LVL1 logic - rdo times are the physical times + 50 ns (BCID of LVL1accept =2) --- in pile up LVL1 triggers whenever there’s a geometrical coincidence (for input provided [by the digitizer] in a time window of 140 ns) --- high unphysical lvl1 trigger rate in the barrel in simulations with pile-up + cavern bkg Solution: - the lvl1 logic emulation can handle time coincidences, when correctly configured (the full configuration is heavy, it will be done when conf. parameters as in the online will be accessible) - short term solution: require the time coincidence in a window of 25ns (loosest hardware condition)

RPC timing in simulation Fix proposal 1 allow LVL1 logic to apply a time window for the coincidence 25ns wide (sw already in place in nigtlies) in digit to rdo: have 2 conf. flags (useTofCorr = True/False, timeOffset = X ns) –the first one toggle on/off the subtruction of tof (computed for prompt muons) to the digit time (sw already in place in nightlies) when producing the input to the LVL1 logic that produces the RDO. –the second add a timeOffset (~<10ns) to compensate for times <0 (due to the current jitter implementation) in case useTofCorr=True (to be done)... is this really needed if LVL1 accept has BCid = 2 ? –in the production of RDO one can decide to set the rdo time equal to the one seen at input of the LVL1 simulation (tof subtracted+shifted) or leave the digit time. The same conf. flags need to be defined for TrigT1RPCLogic the algorithm that emulates LVL1 logic starting from input RDO (can run on MC or data) so that it can know how to work out the digit time (in the rdo -> digit conversion); NOTICE, it will need to behave differently with RDO newly produced (as described above) and with old RDO (which has time inclusive of tof): for old RDO the times at the input of the LVL1 logic will need to be set to 0 (as currently done, or tof subtracted), while for new RDO the times will need to stay unchanged; The global shift ??? does this need to be corrected (aren’t just time differences relevant ??) Slow particle studies on old(new) RDO will (not)need to subtract the muon tof to the rdo time; Anyway need to distinguish old / new rdo.

RPC timing in simulation Fix proposal 2 allow LVL1 logic to apply a time window for the coincidence 25ns wide (sw already in place in nigtlies) in digitizer: subtract tof and add small constant shift to avoid <0 times –digits do not keep any physical absolute info in their time –input to rdo formation and lvl1 logic is already emulating a time alignment of the system TrigT1RPCLogic the algorithm that emulates LVL1 logic starting from input RDO (can run on MC or data) will need to behave differently with RDO newly produced (as described above) and with old RDO (which has time inclusive of tof): for old RDO the times at the input of the LVL1 logic will need to be set to 0 (as currently done, or tof subtracted), while for new RDO the times will need to stay unchanged; The global shift ??? does this need to be corrected (aren’t just time differences relevant ??) Slow particle studies on old(new) RDO will (not)need to subtract the muon tof to the rdo time; Anyway need to distinguish old / new rdo.

A simpler schema digits: from physics (Geant4) + detector effects + FE effects (if any) digits -> rdo: produces the rdo by emulating the readout hardware (CM, PADS); introduce here time offsets and dead times as in the hardware configuration; –this RDO will (?) be equal to the real bytestream a part from the missing CM coincidence result (ijk=6,7) –this rdo will not keep physical time info in its own (unless the time is re-converted with hardware conf. parameters) apply the majority logic (within spatial and time programmed parameters) on top of this RDO –add to the RDO the trigger hits in the CM fragments