Issues of stability and ground motion in ILC Andrei Seryi SLAC October 17, 2005 Selected pages from: Full talk at

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BDS Change Request: Support of Single L* Optics Configuration Shared by both Detectors Glen White, Nick Walker Sept MDI/CFS Ichinoseki.
Advertisements

1 MULTI-BUNCH INTEGRATED ILC SIMULATIONS Glen White, SLAC/QMUL Snowmass 2005.
Nick Walker KEK-DESY meeting 7 th March 2005.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
Issues of stability and ground motion in ILC Andrei Seryi SLAC October 17, 2005.
1 August 12, 2005 Running 2mrad IR in e-e- mode: BDS constraints A.Seryi August 12, 2005.
A.Seryi, Oct. 26, BDS comparison and positron source A.Seryi October 26, 2005 Discussion of BDS and positron source is given in [1] “Comment on.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project “Slow” Feedback Requirements: Deflections and Luminosity Linda Hendrickson IPBI Meeting, SLAC June 26, 2002.
BDSIM simulations/results: Synchrotron Radiation and Muons Motivation and History Tracking results Synchrotron Radiation Tracking of Halo Muons News from.
Luminosity Stability and Stabilisation Hardware D. Schulte for the CLIC team Special thanks to J. Pfingstner and J. Snuverink 1CLIC-ACE, February 2nd,
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
Global Design Effort Push-pull studies How to proceed LCWS07 June 1, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi.
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
For Draft List of Standard Errors Beam Dynamics, Simulations Group (Summarized by Kiyoshi Kubo)
Feedback On Nano-second Timescales: An IP Feedback System for the Future Linear Collider Requirement for a fast IP beam-based feedback system Simulation.
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
ILC Start-End Simulations Glen White, SLAC May 13, 2014 AWLC14, Fermilab.
ILC Feedback System Studies Nikolay Solyak Fermilab 1IWLC2010, Geneva, Oct.18-22, 2010 N.Solyak.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
Active Vibration Stabilization for the NLC Final Focus Quads Josef Frisch, Linda Hendrickson, Thomas Himel, Andrei Seryi,
Dynamic Tuning Selected Highlights Freddy Poirier (DESY) ILC accelerator physics group meeting 28 th January 2008.
Status of ILC BDS Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory Andrei Seryi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ILC-CLIC.
Optimization of L(E) with SB2009 Andrei Seryi, for BDS and other working groups LCWS 2010 / ILC 2010 March 28, 2010.
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
11th December 2007 LET workshop, SLAC 1 Beam dynamics issues in Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
BDS Andrei Seryi, Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Emmannual Tsesmelis, Rogelio Tomas, Andrea Latina, Daniel Schulte Detectors Civil engineering.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
1 SiD Push-pull Plans Marco Oriunno, SLAC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva, October 2010 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010.
GDE questions, including one or two IRs Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei Seryi for WG4 Snowmass, CO, August 25, 2005 Grahame Blair, Tomo Sanuki, Andrei.
Introduction: Tasks of “Information for simulations”, hardware specs K.Kubo
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Mike Woods May 1999 Vibrations and the NLC IR Welcome to the NanoWorld !
1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
SLAC SD0/QD0 Cryomodule Jitter Tolerance Glen White SLAC March 27 th 2007.
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
Beam Dynamics IR Stability Issues Glen White / SLAC September IRENG07 Vibration tolerances for final doublet cryomodules Settlement of detector.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
May 31, 2005Mike Hildreth – ATF 2005 Energy Spectrometry and ATF Components of the nano-BPM Test Program and Plans for Future Tests Mike Hildreth University.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
Global Design Effort Progress and Plans of the Beam Delivery Systems and Machine Detector Interface WG Daniel Schulte (CERN), Brett Parker (BNL), Andrei.
September 18, 2007 Magnetic Field Requirements in the IR Sergei Seletskiy IRENG07 September 17-21, 2007 September 18, 2007.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
J.C. Sheppard, SLAC Americas Region September 28, ILC Positron TDR and R&D Collaboration Meeting 1: Oxford GigaZ and Polarization Upgrade Discussion.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Keeping Nanometer Beams Colliding Vibration Stabilization of the Final Doublet Tom Himel SLAC NLC MAC review October.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
Beam delivery and ATF2 Andrei Seryi SLAC October 1, 2008.
Luminosity Issues for LC BDS Glen White, SLAC LCWS2013, Tokyo November 12, 2013.
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Near IR FF design including FD and longer L* issues
In collaboration with P. N. Burrows, A. Latina and D. Schulte
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
Adaptive Alignment & Ground Motion
What Should We Do?.
SD0/QD0 Cryomodule Jitter Tolerance
MULTI-BUNCH INTEGRATED ILC SIMULATIONS
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
MULTI-BUNCH SIMULATIONS OF THE ILC FOR LUMINOSITY PERFORMANCE STUDIES
Start-to-End Simulations for the TESLA LC
Presentation transcript:

Issues of stability and ground motion in ILC Andrei Seryi SLAC October 17, 2005 Selected pages from: Full talk at

2 17 Oct 05 A.Seryi, SLAC ILC jitter goals discussion The large capture range (10s of  ) of fast feedback does not mean that larger jitter is allowed along the machine Many reasons why the jitter should be smaller that beam size –The need to minimize  due to collimator wake-fields, –to provide acceptable conditions for beam diagnostics, –to minimize jitter effects on dispersion free steering, etc. The edge of the comfortable range: jitter < 50%  –the 50% jitter at the end of main linac => 40nm jitter of linac quads BDS (w. nonlinear elements) is more sensitive than weak linac –criteria for BDS must be different, tighter than in linac –may allow beam jitter to grow to ~100% before FD FD contributes one to one to IP jitter, but less relevant –FD jitter of ~100nm should be OK –No active stabilization should be needed (position monitoring useful)

3 17 Oct 05 A.Seryi, SLAC Discussion of ILC simulation results Linac (driving criteria is jitter) –GM K or C is OK for linac –If GM K or C, then linac component vibration 50nm is a bit too high, wish it to be no more than 30nm BDS (driving criteria is luminosity) –GM K or C is too noisy for BDS, wish to be ~3 quieter –GM B is just fine for BDS, can allow ~3 worse –Component jitter 25nm too high for BDS, wish it would be < 10nm –For FD may allow several times larger, 100nm? Linac and BDS may have different specs for on-the-floor noise –the noise consist of ground noise + noise from nearby utilities, which are different in linac and BDS areas –BDS area may be located in a quieter place than linac average Goals for tunnel floor stability & add. component jitter: –Linac: up to gm K or C & up to 30nm –BDS: up to gm B*3 or gm C/3 & up to 10nm

4 17 Oct 05 A.Seryi, SLAC Summary ILC stability goals for the beam, site and hardware suggested beam jitter: –50%  at the end of linac (or in BDS diagnostics) –100%  at the end of BDS, before FD –several  at IP Tunnel floor stability (site + noise of nearby ILC equipment): –Linac area: up to gm K or C –BDS area: up to gm B*3 or gm C/3 Additional noise due to beamline components: –Linac area: up to 30 nm –BDS area : up to 10 nm –FD : up to ~100nm Need to discuss these goals, their feasibility and consequences Many other issues not discussed, e.g. long term stability…