Luminosity measurements and forward physics in ATLAS forward detectors luminosity calibration and monitoring forward physics beyond luminosity Hasko Stenzel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
Advertisements

P. 1Mario Deile – DIS 2004 Mario Deile CERN on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration TOTEM: Forward Physics at the LHC.
The LHCf experiment Measurement of Photons and Neutral Pions in the Very Forward Region of LHC Letter Of Intent: May 2004 Technical report: September 2005.
The ALFA project in ATLAS Antwerpen 25/10/07 Per Grafstrom.
Status of the Roman Pot Project reminder prototyping & testbeam mechanics & infrastructure simulation Hasko Stenzel ATLAS week October 2006.
The ATLAS experiment The ATLAS Detector Physics at the LHC Luminosity determination Hasko Stenzel.
Luminosity measurments roadmap for luminosity determinations relative luminosity monitors luminosity from machine parameters luminosity from physics processes.
Machine induced background in ALFA The ALFA detector elastic scattering and luminosity background generation, rejection and subtraction impact on luminosity.
M.Gallinaro, ``Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors’’, Siena, October slide 1 The CDF MiniPlug Calorimeter Forward Physics Conceptual.
QCD Studies in ATLAS Martin Siebel (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration XIII Lomonosov Conference, Moscow,
Elastic Scattering at s=1.96 TeV Using the DØ Forward Proton Detector
M. Gallinaro - "Physics with the CT-PPS project" - LHC Forward - Sep. 23, Michele Gallinaro LIP Lisbon (on behalf of the CMS and TOTEM collaborations)
Beam profile measurements based on modern vertex detectors and beam-gas interactions Slides from: Colin Barschel - TIPP 2014 third international conference.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
The LHCf experiment Measurement of Photons and Neutral Pions in the Very Forward Region of LHC Letter Of Intent: May 2004 Technical report: September 2005.
TOF for ATLAS Forward Proton Upgrade AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream and downstream of central detector to precisely.
Stefano Lami INFN Pisa on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
Jorge Barreto Low_x Prague1 Status of Diffractive Physics at DØ Run II Jorge Barreto Instituto de Física - UFRJ Rio de Janeiro – RJ - Brazil Outline.
THE FORWARD PROTON DETECTOR AT DZERO Gilvan Alves Lafex/CBPF 1) MOTIVATION 2) DETECTOR OPTIONS 3) FPD R&D 4) OUTLOOK Lishep 98 Lafex/CBPF Feb 17, 1998.
P. 1Mario Deile – Physics at LHC Mario Deile CERN PH-TOT Diffractive Physics: What answers do we expect from the LHC? DinoGoulianos.
ATLAS Forward Detector Trigger ATLAS is presently planning to install forward detectors (Roman Pot system) in the LHC tunnel with prime goal to measure.
14/03/2007A. Sbrizzi, HERA-LHC Workshop, DESY 1 Luminosity measurement in ATLAS and CMS A.Sbrizzi - University of Bologna, Italy.
1 Diffractive physics simulation for LHC Marek Taševský (Physics Inst. Prague) In collaboration with Ch.Royon, A.Kupčo, M.Boonekamp Low-x workshop - Lisbon.
Luminosity Measurement and Monitoring in ATLAS LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop On behalf of ATLAS Collaboration Laura Fabbri Thanks to LUCID people.
Andrew BrandtSept 13 th 2005FP420/Cerenkov Intro 1 Location of LHC in France and Switzerland, with lake Geneva and the Alps in the background The ATLAS.
The ZEUS Hadron-Electron-Separator Performance and Experience Peter Göttlicher (DESY) for the ZEUS-HES-group Contributions to HES Germany, Israel, Japan,
Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Theodota Lagouri Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration) EPS July 2003, Aachen, Germany.
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March Preparing for the V0 TDR (Lyon-Mexico project)  The V0 detector in 3 chapters  1 - Tests and simulations of detection.
1 Luminosity measurement at LHC Charged Higgs Workshop Uppsala September 2008 Per Grafstrom CERN.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
APS April Meeting Detector Construction of the Forward Proton Detector at D0 Michael Strang University of Texas at Arlington Diffractive Events FPD.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
P. 1K. Eggert – Early TOTEM Running with the  * =90m Optics Karsten Eggert on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration Politecnico di Bari and Sezione INFN Bari,
30 June 2009EDS '09 Antonio Zoccoli1 ATLAS and the Forward Physics Antonio Zoccoli Università & INFN – Bologna Antonio Zoccoli Università & INFN – Bologna.
Andrew Brandt – September Small-x 2003 – 1 Forward Physics with ATLAS Luminosity measurement for ATLAS Forward Physics with ATLAS D.Bocian, M.Boonekamp,
ATLAS-ALFA as a beam instrument Sune Jakobsen (BE-BI-PM and PH-ADO) on behave of the ATLAS-ALFA community LS1 LBOC meeting
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
Gennaro Ruggiero CERN, PH Depart. Planar Edgeless Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment On the behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration
Diffraction at DØ Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington E   Run IRun II Low-x Workshop June 6, 2003 Nafplion, Greece.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Mike AlbrowFP420 – May Timing and Pile-up Considerations 1 Pile-up in trigger and pile-up off-line (HLT) very different issues. Here I consider.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Gas detectors in a ZDC (at LHC) Edwin Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For7 th CMS Heavy-Ion meeting at Delphi June 2003.
1 Welcome to the mini-review of the Roman Pot mechanics for the ALFA project in ATLAS.
Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward Detectors - 25 January 2007 Beniamino Di Girolamo - CERN PH ATLAS Roman Pots status, commissioning.
Maarten Boonekamp Precision measurements with Atlas 1 Precision measurements (?) with Atlas, at the LHC (emphasis on QCD) Maarten Boonekamp CEA-Saclay.
FORWARD ATLAS {major contributions from Per Grafstrom (CERN), Michael Rijssenbeek (Stonybrook), Brian Cox (Manchester} Andrew Brandt Luminosity measurement.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
An FPD quadrupole castle Elastic Scattering and High Mass Exclusive Dijets at DØ (  s=1.96 TeV) Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington on behalf.
Kreuth, 2015/10/5-9 Csörgő, T. Evidence for non-exponential pp d/dt at low t and √s = 8 TeV by TOTEM T. Csörgő for the TOTEM Collaboration.
Status of the Experiment RRB - TOTEM 16 April 2013 S.Giani - CERN on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration CERN-RRB
Antiproton-proton elastic scattering as a day-1 experiment at HESR
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Diffraction and Forward Physics in ATLAS: results and perspectives
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Simulated vertex precision
Recent Results from TOTEM
Present coverage Possible upgrade projects Slogan: Q C D HERA for LHC
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK
ATLAS Plans for Elastic Cross-Section and Luminosity Measurement
On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration:
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status
Presentation transcript:

Luminosity measurements and forward physics in ATLAS forward detectors luminosity calibration and monitoring forward physics beyond luminosity Hasko Stenzel on behalf of the ATLAS Luminosity & forward physics WG

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 2 Forward physics in ATLAS ATLAS proposes a two-stage program: 1: Luminosity calibration with Roman Pot detectors from elastic scattering in the Coulomb region using special beam optics with high β*. Relative luminosity monitoring by an integrated Cerenkov detector LUCID up to highest luminosity. 2: Hard diffractive physics, exclusive central diffraction, double-Pomeron exchange, requiring proton tagging and momentum-loss measurements at collision optics. Studies for radhard RP detectors at 220m are ongoing, complementing FP420 studies.

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 3 The ATLAS detector TAS R Barrel FCAL LUCID Tracking EndCap RP ZDC/TAN Diffraction/Proton Tagging Region y 109  -chambers inelastic

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 4 Motivation for a precise Luminosity determination Relative precision on the measurement of  H  BR for various channels, as function of m H, at  L dt = 300 fb –1. The dominant uncertainty is from Luminosity: 10% (open symbols), 5% (solid symbols). (ATLAS-TDR-15, May 1999) Determination of Standard Model cross sections ●heavy quark production ●W/Z production ●QCD jet cross sections  Background for searches, constraints of PDFs Theorectical predictions at the level of 5% with prospect for improvements (NNLO). New physics manifesting in deviation of  x BR relative to the Standard Model predictions Important precision measurements ●Higgs production  x BR ●tan  measurement for MSSM Higgs

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 5 Methods of Luminosity measurements Absolute luminosity ●from the parameters of the LHC machine ●rate of pp  Z 0 / W ±  l + l - / lν ●rate of pp  γγ  μ + μ - ●Optical theorem: forward elastic+total inelastic rate, extrapolation t  0 (but limited |η| coverage in ATLAS) ●cross-check with ZDC in heavy ion runs ●from elastic scattering in the Coulomb region ●combinations of all above Relative luminosity ●LUCID Cerenkov monitor, large dynamic range, excellent linearity ATLAS aims for 2-3% accuracy in L

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 6 Luminosity from elastic scattering Measure elastic pp-scattering down to very small angles (~3 μrad) ●operate tracking detectors very close to the beam, 10 σ = 1.2 mm ●high β* optics parallel-to-point focusing ●reconstruct the t-spectrum ●fit L to the t-spectrum Coulomb region: F C ≈F N UA4 measurement

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 7 Detector requirements Physics & operation requirements detector resolution  d = 30  m, beam spot size =120  m at RP (t-resolution dominated by beam divergence) detector sensitivity up to the edge towards the beam ( ‘ edgeless detector ’, insensitive region d 0 ≲ 100  m at the edge) position accuracy ~ 10  m relative between top and bottom detector (stringent survey and metrology requirements) radiation tolerance 100 Gy/yr (dominated by beam halo) rate capability O(1 MHz) and time resolution O(5 ns) insensitive to EM pulse from the bunched beam Integration & construction constraints integration in the readout/DAQ/trigger scheme of ATLAS LHC safety, control and interlock requirements limited resources and tight schedule

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 8 Roman Pots for ATLAS RP IP 240m RP Roman Pots Two RP stations with top and bottom vertical pots, separatedby 4 m, at each side 240 from IP1

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 9 Roman Pot detectors Roman Pot mechanics (TOTEM design) PMT baseplate optical connectors scintillating fibre detectors overlap&trigger Roman Pot MAPMTs FE electronics & shield

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 10 The Roman Pot (modified TOTEM design) Overlap extrusions brazed on bottom Top flange with helicoflex joint Pumping hole Rectangular body out of center Brazing of beam windows

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 11 Top view Fiber detector Trigger scintillator (detector) Overlap detector Trigger scintillator (overlaps)

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 12 detector principle LHC beam key features:  square scintillating fibres 0.5x0.5 mm 2  U/V geometry 45 o stereo layers  64 fibres per module plane  10 double sided modules per pot  staggering of modules by n√2x0.5mm/10  trigger scintillator in the crossing area  overlap detectors for relative vertical alignment  overlap triggers in the beam halo Fiber detector: 10 plates of 2x64 fibers Trigger for detector: 1 plastic scintillator 3mm thick Overlap detector: 3 plates of 2x30 fibers Trigger for overlap detector: 2 plastic scintillator 3mm thick

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 13 detector prototypes 0.5mm spacers reference edge 0.17mm Al 2 O 3 ceramic substrate Principle Protoype: 20 Planes u and v of 6 fibres

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 14 Beam tests of ALFA prototypes Trig. Si 1 Si 2 Si 4 S 1 x S 2 S3S3 Purpose of the testbeam: -photoelectric yield -efficiency -cross talk -edge sensitivity -track resolution proof of principle At DESY22, 6 GeV e - October/November 2005

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 15 testbeam results: photoelectric yield and cross talk OPERA readout (900 V) /MIP=4-4.5 total optical cross talk = 4%

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 16 testbeam results: efficiency single fibre efficiency 90-94% (depends on cut) insensitive area at the edge < 30 μm (limited by resolution)

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 17 testbeam results ? Si telescope ALFA ε[%]σ y [µm]σ x [µm]At E e = 6 GeV  resolution scales like 1/E  large multiple scattering contribution  expect σ x,y ≈20µm from MC at LHC

