Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Cluster multi-spacecraft measurements: applications on transition layer development and location of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Madeline Hubbard (Keene High School) Matthew Shindel (Stanwich High School) Advisors: Fathima Muzamil, Dr. Charles Farrugia, Dr. Roy Torbert Objective:
Advertisements

Generation of the transpolar potential Ramon E. Lopez Dept. of Physics UT Arlington.
Statistical study of non-reconnection plasma jets as observed by the DOUBLE STAR spacecraft E. Amata 1, S. Savin 2, D. Ambrosino 1, L. Trenchi 1, M.F.
Anti-Parallel Merging and Component Reconnection: Role in Magnetospheric Dynamics M.M Kuznetsova, M. Hesse, L. Rastaetter NASA/GSFC T. I. Gombosi University.
Principles of Global Modeling Paul Song Department of Physics, and Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusetts Lowell Introduction Principles.
Formation of the Magnetosphere 1 Solar Wind. Formation of the Magnetosphere 2 Solar Wind Bow Shock Magnetosheath.
Fine-scale 3-D Dynamics of Critical Plasma Regions: Necessity of Multipoint Measurements R. Lundin 1, I. Sandahl 1, M. Yamauchi 1, U. Brändström 1, and.
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Comparing the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at Mercury and Saturn A. Masters Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration.
UCL DEPARTMENT OF SPACE & CLIMATE PHYSICS SPACE PLASMA PHYSICS GROUP A Potential Mission Concept for the M Launch: Investigation of MagnetoPause.
Budget and Roles of Heavy Ions in the Solar System M. Yamauchi, I. Sandahl, H. Nilsson, R. Lundin, and L. Eliasson Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF)
Microphysical Plasma Processes in Astrophysics Uppsala 2004.
Auroral dynamics EISCAT Svalbard Radar: field-aligned beam  complicated spatial structure (
Solar wind interaction with the comet Halley and Venus
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling Magnetic reconnection In most solar system environments magnetic fields are “frozen” to the plasma - different plasmas.
Observational signatures of ULF turbulence L. Rezeau CETP/IPSL/Université Pierre et Marie Curie F. Sahraoui, D. Attié CETP/IPSL/CNRS.
Summer student work at MSSL, 2009 Kate Husband – investigation of magnetosheath electron distribution functions. Flat-topped PSD distributions, correlation.
OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California,
O. M. Shalabiea Department of Physics, Northern Borders University, KSA.
Or A Comparison of the Magnetospheres between Jupiter and Earth.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
Intro to Satellite Orbits Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Transverse instability of Alfven wave : Cluster observations and heuristic explication. Olga Alexandrova LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, France. Summer school.
Benoit Lavraud CESR/CNRS, Toulouse, France Uppsala, May 2008 The altered solar wind – magnetosphere interaction at low Mach numbers: Magnetosheath and.
Extreme Space Weather Warning System Andrew Fazakerley (1), Chris Arridge (1), Dhiren Kataria (1), Jonny Rae (1), Matthew Stuttard (2) (1) Mullard Space.
Cusp O+ H+ e- "SPI" event #1 event #2 MLT energy ratio = 15~20 O+ H+ 68°CGLat66°CGLat 63°CGLat #1) Mono-energetic ion injection with O+ faster.
CROSS-SCALE and SCOPE: The future in Space Plasma Physics Matt Taylor on behalf of Steve Schwartz, Masaki Fujimoto and the Cross-Scale and SCOPE Teams.
Concentrated Generator Regions in the Auroral Magnetosphere as Derived from Conjugated Cluster and FAST Data M. Hamrin (1),O. Marghitu (2, 3), B.Klecker.
Shape and dynamics of the terrestrial magnetopause: CLUSTER and THEMIS multi-spacecraft observations Oleksiy Agapitov 1,2, Evgeny Panov 3,4 and Uli Auster.
Structure and Detection of Rolled-up Kelvin-Helmholtz Vortices in the Tail Flank of the Magnetosphere H. Hasegawa, M. Fujimoto, T. K. M. Nakamura, K. Takagi.
Space Research Institute Graz Austrian Academy of Sciences CERN, Geneve, June 2006 Helmut O. Rucker Exploring the Planets and Moons in our Solar System.
Small Introduction Truth, we know, is so delicate that, if we make the slightest deviation from it, we fall into error; but this alleged error is so extremely.
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
1 Multi-spacecraft, multi-scale investigation of intermittency and multifractal structure of turbulence in the terrestrial magnetosheath M. Echim (1,2),
CLUSTER AT THE EARTH’S BOW SHOCK André Balogh Imperial College, London or how Cluster saw this important boundary of the the Earth’s space environment.
Cold plasma: a previously hidden solar system particle population Mats André and Chris Cully Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala.
Energy conversion at Saturn’s magnetosphere: from dayside reconnection to kronian substorms Dr. Caitríona Jackman Uppsala, May 22 nd 2008.
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Turbulence in the magnetosphere studied with CLUSTER data : evidence of intermittency Lamy H. 1, Echim M. 1,2, Darrouzet F. 1, Lemaire J. 3, Décréau P.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
Observation of high kinetic energy density jets in the Earth’s magnetosheath E. Amata 1, S. P. Savin 2, R. Treuman 3, G. Consolini 1, D. Ambrosino, M.F.
Simultaneous in-situ observations of the feature of a typical FTE by Cluster and TC1 Zhang Qinghe Liu Ruiyuan Polar Research Institute of China
Group A: S. Bale(Tutor), B. Engavale, W.L. Shi, W.L. Teh, L. Xie, L. Yang, and X.G. Zhang 13,May rd COSPAR Capacity Building Workshop3 rd COSPAR.
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
A.Vaivads, B. N. Rogers, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, A. Lahiff, B. Lavraud, T. Phan Cluster.
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
17th Cluster workshop Uppsala, Sweden , May 12-15, 2009
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
The effects of the solar wind on Saturn’s space environment
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
24 January, 20011st NOZOMI_MEX Science Workshop, Jan, 2001 R. Lundin, M. Yamauchi, and H. Borg, Swedish Institute of Space Physics H. Hayakawa, M.
STRUCTURE AND BEHAVIOR OF PLANET VENUS BY: ANTON ESCARIO upload.wikimedia.or g.
SS Special Section of JGR Space Physics Marks Polar’s 5th Anniversary September 4, 1996 This April special section is first of two Polar special sections.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
Characterization of Field Line Topologies Near the Magnetopause Using Electron Pitch Angle Measurements D. S. Payne1, M. Argall1, R. Torbert1, I. Dors1,
THEMIS multi-spacecraft observations of a 3D magnetic
The Wakes and Magnetotails of Venus and Mars
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
MMS enters Phase 2b to study Magnetic Reconnection on Earth’s Dark Side On 9 February 2017, NASA’s Magnetospheric Multi-Scale (MMS) mission began a three-month.
Ch6: Gravitational Fields
The Bow Shock and Magnetosheath
Principles of Global Modeling
H. Isobe, 2004/11/1, Taiyo zasshikai
Alfvén Lecture 2014 Magnetospheric Multi-Scale, a multi-satellite
THEMIS Dayside Lessons learned from the coast phase and the 1st dayside season Current plans for the 2nd dayside season and the extended phases.
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Presentation transcript:

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Cluster multi-spacecraft measurements: applications on transition layer development and location of the reconnection site Lars-Göran Westerberg 1, Hans O. Åkerstedt 1 and Hans Nilsson 2 1 Division of Fluid Mechanics Luleå University of Technology 2 Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Outline Introduction - Objective of present paper. - The magnetosphere and Cluster spacecraft orbit. - Magnetic reconnection and the Cluster mission. Cluster in situ measurements coupled with a 3D analysis. Conclusions and future work.

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Objective of present paper  Combine results from a 3D analysis covering the plasma flow near a reconnection site with in situ Cluster observations, in order to study: Development of the magnetopause transition layer. Values on the anomalous transport coefficients ( ν + η d ), where ν is the kinematic viscosity and η d the magnetic diffusivity. Also estimate the distance from the observing spacecraft to the reconnection site.

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology The magnetosphere and Cluster spacecraft orbit

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Magnetic reconnection Main mechanism for the transfer of mass and momentum in space and astrophysical applications. Magnetic field seize to be frozen in the plasma. The resistivity is locally finite. Credit: European Space Agency

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Results from 3D analysis To be coupled with data from the Cluster spacecraft* *Grammatical notation: One spacecraft, several spacecraft

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology y z x Cluster spacecrafts Magnetopause ~8 R E ~9 R E Earth Bow shock z x Magnetosheath y Sub-Solar point a b c sc1 sc4 sc3 sc1 sc4 sc3 sc1 sc4 sc3 Joint position on the 13th of January 2002 Sub-solar region

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Cluster sc1 data during 14:50-15:50 Time (UT)

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Results from Cluster and theory x (R E ) B (nT) V (km/s)

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology (distance to reconnection line) y z Z x U HT reconnection line Z0Z0 satellite a Z (Distance from reconnection site) b δ(Z) sc4 sc3sc1 Location of reconnection line and transition layer development Solid line: Theoretical expression. Cross marks: Measured thickness by respective spacecraft

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Conclusions and future work  Maximum value of anomalous transport coefficients ~ 10 4 km 2 /s.  Cluster satellites pass the magnetopause ~ 0.5 R E from the reconnection site.  Magnetopause transition layer increases when moving away from the reconnection site.  Enhance the data analysis – statistical study of magnetopause crossings.  Develop the theory by including Hall terms as non- ideal effects.

Swedish National Graduate School of Space Technology Any questions? Ask Eddie