Andrews University School of Education. Teaching, Learning, & Curriculum Educational & Counseling Psychology Leadership & Educational Administration Teacher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment & Technology UH-M COLLEGE OF EDUCATION COE Outreach & Technology.
Advertisements

Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
Southern Regional Education Board WELCOME Strategy Work Session For What Should the Tech Center of the Future Look Like? Nancy Headrick, Director State.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Department of Education Professional Education Unit Assessment System September 2008.
Class of  The IB Diploma Programme is an 11 th and 12 th grade program that offers an academically challenging, internationally minded and balanced.
San Juan College Alternative Licensure Program Farmington, NM June 2007.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
PREPARING FOR NCATE May 19, 2008 Teacher Education Retreat.
126th Annual Meeting and Conference December 9, 2011 Discussion of Significant Findings and Aggregate Data Based on the Results of the Endicott College.
Documents That Provide Basis for Professional Standards and NASP Approval and Practices in ISU SCPY Internship* 1. Ed.S. Internship Handbook 2. Internship/Practicum.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
Office of Professional Preparation and Licensure (OPPL) Annual Report.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Joint Advisory Board/Working Group Meeting November 18, 2010 School of Education.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Assessment Day 2012 Focus: Educator as Member of Communities Data: Alumni Survey Initial Programs Employer Survey Initial Programs Alumni Survey Advanced.
Survey Data Summary Data Compiled Fall 2007.
Education Department M. Ed. in Reading CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Fall 2010.
ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM NORTHERN NEW MEXICO COLLEGE Contact Information: Rose Chiovitti-Cavalcante Ph:
A Comprehensive Unit Assessment Plan Program Improvement, Accountability, and Research Johns Hopkins University School of Education Faculty Meeting October.
Bayh College of Education September 23, 2011 The Educator as Mediator of Learning Assessment Day 2011.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Access to Learning Section E STANDARDS & INDICATORS Council of International Schools New England Association of Schools & Colleges.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Survey Data Executive Summary Fall 2008.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Teacher Education Advisory Council College of Education Alabama State University.
Department of Secondary Education Program Assessment Report What We Assessed: Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and CA State Teaching Performance.
Exhibit 3.11 Data Report to Unit Assessment Committee Spring 2008.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
0 1 1.Key Performance Indicator Results ( ) KPI Survey Statistics Student Distribution by Year in Program KPI Overall Results Student Satisfaction.
New York Institute of Technology
Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education.
Science Mentoring Program Hughes STEM High School Community Partnership Experiences February 7, 2012 Kent Buckingham, Ph.D., Program Coordinator.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
STANDARDS FOR THE PREPARATION OF TEACHING LEARNING PROJECT 1 SARA HINE.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
Assessment Report Andrews University School of Education.
Graduate School of Education Assessment Update 2009 State of the School September 23, 2009.
What is the Advanced Placement Program? The Advanced Placement Program are courses taught at local high schools, which allow students to participate in.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
NCATE Program Review Process Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D. September 2006
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Evaluating Real Life Integration and Application of Content Knowledge
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
REPORT CARD ON EDUCATOR PREPARATION
Presentation transcript:

Andrews University School of Education

Teaching, Learning, & Curriculum Educational & Counseling Psychology Leadership & Educational Administration Teacher Education a (~150) Elementary Secondary Curriculum & Instruction a School Counseling b (5) School Psychology c (21) Special Education a (1) Comm. Counseling b (20) Educational Psychology (27) Counseling Psychology (26) K-12 Educ. Admin. d (30) Higher Educ. Admin. (32) Leadership (118) a NCATE and corresponding Specialized Professional Associations (SPAs) b CACREP c NASP and NCATE d NCATE and ELCC

 Worldview  Human Growth & Change  Groups, Leadership & Change  Communication & Technology  Research & Evaluation  Personal & Professional Growth

The SED graduate...  Believes that all students can learn  Is committed to service  Values fairness  Values personal and professional growth  Is committed to inquiry  Values respectful communication  Recognizes personal leadership responsibility  Values diversity

SED Assessment System Candidate Performance Content Knowledge Professional Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions Impact on P-12 Student Learning Program Quality Candidate Performance Curriculum Field Experiences Quality & Diversity Enrollment Trends & Diversity Candidate Suppport Services Advisement, Library, Technology, Career Placement Services Unit Operations Program Quality Faculty Performance Governance Leadership & Structures Policies & Procedures Budget Allocations & Expenditures Facilities Faculty Performance Qualifications Preparation, Professional Development, & Experience Performance Teaching,Scholarship, & Service Workload

 Course grades  Dispositions ratings  Rubrics for key assignments  Standardized tests (MTTC, PRAXIS)  Comprehensive exams  Portfolios  Field/clinical performance ratings  Thesis/Dissertation

Teacher Education

ProgramElem # Sec # ProgramElem # Sec # Art5Int. Lang.: Spanish13 Biology1Language Arts10 Chemistry1Math & Math Education14 Communication2Music Education27 English31Physics1 ESL*1Political Science1 History6Religion4 Integrated Science12Social Studies511 Int. Lang.: French1*MAT students125 Numbers from Banner, may include students not yet accepted into teacher education.