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 18 Transversal displacement of particles in the ring away from the IP: Special optics with high  * and parallel-to-point focusing: independent of the vertex position properties at the roman pot (240m) y*y* y*y* parallel-to-point focusing y det IP L eff Beam optics

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 19 Simulation of elastic scattering t= t= σ 15 σ t reconstruction

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 20 L from a fit to the t-spectrum inputfiterror correl ation L % σ tot 100 mb101.1 mb0.74%-99% B18 Gev Gev % 64% ρ % 92% Simulating 10 M events, running 100 hrs fit range large stat.correlation between L and other parameters

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 21 experimental systematic uncertainties divergence Currently under re-evaluation  beam divergence σ’=0.23µrad  detector resolution  detector alignment  background from  Halo  beam-gas  beam-wall  non-elastic  beam optics uncertainties Δ exp ≈2-3 % impact of beam divergence

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 22 LUCID:Luminosity measurement using Cerenkov integrating detector Front face of LUCID end is ~17m from the IP - covering 5.4 <| η|< 6.1 LUCID region 6  7 Mrad/year at cm -2 s -1 from J.Pinfold

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 23 LUCID detector principle Winston Cones Fibres Two detectors x 168 Al tubes filled with C 4 F 10 or Isobutane at 1 or 2 Bar pressure Winston cones at the end of the tubes bring the Cerenkov light onto quartz fibers. LUCID Cross-section Beam pipe

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 24 LUCID test beam performance  /Cerenkov tube = 5.3, a bit lower than anticipated from simulation  triggered design improvements for tubes/winston cones/fibre coupling

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 25 LUCID luminosity monitoring No Saturation Linear response Sensitive to primaries – projective geometry – smaller signals for secondaries & soft particles: ●shorter paths length for secondaries ●Cerenkov thresholds No Landau fluctuations in Cerenkov emission counting multiple tracks/tube – no saturation Excellent time resolution CDF ●Luminosity bunch-by-bunch Linear relationship between lumi & track counting Segmentation in tubes gives position sensitivity Radiation hard – light – compact Sensitive to primaries – projective geometry – smaller signals for secondaries & soft particles: ●shorter paths length for secondaries ●Cerenkov thresholds No Landau fluctuations in Cerenkov emission counting multiple tracks/tube – no saturation Excellent time resolution CDF ●Luminosity bunch-by-bunch Linear relationship between lumi & track counting Segmentation in tubes gives position sensitivity Radiation hard – light – compact

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 26 Forward physics beyond luminosity From the luminosity run and elastic scattering we get  the total cross section σ tot  the nuclear slope B  the ρ-parameter... to some accuracy

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 27 hard diffraction with ATLAS + RP220 A new project for RP detectors at ~220 m to study DPE at high luminosity has started

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 28 RP220 project  Place two horizontal RP stations around 220m  Run at high luminosity with collision optics  Si strip / micromegas detectors studied  Cerenkov counters for timing considered  extension of the luminosity program, complementary to FP420 beam spot calculated with MADX in the RP region

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 29 acceptance for t and ξ 0<ξ<0.18 acceptance for ξ from ~0.01 to ~0.16

HERA-LHC workshop ATLAS luminosity and forward physics 30 conclusion ATLAS luminosity program ●with roman pot detectors from elastic scattering for absolute calibration ●complemented by W/Z counting and γγ- processes ●and machine parameters ●with LUCID for luminosity monitoring ●gaining experience in operation close to the beam ●2006: testbeams for ALFA and LUCID, final design ●construction 2006/2007, installation 2007/2008 Upgrade options ●RP220 under study to explore hard diffraction & DPE ●complementing/extening FP420 ●time scale ATLAS luminosity program ●with roman pot detectors from elastic scattering for absolute calibration ●complemented by W/Z counting and γγ- processes ●and machine parameters ●with LUCID for luminosity monitoring ●gaining experience in operation close to the beam ●2006: testbeams for ALFA and LUCID, final design ●construction 2006/2007, installation 2007/2008 Upgrade options ●RP220 under study to explore hard diffraction & DPE ●complementing/extening FP420 ●time scale