PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing the Learning Contract
Advertisements

Introduction to Competency-Based Residency Education
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Student Internships and Learning Outcomes Assessment By Harpal S. Dhillon, AGSB University Helmut Pusterer, AGSB University Manpreet K. Dhillon, Hult International.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Learning Outcome Management System This is a Windows application that interacts with a database to manage learning outcomes for College of Business courses.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
1 MBA Learning Assurance Committee Progress Report to the ZSB Faculty September 20, 2007.
Introduction to Business Courses The proposed Introduction to Business Courses consist of three one-credit courses. – BUS 100: Functional Areas of Business.
Competency Assessment Public Health Professional (2012)-
Developing a Personal Development Plan
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
MBA Experience. Assessment of Learning Assessment of Experience Assessment of Market Conditions and Alumni/Employer Feedback MBA Experience.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
May 8 th Assessment Day 2015 Agenda Introductions Assessment Overview Review General Education Outcomes. Overview of past assessment work. What.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
LEARNING GOAL: Teachers will have an overall understanding of Common Core State Standards, understand the timeline for implementation and understand the.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
California State University East Bay
University College: Assessment, Planning and Outcomes
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration –Initiated in 2003 –Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Department Mission Statement and Program Learning Outcomes.
 Examines the nature of culture and the diverse ways in which societies make meaning and are organized across time and space. Topics include cultural.
Copyright © 2005 Prentice-Hall Chapter 1 Management Skills and Managerial Effectiveness Management: A Skills Approach, 2/e by Phillip L. Hunsaker Copyright.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Using the Capstone Course to Generate Student Learning Outcomes Texas State University Thomas E. Castleberry Patricia M. Shields Hassan Tajalli.
Writing Narratives Based on ACGME Competencies. Narratives What Are They?  Written Evaluation of Student Performance Formative  Mid-Course Evaluation.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
“Outcomification”: Development and Use of Student Learning Outcomes Noelle C. Griffin, PhD Director, Assessment and Data Analysis Loyola Marymount University.
The Interactive Model Of Program Planning
Doing It Differently in Science - An Evaluation of the Process Sharon Fraser and Elizabeth Deane University of Western Sydney, Nepean April, 28th 2000.
IKU ROUNDTABLE MEETING FINAL DECLARATION May 28, 2011.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
WELCOME TO BUS 302 The Gateway Experience For more information visit:
Assessment at City Tech April 17, 2015 Living Lab Associate Seminar Susan Nilsen-Kupsch RDH MPA.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
_Macros Learning in the 21st Century Learning in the 21 st Century – Students as Self-Directed and Self-Assessing Learners PowerPoint Slides at.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
Writing Program-level Student Learning Outcomes (PSLOs)
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Program Learning Outcomes
Masters in Public Administration
EPAS Presentation. During one of your field seminars, you will present on your field experiences as they relate to CSWE core competencies and practice.
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Learning goals and assessment (MBA)
Information Technology (IT)
Dr. Michael O’Connor Curriculum Coordinator
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Criminal Justice: Law Enforcement Leadership School of Health, Science and Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Lisa Colbert.
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary

PPA Graduate Themes and Objectives THEME 1. COMMUNICATION. –Objective 1a. Oral Communication: Students will be able to present opinions, theories, and research findings orally. –Objective 1b. Writing: Students will be able to produce focused, coherent, and grammatically correct written communications applicable to government and nonprofit management. –Objective 1c. Teamwork: Students will be able to collaborate effectively in team processes. –Objective 1d. Interpersonal: Students will be able to demonstrate skills in personal interaction. THEME 1. COMMUNICATION. –Objective 1a. Oral Communication: Students will be able to present opinions, theories, and research findings orally. –Objective 1b. Writing: Students will be able to produce focused, coherent, and grammatically correct written communications applicable to government and nonprofit management. –Objective 1c. Teamwork: Students will be able to collaborate effectively in team processes. –Objective 1d. Interpersonal: Students will be able to demonstrate skills in personal interaction.

