Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Advertisements

6 Efficient Diversification Bodie, Kane, and Marcus
6 Efficient Diversification Bodie, Kane, and Marcus
5.5Asset Allocation Across Risky and Risk Free Portfolios 5-1.
P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN INVESTMENTS.
1 Risk, Returns, and Risk Aversion Return and Risk Measures Real versus Nominal Rates EAR versus APR Holding Period Returns Excess Return and Risk Premium.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Return and Risk: The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Chapter.
FIN352 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Asset Pricing Models (chapter 9)
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Chapter 8 Portfolio Selection.
LECTURE 5 : PORTFOLIO THEORY
Risk and Return: Past and Prologue CHAPTER 5. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Holding Period Return.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Risk and Return: Past and Prologue CHAPTER 5.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS ©2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies CHAPTER 7 Optimal Risky Portfolios 1.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS ©2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies CHAPTER 7 Optimal Risky Portfolios 1.
Risk and Return: Past and Prologue
1 Fin 2802, Spring 10 - Tang Chapter 6: Asset Allocation Fina2802: Investments and Portfolio Analysis Spring, 2010 Dragon Tang Lecture 9 Capital Allocation.
Chapter 5 Risk and Return: Past and Prologue. Measuring Ex-Post (Past) Returns One period investment: regardless of the length of the period. Must be.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2001 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-1 Capital Allocation Between the Risky Asset and the Risk-Free.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Efficient Diversification CHAPTER 6.
Return and Risk: The Capital Asset Pricing Model Chapter 11 Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Capital Asset Pricing and Arbitrage Pricing Theory CHAPTER 7.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS ©2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets.
Portfolio Theory & Capital Asset Pricing Model
Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk-Free Asset
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Return: Past and Prologue 5 Bodie, Kane, and Marcus.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Risk and Risk Aversion.
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Risk Premiums and Risk Aversion
Optimal Risky Portfolios
Capital Asset Pricing Model
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Finding the Efficient Set
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Return: Past and Prologue 5 Bodie, Kane, and Marcus.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management Chapter 7.
Theory 1: Risk and Return The beginnings of portfolio theory
Chapter 8 Portfolio Selection.
The Capital Asset Pricing Model
0 Portfolio Managment Albert Lee Chun Construction of Portfolios: Introduction to Modern Portfolio Theory Lecture 3 16 Sept 2008.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk-Free.
FIN437 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Portfolio management Optimum asset allocation Optimum asset allocation (see chapter 7 Bodie, Kane and Marcus)
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Chapter Seven Optimal Risky Portfolios Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or.
Efficient Diversification CHAPTER 6. Diversification and Portfolio Risk Market risk –Systematic or Nondiversifiable Firm-specific risk –Diversifiable.
Risk and Return: Past and Prologue Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risk Assets.
Risk and Return: Portfolio Theory and Assets Pricing Models
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Seventh Edition.
5-1 CHAPTER 5 Risk and Rates of Return Rates of Return Holding Period Return: Rates of Return over a given period Suppose the price of a share.
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Seventh Edition.
Chapter 5 Risk and Return: Past and Prologue Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Bodie Kane Marcus Perrakis RyanINVESTMENTS, Fourth Canadian Edition Copyright © McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, 2003 Slide 6-1 Chapter 6.
FIN437 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Portfolio management Optimum asset allocation Optimum asset allocation (see chapter 8 RN)
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Risk and Return: Past and Prologue CHAPTER 5.
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Risk and Return: Past and Prologue
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
6 Efficient Diversification Bodie, Kane and Marcus
Chapter 19 Jones, Investments: Analysis and Management
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
2. Building efficient portfolios
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Figure 6.1 Risk as Function of Number of Stocks in Portfolio
5 Risk and Return: Past and Prologue Bodie, Kane and Marcus
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation
Presentation transcript:

Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Allocation to Risky Assets Investors will avoid risk unless there is a reward. i.e. Risk Premium should be positive Agents preference (taste) gives the optimal allocation between a risky portfolio and a risk-free asset.

Speculation vs. Gamble Speculation Gamble Taking considerable risk for a commensurate gain Parties have heterogeneous expectations Gamble Bet or wager on an uncertain outcome for enjoyment Parties assign the same probabilities to the possible outcomes

Table 6.1 Available Risky Portfolios (Risk-free Rate = 5%) Each portfolio receives a utility score to assess the investor’s risk/return trade off

Utility Function U = utility of portfolio with return r E ( r ) = expected return portfolio A = coefficient of risk aversion s2 = variance of returns of portfolio ½ = a scaling factor

Table 6.2 Utility Scores of Alternative Portfolios for Investors with Varying Degree of Risk Aversion IN CLASS EXERCISE. Anwer: How high the risk aversion coefficient (A) has to be so that L is preferred over M and H?

Mean-Variance (M-V) Criterion Portfolio A dominates portfolio B if: And As noted before: this does not determine the choice of one portfolio, but a whole set of efficient portfolios.

