CH3Br, Relative ion intensities and trend summary & “impurity threshold” agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass km ak.pxp agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass km ak.pxp agust,www,...Nov09/PPT ak.ppt Agust,heima,...Nov09/XLS ak.xls
Agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass km ak.pxp:agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass km ak.pxp: CH Br - threshold
agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass km ak.pxp:agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass km ak.pxp: CH Br - threshold
It looks as if the a significant change in relative ion intensities, in terms of increasing I(CH+)/I(CH3+) I(CH2+)/I(CH3+) I(Br+)/I(CH3+) -for “Rydberg state + bgr-signals” with energy does not happen significantly untill from about cm-1 -> > After which it drops, i.e. The mayjor trend is as:
I(CH+)/I(CH3+) I(CH2+)/I(CH3+) I(Br+)/I(CH3+) This needs verification (?) from KM (i.e. “table values for relative Intensities”)
“impurity threshold” (??) agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass km ak.pxp:agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass km ak.pxp: CH Br - threshold Why is this mass spectrum so noizy??