 Number completing student teaching = 27  Program completion rate (6 yrs) = 90%  Number of program completers = 27  Percent minority candidates = 41%  Percent in high need areas = 52% (math, sciences, world languages)

 Basic Skills  22 candidates  100% pass rate vs. 91% statewide  Content Area Tests  28 candidates  96% pass rate vs. 85% statewide

Content Area# (in all courses*) % Satisfactory C+ or above Art28100 Biology2100 Chemistry2100 Communication2693 English7772 History, Pol. Sci., Social Studies, Econ13180 International Languages6100 Mathematics3954 Physics583 *# may include same students in multiple classes

CourseRubric# Students % at Levels 3-5* Mean* EDTE165Portfolio rubric EDTE408Element 1 (worldview) EDTE408Element 2 (growth & change) EDTE408Element 3 (groups, leadership, & change) EDTE408Element 4 (communication & technology) EDTE408Element 5 (research & evaluation) EDTE408Element 6 (personal & professional growth) EDTE408Element 7 (content) *Percentage and mean include all indicators on rubric

CourseRubric# Students % at Levels 3-5* Mean* EDTE288Clinical Observation & Interaction Matrix EDTE408Micro-teaching Assessment EDTE417Implementation Plan EDTE424Test Creation Project EDTE424Philosophy of Assessment EDTE459Summative Evaluation EDTE480Classroom Management Plan *Percentage and mean include all indicators on rubric

CourseRubric# Students % at Levels 3-5* Mean* EDTE487Impact on K-12 Student Learning EDTE488/ 588 Student Teaching Summative Evaluation *Percentage and mean include all indicators on rubric

Educational & Counseling Psychology

Program# Enrolled PRAXISCompsPortfolioIntern.National Exam Dissert School Counseling 51/12/21/1 School Psychology 214/44/52/2 Community Counseling 208/810/121/1 Counseling Psychology 26-- Educational Psychology Masters 9+22 EdS 7 Doctoral 11 48/501/1

 Cohort admission  Additional instruction in weak areas  Brown Bag Lunch and Learn  Revised comprehensive exams  Review sessions  New CACREP standards

 Need better recruiting  Prepare self-study for CACREP visit in 2011  Community Counseling (48 credits) to become Clinical Mental Health Counseling (60 credits)  Develop Culture, Trauma, and Resiliency Research Center  Encourage students to participate in professional development & professional organizations

Leadership & Educational Administration

Program# enrolled PortfolioCompsDissertation Defense K-12 Educational Administration 30Masters: 2/2Masters: 3/3 EdS: 3/3 Doctoral: 4/4 4/4 Higher Education Administration 32Masters: 3/3Doctoral: 3/3--- Leadership118*14/14---*15/15 * For 2009 calendar year

 Required writing course  K-12 newsletter  EDRM505 required at beginning of research strand  Annual review of candidate progress & dispositions  K-12 application to ELCC September 2010  Presentation or publication of research required in Leadership

 Improve recruitment & marketing  Support for group processes  Monitor research strand  Student participation in professional development  Advising process for online students  Integrate better feedback into programs  Reworking Higher Ed. website and other web modalities to better connect with students

Faculty Assessment

 851 respondents  5-pt Likert scale  5 = strongly agree  1 = strongly disagree

Selected Evaluation Statements (n=851):MeanSt Dev The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter The instructor was respectful of all people and other points of view I gained a good understanding of the concepts and principles taught in this course The course was organized to accomplish the course objectives Christian concepts were integrated into the course effectively The instructor motivated me to learn The course was challenging intellectually This course helped me to respect gender and cultural diversity The way this course was taught helped me to learn This course helped me communicate effectively This course helped me think clearly Exams and other methods of evaluation were fair and accurate measures of my learning My overall rating of this instructor’s teaching effectiveness is: My overall rating of this course is:

Unit Assessment

 MTTC 30  Teacher Exit Surveys 5  Supervisor surveys 5  Program completion rate 10  Program review status 10  Diversity 5  High need content 5  Principal feedback received yes  Total Score70/70

 Collected spring 2010  and graduates  57 alumni, 30 employers  Responses according to preparation received from AU SED  Scale: 5=excellent, 4=very well, 3=satisfactory, 2=somewhat, 1=not at all

Alumni & Employer Surveys, & combined

See for:  SED Policy Handbook  SED Assessment System  2010 SED Annual Assessment Report  PowerPoint of this presentation Thank you for your role in the delivery of quality programs at Andrews University SED