PARFIT WHO THINKS THAT THERE IS NO SELF?. Derek Parfit (born 1942)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Personal identity Michael Lacewing
Advertisements

The Matrix as Metaphysics
Joe Levines Purple Haze. Physical/Phenomenal Gaps P = the complete microphysical truth Q = a phenomenal truth Q1: Is there an epistemic gap between.
Simulation and the Singularity David Chalmers Departments of Philosophy Australian National University New York University.
© Michael Lacewing Are any non-humans persons? Michael Lacewing.
Lecture 22 Strawson on Persons, Minds, and Bodies; Frankfurt on Persons and the Will.
Section 4.2 Golden Memories
Descartes’ rationalism
Personal Identity. CAUSAL EFFICACY OF CONTENT Breaking Glass o.
PHIL105: The Big Questions
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
animalism Some Related Questions The Mind-Body Problem Personhood: what makes something a person in the Lockean sense where “person is a forensic term”?
Section 4.3 You Can’t Step into the Same River Twice Self as Process.
Section 2.2 You Are What You Eat Mind as Body 1 Empiricism Empiricism claims that the only source of knowledge about the external world is sense experience.
Mental Modules, Mindreading & Male-Female Brain-Based Differences Autism and Baron-Cohen’s “Four Evolutionary Steps” that underlie the Human Mindreading.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
David Hume ( )  Fame as a philosopher (for Treatise and Enquiry) followed fame as an historian (for A History of Britain)
SEARLE THE CHINESE ROOM ARGUMENT: MAN BECOMES COMPUTER.
PHL 201 March 18, 2004  Quiz #3 Answers  Next Quiz – Mar. 26 (new format)  Essay Assignments  Chapter Four – The Self  Faculty Course Surveys.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Free Will Theories  Agency Theory: we define ourselves as agents through free choices: this we experience (and is what our theory should explain)  Person.
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College Lecture 8: Personal Identity.
General Philosophy Dr Peter Millican, Hertford College Lecture 8: Personal Identity.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
The Problem of Personal Identity Minds and Machines.
Descartes I am essentially rational, only accidentally an animal ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily Strictly speaking,
The Teleological Argument also known as “ the argument from design ”
Life and Death Philosophical Perspectives. Two problems To discuss whether life after death is possible we need to understand two related philosophical.
Introduction to Personal Identity Lecture 7. Dan Turton Office: MY715 Office Hour: Thurs 2:10-3:00pm Phone: x.
Persons, Minds and Brains
Chapter 11: Who Am I?. Introduction What is the nature of human beings and what constitutes their being? What is the nature of human beings and what constitutes.
Dennett’s Where Am I?. Dennett’s “Where Am I?” Cast of Characters Yorick: Dennett’s original brain Hamlet: Dennett’s original body Fortinbras: second.
Mind-Body Dualism. The Mind-Body Problem The problem of explaining how a mind is connected to and interacts with a body whose mind it is, or the problem.
A New Artificial Intelligence 5 Kevin Warwick. Philosophy of AI II Here we will look afresh at some of the arguments Here we will look afresh at some.
8.1.4 Can it still be factored? Factoring Completely I can factor out a common factor.
PERSONAL IDENTITY. What is personal identity Am I the same person as I was when I was born? when I was a child? ten years ago? yesterday? Is there a single.
PHL 203 Theories of Reality Lecture for January 11 & 13, 2011 Prof. Borrowdale.
Personal identity. An Ego Theorist claims that, if we ask what unifies someone’s consciousness at any time – what makes it true, for example, that.
Personal Identity Mind/Soul Brain Body Memory Story.
Mark C, Emtiaz M, Nav V, Jeremy F, Ajit K, Eugene L, Ernest Da Re, Arthur S, Zain S.
Philosophy of Mind: Theories of self / personal identity: REVISION Body & Soul - what makes you you?
LYCAN ONLY “HUMAN CHAUVINISTS” DENY ROBOT CONSCIOUSNESS.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 4: Personal Identity III and Plato.
Split Brain The findings and implications of split brain research.
Section 2.2 You Are What You Eat Mind as Body McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 1: Introduction.
Blindsight, Zombies & Consciousness Jim Fahey Department of Cognitive Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 10/4/2007.
Lecture 10 (last one of term!) Personal Identity… Part B.
Section 4.3 You Can’t Step into the Same River Twice Self as Process McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Human : The Science behind what makes us Unique Michael Gazzaniga.
A PRESENTATION BY AMELIE NILSSON & EMELI PALM SPLIT-BRAIN SURGERY & THE BRAIN HEMISPHERES.
Ch. 3 – Atoms: The Building Blocks of Matter
Section 4.2 Golden Memories Self as Psyche McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
OV Copyright © 2011 Element K Content LLC. All rights reserved. Calculating Data with Advanced Formulas  Apply Cell and Range Names  Calculate.
By Joe Hummer and Joe Martin. Lacan reconceptualized Freud using post structuralism. He focused on early development and how this affects the unconscious.
Ch. 2 Split- Brain Research.
Some People Are Left-Brained, Others Are Right-Brained
What is Personal Identity?
The Problem of Personal Identity
Personal Identity.
Consciousness and the Embodied Self Philosophy Department
General Philosophy Lecture 8: Personal Identity
The Perfect Marriage! Ephesians 5:21-33.
Mental Modules, Mindreading & Male-Female Brain-Based Differences
Susan Blackmore – “The Self”
Body and Soul Key Words! In your group, write as many key words and definitions on this topic as possible!
The findings and implications of split brain research
The Teleological Argument
Тархи ба оюун \Brain and Mind\
The findings and implications of split brain research
Presentation transcript:

