POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics Week 4, October 17, 2006 Strategies of Comparative Analysis (con’t) The Mixed Design Banality of Ethnic War.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Critical and Analytical Thinking
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics Comparative Strategies Lecture January 23, 2008 Professor Timothy C. Lim CSU Los Angeles
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics “Stupid in America” Learning how to apply the principles of comparative analysis.
Introduction to the course September 24, 2008 seminar comparative politics professor timothy c. lim / cal state los angeles
foundations of comparative politics
1 Procedural Analysis or structured approach. 2 Sometimes known as Analytic Induction Used more commonly in evaluation and policy studies. Uses a set.
Week 9, march 16, tuesday  Inquiry Project 2  Inquiry and learning  Ladson-Billings, G. Teaching and cultural competence the one five o.
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics
Epistemology and Methods Data Selection, Operationalization and Measurement May
1 Module 1 What is a research paper? Matakuliah: G1112, Scientific Writing I Tahun: 2006 Versi: v 1.0 rev 1.
The Art of Persuasion * * * * * How to write persuasive essays * * * * *
Understanding the Rubrics
It’s the Long Essay, with documents and higher expectations.
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics Comparative Strategies Lecture October 12, 2006 Comparative Strategies Lecture October 12, 2006.
Guidelines to Publishing in IO Journals: A US perspective Lois Tetrick, Editor Journal of Occupational Health Psychology.
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics Topic: Introduction to Comparative Politics and Comparative Analysis Lecture Date: January 16, 2008 Professor.
Historical Thinking Skills
Aesthetics: Diversity in Criticism and Analysis of the Arts Julie Van Camp Fulbright Lecturer Comenius University Professor of Philosophy California State.
Politics and Political Science. Defining Characteristics of Politics making of decisions for groups 1.Involves the making of decisions for groups of people.
Writing a Thesis Statement
Writing An Extended Essay in Human Rights
Developing Higher Level Study Skills
Michigan Common Core Standards
A Level (A2 History) Welcome Year 13!!. A2 Unit F966: Historical Themes The Historical Themes unit is a part of the specification that seeks to develop.
PRIMARY/SECONDARY SOURCE HISTORY LABS SOCIAL STUDIES CRITICAL THINKING LABS.
How to Critically Review an Article
How to Write a Literature Review
Lecture: Debates on theory and method in the social sciences Harold Wilhite SUM 3011/4011a 2010.
September 19, 2015September 19, 2015September 19, 2015Comparative Politics1 Revolution and Political Violence Frank H. Brooks.
Lecture 3 THE KEY SKILLS TESTED IN A DISSERTATION.
09/08 Bellringer Take 5 minutes to look over Chapter 1-3 in textbook or skim over notes. Quiz 1 (Chapter 1-3)
Anatomy of an Article P152 Week 4. Three types of articles Reports of empirical studies Literature reviews/meta-analyses –Statistical reviewing procedure.
Keys to Writing in AP History. Two Essay Types  Free Response Question (or FRQ)  “Long Essay”  Document-Based Question (or DBQ)  A long essay…just.
Nurturing Historical Thinking Document Analysis/Socratic Seminar Persistent Issue: What should society do to promote fairness and justice for people who.
POSC 3315 W12.1. Studying Latin American politics Context ◦ Who’s in, who’s out.
Introduction to the Content and Assessment of the Elective Part Wan Ho Yin CDC-HKEAA Committee on History ( Senior Secondary)
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics Topic: Introduction to Comparative Analysis Lecture Date: January 9, 2007 Professor Timothy Lim California.
APUSH ‘themes’ (B.A.G.P.I.P.E.)
Historical Thinking Skills
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
Politics and Political Science. Defining Characteristics of Politics making of decisions for groups 1.Involves the making of decisions for groups of people.
Applying a health systems research perspective to the synergy question Peter Berman The World Bank Cape Town July 18, 2009.
Historical Thinking Skills
From Perspectives on Contemporary Issues: Readings Across the Disciplines - 5 th Edition.
Writing a Good Essay. Essays should be in third person. Do not talk to the reader: –If you think… –If that sounds familiar… –As you can imagine…. Do not.
Harvard Summer School, 2013 Graduate Research Methods and Scholarly Writing in the Social Sciences: Government and History Harvard Summer School: SSCI.
1 This resource contains example(s) of demonstrating own / scholarly voice in Education-related disciplines. Follow the steps below to customise the slides.
Writing for AP/Social Sciences 5 Paragraph Essay.
Historical Thinking Skills A.P. World History Mr. Schabo Crestwood High School All info care of College Board:
From description to analysis
HISTORICAL THINKING A lesson on WHY and HOW we study history.
 EXAM FORMAT – AGAIN  3 HOURS & 15 MINUTES  55 MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 40% -  4 SHORT ANSWERS 20% - MAX. 3 PTS EACH  1 DBQ 25% - MAX 7 POINTS POSSIBLE.
Keys to the Comparison Essay. What is the Comparison essay? THE BASICS  An essay discussing the similarities and differences between two given regions.
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics Banality of ‘Ethnic War’: Discussion Lecture Date: October 11, 2005.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
Historical Thinking Skills and Themes in American History
AP World History: An Introduction
A review of the literature
Long Essay Question (LEQ)
The Compare/Contrast (C&C) Essay
The Continuity and Change Over Time (CCOT) Essay
Long Essay Prompts APUSH Practice.
AP World History Riverside High School Mr. Sakole
The Argumentative Essay
CSCD 506 Research Methods for Computer Science
Historical Thinking Skills
RESEARCH BASICS What is research?.
Academic Argument: The Key to Success
Historical Thinking Skills
Presentation transcript:

POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics Week 4, October 17, 2006 Strategies of Comparative Analysis (con’t) The Mixed Design Banality of Ethnic War Week 4, October 17, 2006 Strategies of Comparative Analysis (con’t) The Mixed Design Banality of Ethnic War

3 Strategies of Comparative Analysis The Mixed Design  Involves a combination of several research design and strategies--a mixture--used simultaneously within the context of single research project  In principle, this is really the best type of comparative research strategy to adopt The Mixed Design  Involves a combination of several research design and strategies--a mixture--used simultaneously within the context of single research project  In principle, this is really the best type of comparative research strategy to adopt

4 Strategies of Comparative Analysis The Mixed Design: Example from Skocpol  No. 1: “France, Russia and China will serve as three positive cases of successful social revolution, and I shall argue that these cases reveal similar causal patterns despite their many other differences.”  This is an example of ______________________? The Mixed Design: Example from Skocpol  No. 1: “France, Russia and China will serve as three positive cases of successful social revolution, and I shall argue that these cases reveal similar causal patterns despite their many other differences.”  This is an example of ______________________?

5 Strategies of Comparative Analysis The Mixed Design: Example from Skocpol  No. 2: “In addition, I shall invoke negative cases for the purpose of validating various particular parts of the causal argument…. Thus, for example, the abortive Russian Revolution of 1905 will be contrasted with the successful Revolution of 1917 in order to validate arguments about the crucial contribution to social- revolutionary success in Russia of war-related processes that led to the breakdown of state repressive capacities.”  This is an example of ______________________? The Mixed Design: Example from Skocpol  No. 2: “In addition, I shall invoke negative cases for the purpose of validating various particular parts of the causal argument…. Thus, for example, the abortive Russian Revolution of 1905 will be contrasted with the successful Revolution of 1917 in order to validate arguments about the crucial contribution to social- revolutionary success in Russia of war-related processes that led to the breakdown of state repressive capacities.”  This is an example of ______________________?

6 Strategies of Comparative Analysis The Mixed Design: Example from Skocpol  No. 3: “Moreover, selected aspects of English, Japanese, and German history will be used in various places to strengthen arguments about the causes of revolutionary political crises and peasant revolts in France, Russia, and China. These cases are suitable as contrasts because they were comparable countries that underwent non-revolutionary political crises and transformations in broadly similar terms and circumstances to France, Russia, and China.”  This is an example of ______________________? The Mixed Design: Example from Skocpol  No. 3: “Moreover, selected aspects of English, Japanese, and German history will be used in various places to strengthen arguments about the causes of revolutionary political crises and peasant revolts in France, Russia, and China. These cases are suitable as contrasts because they were comparable countries that underwent non-revolutionary political crises and transformations in broadly similar terms and circumstances to France, Russia, and China.”  This is an example of ______________________?