PPA Graduate Themes and Objectives THEME 2. THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. –Objective 2a. History: Students will demonstrate knowledge of the history of public administration. –Objective 2b. Politics: Students will be able to explain how the political processes of the United States influence public management. –Objective 2c. Theory: Students will be able to explain the key elements of public administration theory, organizational theory and organizational behavior. –Objective 2d. Diversity: Students will demonstrate awareness and sensitivity to a diverse public. –Objective 2e. Careers: Students will understand the careers available in public administration and how to prepare for them. THEME 2. THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION. –Objective 2a. History: Students will demonstrate knowledge of the history of public administration. –Objective 2b. Politics: Students will be able to explain how the political processes of the United States influence public management. –Objective 2c. Theory: Students will be able to explain the key elements of public administration theory, organizational theory and organizational behavior. –Objective 2d. Diversity: Students will demonstrate awareness and sensitivity to a diverse public. –Objective 2e. Careers: Students will understand the careers available in public administration and how to prepare for them.

PPA Graduate Themes and Objectives THEME 3. CRITICAL THINKING. –Objective 3a. Theory Application: Students will be able to apply theories to policy and administrative situations. –Objective 3b. The Scientific Method: Students will be able to explain the scientific method and apply it to a policy or management issue. –Objective 3c. Problem Solving: Students will be able to structure problems and apply a systematic problem solving approach. THEME 3. CRITICAL THINKING. –Objective 3a. Theory Application: Students will be able to apply theories to policy and administrative situations. –Objective 3b. The Scientific Method: Students will be able to explain the scientific method and apply it to a policy or management issue. –Objective 3c. Problem Solving: Students will be able to structure problems and apply a systematic problem solving approach.

PPA Graduate Themes and Objectives THEME 3. CRITICAL THINKING. –Objective 3d. Ethical Reasoning: Students will be able to describe and apply a range of ethical perspectives to ethical dilemmas inherent in Public Administration. –Objective 3e. Data analysis: Students will demonstrate ability to analyze qualitative and quantitative data. –Objective 3f. Argumentation: Students will be able to organize and defend an argument. –Objective 3g. Reporting: Students will integrate the elements of theory, methods, problem structuring, ethics, analysis, and argumentation to generate reports usable in government and nonprofit management. THEME 3. CRITICAL THINKING. –Objective 3d. Ethical Reasoning: Students will be able to describe and apply a range of ethical perspectives to ethical dilemmas inherent in Public Administration. –Objective 3e. Data analysis: Students will demonstrate ability to analyze qualitative and quantitative data. –Objective 3f. Argumentation: Students will be able to organize and defend an argument. –Objective 3g. Reporting: Students will integrate the elements of theory, methods, problem structuring, ethics, analysis, and argumentation to generate reports usable in government and nonprofit management.

PPA Graduate Themes and Objectives THEME 4. CORE PUBLIC MANAGEMENT COMPETENCIES. –Objective 4a. Policy Process: Students will understand the stages and processes of policy making. –Objective 4b. Policy Analysis: Students will demonstrate the ability to formally structure problems, forecast expected policy outcomes, recommend preferred policies, monitor observed policy outcomes, and evaluate policy performance. –Objective 4c. Budgeting: Students will be able to develop budgets and know when to apply which budgeting approaches. –Objective 4d. Human Resources Management: Students will demonstrate the ability to perform core and strategic human resources functions. THEME 4. CORE PUBLIC MANAGEMENT COMPETENCIES. –Objective 4a. Policy Process: Students will understand the stages and processes of policy making. –Objective 4b. Policy Analysis: Students will demonstrate the ability to formally structure problems, forecast expected policy outcomes, recommend preferred policies, monitor observed policy outcomes, and evaluate policy performance. –Objective 4c. Budgeting: Students will be able to develop budgets and know when to apply which budgeting approaches. –Objective 4d. Human Resources Management: Students will demonstrate the ability to perform core and strategic human resources functions.

PPA Graduate Themes and Objectives THEME 4. CORE PUBLIC MANAGEMENT COMPETENCIES. –Objective 4e. Public Management: Students will be able to effectively design work, delegate tasks, manage contracts, assess performance, and implement programs. –Objective 4f. Leadership: Students will be demonstrate an understanding of human behavior, leadership, and organizational theory to guide and inform leadership activities. –Objective 4g. Information Technology: Students will be able to effectively use information technology to accomplish administrative and policy tasks. THEME 4. CORE PUBLIC MANAGEMENT COMPETENCIES. –Objective 4e. Public Management: Students will be able to effectively design work, delegate tasks, manage contracts, assess performance, and implement programs. –Objective 4f. Leadership: Students will be demonstrate an understanding of human behavior, leadership, and organizational theory to guide and inform leadership activities. –Objective 4g. Information Technology: Students will be able to effectively use information technology to accomplish administrative and policy tasks.