PARFIT WHO THINKS THAT THERE IS NO SELF?

Derek Parfit (born 1942)

Split Brain Argument

[Split Brains: A Primer] Michael Gazzaniga’s (b1939) findings…

The Social Brain (Gazzaniga1987) Gazzaniga does new research on the split- brain patients of his (teacher and ? ) colleague Roger Sperry Nobel 1981 (1913 – 1994)

Rodolfo Llinas Columbian Neurosurgeon Philosopher of mind Book: The I of the Vortex

Split Brain

Split Brain Argument (373) Premise 1. Surgical separation of brain lobes yields 2 streams of consciousness. Premise 2. There are three possibilities: 2, 1, or 0 persons. Parfit to argues for 0 person theory.

Person Theory Two Person Theories [Parfit does not consider all theories]: Ego (Cartesian)  Bundle (Hume) = no self Parfit argues for Bundle theory: a no self/ego/person theory.

Buddha [Parfit’s argumentam ad verecundiam?] Buddha says Self is “only a conventional name given to a set of elements.” Analogue: carriage. [Cf. computer, plant, animal] Parfit: “Most of us therefore…have false beliefs about ourselves.” (375)

Teletransportation Arguments Point: to reveal our false beliefs. (375-7) Case: original brain and body destroyed, and perfect replica made. Range: different proportions of cells in brain and body replaced. Variant: original is not destroyed, and replica still made.

Teletransportation Arguments ARGUMENT (375-6): [cf: Lycan’s “Henrietta”] i) Variant case shows result of 100% replacement is not you. ii) If only 1% of cells replaced, then the result is you. iii) Assume result either is you or is not. [identity is all-or-none] iv) It is “implausible” that a precise percentage maintains identity. SO: There is no such thing as personal identity.

Club Analogy Argument (376) Personal identity is like [is analogous to] club identity. But: there are no criteria for club identity. SO: there are no criteria for personal identity

Parfit’s take on teletransportation “You do not merely want there to be psychological continuity between you and some future person. You want to be this future person. On the bundle theory there is no such special further fact…judged from the standpoint of your natural beliefs, even ordinary survival is about as bad as teletransportation.”

Parfit’s Reflections “Ordinary survival is about as bad as being destroyed and having a replica.” (377) Parfit’s Solution/Theory (377-8): Unification of streams of consciousness is real, but ego is not.