7 Strategies of Comparative Analysis The Mixed Design: Example from Skocpol  Summary of Skocpol’s Mixed Design 1.MDS design using three primary cases 2.MSS design and within-case comparison using Russia 3.MDS, Multiple unit comparison (three or more units) using secondary cases: England, Japan, and Germany 4.(Implicit strategy) Individual case studies using analytical induction The Mixed Design: Example from Skocpol  Summary of Skocpol’s Mixed Design 1.MDS design using three primary cases 2.MSS design and within-case comparison using Russia 3.MDS, Multiple unit comparison (three or more units) using secondary cases: England, Japan, and Germany 4.(Implicit strategy) Individual case studies using analytical induction

8 Strategies of Comparative Analysis The Mixed Design: A Methodological Exercise  Gun violence is a complicated issue, but one for which a mixed research design would be very appropriate.  So, how might we go about setting up a mixed research design? The Mixed Design: A Methodological Exercise  Gun violence is a complicated issue, but one for which a mixed research design would be very appropriate.  So, how might we go about setting up a mixed research design?

9 Strategies of Comparative Analysis The Mixed Design: A Methodological Exercise  What do we need to do first?  Short answer: Research, and lots of it. The Mixed Design: A Methodological Exercise  What do we need to do first?  Short answer: Research, and lots of it.

10 Strategies of Comparative Analysis

11 Strategies of Comparative Analysis

12 Strategies of Comparative Analysis

13 Strategies of Comparative Analysis

14 Strategies of Comparative Analysis More Practice: Stupid in America? Source: Consider the following questions:Consider the following questions: What is the reporter’s central thesis? What is the reporter’s central thesis? How does he use comparisons? How does he use comparisons? Is the argument persuasive? Is the argument persuasive? As a comparativist, what would you do to evaluate the argument? As a comparativist, what would you do to evaluate the argument?

15 Strategies of Comparative Analysis More Practice: Stupid in America? Key Points –“ American schools don't teach as well as schools in other countries because they are government monopolies, and monopolies don't have much incentive to compete ” –“ In Belgium, by contrast, the money is attached to the kids it's a kind of voucher system. Government funds education at many different kinds of schools but if a school can't attract students, it goes out of business. ” More Practice: Stupid in America? Key Points –“ American schools don't teach as well as schools in other countries because they are government monopolies, and monopolies don't have much incentive to compete ” –“ In Belgium, by contrast, the money is attached to the kids it's a kind of voucher system. Government funds education at many different kinds of schools but if a school can't attract students, it goes out of business. ”

16 Strategies of Comparative Analysis DISCUSSION OF “BANALITY OF ETHNIC WAR” BY MUELLER Let’s begin with some questions … DISCUSSION OF “BANALITY OF ETHNIC WAR” BY MUELLER Let’s begin with some questions …

17 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion Q: What is Mueller ’ s central argument?

18 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion Mueller’s Position: See reading or in-class notes Mueller’s Position: See reading or in-class notes

19 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion Questions: How does Mueller go about supporting the argument that he makes? What type of comparative research design does he use? Questions: How does Mueller go about supporting the argument that he makes? What type of comparative research design does he use?

20 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion Mueller’s Comparative Strategy? Is it …  Case study in comparative perspective  Binary analysis  Multi-unit (3+) analysis  Within-case comparison  Analytical induction  Mixed design Mueller’s Comparative Strategy? Is it …  Case study in comparative perspective  Binary analysis  Multi-unit (3+) analysis  Within-case comparison  Analytical induction  Mixed design

21 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion Although there might be some debate on Mueller ’ s comparative strategy, it is fairly clear that he is primarily using … The case study in comparative perspective Although there might be some debate on Mueller ’ s comparative strategy, it is fairly clear that he is primarily using … The case study in comparative perspective

22 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion What makes his strategy a case study in comparative perspective? Mueller ’ s main focus is the violence that took place in the former Yugoslavia; he uses Rwanda (1994) as an explicit secondary case What makes his strategy a case study in comparative perspective? Mueller ’ s main focus is the violence that took place in the former Yugoslavia; he uses Rwanda (1994) as an explicit secondary case

23 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion Does Mueller follow the two “ rules ” of the case study in comparative perspective? To refresh your memory, these are: –(1) to see case in relation to others; and –(2) to aim at generalization Does Mueller follow the two “ rules ” of the case study in comparative perspective? To refresh your memory, these are: –(1) to see case in relation to others; and –(2) to aim at generalization

