9/22/08ESPP-781 The Politics of Environmental Science Solving environmental problems almost always requires scientific (or technical) knowledge. –Differences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2. 12 Resolving disagreements Resolving disagreements Disagreements between employers and employees  May occur rarely, if ever  May be minor,
Advertisements

The Enlightenment Transition from the Scientific Revolution to new ideas in Philosophy, Art, Economics,& Government.
VLH tw1 Dealing with RESEARCH MISCONDUCT A state has laws for regulating the behaviour of its inhabitants in order to prevent undesired actions. In the.
10/8/08ESPP /8/08ESPP-782 In May 1999, a laboratory at Cornell University published the results from a laboratory trial that appeared to indicate.
Patrick W. Kelley, MD, DrPH Director, Board on African Science Academy Development US National Academy of Sciences How Science Academies Provide Evidence-based.
Audiences for Science Thinking Analytically About Audiences Susanna Priest, Ph.D. Editor, Science Communication Visiting Scholar, University of Washington.
Dynamics of Comparison Comparing Political Systems.
Aid, Preemption, Mandate & Restraint FEDERALISM:.
Chapter 24 Environmental Policy, Law, and Planning.
How do we know what is ‘good science’? Scientists follow logical paths that refine our knowledge – uses quality data and methods to arrive at a defensible.
9/24/08ESPP-781 Science as Representation (of Nature and Society) Two meanings of representation: –Make a picture, image, diagram, or model –Speak for,
10/6/08ESPP-781 Outline Why care about the precautionary principle? Political contexts and controversies Definition and sources of the precautionary principle.
FRQ Members of Congress are charged with three primary duties — writing laws, overseeing the implementation of laws, and serving the needs of their constituents.
E-109: Environmental Politics Section Meeting 1 September 30, 2008.
War on Science By Adam Hatefi. The Question We Are Trying to Answer What factors could effect an individual’s denial of natural sciences and thus affecting.
Strengthening the Science-Policy Interface Towards Sustainable Development Dr. Gisbert Glaser International Council for Science (ICSU) Side Event at 2.
Media and its Portrayal of Islam. By the age of 70, Americans will have spent 7-10 years of their lives watching TV. The media wields such great influence.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE. Industrial Hygiene  The science and art devoted to the anticipation, recognition, evaluation, control and management.
Vocabulary Interest groups- Groups that hope to influence gov’t officials to create legislation (laws) that benefit their agenda. Types of interest groups.
HOW FEDERAL LAWS ARE MADE Learning Objectives Explain where the ideas for laws may come from. Name the six steps it takes for a bill to become a law. Give.
Expert Witnesses Texas Rules of Evidence Article VII. Opinions and Expert Testimony Judge Sharen Wilson.
1.  Engineers point to socio-political reasons  Why challenge is so formidable (Victor)  Carbon lock-in  science-policy dilemma  Mooney (2) 2.
11/16/11ESPP /16/11ESPP Does it matter that they are inanimate, lack voice, have no subjectivity, could not place a value on themselves,
Government and Public Policy
1.  Policy Cycle  Government actors - incentives  Interest Groups  Interests  Resources  Strategies 2.
134 The Enlightenment & Age of Revolution ISN pg 134 Unit 10 coverpage: The Enlightenment & Age of Revolution 136The Enlightenment ISN pg 136: The Enlightenment.
Maa Maankäytön suunnittelun erikoistyö (2014) - Aalto Course on Negotiation and Dispute Resolution Jonna Kangasoja Aalto University
 Science A body of knowledge and the process for building that knowledge of the natural world. Based on inquiry that develops explanations and is rooted.
 Remember, it is important that you should not believe everything you read.  Moreover, you should be able to reject or accept information based on the.
1.  Engineers point to socio-political reasons  Why challenge is so formidable (Victor)  Carbon lock-in  science-policy dilemma  Mooney (2) 2.
 “In a democratic society, you can't control people by force. Therefore, you've got to control what they think.”  -Noam Chomsky, author of Manufacturing.
Government Influence on Media. Who has more clout?
The U.S. Media and Climate Confusion Erik M. Conway Historian 16 October 2010.
Working with the media a presentation by Bruce Hugman Consultant to the Uppsala Monitoring Centre Pretoria September 2004.
UNESCO and Global Bioethics
From the lab to the public-the making of science news Thomas Abraham.
A Comparative View of the American Bureaucracy 1.Public’s hostile feelings towards ‘big government’ & ‘bureaucracies’. 2.Decentralized: more representational,
TRUEIT U.S. GOVERNMENT Friday, October 24, Learning Goal: Understand how political parties work. What we are doing: Review Chapter 19 Slides ~ Mass.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Mass Media & the Political Agenda.
Introduction to the American Political Process Legislative Behavior: The Committee Model.
Comments on the Liberal government’s Chief Science Officer Ted Hsu Liberal Science and Technology Critic in the 41 st Parliament.
LCAs and policymaking: The good, the bad, and the ugly Dr Michael Warhurst, Friends of the Earth.
SCREENING KNOWLEDGE From harm to risk. What does the move from harm to risk tell us about changes in cultural values?
DELIBERATION JACQUIE BURGESS DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY, UCL EUROPEAN RESEARCH 2002 CONFERENCE.
Doc.JUDr.Soňa Skulová, Ph.D. Principles of Good Governance.
Skepticism: the Intertwining of Politics and Science M. Leach May 4, 2011.
Unit 6 Chapter 10, Sections 2-3 Civil Service System Bureaucracy at Work Mr. Young.
The Mass Media and the Political Agenda Chapter 7.
The Federal Bureaucracy A Large Part of the Executive Branch “The 4 th branch of government”
The Nature of Environmental Conflict Chapter 1 Environmental Dispute Resolution Bacow & Wheeler, 1987.
What is an “argument”? Anger: Fight or quarrel Debate: Pro and con Programming:  A parameter is a variable which takes on the meaning of a corresponding.
THE ENLIGHTENMENT SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION TRANSITION FROM THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION TO NEW IDEAS IN PHILOSOPHY, ART, ECONOMICS,& GOVERNMENT.
 Why does environmental policy differ across countries?  Why doesn’t science necessarily lead to convergent outcomes?  What is the relationship of science.
VCE Legal Studies Peter F Hughes 2013 © Unit 3 LAW MAKING Parliament part (ii)
Charles University – Law Faculty October 2012 © Peter Kolker 2012 Class III
Scientific Literature and Communication Unit 3- Investigative Biology b) Scientific literature and communication.
CAPE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Last Topic - Factor responsible for development of Administrative Law
The Federal Judicial System: Applying the Law
Development of Policy on Geo- engineering
Politics and Science How science should advise, influence, and shape climate policy in the 21st Century.
Journal #1 Your parents have made decisions about your schooling, friends, or work, name 3 decisions have they made you that you have promised to never.
Journal #1 Your parents have made decisions about your schooling, friends, or work, name 3 decisions have they made you that you have promised to never.
Topic 2, group 3: How do we best communicate the magnitude and inevitability of uncertainty in order to support policy makers in dealing with climate-related.
Responding to Consumers – An Overview of Industry Actions
Chapter 13 The Bureaucracy
COURTS VS PARLIAMENT.
CAPE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Debate Formalized public speaking in which participants prepare and present speeches on opposite sides of an issue Determine which side has the stronger.
democracy DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY Matt Bennett
Presentation transcript:

9/22/08ESPP-781 The Politics of Environmental Science Solving environmental problems almost always requires scientific (or technical) knowledge. –Differences between scientific and technical? Science is supposed to be apolitical. Environmental science nonetheless is a recurrent source of controversy -- i.e., there are constant disagreements about the nature of nature. One way to resolve disputes is to decide who has the last word. How do we do this for science?

9/22/08ESPP-782 Standard Explanations for Scientific Controversies 1.Abuse of science (e.g., Mooney) –Proposition: Policymakers know what science says and calls for but they don’t do it for (bad) political reasons: Interests (politicians, regulators, corporations, environmentalists) Ignorance (politicians, judges, lay publics) Distortion and bias (media) 2.Uncertainty –Proposition: Science should eliminate need for politics, but there just isn’t enough knowledge. Therefore, we Need more science (policy: do more research) Need better science (policy: get better peer review and expert advice)

9/22/08ESPP-783 Application to the Science of Climate Change Anthropogenic climate change is: –Scientific truth, contradicted mainly by industry-funded “manufactured uncertainty” –Product of strategic research reflecting the biases of well-placed, well-funded, self-interested scientists Which view is more satisfactory? Which view better explains why Europeans don’t contest climate change science but Americans do? Are there other possible views?

9/22/08ESPP-784 Questions for Climate Change Video Clips What do the producers of each account mean when they refer to “science”? Who do they turn to for authoritative science? What techniques do they use to establish their own credibility in speaking for science? How do they build trust or distrust in particular claims? How do they use the visual medium?

9/22/08ESPP-785 Places of Deliberation

9/22/08ESPP-786 Forums for Political Debate Classical model –Political deliberation (legislative, regulatory) Designated places Formal rules of access, representation, expression of views –Agora or public sphere in the modern world (newspapers, TV, print media) Partially licensed spaces, with balance requirements Legal protection against personal attacks and misrepresentations

9/22/08ESPP-787 Forums for Scientific Debate (when science speaks to policy) Labs and scientific workplaces Research grant applications Conferences Journals and publications Scientific advisory committees Congressional hearings Courts

9/22/08ESPP-788 The Unruly Public Sphere for environmental science What rules govern An Inconvenient Truth or The Great Global Warming Swindle? Where do these rules, if any, come from; and who is responsible for making them? What penalties are there for error or misrepresentation? Who gets to express dissent, and where? Who listens?