1.5 -1.5 6.0-6.0 2100 Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms 0 2100 Four-Layer Sand Channel Model 0 0 0.8 Midpoint (m)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Advertisements

Geological Model Depth(km) X(km) 2001 Year.
3D Super-virtual Refraction Interferometry Kai Lu King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Local Reverse Time Migration with VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao UTAM, Univ. of Utah May 1, 2008 PhD Defense 99 pages.
Closure Phase Statics Correction Closure Phase Statics Correction University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley University of Utah.
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Salt Boundary Delineation by Transmitted PS Waves David Sheley.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Arbitrary Parameter Extraction, Stationary Phase Migration, and Tomographic Velocity Analysis Jing Chen University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
Migration and Attenuation of Surface-Related and Interbed Multiple Reflections Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah April 21, 2006.
Salt Flank Delineation by Interferometric Imaging of Transmitted P-to-S Waves Xiang Xiao Advisor: Gerard T. Schuster Committee: Michael Zhdanov Bob Smith.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
FAST VELOCITY ANALYSIS BY PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
Midyear Overview of Year 2001 UTAM Results T. Crosby, Y. Liu, G. Schuster, D. Sheley, J. Sheng, H. Sun, J. Yu and M. Zhou J. Yu and M. Zhou.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Crosscorrelation Migration of Free-Surface Multiples in CDP Data Jianming Sheng University of Utah February, 2001.
Imaging Every Bounce in a Multiple G. Schuster, J. Yu, R. He U of Utah.
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
Virtual Source Imaging vs Interferometric Imaging Gerard T. Schuster, Andrey Bakulin and Rodney Calvert.
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
Reverse-Time Migration For 3D SEG/EAGE Salt Model
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: P-to-S Converted Wave Case Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 7, 2008.
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
Crosscorrelation Migration of Free-Surface Multiples in RVSP Data Jianming Sheng University of Utah February, 2001.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Demonstration of Super-Resolution and Super-Stacking Properties of Time Reversal Mirrors in Locating Seismic Sources Weiping Cao, Gerard T. Schuster, Ge.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Seeing the Invisible with Seismic Interferometry: Datuming and Migration Gerard T. Schuster, Jianhua Yu, Xiao Xiang and Jianming Sheng University of Utah.
Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data J. Sheng, G. T. Schuster, K. L. Pankow,
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
1 Local Reverse Time Migration: Salt Flank Imaging by PS Waves Xiang Xiao and Scott Leaney 1 1 Schlumberger UTAM, Univ. of Utah Feb. 8, 2008.
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D SSP Data Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping Cao Gerard T. Schuster October 2009.
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Interferometric Traveltime Tomography M. Zhou & G.T. Schuster Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Hydro-frac Source Estimation by Time Reversal Mirrors Weiping Cao and Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat Feb 7, 2008.
Jianhua Yu University of Utah Robust Imaging for RVSP Data with Static Errors.
Shuqian Dong and Sherif M. Hanafy February 2009 Interpolation and Extrapolation of 2D OBS Data Using Interferometry.
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Sisgbee2b / Data Release
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods
Seismic Interferometry and 3x3 Classification Matrix
Presentation transcript:

Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)

Interferometric Seismic Imaging Gerard T. Schuster

Outline Passive data for IVSP while Drilling Imaging of Free Surface CDP Multiples Imaging of Hydo-Frac Location Transmission PS Migration Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Claerbout, Katz, 70’s xx Earthquake 1900’s xx Utah+LLNL 1997 Migrate Claerbout, Rickett 1999 xyxyxyxy xyxyxyxyMigrate Arbitrary Unknown Src V(z) V(x,y,z) W(t) Location W(t) Location NOYESYESYES NO YESYESYES YES/NO YESNO? NOYESYES YESNO YES YES YES SELECTIVE HISTORY PASSIVE IMAGING Validity

Interference Pattern Optical Lens LASER t

Interference Pattern Optical Lens ss t LASER Lens Deformation Time Differences

Outline Passive data for IVSP while Drilling Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Seismic Ghost Reflection Direct Ghost ? Find R(x,z) but not know source location

Direct Ghost 12Directx Directx Master Seismic Ghost Reflection Seismic Interferogram: Correlate Traces t }M m(x) = (g, t + t ) gx g MxMxMxMxgx M Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Ghost Direct has kinematics of primary reflection x M

Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)

Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Migration Image: 1-s Stack Midpoint (m)