Assessment Procedures TEAM-BASED LEARNING –The Department adopted a team-based, collective approach to assessment in –A team structure was chosen in order to facilitate problem solving, information sharing, and collective learning among the faculty. –The Department’s team-based outcome assessment process is cyclical, involving planning meetings, program implementation, data gathering, and data analysis meetings. TEAM-BASED LEARNING –The Department adopted a team-based, collective approach to assessment in –A team structure was chosen in order to facilitate problem solving, information sharing, and collective learning among the faculty. –The Department’s team-based outcome assessment process is cyclical, involving planning meetings, program implementation, data gathering, and data analysis meetings.

Assessment Procedures OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PROCESS –Fall - Planning Meetings - Assessment Improvements. –Year round - Program Implementation (teaching, support)- Program Improvements. –Year round - Data gathering –Winter, Spring - Data analysis meetings - Feedback OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PROCESS –Fall - Planning Meetings - Assessment Improvements. –Year round - Program Implementation (teaching, support)- Program Improvements. –Year round - Data gathering –Winter, Spring - Data analysis meetings - Feedback

Assessment Activities, Since communication and analysis are critical to our MPA model, the Department chose to examine the following objectives during the academic year: –Objective 1a. Oral Communication. –Objective 1b. Writing. –Objective 1c. Teamwork. –Objective 3a. Theory Application. –Objective 3c. Problem Solving. –Objective 3e. Data analysis. –Objective 3f. Argumentation. –Objective 3g. Reporting –Objective 4b. Policy Analysis. Since communication and analysis are critical to our MPA model, the Department chose to examine the following objectives during the academic year: –Objective 1a. Oral Communication. –Objective 1b. Writing. –Objective 1c. Teamwork. –Objective 3a. Theory Application. –Objective 3c. Problem Solving. –Objective 3e. Data analysis. –Objective 3f. Argumentation. –Objective 3g. Reporting –Objective 4b. Policy Analysis.

Assessment Activities, The Department assessed these objectives during Winter 2006 in PPA 502, Program Evaluation; PPA 503, The Public Policy-Making Process; and PPA 691, Policy Analysis. The instructor for these courses developed (with Departmental input) scoring rubrics for the writing assignments in PPA 503 and PPA 691 and the midterm and final test content in PPA 502, PPA 503, and PPA 691. The Department assessed these objectives during Winter 2006 in PPA 502, Program Evaluation; PPA 503, The Public Policy-Making Process; and PPA 691, Policy Analysis. The instructor for these courses developed (with Departmental input) scoring rubrics for the writing assignments in PPA 503 and PPA 691 and the midterm and final test content in PPA 502, PPA 503, and PPA 691.

Assessment Activities, Conclusions: –1a (oral presentation): 90% acceptable standards. –1b (Writing): 80% to 90% acceptable standards. –1c (teamwork): 71% acceptable (NEEDS EXAMINATION BY DEPARTMENT) –3a (Theory Application): 83% acceptable. –3c (Problem solving): 82% acceptable (culminating project); 98% acceptable (PPA 503) (PROBLEM STRUCTURING AND ORGANIZATION NEED HELP IN CULMINATING). –3e (Data analysis) and 3g (Reporting): 94% acceptable. –3f (Argumentation): 86% acceptable (IMPROVEMENT OVER LAST ASSESSMENT IN 2004) –4b (Policy Analysis): 84% acceptable on exams. Conclusions: –1a (oral presentation): 90% acceptable standards. –1b (Writing): 80% to 90% acceptable standards. –1c (teamwork): 71% acceptable (NEEDS EXAMINATION BY DEPARTMENT) –3a (Theory Application): 83% acceptable. –3c (Problem solving): 82% acceptable (culminating project); 98% acceptable (PPA 503) (PROBLEM STRUCTURING AND ORGANIZATION NEED HELP IN CULMINATING). –3e (Data analysis) and 3g (Reporting): 94% acceptable. –3f (Argumentation): 86% acceptable (IMPROVEMENT OVER LAST ASSESSMENT IN 2004) –4b (Policy Analysis): 84% acceptable on exams.