24 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion Does Mueller follow the two “ rules ” of the case study in comparative perspective?  The answer is clearly “ yes ” on both counts  Mueller use of Rwanda demonstrates his clear intention to see Yugoslavia in relation to others; moreover, he points out that his reason for using Rwanda is to “ explore the possibilities for generalizing from the Yugoslav experience …”. Does Mueller follow the two “ rules ” of the case study in comparative perspective?  The answer is clearly “ yes ” on both counts  Mueller use of Rwanda demonstrates his clear intention to see Yugoslavia in relation to others; moreover, he points out that his reason for using Rwanda is to “ explore the possibilities for generalizing from the Yugoslav experience …”.

25 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion Next important methodological question:  What basic logic underlies his comparison of Yugoslavia and Rwanda?  That is, is the author ’ s comparison based on an MSS or and MDS design? Next important methodological question:  What basic logic underlies his comparison of Yugoslavia and Rwanda?  That is, is the author ’ s comparison based on an MSS or and MDS design?

26 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion It is fairly easy to discern that Mueller is using an MDS design. Specifically, Mueller assumes that Yugoslavia and Rwanda are two very different places: different cultures; different political systems; different history of ethnic relations; different geopolitical position; and so on. At the same time, Mueller tells us that there are two key similarities. It is fairly easy to discern that Mueller is using an MDS design. Specifically, Mueller assumes that Yugoslavia and Rwanda are two very different places: different cultures; different political systems; different history of ethnic relations; different geopolitical position; and so on. At the same time, Mueller tells us that there are two key similarities.

27 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion What are the similarities? Independent Variable: The existence of vicious, opportunistic, but substantially non-ideological criminals and criminal-like elements Dependent variable:An extremely brutal outbreak of societal wide violence What are the similarities? Independent Variable: The existence of vicious, opportunistic, but substantially non-ideological criminals and criminal-like elements Dependent variable:An extremely brutal outbreak of societal wide violence

28 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion What conclusions, methodologically speaking, can we draw from Mueller ’ s argument? Conclusion #1: See in-class notes What conclusions, methodologically speaking, can we draw from Mueller ’ s argument? Conclusion #1: See in-class notes

29 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion How about the quality, sufficiency, and relevance of the evidence Mueller uses?  Almost all of Mueller ’ s evidence is based on secondary sources, and mostly other academic or scholarly articles. Mueller also used some newspaper accounts and a UN-prepared report (which may have been based on some primary source material) Are they any problems with relying almost exclusively on secondary sources? How about the quality, sufficiency, and relevance of the evidence Mueller uses?  Almost all of Mueller ’ s evidence is based on secondary sources, and mostly other academic or scholarly articles. Mueller also used some newspaper accounts and a UN-prepared report (which may have been based on some primary source material) Are they any problems with relying almost exclusively on secondary sources?

30 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion What conclusions, empirically speaking, can we draw from Mueller ’ s argument? Conclusion #2: See in-class notes What conclusions, empirically speaking, can we draw from Mueller ’ s argument? Conclusion #2: See in-class notes

31 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion From a theoretical view, Mueller does not discount “ ethnicity ” completely, but he argues that it served as an ordering device as opposed to causal factor in and of itself. What does this mean? What is an “ ordering device ” ? From a theoretical view, Mueller does not discount “ ethnicity ” completely, but he argues that it served as an ordering device as opposed to causal factor in and of itself. What does this mean? What is an “ ordering device ” ?

32 Banality of Ethnic War | Discussion Key point about ordering devices: Mueller suggests that, were there not ethnic differences in either case, those who encouraged the conflict would have (and did, to a limited extent) simply used another available ordering device. This could have been class (i.e., pitting the poor against the rich); loyalty to a particular soccer team (as happened in Rwanda); regional ties; political affiliation; and so on. Key point about ordering devices: Mueller suggests that, were there not ethnic differences in either case, those who encouraged the conflict would have (and did, to a limited extent) simply used another available ordering device. This could have been class (i.e., pitting the poor against the rich); loyalty to a particular soccer team (as happened in Rwanda); regional ties; political affiliation; and so on.