Midpoint (m) Depth (m) Raw Seismograms Time (s) Migration Image: 50 1-s Stacks

Geological Model 0 Depth (m) 3 40 X (m) V1 V2 V4 V3 V5 V6

Velocity Model (J. Yu) Depth(km) X(km) X(km) Interval VelocityRMS Velocity

Shot Gather Time (s) CSG Time (s) Traces Autocorrelogram

X (km) Without ghost Ghost Autocorrelogram Depth Migration Depth (km) X (km) With primary+ghost

Acquisition Survey East (kft) North (kft) Well Rig 3C Receivers Drill bit 10 Depth (kft) 0

1 Trace # Time (s) 5-40 Hz 1 Trace # 10 Raw CGR 96 Proc. CGR 96

Acquisition Survey Map Well Rig 3C Receivers Drill bit East (ft) North (ft) C Line AC4

Time (s) SP Ghost Autocorrelogram Image( Corr. window=8 s) Drill hole

Outline Passive data for IVSP while Drilling Imaging of Free Surface CDP Multiples Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Primary Ghost 12 Free-Surface Multiple

Primary Ghost 12 x PrimaryxPrimary Seismic Interferogram: Correlate Traces Caution: Ghostx Primary = R 3 t } m(x) = (g, t + t ) gx g MxMxMxMxgx M Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Ghost Primary has kinematics of primary ref. x

Nine-Layered Model (J. Sheng) Depth (km) 2.4 Model Crosscorrelogram image Distance (km) Distance (km) artifacts Kirchhoff Image

Nine-Layered Model Kirchhoff Image Product Image =Kirch*correl Depth (km) 2.4 Distance (km) Distance (km) artifacts

SEG/EAGE Salt Model Depth (km) Distance (km)

Crosscorrelogram Image Crosscorrelogram Image Depth (km) Distance (km)

Kirchhoff Image Depth (km) Distance (km)

Product Image Depth (km) Distance (km)

Outline Passive data for IVSP while Drilling Imaging of Free Surface CDP Multiples Imaging of Hydo-Frac Location Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Hydro-Fracturing=Unknown Source ? P P P P x12?

P S P P MasterP*P P*P x12 Hydro-Fracturing=Unknown Source t } m(x) = (g, t - t ) gx g MxMxMxMxgx M Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Difference between Paths

m 70 Ringy 30 Hz Seismograms Time (s) m Kirchhoff Migration Image Correlogram Migration Image Midpoint (m)

Migration Image: 1-s Stack Migration Image: 40-s Stack m 70 Raw Seismograms Time (s) m 0 Migration Image: 40-s Stack Migration Image: 1-s Stack

Outline Passive data for IVSP while Drilling Imaging of Free Surface CDP Multiples Imaging of Hydo-Frac Location Transmission PS Migration Interferometric Principle: Interferometric Principle: Time Diff. between Arrivals Structure Diff. Interferometric Imaging Applications: Interferometric Imaging Applications:

Seismic P and PS Transmission S P P S ? Find R(x,z)

S P P S MasterS*S P*S Seismic P and PS Transmission P and PS Transmission Interferograms P and PS Transmission Interferograms x12 t } m(x) = (g, t - t ) gx g MxMxMxMx M Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Kirchhoff Migrate psuedo-shot gathers Difference between Paths

Crosswell Model (D. Sheley) Depth (m) Offset (m) V p /V s = 1.5 Well Separation = 100 m = 100 m Source = 1500 Hz ds = 2 m dg = 2 m 5000 m/s 5500 m/s

Synthetic Data Depth (m) Time (ms) Original Data Depth (m) Time (ms) Shifted Muted Data SPPS PPS S SP

Conventional PS Transmission Migration Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity + 10 % Velocity Offset (m) 0100

Depth (m) Offset (m) True Velocity Reduced-Time PS Migration + 10 % Velocity Offset (m) 0100

Depth (m) Offset (m) Conventional PS Comparison +10% Velocity Interferometric PS Offset (m) 0100

km/sec Kidd Creek Crosswell Well Receiver Well Source Depth (m) Offset (m)

Time Delay = 3 ms ?Time Delay = 3 ms ? Well LocationWell Location Velocity ModelVelocity Model Data Problems

6 Time (ms) Depth (m) 0 Time Shifted CRG

Conventional PS Offset (m) Depth (m)

Conventional PS Offset (m) 50 0Reduced-Time Depth (m)

2 3. Limitations: 3. Limitations: Virtual Multiples Reflectivity Imaging > Source Imaging N Traces N Correlograms Coherent Noise Summary m(x) = (g, t + t ) g gx MxMxMxMx M 1. New Passive Seismic Imaging Capability: Valid for V(x,y,z) Arbitrary Sources Src & R Images Poststack & Prestack 2. Possible Applications: Horizontal Drill Bit Imaging, CDP Mult. Reservoir Monitoring, Mars/Sun Seismology Earthquake Rec.-Function/Ghost Imaging

1. Reduce Coherent Noise and Virtual Multiples Current & Future Work 2. Earthquake Rec. Funct. & Ghost Imaging 3. Reservoir Monitoring with CDP Data 4. Passive Data Experiment

Reduced-Time Migration Shift Traces by R1 Traveltime R1 Traveltime R1 R2 Mitigate Src-Rec Statics m(x)= d(x, t + t - t ) sxgxred.