Estimating Risk Aversion Use questionnaires Observe individuals’ decisions when confronted with risk Observe how much people are willing to pay to avoid risk

Capital Allocation Across Risky and Risk-Free Portfolios Asset Allocation: Controlling Risk: Is a very important part of portfolio construction. Refers to the choice among broad asset classes. % of total Investment in risky vs. risk-free assets Simplest way: Manipulate the fraction of the portfolio invested in risk-free assets versus the portion invested in the risky assets

Basic Asset Allocation Example Total Amount Invested $300,000 Risk-free money market fund $90,000 Total risk assets $210,000 Equities $113,400 Bonds (long-term) $96,600 Proportion of Risk assets on Equities Proportion of Risk assets on Bonds

Basic Asset Allocation P is the complete portfolio where we have y as the weight on the risky portfolio and (1-y) = weight of risk-free assets: Complete Portfolio is: (0.3, 0.378, 0.322)

The Risk-Free Asset Only the government can issue default-free bonds. Risk-free in real terms only if price indexed and maturity equal to investor’s holding period. T-bills viewed as “the” risk-free asset Money market funds also considered risk-free in practice

Figure 6.3 Spread Between 3-Month CD and T-bill Rates

Portfolios of One Risky Asset and a Risk-Free Asset It’s possible to create a complete portfolio by splitting investment funds between safe and risky assets. Let y=portion allocated to the risky portfolio, P (1-y)=portion to be invested in risk-free asset, F.

Example Using Chapter 6.4 Numbers rf = 7% rf = 0% E(rp) = 15% p = 22% y = % in p (1-y) = % in rf

Example (Ctd.) The expected return on the complete portfolio is the risk-free rate plus the weight of P times the risk premium of P

Example (Ctd.) The risk of the complete portfolio is the weight of P times the risk of P: This follows straight from the formulas we saw before and the fact that any constant random variable has zero variance.

Feasible (var, mean) Taken together this determines the set of feasible (mean,variance) portfolio return: This determines a straight line, which we call Capital Allocation Line. Next we derive it’s equation completely

Example (Ctd.) Rearrange and substitute y=sC/sP: The sub-index C is to stand for complete portfolio The slope has a special name: Sharpe ratio.

Figure 6.4 The Investment Opportunity Set

Capital Allocation Line with Leverage Lend at rf=7% and borrow at rf=9% Lending range slope = 8/22 = 0.36 Borrowing range slope = 6/22 = 0.27 CAL kinks at P

Figure 6.5 The Opportunity Set with Differential Borrowing and Lending Rates

Risk Tolerance and Asset Allocation The investor must choose one optimal portfolio, C, from the set of feasible choices Expected return of the complete portfolio: Variance:

Table 6.4 Utility Levels for Various Positions in Risky Assets (y) for an Investor with Risk Aversion A = 4

Figure 6.6 Utility as a Function of Allocation to the Risky Asset, y

Table 6.5 Spreadsheet Calculations of Indifference Curves

Portfolio problem Agent’s problem with one risky and one risk-free asset is thus: Pick portfolio (y, 1-y) to maximize utility U U(y,1-y) = E(r_C) -0.5*A*Var(r_C) Where r_C is the complete portfolio This is the same as r_f + y[E(r) – r_f] -0.5*A*y^2*Var(r) Solution (take foc) is y (proportion on risky asset) as (1/A)*SharpeRatio

Figure 6. 7 Indifference Curves for U =. 05 and U = Figure 6.7 Indifference Curves for U = .05 and U = .09 with A = 2 and A = 4

Figure 6.8 Finding the Optimal Complete Portfolio Using Indifference Curves

Table 6.6 Expected Returns on Four Indifference Curves and the CAL

Risk Tolerance and Asset Allocation The investor must choose one optimal portfolio, C, from the set of feasible choices Expected return of the complete portfolio: Variance:

One word on Indifference Curves If you see the IC curves over (mean,st. dev) you will note that these are all nice smooth concave curves. This is an assumption. Note that agents have preference over random variables (representing payoff/return). A random variable, in general, is not completely described by (mean, variance). That is, in general, we can have X and Y with mean(X) < mean (Y) and var(X)=var(Y) BUT X is ranked better than Y nonetheless. IF agents have expected utility, we can solve this issue in two ways.

One word on Indifference Curves First method is: Assumption 1: all random variables are normally distributed Assumption 2: agents have expected utility with Bernoulli given by u(x)= a*x^2 + bx + c BLACKBOARD (Expected utility computation)

Word on our Portfolio problem So far we saw how to solver for

Passive Strategies: The Capital Market Line A natural candidate for a passively held risky asset would be a well-diversified portfolio of common stocks such as the S&P 500. The capital market line (CML) is the capital allocation line formed from 1-month T-bills and a broad index of common stocks (e.g. the S&P 500).

Passive Strategies: The Capital Market Line The CML is given by a strategy that involves investment in two passive portfolios: virtually risk-free short-term T-bills (or a money market fund) a fund of common stocks that mimics a broad market index.

Passive Strategies: The Capital Market Line From 1926 to 2009, the passive risky portfolio offered an average risk premium of 7.9% with a standard deviation of 20.8%, resulting in a reward-to-volatility ratio of .38.