Acknowledgements Thanks for support of UTAM sponsors. Thank J. Rickett and J. Claerbout for fruitful discussions. fruitful discussions.

Interference Pattern Phase Difference Phase of Rays with Common Path Cancels We only “see” Phase Difference

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Synthetic Data Results Synthetic Data Results Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging CDP Multiple Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging CDP Multiple Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Synthetic Data Results Synthetic Data Results Source Imaging & Transmission PS Imaging Source Imaging & Transmission PS Imaging Summary Summary

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Synthetic Data Results Synthetic Data Results Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Synthetic Data Results Synthetic Data Results Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging CDP Multiple Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging CDP Multiple Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Synthetic Data Results Synthetic Data Results Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging CDP Multiple Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging CDP Multiple Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Synthetic Data Results Synthetic Data Results

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Synthetic Data Results Synthetic Data Results Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging CDP Multiple Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging CDP Multiple Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Synthetic Data Results Synthetic Data Results Source Imaging & Transmission PS Imaging Source Imaging & Transmission PS Imaging

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences F.S. CDP Multiples IVSPWD ? ? ? ? F.S. CDP Multiple Migration F.S. CDP Multiple Migration

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences F.S. CDP Multiples ? IVSPWD ? Hydro-Frac ? ? ? ? ? Locating Hydro-Fractures in EOR Locating Hydro-Fractures in EOR

? Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences F.S. CDP Multiples ? IVSPWD ? Hydro-Frac ? PS Transmission Migration Migration PS ? ? ? ? ? PS Transmission Migration PS Transmission Migration

? Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection ImagingIVSPWD ? ?

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences F.S. CDP Multiples ? IVSPWD ? Hydro-Frac ? ? ? ? ? Locating Hydro-Fractures in EOR Locating Hydro-Fractures in EOR

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences F.S. CDP Multiples IVSPWD ? ? ? ? ? Locating Hydro-Fractures in EOR Locating Hydro-Fractures in EOR

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences F.S. CDP Multiples ? IVSPWD ? Hydro-Frac ? ? ? ? ? PS Transmission Migration PS Transmission Migration

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences F.S. CDP Multiples ? IVSPWD ? Hydro-Frac ? PS Transmission Migration MigrationPS ? ? ? ? ? ? PS Transmission Migration PS Transmission Migration

Crosscorrelogram R*G Migration 1. Construct M pseudo-shot gathers (g, t ) M m(x) = (g, t + t ) gx g MxMxMxMxgx M 2. Migrate psuedo-shot gathers by sum M, g M shifted time shifted time R G R*R R*G

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase DifferencesIVSPWD ? ? ? F.S. CDP Multiple Migration F.S. CDP Multiple Migration

Outline Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Interferometric Principle: Phase Differences Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging Passive Seismic Data: Ghost Reflection Imaging F.S. CDP Multiples IVSPWD ? ? ? ? ? F.S. CDP Multiple Migration F.S. CDP Multiple Migration

Direct Ghost Specular Ray Ray Master DG

Ghost Direct D*D D*G

Midpoint (m) Depth (m) Raw Seismograms Time (s) 4-Layer Model

Midpoint (m) Depth (m) Raw Seismograms Time (s) R G 4-Layer Model

Midpoint (m) Depth (m) Raw Seismograms Time (s) Correlogram Migration Image Others Imaged Incorrectly Ghosts Imaged Correctly

Crosscorrelogram R*G Migration 1. Construct N pseudo-shot gathers (g, t ) N m(x) = (g, t + t ) gx g NxNxNxNxgx N 2. Migrate psuedo-shot gathers by sum N, g N shifted time shifted time MP

Crosscorrelogram R*G Migration 1. Construct N pseudo-shot gathers (g, t ) N m(x) = (g, t + t ) gx g NxNxNxNxgx N 2. Migrate psuedo-shot gathers by sum N, g N shifted time shifted time MP